BK Polyomavirus Viremia Research Articles

Polyomavirus Replication and Smoking Are Independent Risk Factors for Bladder Cancer After Renal Transplantation.

Solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk for developing malignancies. Polyomaviruses (PV) have been historically associated with experimental tumor development and recently described in association with renourinary malignancies in transplant patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between PV replication and smoking, and the development of malignant neoplasms in kidney transplant recipients. A retrospective case-control study was conducted for PV replication in all kidney biopsies and urine cytologies performed between 1998 and 2014 from kidney transplant recipients at the University of Maryland Medical Center. Polyomavirus-positive patients (n = 943) were defined as having any of the following: a kidney biopsy with PV associated nephropathy, any urine cytology demonstrating "decoy" cells, and/or significant polyomavirus BK viremia. Polyomavirus-negative matched patients (n = 943) were defined as lacking any evidence of PV replication. The incidence of malignancy (excluding nonmelanoma skin tumors) was determined in these 1886 patients and correlated with demographic data and history of smoking. There was a 7.9% incidence of malignant tumors after a mean posttransplant follow-up of 7.9 ± 5.4 years. Among all cancer subtypes, only bladder carcinoma was significantly associated with PV replication. By multivariate analysis, only PV replication and smoking independently increased the risk of bladder cancer, relative risk, 11.7 (P = 0.0013) and 5.6 (P = 0.0053), respectively. The findings in the current study indicate that kidney transplant recipients with PV replication and smoking are at particular risk to develop bladder carcinomas and support the need for long-term cancer surveillance in these patients.

Stability of BK polyomavirus IgG seroreactivity and its correlation with preceding viremia

BackgroundRecently we showed that the level of BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) IgG seroreactivity in kidney donors predicted viremia and BKPyV-associated nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This observation could be explained by assuming a direct association between BKPyV seroreactivity and the amount of persistent infectious virus in the renal allograft. ObjectivesSince the renal BKPyV reservoir is probably sowed by viremia during primary BKPyV infection, we systematically analysed the dynamics of BKPyV IgG seroreactivity in relation to preceding BKPyV viremia in KTRs and healthy individuals. Study designA cohort of 85 KTRs consisting of BKPyV viremic and nonviremic subjects was analysed for BKPyV IgG seroreactivity at five fixed time points until one year after transplantation. A cohort of 87 healthy blood donors (HBDs) was used as controls. ResultsBaseline BKPyV seropositivity was high in both KTRs and HBDs, and the baseline mean BKPyV IgG level comparable. BKPyV IgG levels in nonviremic KTRs and HBDs remained stable during follow-up, while a considerable increase was observed in viremic KTRs (p=0.015). The increase of BKPyV seroreactivity in viremic KTRs was associated with the duration and peak level of BKPyV viremia. ConclusionsBKPyV IgG seroreactivity was stable over time in immunocompetent subjects, which enables the use of this potential pretransplantation biomarker in kidney donors. The observed dose-dependent relationship of BKPyV IgG seroreactivity with preceding BKPyV replication is in agreement with the assumption that BKPyV seroreactivity reflects past BKPyV activity and correlates with the amount of latent BKPyV residing within a kidney allograft.

Persistently high-level polyomavirus BK replication in the absence of renal function abnormalities in a kidney transplant recipient

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy is an important cause of allograft dysfunction and graft loss after kidney transplantation. Even if histological evaluation is the gold standard for graft study and diagnosis of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy, K-DIGO guidelines suggest performing an <em>indication biopsy</em> in selected patient’s clinical conditions or laboratory parameters. The practice of <em>protocol biopsy</em> is still controversial. We report the management of a case of presumptive polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in a 53-year-old kidney transplant recipient affected by type 1 hyperoxaluria with persistent high levels of viruria and sustained levels of polyomavirus BK viremia. The presence of a presumptive polyomavirus-associated nephropathy, even if never confirmed by biopsy, never compromised his clinical condition and allograft function. As a result of an immunosuppression-sparing policy and use of mTOR inhibitor, the polyomavirus BK viremia was successfully controlled with an observation time >5 years. The decision to perform or not a graft biopsy was the main question in the management of this case. We opted for a non-invasive approach because of the high risk of biopsy with macrohematuria on earlier biopsy in a dual kidney transplant and patient’s unwillingness for the procedure. The replication level of polyomavirus BK was significantly reduced by the decrease of immunosuppression on the basis of a close nucleic acid testing monitoring. The strategy we adopted could be considered in cases when renal biopsy is contraindicated or considered to be high risk.

