Bag-valve Device Research Articles

Pre-hospital emergency cricothyrotomy in dogs part 2: Airway sealing and ventilation using cricothyrotomy tubes.

Cricothyrotomy (CTT) has been recommended for use in the pre-hospital setting for military working dogs and Operational K9s during airway emergencies. Although the CTT can establish a patent airway for spontaneous ventilation, the ability to seal the airway and provide positive pressure ventilation (PPV) using tubes designed for humans has not been determined. Using various CTT tubes placed in cadaver dog airways, this study aimed to determine: (1) Whether the tube cuff could create a functional airway seal with safe intra-cuff pressures; (2) The magnitude of delivered tidal volume (TV) loss during a standard breath to assess the possibility of delivering an adequate tidal volume with a bag-valve device (BVM); (3) The best performing tubes for either test; (4) The reasons behind the findings using observations from upper airway endoscopy, dissection, and measurements. Cadaver dogs of similar weights to MWD and Operational K9 breeds had various CTT tubes placed including three from commercial kits, a standard endotracheal tube, and a tracheostomy tube. The minimum occlusive volume technique was used to inflate the tube cuff and a pressure ≤ 48 cm H2O with an adequate seal was considered successful. Individual TVs were calculated for each dog and added to the volume lost during delivery of a standard breath from an ICU ventilator. Endoscopy and airway dissection were performed to assess the relationship between tubes cuffs and the airway. The tubes from the CTT kits performed poorly with regards to producing an airway seal with the H&H tube failing to seal the airway all tests. Tracheal dimensions were significantly associated with successful airway sealing (P = 0.0004). Tidal volume loss could be compensated using a BVM in 34/35 tests with the H&H tube in cadaver 8 the only to fail. Tracheal airway sealing is influenced by airway anatomy when tube cuffs are inflated to a target pressure and larger tubes do not always provide a better seal. The CTT tubes tested have the potential to facilitate ventilation with a BVM under the conditions set in this study. The 8.0 mm endotracheal tube performed the best and the H&H the worst in both tests.

Six-Hour Manual Ventilation with a Bag-Valve-Tube Device by Briefly Trained Non-Medical Personnel is Feasible.

Manual ventilation with a bag-valve device (BVD) is a Basic Life Support skill. Prolonged manual ventilation may be required in resource-poor locations and in severe disasters such as hurricanes, pandemics, and chemical events. In such circumstances, trained operators may not be available and lay persons may need to be quickly trained to do the job. The current study investigated whether minimally trained operators were able to manually ventilate a simulated endotracheally intubated patient for six hours. Two groups of 10 volunteers, previously unfamiliar with manual ventilation, received brief, structured BVD-tube ventilation training and performed six hours of manual ventilation on an electronic lung simulator. Operator cardiorespiratory variables and perceived effort, as well as the quality of the delivered ventilation, were recorded. Group One ventilated a "normal lung" (compliance 50cmH2O/L, resistance 5cmH2O/L/min). Group Two ventilated a "moderately injured lung" (compliance 20cmH2O/L, resistance 20cmH2O/L/min). Volunteers' blood pressure, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) were stable throughout the study. Perceived effort was minimal. The two groups provided clinically adequate and similar RRs (13.3 [SD = 3.0] and 14.1 [SD = 2.5] breaths/minute, respectively) and minute volume (MV; 7.6 [SD = 2.1] and 7.7 [SD = 1.4] L/minute, respectively). The results indicate that minimally trained persons can effectively perform six hours of manual BVD-tube ventilation of normal and moderately injured lungs, without undue effort. Quality of delivered ventilation was clinically adequate.

Ventilating the Bearded: A Randomized Crossover Trial Comparing a Novel Bag-Valve-Guedel Adaptor to a Standard Mask.

