Event Abstract Back to Event Artifact reduction performance of different algorithms for simultaneous recordings of EEG and fMRI Basri Erdogan1*, Zübeyir Bayraktaroglu2, A. Bayram3, B. Bilgiç3 and T. Ölmez1 1 Istanbul Technical University , Turkey 2 Istanbul University, Turkey 3 NPI Hospital, Turkey Purpose: EEG data recorded during fMRI is heavily contaminated by imaging and ballistocardiogram (BCG) artifacts. Imaging artifact is caused by switching of the MR gradients and BCG is mostly caused by movements of the EEG electrodes due to cardiac activity. Here we evaluate the performances of several algorithms to remove both imaging and BCG artifacts in EEG. Methods: EEG was recorded inside a 1.5 T scanner with a 32 channel MR-compatible BrainAmp system. Artifact reduction is performed on the steady state visual evoked potential (VEP) recordings. The reason why we chose this paradigm is that steady state VEP forms clearly visible frequency peaks in the EEG spectrum, which makes it easier to differentiate the artifact and the EEG data and to evaluate the performances of the artifact reduction algorithms. To perform imaging artifact reduction we chose the two least complex and also computationally efficient methods, which are Image Artifact Reduction (IAR) with marker alignment and Frequency Domain Filtering (FDF). For BCG reduction, the two most popular methods are used, which are Average Artifact Subtraction (AAS) and Independent Component Analysis (ICA). For ICA, EEGLAB toolbox is used that is based on the Infomax algorithm and artifact related independent components are detected by visual inspection. Results and Discussion: IAR and FDF methods both successfully eliminated the imaging artifact on visual evoked potentials. Frequency Domain Filtering method needs a base signal recorded in MR without fMRI recording. But it does not use MR markers, which requires extra hardware to be recorded. After IAR method applied, some high frequency residual artifacts remained. However, they were easily eliminated by low-pass filtering, since the sub 40 Hz range was not contaminated by this type of artifact. There was no residual artifact problem with FDF method, but it suffered from ringing artifacts occurring at the boundaries of the signals, which is not a major problem in the case of continuous fMRI recording. However, it may become important for interleaved recordings. In the BCG case, different groups used ICA and AAS in their studies to reduce BCG artifacts and reported varying results on the performances of ICA and AAS. In our study ICA and AAS gave comparable results. ICA provided better BCG suppression in general. Nevertheless, it also suppressed some VEP components at specific frequencies. We found AAS more reliable, because ICA seemed to be prone to deteriorate the frequencies that are not related with BCG. It also deteriorated the topography of the steady-state VEP responses at certain stimulation frequencies. Conference: 10th International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience, Bodrum, Turkey, 1 Sep - 5 Sep, 2008. Presentation Type: Poster Presentation Topic: Neuroinformatics of Cognition Citation: Erdogan B, Bayraktaroglu Z, Bayram A, Bilgiç B and Ölmez T (2008). Artifact reduction performance of different algorithms for simultaneous recordings of EEG and fMRI. Conference Abstract: 10th International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience. doi: 10.3389/conf.neuro.09.2009.01.348 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 15 Dec 2008; Published Online: 15 Dec 2008. * Correspondence: Basri Erdogan, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, basri_erd@yahoo.com Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Basri Erdogan Zübeyir Bayraktaroglu A. Bayram B. Bilgiç T. Ölmez Google Basri Erdogan Zübeyir Bayraktaroglu A. Bayram B. Bilgiç T. Ölmez Google Scholar Basri Erdogan Zübeyir Bayraktaroglu A. Bayram B. Bilgiç T. Ölmez PubMed Basri Erdogan Zübeyir Bayraktaroglu A. Bayram B. Bilgiç T. Ölmez Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.
Read full abstract