Antigen-Specificity of T Cell Infiltrates in Biopsies With T Cell-Mediated Rejection and BK Polyomavirus Viremia: Analysis by Next Generation Sequencing.

This study interrogates the antigen-specificity of inflammatory infiltrates in renal biopsies with BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) viremia (BKPyVM) with or without allograft nephropathy (BKPyVN). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from five healthy HLA-A0101 subjects were stimulated by peptides derived from the BKPYV proteome or polymorphic regions of HLA. Next generation sequencing of the T cell-receptor complementary DNA was performed on peptide-stimulated PBMC and 23 biopsies with T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) or BKPyVN. Biopsies from patients with BKPyVM or BKVPyVN contained 7.7732 times more alloreactive than virus-reactive clones. Biopsies with TCMR also contained BKPyV-specific clones, presumably a manifestation of heterologous immunity. The mean cumulative T cell clonal frequency was 0.1378 for alloreactive clones and 0.0375 for BKPyV-reactive clones. Samples with BKPyVN and TCMR clustered separately in dendrograms of V-family and J-gene utilization patterns. Dendrograms also revealed that V-gene, J-gene, and D-gene usage patterns were a function of HLA type. In conclusion, biopsies with BKPyVN contain abundant allospecific clones that exceed the number of virus-reactive clones. The T cell component of tissue injury in viral nephropathy appears to be mediated primarily by an "innocent bystander" mechanism in which the principal element is secondary T cell influx triggered by both antiviral and anti-HLA immunity.

Pretransplantation Donor-Recipient Pair Seroreactivity Against BK Polyomavirus Predicts Viremia and Nephropathy After Kidney Transplantation.

Kidney transplant donors are not currently implicated in predicting BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection in kidney transplant recipients. It has been postulated, however, that BKPyV infection originates from the kidney allograft. Because BKPyV seroreactivity correlates with BKPyV replication and thus might mirror the infectious load, we investigated whether BKPyV seroreactivity of the donor predicts viremia and BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) in the recipient. In a retrospective cohort of 407 living kidney donor-recipient pairs, pretransplantation donor and recipient sera were tested for BKPyV IgG levels and correlated with the occurrence of recipient BKPyV viremia and BKPyVAN within 1 year after transplantation. Donor BKPyV IgG level was strongly associated with BKPyV viremia and BKPyVAN (p < 0.001), whereas recipient BKPyV seroreactivity showed a nonsignificant inverse trend. Pairing of high-BKPyV-seroreactive donors with low-seroreactive recipients resulted in a 10-fold increased risk of BKPyV viremia (hazard ratio 10.1, 95% CI 3.5-29.0, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, donor BKPyV seroreactivity was the strongest pretransplantation factor associated with viremia (p < 0.001) and BKPyVAN (p = 0.007). The proportional relationship between donor BKPyV seroreactivity and recipient infection suggests that donor BKPyV seroreactivity reflects the infectious load of the kidney allograft and calls for the use of pretransplantation BKPyV serological testing of (potential) donors and recipients.

In kidney transplant recipients with BK polyomavirus infection, early BK nephropathy, microvascular inflammation, and serum creatinine are risk factors for graft loss.

Little information is available on the risk factors for graft loss in kidney transplant recipients with BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) nephropathy (BKVN) in the presence or absence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). We examined the risk factors for graft loss in consecutive kidney allograft recipients with biopsy-confirmed BKVN, with or without concomitant AMR. A total of 1904 kidney transplants were performed at our institution during 2005-2011. Of these, 330 (17.33%) were diagnosed with BKPyV viremia, and 69 were diagnosed with BKVN (3.6%). Eleven patients had a concomitant diagnosis of AMR. Patients with AMR were characterized by significantly higher peak panel-reactive antibody, retransplant rates, and desensitization preconditioning at the time of transplantation, as well as microvascular inflammation (MVI = glomerulitis + peritubular capillaritis), C4d score, and donor-specific antibody at the time of diagnosis (P ≤ 0.01). Treatment with plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and cidofovir was more prevalent in this group (P ≤ 0.02). Univariate analyses assessing the risk factors for graft loss in all patients with BKVN, identified an independent association of African-American race, deceased-donor transplantation, serum creatinine (Scr), MVI, and early disease (BKVN within 6 months of transplant) with poor outcomes. Multivariate analyses retained only 3 variables: Scr >2 mg/dL (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-9.7, P = 0.0004), early BKVN (HR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.3, P = 0.004), and MVI (HR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.8, P = 0.008). These observations suggest that, in patients with BK infection, early BKVN, Scr >2, and MVI are predictors of poor outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine effective treatment strategies for BKVN, with or without AMR.

