Binocular Depth Discrimination Research Articles

Factors Affecting Stimulus Duration Threshold for Depth Discrimination of Asynchronous Targets in the Intermediate Distance Range.

Binocular depth discrimination in the near distance range (< 2 m) improves with stimulus duration. However, whether the same response-pattern holds in the intermediate distance range (approximately 2-25 m) remains unknown because the spatial coding mechanisms are thought to be different. We used the two-interval forced choice procedure to measure absolute depth discrimination of paired asynchronous targets (3, 6, or 16 arc min). The paired targets (0.2 degrees) were located over a distance and height range, respectively, of 4.5 to 7.0m and 0.15 to 0.7 m. Experiment 1 estimated duration thresholds for binocular depth discrimination at varying target durations (40-1610 ms), in the presence of a 2 × 6 array of parallel texture-elements spanning 1.5 × 5.83 m on the floor. The texture-elements provided a visible background in the light-tight room (9 × 3 m). Experiment 2 used a similar setup to control for viewing conditions: binocular versus monocular and with versus without texture background. Experiment 3 compared binocular depth discrimination between brief (40, 80, and 125 ms) and continuous texture background presentation. Stimulus duration threshold for depth discrimination decreased with increasing disparity in experiment 1. Experiment 2 revealed depth discrimination performance with texture background was near chance level with monocular viewing. Performance with binocular viewing degraded without texture background. Experiment 3 showed continuous texture background presentation enhances binocular depth discrimination. Absolute depth discrimination improves with target duration, binocular viewing, and texture background. Performance further improved with longer background duration underscoring the role of ground surface representation in spatial coding.

Associations Between Binocular Depth Perception and Performance Gains in Laparoscopic Skill Acquisition.

The ability to perceive differences in depth is important in many daily life situations. It is also of relevance in laparoscopic surgical procedures that require the extrapolation of three-dimensional visual information from two-dimensional planar images. Besides visual-motor coordination, laparoscopic skills and binocular depth perception are demanding visual tasks for which learning is important. This study explored potential relations between binocular depth perception and individual variations in performance gains during laparoscopic skill acquisition in medical students naïve of such procedures. Individual differences in perceptual learning of binocular depth discrimination when performing a random dot stereogram (RDS) task were measured as variations in the slope changes of the logistic disparity psychometric curves from the first to the last blocks of the experiment. The results showed that not only did the individuals differ in their depth discrimination; the extent with which this performance changed across blocks also differed substantially between individuals. Of note, individual differences in perceptual learning of depth discrimination are associated with performance gains from laparoscopic skill training, both with respect to movement speed and an efficiency score that considered both speed and precision. These results indicate that learning-related benefits for enhancing demanding visual processes are, in part, shared between these two tasks. Future studies that include a broader selection of task-varying monocular and binocular cues as well as visual-motor coordination are needed to further investigate potential mechanistic relations between depth perceptual learning and laparoscopic skill acquisition. A deeper understanding of these mechanisms would be important for applied research that aims at designing behavioral interventions for enhancing technology-assisted laparoscopic skills.

Correlated structure of neuronal firing in macaque visual cortex limits information for binocular depth discrimination.

Variability in cortical neural activity potentially limits sensory discriminations. Theoretical work shows that information required to discriminate two similar stimuli is limited by the correlation structure of cortical variability. We investigated these information-limiting correlations by recording simultaneously from visual cortical areas primary visual cortex (V1) and extrastriate area V4 in macaque monkeys performing a binocular, stereo depth discrimination task. Within both areas, noise correlations on a rapid temporal scale (20-30 ms) were stronger for neuron pairs with similar selectivity for binocular depth, meaning that these correlations potentially limit information for making the discrimination. Between-area correlations (V1 to V4) were different, being weaker for neuron pairs with similar tuning and having a slower temporal scale (100+ ms). Fluctuations in these information-limiting correlations just prior to the detection event were associated with changes in behavioral accuracy. Although these correlations limit the recovery of information about sensory targets, their impact may be curtailed by integrative processing of signals across multiple brain areas.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Correlated noise reduces the stimulus information in visual cortical neurons during experimental performance of binocular depth discriminations. The temporal scale of these correlations is important. Rapid (20-30 ms) correlations reduce information within and between areas V1 and V4, whereas slow (>100 ms) correlations between areas do not. Separate cortical areas appear to act together to maintain signal fidelity. Rapid correlations reduce the neuronal signal difference between stimuli and adversely affect perceptual discrimination.

