Target DNA Bending Research Articles

Target DNA bending by the Mu transpososome promotes careful transposition and prevents its reversal

The transposition of bacteriophage Mu serves as a model system for understanding DDE transposases and integrases. All available structures of these enzymes at the end of the transposition reaction, including Mu, exhibit significant bends in the transposition target site DNA. Here we use Mu to investigate the ramifications of target DNA bending on the transposition reaction. Enhancing the flexibility of the target DNA or prebending it increases its affinity for transpososomes by over an order of magnitude and increases the overall reaction rate. This and FRET confirm that flexibility is interrogated early during the interaction between the transposase and a potential target site, which may be how other DNA binding proteins can steer selection of advantageous target sites. We also find that the conformation of the target DNA after strand transfer is involved in preventing accidental catalysis of the reverse reaction, as conditions that destabilize this conformation also trigger reversal.

CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity

Bacteria and archaea employ adaptive immunity against foreign genetic elements using CRISPR-Cas systems. To generate immunological memory, the Cas1-Cas2 protein complex captures 30-40 base pair segments of foreign DNA and catalyzes their integration into the host genome as unique spacer sequences. Although spacers are inserted strictly at the A-T-rich leader end of CRISPR loci invivo, the molecular mechanism of leader-specific spacer integration remains poorly understood. Here we show that the E.coli integration host factor (IHF) protein is required for spacer acquisition invivo and for integration into linear DNA invitro. IHF binds to the leader sequence and induces a sharp DNA bend, allowing the Cas1-Cas2 integrase to catalyze the first integration reaction at the leader-repeat border. Together, these results reveal that Cas1-Cas2-mediated spacer integration requires IHF-induced target DNA bending and explain the elusive role of CRISPR leader sequences during spacer acquisition.

Intasome architecture and chromatin density modulate retroviral integration into nucleosome.

BackgroundRetroviral integration depends on the interaction between intasomes, host chromatin and cellular targeting cofactors as LEDGF/p75 or BET proteins. Previous studies indicated that the retroviral integrase, by itself, may play a role in the local integration site selection within nucleosomal target DNA. We focused our study on this local association by analyzing the intrinsic properties of various retroviral intasomes to functionally accommodate different chromatin structures in the lack of other cofactors.ResultsUsing in vitro conditions allowing the efficient catalysis of full site integration without these cofactors, we show that distinct retroviral integrases are not equally affected by chromatin compactness. Indeed, while PFV and MLV integration reactions are favored into dense and stable nucleosomes, HIV-1 and ASV concerted integration reactions are preferred into poorly dense chromatin regions of our nucleosomal acceptor templates. Predicted nucleosome occupancy around integration sites identified in infected cells suggests the presence of a nucleosome at the MLV and HIV-1 integration sites surrounded by differently dense chromatin. Further analyses of the relationships between the in vitro integration site selectivity and the structure of the inserted DNA indicate that structural constraints within intasomes could account for their ability to accommodate nucleosomal DNA and could dictate their capability to bind nucleosomes functionally in these specific chromatin contexts.ConclusionsThus, both intasome architecture and compactness of the chromatin surrounding the targeted nucleosome appear important determinants of the retroviral integration site selectivity. This supports a mechanism involving a global targeting of the intasomes toward suitable chromatin regions followed by a local integration site selection modulated by the intrinsic structural constraints of the intasomes governing the target DNA bending and dictating their sensitivity toward suitable specific nucleosomal structures and density.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12977-015-0145-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The μ transpososome structure sheds light on DDE recombinase evolution.

Studies of bacteriophage Mu transposition paved the way for understanding retroviral integration and V(D)J recombination as well as many other DNA transposition reactions. Here we report the structure of Mu transposase (MuA) in complex with bacteriophage DNA ends and target DNA, determined from data that extend anisotropically to 5.2/5.2/3.7Å resolution, in conjunction with previously-determined structures of individual domains. The highly intertwined structure illustrates why chemical activity depends on formation of the synaptic complex, and reveals that individual domains play different roles when bound to different sites. It also suggests explanations for the increased stability of the final product complex and for its preferential recognition by the ATP-dependent unfoldase ClpX. Although MuA and many other recombinases share a structurally conserved “DDE” catalytic domain, comparisons among the limited set of available complex structures suggest that some conserved features, such as catalysis in trans and target DNA bending, arose through convergent evolution because they are important for function.

The effect of host-encoded nucleoid proteins on transposition: H-NS influences targeting of both IS903 and Tn10.