Characterization of Immunodominant BK Polyomavirus 9mer Epitope T Cell Responses.

Uncontrolled BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) replication in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) causes polyomavirus‐associated nephropathy and allograft loss. Reducing immunosuppression is associated with clearing viremia and nephropathy and increasing BKPyV‐specific T cell responses in most patients; however, current immunoassays have limited sensitivity, target mostly CD4+ T cells, and largely fail to predict onset and clearance of BKPyV replication. To characterize BKPyV‐specific CD8+ T cells, bioinformatics were used to predict 9mer epitopes in the early viral gene region (EVGR) presented by 14 common HLAs in Europe and North America. Thirty‐nine EVGR epitopes were experimentally confirmed by interferon‐γ enzyme‐linked immunospot assays in at least 30% of BKPyV IgG–seropositive healthy participants. Most 9mers clustered in domains, and some were presented by more than one HLA class I, as typically seen for immunodominant epitopes. Specific T cell binding using MHC class I streptamers was demonstrated for 21 of 39 (54%) epitopes. In a prospective cohort of 118 pediatric KTRs, 19 patients protected or recovering from BKPyV viremia were experimentally tested, and 13 epitopes were validated. Single HLA mismatches were not associated with viremia, suggesting that failing immune control likely involves multiple factors including maintenance immunosuppression. Combining BKPyV load and T cell assays using immunodominant epitopes may help in evaluating risk and reducing immunosuppression and may lead to safe adoptive T cell transfer.

Onset and progression of de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies after BK polyomavirus and preemptive immunosuppression reduction.

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) viremia/nephropathy and reduction in immunosuppression following viremia may increase the risk of alloimmune activation and allograft rejection. This study investigates the impact of BKPyV viremia on de novo donor anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies (dnDSA). All primary renal transplants at East Carolina University from March 1999 to December 2010, with at least 1 post-transplant BKPyV viral load testing, were analyzed. Patients were negative for anti-HLA antibodies to donor antigens (tested via single antigen beads) at transplantation and at first BKPyV testing. Nineteen of 174 patients (11%) tested positive for BKPyV viremia. Within 24 months of BKPyV viremia detection, 79% of BKPyV-viremic patients developed dnDSA. Only 20% of BKPyV viremia-persistent cases, compared to 86% of BKPyV viremia-resolved cases, developed dnDSA (P = 0.03). Poor allograft survival was evident in BKPyV viremia-persistent patients (60% failure by 2 years post BKPyV diagnosis) and in BKPyV viremia-resolved patients with dnDSA (5-year post BKPyV diagnosis allograft survival of 48%). Post-transplant BKPyV viremia and preemptive immunosuppression reduction is associated with high rates of dnDSA. When preemptively treating BKPyV viremia, dnDSA should be monitored to prevent allograft consequences.

JC polyomavirus viremia and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in human leukocyte antigen-sensitized kidney transplant recipients desensitized with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab.

Desensitization (DES) with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)+rituximab is effective, safe, and increases the transplantation rate in human leukocyte antigen-sensitized patients. However, reports of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) caused by JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) in autoimmune patients treated with rituximab is concerning. Here, we report on the JCPyV viremia and PML status in kidney transplant patients with/without DES (non-DES). In total 1195 and 699 DNA samples from plasma in 117 DES (78% lymphocyte-depleting [LyD] induction) and 100 non-DES patients (45% LyD), respectively, were submitted for JCPyV-polymerase chain reaction. Results were compared in both groups. No patients in either DES or non-DES developed PML or presented with any neurological symptoms. The JCPyV viremia rate was similar in DES and non-DES patients (3/117 vs. 9/100, P=0.07). The JCPyV levels were low (median peak levels, 1025 copies/mL) and JCPyV viremia was observed only once during the study period in most patients. All 3 DES patients with JCPyV(+) received 1 dose rituximab and no DES patients with >1 dose rituximab showed JCPyV(+). All 3 JCPyV(+) DES patients received LyD induction, while only 2 of 9 JCPyV(+) non-DES patients did so, and the remaining 7 received non-LyD or no induction. JCPyV in leukocyte was mostly negative in DES and non-DES patients. Immunosuppression in patients with or without JCPyV(+) was similar. BK polyomavirus viremia was observed more commonly in patients with JCPyV(+) than in those without (P<0.02). Patients with IVIG+rituximab DES followed by transplantation with LyD induction and additional rituximab rarely show JCPyV viremia and appear at low risk for PML.