Natural binocular depth discrimination behavior in mice explained by visual cortical activity

In mice and other mammals, forebrain neurons integrate right and left eye information to generate a three-dimensional representation of the visual environment. Neurons in the visual cortex of mice are sensitive to binocular disparity,1-3 yet it is unclear whether that sensitivity is linked to the perception of depth.4-8 We developed a natural task based on the classic visual cliff and pole descent tasks to estimate the psychophysical range of mouse depth discrimination.5,9 Mice with binocular vision descended to a near (shallow) surface more often when surrounding far (deep) surfaces were progressively more distant. Occlusion of one eye severely impaired their ability to target the near surface. We quantified the distance at which animals make their decisions to estimate the binocular image displacement of the checkerboard pattern on the near and far surfaces. Then, we assayed the disparity sensitivity of large populations of binocular neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) using two-photon microscopy2 and quantitatively compared this information available in V1 to their behavioral sensitivity. Disparity information in V1 matches the behavioral performance over the range of depths examined and was resistant to changes in binocular alignment. These findings reveal that mice naturally use stereoscopic cues to guide their behavior and indicate a neural basis for this depth discrimination task.

Binocular depth discrimination based on perspective: one plus one equals one

Binocular depth discrimination based on perspective: one plus one equals one

Adaptation Changes Stereoscopic Depth Selectivity in Visual Cortex

Exposure to specific visual stimuli causes a reduction in sensitivity to similar subsequent stimulation. This adaptation effect is observed behaviorally and for neurons in the primary visual cortex. Here, we explore the effects of adaptation on neurons that encode binocular depth discrimination in the cat's primary visual cortex. Our results show that neuronal preference for binocular depth is altered selectively with appropriate adaptation. At the preferred depth, adaptation causes substantial suppression of subsequent responses. Near the preferred depth, the same procedure causes a shift in depth preference. At the null depth, adaptation has little effect on binocular depth coding. These results demonstrate that prior exposure can change the depth selectivity of binocular neurons. The findings are relevant to the theoretical treatment of binocular depth processing. Specifically, the prevailing notion of binocular depth encoding based on the energy model requires modification.

Binocular depth discrimination based on perspective: One plus One equals One

Binocular depth discrimination based on perspective: One plus One equals One

Variation in stereoacuity: normative description, fixation disparity, and the roles of aging and gender.

Variation in stereoacuity was examined in a large group of observers with Snellen acuity of 20/30 or less. Threshold retinal disparity for 2.78 degrees x 2.28 degrees rectangular test stimuli was determined as a function of the retinal disparity (varied from 55 arcmin uncrossed to 55 arcmin crossed) of a 5.57 degrees x 4.8 degrees rectangular pedestal stimulus in 160 observers 15 to 79 years of age. In most cases, data were collected during viewing of random dot stereograms (RDSs) presented for 100-ms, which prevents involvement of vergence or monocular depth cues. When plotted logarithmically, 100-ms thresholds in 106 observers less than 60 years of age approximated a normal distribution (mean, 1.57 +/- 0.227 [SD] log arcsec [37 linear arcsec]). Among these, one observer was supernormal, 88% were within the normal range (+/-2 SD of the log mean), 2% had elevated thresholds, and 8% failed testing with 100-ms stimuli but had residual binocular depth discrimination; 1 observer was stereoblind. In contrast, only 37% of the observers aged 60 to 69 and 25% of the observers aged 70 to 79 had stereoacuity within the normal range. Moreover, the extent of the stereo deficiencies became more pronounced with age. Fixation disparity was operationally defined as optimal stereoscopic threshold with a nonzero retinal disparity pedestal. Of the 151 normal observers tested, 89% were maximally sensitive to disparities within 11 arcmin of fixation: all males were maximally sensitive to pedestals within 22 arcmin of fixation, whereas 8% of females had fixation disparities of more than 22 arcmin. Males were more likely to be sensitive with uncrossed-disparity pedestals, whereas females were more likely to be sensitive with crossed disparity. Age-related deterioration in stereoacuity is reflected not only by a linear correlation between age and threshold but also by a catastrophic factor that produces more marked deterioration after age 60. Both factors are probably cerebral and not specifically related to stereopsis. The prevalence of fixation disparity in the normal population is probably more common than previously reported.