Nucleoid proteins are small, abundant, DNA-binding proteins that profoundly affect the local and global structure of the chromosome, and play a major role in gene regulation. Although several of these proteins have been shown to enhance assembly of transpososomes before initiating transposition, no systematic survey has been carried out examining the in vivo role(s) of these proteins in transposition. We have examined the requirement of the six most abundant nucleoid proteins in transposition for three different transposons, IS903, Tn10 and Tn552. Most notably, H-NS was required for efficient transposition of all three elements in a papillation assay, suggesting a general role for H-NS in bacterial transposition. Further studies indicated that H-NS was exerting its effect on target capture. Targeting preferences for IS903 into the Escherichia coli chromosome were dramatically altered in the absence of H-NS. In addition, the alterations observed in the IS903 target profile emphasized the important role that H-NS plays in chromosome organization. A defect in target capture was also inferred for Tn10, as an excised transposon fragment, a precursor to target capture, accumulated in in vivo induction assays. Furthermore, a transposase mutant that is known to increase target DNA bending and to relax target specificity eliminated this block to target capture. Together, these results imply a role for H-NS in target capture, either by providing regions of DNA more accessible to transposition or by stabilizing transpososome binding to captured targets immediately before strand transfer.

Enhancement and rescue of target capture in Tn10 transposition by site-specific modifications in target DNA.

The bacterial transposon Tn10 inserts preferentially into specific target sequences. This insertion specificity appears to be linked to the ability of target sites to adopt symmetrically positioned DNA bends after binding the transposition machinery. Target DNA bending is thought to permit the transposase protein to make additional contacts with the target DNA, thereby stabilizing the target complex so that the joining of transposon and target DNA sequences can occur efficiently. In the current work, we have asked whether the introduction of a discontinuity in a target DNA strand, a modification that is expected to make it easier for a DNA molecule to bend, can enhance or rescue target capture under otherwise suboptimal reaction conditions. We show that either a nick or a missing phosphate specifically at the site of reaction chemistry increases the ability of various target DNAs to form the target capture complex. The result suggests that the bends in the target DNA are highly localized and include the scissile phosphates. This raises the possibility that strand transfer is mechanistically linked to target capture. We have also identified specific residues in the target DNA and in transposase that appear to play an important role in target DNA bending.

Target DNA Bending is an Important Specificity Determinant in Target Site Selection in Tn10 Transposition

The bacterial transposon Tn10 inserts preferentially into specific DNA sequences. DNA footprinting and interference studies have revealed that the Tn10-encoded transposase protein contacts a large stretch of target DNA (∼24 bp) and that the target DNA structure is deformed upon incorporation into the transpososome. Target DNA deformation might contribute significantly to target site selection and thus it is of interest to further define the nature of this deformation. Circular permutation analysis was used to demonstrate that the target DNA is bent upon its incorporation into the transpososome. Two lines of evidence are presented that target DNA bending is an important event in target site selection. First, we demonstrate a correlation between increased target site usage and an increased level of target DNA bending. Second, transposase mutants with relaxed target specificity are shown to cause increased target DNA bending relative to wild-type transposase. This latter observation provides new insight into how relaxed specificity may be achieved. We also show that Ca2+ facilitates target capture by stabilizing transposase interactions with sequences immediately flanking the insertion site. Ca2+ could, in theory, exert this effect by stabilizing bends in the target DNA.

Symmetry and asymmetry in the function of Escherichia coli integration host factor: implications for target identification by DNA-binding proteins

Background:Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF) is a DNA-binding protein that participates in a wide variety of biochemical functions. In many of its activities, IHF appears to act as an architectural element, dramatically distorting the conformation of bound DNA. IHF is a dimer of non-identical subunits, each about 90 amino acids long. One dimer interacts specifically with a 30 base pair (bp) target, but well-conserved sequences are found in only half of this binding site. Thus, the IHF–DNA system has long been viewed as a paradigm of asymmetry in a protein–DNA interaction.Results We have isolated the subunits of IHF and show that either subunit is capable of specifically recognizing natural IHF-binding sites and supporting λ site-specific recombination in vitro. Mobility shift and footprinting data indicate that the isolated subunits interact with DNA as homodimers. We also describe the design of symmetric duplexes to which heterodimeric and homodimeric IHFs can bind by recognizing specific sequences.Conclusion Our in vitro manipulation of the IHF system demonstrates that binding and bending of target DNA can be accomplished symmetrically. The prevalence of asymmetry found for this system in nature suggests that additional selective forces may operate. We suggest that these follow from the disparity between the size of the DNA that IHF protects (30 bp) and the length of DNA that the protein can initially contact (10 bp). This disparity implies that an IHF target is recognized in stages and may dispose the part of the protein–DNA system used for initial recognition to evolve distinctly from the remainder of the interaction surface. We suggest that a limitation in the length of DNA that can be initially contacted is a general property of DNA-binding proteins. In that case, many proteins can be expected to identify complex targets by step-wise, rather than simultaneous, contact between sequence elements and DNA-binding domains.