The Impact of Donor Viral Replication at Transplant on Recipient Infections Posttransplant

Organ donors are often implicated as the source of posttransplant recipient infection. We prospectively studied kidney and liver donor-recipient pairs to determine if donor viral replication of cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and BK polyomavirus (BKV) at transplant was a risk factor for posttransplant recipient infection and disease. Donors and recipients were studied for antibodies against CMV and EBV and for quantitative viral replication of CMV, EBV, and BKV in oral washes, urine, and whole blood pretransplant. Recipient testing continued every 3 months after transplantation. Demographic and clinical data on infections and graft and subject outcomes were obtained. The 98 donor-recipient pairs included 15 liver and 83 kidney transplants (18 of whom were children). No donor had detectable CMV replication; therefore, its impact on recipient CMV replication could not be analyzed. Donor EBV replication occurred in 22%, mostly in the oral wash and showed no impact on posttransplant recipient EBV replication (P=0.9) or EBV viremia (P=0.6) in kidney or liver recipients. Donor BKV replication occurred in 17%, mostly in the urine and although not associated with posttransplant recipient urinary BKV replication in recipients, it was associated with BKV viremia (P=0.02), and a significantly shorter time to BKV viremia (P=0.01) in kidney recipients. Donor replication of CMV or EBV did not impact posttransplant recipient viral replication in kidney or liver transplants. Donor urinary BKV replication is associated with recipient BKV viremia in kidney transplants.

BK polyomavirus reactivation after reduced-intensity double umbilical cord blood cell transplantation

Serial serum samples from 27 patients who underwent double umbilical cord blood transplantation (dUCBT) were analyzed for BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) DNA by real-time PCR and BKPyV-specific immune globulin by ELISA. Clinical data were collected on all patients. All pre-transplant sera had detectable anti-BKPyV IgG. Fifteen patients (56%) had detectable serum BKPyV DNA (median 8.9×104copies/ml; range 4.1×103–7.9×106copies/ml) a median of 40days (range, 27–733days) after dUCBT, with highest viral loads on Day 100 assessment. The cumulative probability of developing BKPyV viremia by Day 100 was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.33–0.71). Six of 15 patients with BKPyV viremia experienced hemorrhagic cystitis by Day 100. By Day 100, there was a trend towards higher BKPyV viral loads in sera of patients with hemorrhagic cystitis than in those BKPyV viremic patients without hemorrhagic cystitis (p=0.06). BKPyV viremia was associated with significantly higher anti-BKPyV IgM values at 6months post-dUCBT (P=0.003). BKPyV viremia occurs early after dUBCT and is associated with a detectable humoral immune response by 6months post-dUBCT.

Polyomavirus BK Viremia in Kidney Transplant Recipients After Desensitization With IVIG and Rituximab

Desensitization with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and rituximab improves transplantation rates. It is unclear if desensitization increases the risk of polyomavirus BK (BKV) viremia. Here, BKV viremia in HLA-sensitized patients after desensitization with IVIG and rituximab was analyzed. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared in the desensitized group (N=187) and the non-desensitized group (N=284). Surveillance for BKV viremia was done at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months posttransplant. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. BKV viremia was observed in 20% of the desensitized and 10% of the non-desensitized (P<0.001) groups by 2 years posttransplant. The desensitized group had more lymphocyte depleting induction and more rejection. They also had a greater degree of viremia with more patients having a peak viral load greater than 10,000 copies per milliliter (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in BKV-associated nephropathy or graft loss in the two groups. There was an association of BKV viremia with desensitization and lymphocyte induction. Only desensitization remained a significant predictor in the multivariable model with an adjusted HR of 2.13 (95% CI 1.21-3.77, P=0.009). Desensitization with IVIG and rituximab is associated with a higher incidence of BKV viremia with high viral copies and was the major predictor of BKV viremia in the multivariable model. More frequent surveillance for BKV viremia and an early, aggressive treatment strategy are essential for preventing high BKV viral loads in this patient population.