Binocular interactions and disparity coding in area 21a of cat extrastriate visual cortex.

We have examined, using both qualitative and quantitative techniques, binocular interactions of extracellularly recorded single neurons in the extrastriate cortical area 21a of anaesthetized and paralysed cats. Consistent with previous reports we have found that: (a) all area 21a neurons were orientation-selective, with about 65% of them preferring orientations within 30 degrees of the vertical; and (b) over 75% of area 21a cells could be activated through either eye. Furthermore, a significant minority (4 cells; about 10%) of a subpopulation of 39 neurons in which binocular interactions were examined quantitatively, were "obligatory binocular neurons", that is, they responded very weakly, if at all, to the monocular stimuli presented through either eye but responded vigorously to simultaneous stimulation through both eyes. Almost 70% (27/39) of neurons tested quantitatively for binocular interaction have shown significant modulation (over 50%) of their peak responses in relation to binocular positional retinal disparities. The majority of neurons sensitive to binocular positional disparities resembled either "tuned excitatory" (22 cells; 56.5% of the sample) or "tuned inhibitory" (2 cells; 5% of our sample) cells. In particular, they gave, respectively, maximal or minimal responses to optimally oriented, moving photic stimuli when the receptive fields plotted through each eye completely or partially overlapped. Although neurons recorded in area 21a have relatively large receptive fields (mean width 3.3 +/- 1.1 degrees; range 2.0-5.6 degrees), the mean width of the disparity tuning curve (2.8 +/- 1.0 degrees; range 1.3-4.8 degrees) for our sample of area 21a neurons was similar to those of neurons with significantly smaller receptive fields, recorded in areas 17 and 18 of cat's primary visual cortex. We conclude that area 21a of the cat, like areas 17 and 18 of primary visual cortex, is likely to play an important role in binocular depth discrimination and might constitute a "higher order" area for stereoscopic binocular vision.

Neuronal stereoscopic processing following extraocular proprioception deafferentation

In adult cats, after section of extraocular muscle proprioceptive (EOMP) afferents during the 'critical period', most cortical area 17 cells loose their ability to discriminate changes in binocular spatial disparity. After unilateral section this loss depends on whether or not cortical cells modulate their responses to the presentation of sinusoidal gratings linearly. For 'modulated cells', this loss is due to a reduction of binocular suppression while for 'unmodulated cells', it is due to a selective increase in the variability of the binocular response. These permanent neural dysfunctions show that balance in EOMP inflow plays a crucial role in cortical processing of binocular depth discrimination.

Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity

The neural signals in visual cortex associated with positional disparity and contrast texture correlation of binocular images are the subject of this study. We have analyzed the effects of stereoscopically presented luminous bars and of dynamic random-dot patterns on the activity of single neurons in cortical visual areas V1, V2, and V3-V3A of the alert, visually trained rhesus macaque. The interpretation of the results and considerations of possible neural mechanisms led us to recognize 2 functional sets of stereoscopic neurons. (1) A set of neurons, tuned excitatory (T0) or tuned inhibitory (TI), which respond sharply to images of zero or near-zero disparity. Objects at or about the horopter drive the T0 neurons and suppress the TI, while objects nearer and farther have the opposite effects on each type, inhibition of the T0 and excitation of the TI. The activity of these neurons may provide, in a reciprocal way, the definition of the plane of fixation, and the basic reference for binocular single vision and depth discrimination. (2) A second set of neurons includes tuned excitatory at larger crossed or uncrossed disparities (TN/TF) and neurons with reciprocal excitatory and inhibitory disparity sensitivity with cross-over at the horopter (NE/FA). Binocularly uncorrelated image contrast drives these neurons to a maintained level of activity, which shifts, in response to correlated images, toward facilitation or suppression as a function of positional disparity. These neurons may operate in the neural processing leading to stereopsis, both coarse and fine, and also provide signals for the system controlling binocular vergence. These results indicate that cortical visual neurons are binocularly linked to respond to the relative position and contrast of the images over their receptive fields, and also that both these aspects of binocular stimulation may be utilized by the brain as a source of stereoscopic information.

