Introduction: This study explores five energy-saving action plans promoted by the Faculty of Education of a university in Taiwan and evaluates their contribution to the five indicators of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG). The results of quantitative analysis based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) found that: 1. "Updating power-consuming equipment" (weight value .433) is the highest priority implementation plan; 2. The five plans have a significant impact on the characteristic indicator "net zero carbon emissions" has the highest contribution (weight value .284); 3. Promoting energy-saving actions requires considering multi-faceted contributions to balance the development of various SDGs indicators promoted by the university. The significance of this study is to provide a specific basis for the priority order of energy-saving actions in the case college, and to provide multiple perspectives for the formulation of follow-up action plans. In addition, this study’s value lies in its development of an evaluative model that universities can apply to design or compare sustainability programs. Objective: This study explores five energy-saving action plans promoted by the Faculty of Education of a university in Taiwan and evaluates their contribution to the five indicators of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG). Theoretical Framework: The theoretical framework of this study centers on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), utilizing a hierarchical structure and pairwise comparison to quantify the priority of energy-saving action plans and assess their contributions to the SDG. This framework provides a basis for decision-making, enhancing the precision and systematization of resource allocation and action plan development in the case study institution. Method: This study adopts a case study approach, with a workshop consisting of five participants. Evaluation data were collected through interview questionnaires, and AHP analysis was conducted using Expert Choice software to generate weight values and sensitivity analysis charts, which were used to assess the study's results and findings. Results and Discussion: The results indicate that: 1. "Upgrading power-consuming equipment" is the highest priority action plan; 2. The plan contributes the most to "net zero carbon emissions." These findings, derived from AHP analysis, highlight the need to consider multi-dimensional contributions of energy-saving actions to balance the development of various SDG indicators. Additionally, the results may be subject to case-specific variations and limitations in generalizability. Research Implications: This study found that "upgrading power-consuming equipment" contributes most to "net zero carbon emissions," suggesting that universities should prioritize technological upgrades and combine them with educational promotion to enhance multi-dimensional SDG contributions, providing a model for energy-saving program evaluation and decision-making for other universities. Originality/Value: The originality and value of this study lie in the application of the AHP method to assess the contribution of university energy-saving actions to the SDG, innovatively proposing specific action priorities and decision-making references. This model serves as a reference for universities to formulate energy-saving strategies and can be extended to other universities, facilitating inter-university comparisons of energy-saving effectiveness and the sharing of best practices.
Read full abstract- All Solutions
Editage
One platform for all researcher needs
Paperpal
AI-powered academic writing assistant
R Discovery
Your #1 AI companion for literature search
Mind the Graph
AI tool for graphics, illustrations, and artwork
Journal finder
AI-powered journal recommender
Unlock unlimited use of all AI tools with the Editage Plus membership.
Explore Editage Plus - Support
Overview
8937 Articles
Published in last 50 years
Articles published on Basis For Decisions
Authors
Select Authors
Journals
Select Journals
Duration
Select Duration
8554 Search results
Sort by Recency