Transient versus Persistent BK Viremia and Long-Term Outcomes after Kidney and Kidney–Pancreas Transplantation

The objective was to study the long-term impact of transient versus persistent BK viremia on kidney transplant outcomes. In total, 609 recipients who underwent kidney transplant from 2007 to 2011 were screened at months 1-12 for the occurrence of polyomavirus BK viremia; 130 patients (21.7%) developed BK viremia during the first year post-transplant. BK viremia patients were classified according to duration of infection (more or less than 3 months), and BK viral loads (more or less than 10,000 copies/ml) were classified as transient low viremia (n=42), transient high viremia (n=18), persistent low viremia (n=23), and persistent high viremia (n=47). All patients were followed a median of 36 (3-66) months. The rates of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy, acute rejection, and 1-year graft function were compared with the polyomavirus BK-negative control group. Patient and graft survival were not significantly different among the groups. Graft function (creatinine; milligrams per deciliter) at 1 year was significantly worse in the persistent high viremia (1.75±0.6) and transient high viremia (1.85±0.7) groups compared with aviremic controls (1.47±0.4; P=0.01 and P=0.01, respectively). The incidence of BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy was limited to the persistent high viremia group (1.3%, P<0.001). The transient high viremia (50%) and persistent high viremia (34%) groups showed significantly (P=0.01) increased incidence of acute rejection versus aviremic controls (21.5%), transient low viremia (19%), or persistent low viremia (17.3%) groups. Low viral load BK viremia, either transient or persistent, was not associated with long-term transplant outcomes. Persistent high viremia was associated with a greater risk for BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy and subsequent graft dysfunction. Although transient high viremia was not associated with BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy, it was associated with worse graft function. These data support the role of surveillance for BK viremia after transplant.

BK Polyomavirus in Solid Organ Transplantation

The human BK polyomavirus (BKV) is the major cause of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) putting 1-15% of kidney transplant patients at risk of premature allograft failure, but is less common in other solid organ transplants. Because effective antiviral therapies are lacking, screening kidney transplant patients for BKV replication in urine and blood has become the key recommendation to guide the reduction of immunosuppression in patients with BKV viremia. This intervention allows for expanding BKV-specific cellular immune responses, curtailing of BKV replication in the graft, and clearance of BKV viremia in 70-90% patients. Postintervention rejection episodes occur in 8-12%, most of which are corticosteroid responsive. Late diagnosis is faced with irreversible functional decline, poor treatment response, and graft loss. Adjunct therapies such as cidofovir, leflunomide and intravenous immunoglobulins have been used, but the benefit is not documented in trials. Retransplantation after PyVAN is largely successful, but requires close monitoring for recurrent BKV viremia.

Early BK Polyomavirus (BKV) Reactivation in Donor Kidney Is a Risk Factor for Development of BKV-Associated Nephropathy

The pathogenesis of BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection and associated nephropathy in renal transplant recipients is not clearly understood. To gain insight, urine and plasma samples were collected from 112 renal transplant recipients before and after transplantation and tested for the presence of BKV by polymerase chain reaction. Detection of BKV infection very early (ie, 5 days) after transplantation was identified as a risk factor for subsequent BKV viremia and BKV-associated nephropathy. Phylogenetic analysis of VP1 sequences with corresponding ethnicity data suggests that reactivation was of donor origin. Thus, early testing of urine samples from renal transplant recipients may identify those at risk for BKV-associated nephropathy.

BKV-DNA Replication in Renal Transplant Recipients: Early Discontinuation of Mycophenolate Mofetil or an Early Combination Therapy with Fluoroquinolones and Activated Vitamin D. What Is the Best Strategy for Management?