Functional and neuronal binocularity in kittens raised with rapidly alternating monocular occlusion.

1. In order to determine the degree of synchrony of binocular activation required for the development of binocularity we reared 11 kittens with rapidly alternating monocular occlusion. Alternating occlusion was achieved with microprocessor-controlled electrooptic solid-state shutters, which were fitted to individually moulded goggles. The intervals of alternating occlusion were varied from 50 to 1,000 ms. Two normally reared kittens and three kittens that were reared with the shutters operating synchronously with open/close intervals of 50/50 ms, 200/200 ms, and 400/100 ms, respectively, were used as controls. Toward the end of the critical period we examined the kittens' ability for binocular depth discrimination and tested binocular luminance summation of the pupillary light reflex. Single-cell recordings were made from the visual cortex in order to determine the percentages of binocularly excitable neurons. 2. There was a good correlation between the degree of asynchrony of binocular experience, the impairment of depth discrimination, and the percentage of binocular neurons. Kittens reared with alternation rates of 200, 330, and 400 ms, respectively, had developed normal binocularity and were indistinguishable from the controls. Alternation rates of 500 ms or longer prevented the development of normal depth discrimination and luminance summation and resulted in reduced cortical binocularity. 3. A linear relationship between depth discrimination, binocular luminance summation, and percentages of binocular neurons was found. 4. Our findings indicate that an asynchrony of binocular activation of several hundred milliseconds is compatible with the development of normal binocularity in the kitten visual system.

End-stopped cells and binocular depth discrimination in the striate cortex of cats.

Proposals concerning neural mechanisms for binocular depth discrimination have been criticized on the grounds that only striate cells with a preferred stimulus orientation not too far from the vertical can make significant horizontal disparity discriminations. We investigated this claim by preparing a two-dimensional array of position-disparity response profiles to moving light and dark bars from each of 18 cells in the simple family. From these arrays, it was possible to reconstruct disparity response profiles along any axis across the receptive field, irrespective of the cell's optimal stimulus orientation. This analysis showed that cells with a predominantly excitatory binocular response (N = 10) can make precise horizontal disparity discriminations, independent of their optimal stimulus orientation, provided that they are sufficiently end stopped. End-free cells, on the other hand, are effective for horizontal disparity discriminations only if their preferred orientation are near the vertical. Nearly all striate cells we examined were end-stopped to some degree and nearly half had an end inhibition sufficient to reduce the monocular response from the dominant eye to half its maximal amplitude. Cells having a predominantly inhibitory disparity response profile of the symmetric type (N = 8) have an inhibitory profile along every axis across the receptive field. An outline is given of a neural mechanism for the determination of absolute viewing distance based on the sensitivities of striate cells to vertical retinal-image disparities.

Binocular depth perception in the cat following early corpus callosum section.

The role of the corpus callosum in the mediation of binocular depth perception was examined by measuring monocular and binocular depth discrimination thresholds in cats which had undergone section of the corpus callosum shortly after birth. Three kittens had the posterior callosum sectioned at the age of eleven days. A fourth kitten underwent a sham operation and one additional animal served initially as an unoperated control. Monocular and binocular depth thresholds were measured for all kittens when they were between three and five months old. Although there was some individual variability, none of the callosum-sectioned kittens showed any deficits of binocular depth perception relative to normal animals. The initially unoperated kitten had its callosum sectioned at five months and was retested following surgery. Its performance did not change from preoperated levels. Finally, the three neonatal callosum-sectioned kittens underwent section of the optic chiasm when they were six months old, causing a complete breakdown in binocular depth discrimination. The results are interpreted to indicate that although the corpus callosum may be a sufficient pathway for the maintenance of stereopsis in cat, it is not necessary.

Deafferentation of oculomotor proprioception affects depth discrimination in adult cats.

Depth discrimination was tested behaviourally in adult cats prior to and after chronic section of the ophthalmic branch of the Vth cranial nerve, that contains the majority of oculomotor proprioceptive fibers. Binocular depth discrimination was considerably impaired following either unilateral or bilateral oculomotor proprioceptive deafferentation.

