Molecular EcologyVolume 20, Issue 12 p. 2655-2655 Free Access Corrigendum This article corrects the following: A quantitative review of heterozygosity–fitness correlations in animal populations J. R. CHAPMAN, S. NAKAGAWA, D. W. COLTMAN, J. SLATE, B. C. SHELDON, Volume 18Issue 13Molecular Ecology pages: 2746-2765 First Published online: June 4, 2009 J. R. CHAPMAN, J. R. CHAPMANSearch for more papers by this authorS. NAKAGAWA, S. NAKAGAWASearch for more papers by this authorD. W. COLTMAN, D. W. COLTMANSearch for more papers by this authorJ. SLATE, J. SLATESearch for more papers by this authorB. C. SHELDON, B. C. SHELDONSearch for more papers by this author J. R. CHAPMAN, J. R. CHAPMANSearch for more papers by this authorS. NAKAGAWA, S. NAKAGAWASearch for more papers by this authorD. W. COLTMAN, D. W. COLTMANSearch for more papers by this authorJ. SLATE, J. SLATESearch for more papers by this authorB. C. SHELDON, B. C. SHELDONSearch for more papers by this author First published: 17 May 2011 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05146.xCitations: 1AboutReferencesRelatedInformationPDFSectionsReferencesCiting LiteraturePDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessClose modalShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat We wish to bring a correction to Chapman et al. (2009) to the attention of readers. In the original paper, we used mixed-effects models with the effect statistic Zr (Fisher transformation of correlation coefficients) as the response, which can be written as (supposing that z denotes the n by 1 vector of effect sizes, Zr): where β is the a by 1 vector of fixed effects, X is an n by a design matrix associated with the effect sizes, u is the b by 1 vector of random effects (we had the four random factors in our analysis: Class, Family, Species and Study) and the ith element of u is normally distributed with the mean of zero and the variance of , Z is an n by b design matrix associated with the effect sizes, and e is the n by 1 vector of residual errors, normally distributed with the mean of zero and with the variance of divided by (n−3); note that 1/(n−3) represents the effect-size specific measurement error variance of Zr. We inadvertently estimated from the data in the original analysis. In meta-analysis, however, should be fixed to 1 ( = 1). Fortunately, our estimates of in all the original models were very close to 1 (such similarity is probably expected, because the variance of the z distribution is 1). Therefore, our original results are quantitatively very similar to those of correct meta-analytic models and our qualitative conclusions remain unchanged. We wish to refer readers to Nakagawa et al. (2011) for more detailed explanations of how correct meta-analysis can be implemented using existing computer programs. We apologize for the error. References Chapman JR, Nakagawa S, Coltman DW, Slate J, Sheldon BC (2009) A quantitative review of heterozygosity-fitness correlations in animal populations. Molecular Ecology, 18, 2746– 2765. Nakagawa S, Ockendon N, Gillespie DOS, Hatchwell BJ, Burke T (2011) Corrections for “Assessing the function of house sparrows’ bib size using a flexible meta-analysis method [Behav Ecol 18:831–840]”. Behavioral Ecology, 22, 445– 446. Citing Literature Volume20, Issue12June 2011Pages 2655-2655 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Read full abstract