Emergency field ventilation using bag-valve face mask devices can be difficult to perform, especially in bearded individuals. In view of the increasing numbers of servicemen and civilians sporting a beard or moustache, the issue of finding a technical solution for ventilation in this population has gained importance. We therefore developed a novel adaptor that enables the direct connection of a bag-valve device to a Guedel-type oropharyngeal airway device thereby directly connecting the oral airway to the bag valve, eliminating the need for a face mask. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of the bag-valve-Guedel adaptor (BVGA) to the common face mask in healthy bearded volunteers. This study was a randomized-by-sequence, crossover-controlled trial (NCT02768246) approved by the local IRB (0051-16-HMO). All subjects signed an informed consent before participation. Twenty-five healthy bearded men (age 28±7) were recruited. After randomization, the first group (mask then BVGA, n=12) began breathing room air through the face mask, followed by 100% O2. After washout in room air, the procedure was repeated with the BVGA. The second group (BVGA then mask, n = 13) began with the BVGA followed by the face mask. Subjects were awake and breathed spontaneously throughout the experiment. Therefore, a Guedel was not used. Physiological and respiratory parameters were monitored continuously. The primary endpoint was the presence of suspected leak as determined by end-tidal-CO2 (EtCO2<20mmHg). Secondary endpoints included tidal volume and safety. The order of device use did not affect the results significantly (p>0.05 by Mann-Whitney-U test); therefore, the data were pooled. There were no cases of suspected leak while breathing through the BVGA. By contrast, while breathing through a face mask, there were 8 of 25 (32%) and 5 of 25 (20%) cases of suspected leak in air and 100% O2, respectively (air: p=0.002; 100% O2: p=0.014 by McNemar test). No adverse events were observed. In bearded individuals, the BVGA provides significantly more efficient (less leak) ventilation compared to a face mask. This is also of particular importance in view of the increasing number of bearded individuals serving in the armed forces. Moreover, since effective ventilation with a mask requires experience, the relatively easy-to-apply BVGA will enable less experienced first responders to achieve higher success rates in this critical phase of treatment. Further studies are planned to evaluate the efficacy of the BVGA in the prehospital setting.

Abstract 122: Compression-Induced Ventilation Volumes Decrease with Chest Compression Depth and Prolonged CPR

Introduction: Compression-induced ventilation may aid gas exchange during CPR. We hypothesized that the amount of gas moving in and out of the lungs depends on chest compression depth. Methods: VF was induced in five female, anesthetized and intubated pigs of about 30 kg. After 30 seconds of non-intervention time, chest compressions were started and maintained at a rate of 100 compressions per minute. Every two minutes chest compression depth was altered, resulting in 14 minutes of CPR with a depth sequence of 4 cm, 3 cm, 4 cm, 5 cm, 5.5 cm, 5 cm and 4 cm. Ventilations were performed manually with a bag-valve device 10 times per minute during continuous chest compressions by a dedicated expert. Airway flow was measured at the end of the endotracheal tube. Compression-induced ventilation was determined from the periods between the manual ventilations. The average compression-induced minute ventilation volume was determined over the last minute of each two minute period of CPR at each specific chest compression depth. Results: The compression-induced ventilation volume in the first period of CPR at 4 cm of depth was 1.6 ± 0.9 L/min (about 4% of total ventilation volume). The figure shows how the compression-induced ventilation volume decreases with increasing chest compression depth, relative to this initial value. CPR with a chest compression depth of 4 cm was performed three times in each pig, and the corresponding compression-induced ventilation volumes decreased with time. This suggested that there might be just a time effect (e.g. atelectasis). However, the final compression depth of 4 cm resulted in larger compression-induced ventilation volumes than the preceding 5 cm and 5.5 cm compression depths, indicating that the decreased volume over time could not purely be a time effect, but must also be an effect of the depth. Conclusion: In conclusion, compression-induced ventilation volume appears to decrease with deeper chest compressions as well as with prolonged CPR.

A bag-valve device in spontaneously breathing/gasping patients: Wasting energy?

A bag-valve device in spontaneously breathing/gasping patients: Wasting energy?