The effects of early and late monocular deprivation on binocular depth perception in cats

Binocular and monocular depth discrimination thresholds were obtained from cats which had been monocularly deprived either from the time of natural eye opening or else at the age of 4 months. Among normal cats, binocular depth thresholds typically are very much better than monocular thresholds, allowing the inference that normal cats have good stereopsis. For the early-deprived animals in the present study, only those whose deprived eyes were opened by 30 days of age showed any binocular advantage. Deprivation periods lasting to 35 days or older completely eliminated the binocular superiority, with no sign of any recovery. These results provide behavioral evidence that binocular visual mechanisms are extremely susceptible to disruption and, unlike those underlying visual acuity, do not have the potential for recovery. The effect of deprivation imposed later in life was quite different. Three cats, deprived for 1, 2 or 3 months respectively, beginning at the age of 4 months, showed no deficits in binocular depth perception. This latter finding implies the existence of a sensitive period for stereopsis which is over completely by the age of 4 months.

Stereopsis and the random element in the organization of the striate cortex.

Receptive field position and orientation disparities are both properties of binocularly discharged striate neurons. Receptive field position desparities have been used as a key element in the neural theory for binocular depth discrimination. Since most striate cells in the cat are binocular, these position disparities require that cells immediately adjacent to one another in the cortex should show a random scatter in their monocular receptive field positions. Superimposed on the progressive topographical representation of the visual field on the striate cortex there is experimental evidence for a localized monocular receptive field position scatter. The suggestion is examined that the binocular position disparities are built up out of the two monocular position scatters. An examination of receptive field orientation disparities and their relation to the random variation in the monocular preferred orientations of immediately adjacent striate neurons also leads to the conclusion that binocular orientation disparities are a consequence of the two monocular scatters. As for receptive field position, the local scatter in preferred orientation is superimposed on a progressive representation of orientation over larger areas of the cortex. The representation in the striate cortex of visual field position and of stimulus orientation is examined in relation to the correlation between the disparities in receptive field position and preferred orientation. The role of orientation disparities in binocular vision is reviewed.

Binocular depth discrimination depends on orientation

Using both the method of adjustment and forced-choice techniques, it was found that binocular depth thresholds depend on the orientation of the test targets, which in these experiments consisted of long, thin rods. Stereoacuity is greatest with vertical rods and decreases progressively as the angle of orientation approaches horizontal. The relationship between stereoacuity and orientation is governed by the orientation of the images of the targets on the retina, and is predicted fairly well by the sine of the angle of orientation, suggesting an equivalence between angular rotation and reductions in rod length.

A second neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination

1. Rotation of an object about its horizontal axis, towards or away from the viewer's eyes, usually causes the images of its contours to have slightly different orientations on the two retinae.2. We recorded action potentials from binocular neurones in the cat's visual cortex and measured their orientation-selectivity carefully in both eyes.3. The optimal orientation for a single cell is not necessarily identical on both retinae. For a large sample of cells there is a range of more than + 15 degrees (S.D. about 6-9 degrees ) in the difference of preferred orientation in the two eyes. These interocular differences in receptive field properties cannot be attributed to rotation of the eyes or to the errors of measurement.4. During simultaneous binocular stimulation the images must not only lie in the correct place on both retinae but also have exactly the right orientation for both receptive fields in order to elicit the maximum response from a neurone.5. Therefore certain binocular cells respond specifically to objects tilted in three-dimensional space towards the cat, or away from it.

Effect of target-background luminance contrast on binocular depth discrimination at photopic levels of illumination

Data are presented on binocular depth-discrimination thresholds for stationary and oscillating black or self-illuminated targets which are presented against a large illuminated background. The stereoscopic threshold angle, η AD is measured at target-background contrast values ranging from0 to ± 100 per cent at five fixed levels of target or background retinal illuminances (−1.22, −0.57, 1.02, 1.57, and 2.06 log td). The results show that for target-background contrasts greater than some critical near-zero value, the magnitude of η AD is determined by the prevailing retinal illuminance of that component, either target or background, which has the higher illumination level. The data for the target-varied and for the background-varied conditions were essentially identical, suggesting the absence of any areal effects. An analysis of the corresponding constant errors of the equidistance settings, η ΔR is also presented, and the results for η ΔR are similar to those for η AD , but somewhat more variable. A schematic representation which predicts the results of contrast effects greater than near-zero values is presented, based on the relationship between stereoscopic threshold and target or background illumination level under 100 per cent contrast conditions.