Background: Early detection of polyomavirus BK-viremia and an early reduction of the maintenance immunosuppressive therapy are recommended for preventing polyomavirus-associated-nephropathy, but despite these measures, a progressive graft dysfunction and a graft loss occur in many cases. Objectives: We diagnosed BKV-viremia in 92 recipients grafted between October 2005 and January 2010. 53 affected recipients were treated with only a discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil (Group 1). 39 affected recipients were treated with a combination therapy based on fluoroquinolones and activated vitamin D without a reduction of the maintenance immunosuppression (Group 2). All recipients were studied for a minimum follow-up period of 18 months after diagnosis of BKV-viremia. Results: The mean blood viral load during follow-up decreased in both groups but the graft function was stabilized only in Group 2. In fact in Group 2 the mean creatinine clearance was 68.5 +/- 18.1 ml/min after follow-up versus 69.1 +/- 25 ml/min before diagnosis of BKV-viremia (p = ns) and the mean serum creatinine was 1.31 +/- 1.1 mg/dl versus 1.27 +/- 0.9 mg/dl before diagnosis of BKV-viremia (p = ns). Group 2 affected recipients had 13% major graft functional decline rate (5 affected recipients had doubling of serum creatinine after the follow-up) while Group 1 affected recipients had 36% major graft functional decline rate (7 affected recipients had doubling of serum creatinine and 12 affected recipients had graft loss after the follow-up). The rate of polyomavirus-associated-nephropathy was similar between the groups: 9.4% in Group 1 versus 10% in Group 2 (p = ns). 7 affected recipients of Group 1 developed a new acute rejection episode during the minimum follow-up. None new acute rejection episode occurred in affected recipients of Group 2 during the minimum follow-up. Risk factors were also evaluated. Conclusion: In this select group of renal transplant recipients with BKV-replication the use of a combination therapy based on fluoroquinolones and activated vitamin D resulted in prolonged graft survival and stabilized graft function than an early discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil.

Ureteral Stents: A Risk Factor for Polyomavirus BK Viremia in Kidney Transplant Recipients Undergoing Protocol Screening

Background Polyomavirus BK nephropathy (BKN) remains a common cause of early renal transplant dysfunction and graft loss. To date, little has been reported on the role, if any, of transplant ureteral stents in the development of polyomavirus BK viremia (BVK) and BKN. Methods We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of renal transplant recipients who underwent renal transplantation followed by monthly BKV screening at Albany Medical Center between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2009. A transplant ureteral stent was placed at the discretion of the surgeon. The immunosuppression protocol employed for deceased donor and unrelated living -donor recipients was antithymocyte antibody induction with methylprednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and sirolimus. Results During the study period, 186 recipients were identified; 124 (67%) underwent intraoperative transplant ureteral stent placement, while 62 patients (33%) did not undergo stent placement. With our monthly screening protocol, we detected BKV in 32 of the 186 recipients (17%) following transplantation; 27 of the 32 (84%) viremic patients were stent recipients. In all patients who developed BKV, an immunosuppression dose reduction protocol was employed. Ureteral stent placement conferred a statistically significant elevated risk of developing BKV (odds ratio = 3.17, 95% confidence interval 1.16–8.70). Patient gender, age, ethnicity, diabetes status, and retransplant status were not statistically significant factors in the development of BKV. Conclusion Our study demonstrated the elevated risk of BKV in recipients who undergo transplant ureteral stenting. Monthly BK polymerase chain reaction screening appears to be a useful tool for the early detection of BKV in this higher-risk group.

The prevalence of BK polyomavirus infection in outpatient kidney transplant recipients followed in a single center

BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection has emerged as an important cause of renal allograft loss. There is no proven therapy, and much basic clinical information is still lacking. We serially enrolled 95 outpatient renal transplant recipients (43% of whom were African American) in a single center cross-sectional screening study to determine the prevalence of BKV infection by whole blood polymerase chain reaction, and the prevalence of decoy cells by urinalysis and cytology. We also investigated the demographic and clinical factors associated with BKV infection, and the performance of urinalysis for decoy cells as a screening test for BKV infection. The point prevalence of active BKV viremia was 7.4%. When subjects without active viremia but with a history of viremia and/or nephropathy were included, the overall prevalence was 15.8%. Urinary decoy cells were common, present in 50% of subjects at study entry. Urinalysis for decoy cells as a screen for BKV viremia had a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 52%, positive predictive value of 13% and negative predictive value of 98%. Decoy cells on urinalysis were the only factor independently associated with an increased risk of BKV infection on multivariate analysis. Although associated with BKV infection on univariate analysis, thymoglobulin, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus use were not independently associated with BKV infection on multivariate analysis, neither were history of acute rejection, gender, race, nor cause of end-stage renal disease.