Squeeze casting is one of the most cost-effective methods of fabricating discontinuously reinforced metal matrix composites. One of the advantages of squeeze casting over other fabrication methods of composites, such as powder metallurgy, stir casting, etc, lies in its possibility to fabricate selectively reinforced composites, such as selectively reinforced squeeze cast pistons [1], which is low cost, lightweight and durable. In a selectively reinforced metal matrix composite, the preform is normally only used to strengthen a portion of the casting, and the rest casting is not reinforced. Then, a boundary is introduced between the composite and the matrix zones, which is commonly called the macrointerface [2, 3]. As with the interface between the matrix and the reinforcement in the composite, there also exists discontinuity of mechanical and physical properties at the interface between the matrix zone and the composite zone. Most studies in the field of squeeze cast metal matrix composites have been carried out on the region of the casting containing the preform, very few investigations have been focused on the macrointerface between the matrix zone and the composite zone [2–5]. Discontinuously reinforced magnesium matrix composites have great potential in aircraft and automotive application because of their low density and high specific properties [6]. In our previous works, the interface between SiC whisker and magnesium in squeeze cast SiCw/Mg composites has been studied in detail [7–9]. The main purpose of the study is to evaluate the mechanical properties of the macro-interface in squeeze cast SiCw/Mg composites, which play an important role in the application of selectively reinforced magnesium matrix composites. All the castings were produced by squeeze casting under CO2/SF6 atmosphere. In the matrix-composite system, the matrix alloy is commercial heat-treatable AZ91 magnesium alloy (8.5–9.5% Al, 0.45–0.90% Zn, 0.15–0.30% Mn, 0.20% Si, 0.01% Ni, balance Mg), the reinforcement is β-SiC whisker whose volume fraction in the preform is 20% with silica binder. The preforms were cylindrical with 50 mm diameter and 50 mm height. The mold and the preform are preheated to 500 ◦C. Magnesium melt overheated to 800 ◦C was poured into the preform. The casting pressure exerted was 100 Mpa. The properties of macro-interface were evaluated under tensile test on bimaterial tensile specimens containing the macro-interface at the mid-length of the reduced section. The tensile specimens were dog bone-shaped with gauge length of 15 mm and thickness of 2 mm. The specimens were machined from the casting cylinder, with the tensile axis parallel to the axis of the casting cylinder (direction of squeeze casting). For comparison, the tensile specimens with the same dimensions machined from the matrix zone and composite zone, respectively, were also tested. The fracture surfaces were examined using Hitachi S570 scanning electron microscope (SEM). Fig. 1 illustrates the typical stress-strain curves for the AZ91, SiCw/AZ91 composite and the bimaterial tensile specimen containing macro-interface between AZ91 alloy and SiCw/AZ91 composite zone, respectively. It can be seen that the ultimate tensile strength of the specimen containing the macro-interface is lower than that of the AZ91 matrix alloy. The same result was also obtained on selectively reinforced SiCw/Al composite that the ultimate tensile strength of the specimens containing the macro-interface is lower than that of the matrix alloy [3]. The yield strength, modulus and elongation of the bimaterial specimen containing macro-interface lay between AZ91 matrix alloy and SiCw/AZ91 composite. It suggests that there exists a certain interfacial bond strength between the matrix and composite region, and both the matrix zone and composite zone contribute to the deformation during the tensile test of specimen containing the macro-interface. The deformation behavior at different regions of the specimen containing macro-interface can be characterized by strain gauges pasted in different parts of the bimaterial tensile specimen, as shown in Fig. 2. Fig. 3 shows the stress-strain curves at different parts of the
Read full abstract