Evaluation of pressure-controlled ventilation concepts during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in dental chairs

Infrequent training of lay rescuers in cardiopulmonary resuscitation may lead to stomach inflation during ventilation of the unsecured airway. This is caused by a pressure loss of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LOSP) after onset of cardiac arrest. To minimise the risk of stomach inflation, the SMART BAG® (SB), a disposable flow-limited bag-valve-mask resuscitator, has been designed. Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of stomach inflation by use of SB in comparison to two other ventilation devices with respect to the ventilation capability. An Easy Grip® disposable bag-valve-mask resuscitator (EG), an SB and an EG with an interposed T-piece attached to a 0.5l reservoir bag (EG/R) were compared in a manikin ventilation training setting. Fourteen dentists performed ventilations on a Mini Ventilation Training Analyzer using EG, SB and EG/R with lung compliance (LC) and LOSP being adjusted to 700ml/kPa and 1.5 kPa (best case) and 500ml/kPa and 0.5 kPa (worst case) in a randomised order. Sufficient tidal volumes were obtained by use of all the three test devices regardless of LC or LOSP. No statistical differences were detected between the use of SB and EG/R. Using EG led to statistically larger volumes. Stomach inflation could only be avoided using SB and EG/R at a high LOSP regardless of LC. Even in the worst case scenario, use of SB and EG/R administered sufficient tidal volumes with a significantly smaller stomach inflation compared to EG. Combination of standard bag-valve devices with a reservoir bag may provide similar protection from gastric inflation as the SMART BAG®.

A mannequin study comparing suitability of the i-gelTM with a laryngeal mask airway device

Objectives: To compare the suitability of the i-gelTM (Intersurgical Ltd, UK) supraglottic airway device with a single-use laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in the hazardous area response team (HART) environment and the urban search and rescue (USAR) environment. Method: five chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear trained urban search and rescue paramedics attempted five insertions of each supraglottic airway device into a Laerdal® ALS mannequin (Laerdal, Norway) in three separate environments: normal (supine, waist high), HART (wearing gas-tight suits and respirators) and USAR (in a simulated confined space). As a control group, five anaesthetists also attempted five insertions of each supraglottic airway device into a Laerdal® Airway Trainer (Laerdal, Norway) under normal conditions. Time from first touching the device to successful inflation of the mannequin's lungs’ using a self-inflating bag-valve device was recorded and operator opinion was captured using a four-point Likert scale. Results: insertion of the i-gel airway was significantly faster than insertion of the LMA in simulated USAR conditions (P&lt;0.001), there was no significant difference in control conditions or when wearing gas-tight personal protective equipment. There was no difference in the number of attempts required to achieve correct placement of either supraglottic airway device in any situation. Conclusions: this study has demonstrated that, in simulated USAR conditions, the i-gel supraglottic airway device performs at least as well as the LMA and is significantly quicker to insert. The authors therefore recommend that the i-gel is introduced into the USAR HART environment with further clinical evaluation in this and other prehospital settings.

Hvordan oppnå fri luftvei?

To secure the airway has the highest priority when handling critically ill and injured patients. The aim of this article is to present simple and new devices and techniques to secure the airway. The paper is based on international algorithms for optimal treatment of patients with acute airway problems, and the authors' experience from clinical work and organizing of courses. Unconscious patients have obstructed airways because the tongue slides back and blocks the airway. This can be prevented by lifting the jaw, possibly supplemented by insertion of an oropharyngeal airway. When these active techniques are not used, patients must be placed in the semi-prone position and air passage checked. The non-breathing patient must be ventilated with simple devices: mouth-to-mouth, pocket-mask or face-mask and bag. Endotracheal intubation is difficult and supraglottic devices are easier and safer to handle. Anaesthetists may use special equipment when securing of airway is particularly difficult. Hospitals routinely intubate with bronchoscopy when presented with patients who breathe spontaneously and for whom airway is expected to have very difficult access. Direct transtracheal access can be obtained by emergency tracheotomy or with various puncturing techniques. In the unconscious patient, it is of vital importance to maintain a secure airway with simple devices. Hypoxia subsequent to obstructed airways in unconscious patients will become life-threatening, and may cause cerebral ischemia and cardiac arrest within 5-6 minutes. All doctors should be able to ventilate patients with face-mask and bag-valve device. Intubation and tracheotomy should only be performed by trained personnel.

The mouth-to-bag resuscitator during standard anaesthesia induction in apnoeic patients

Aim Ventilation of a non-intubated emergency patient by inexperienced rescuers with a standard bag-valve device may result in high inspiratory flow rates and subsequently high airway pressures with stomach inflation. Therefore, a self-inflating bag has been developed that requires lay rescuers to blow up a single-use balloon inside an adult bag-valve device, which, in turn, displaces air within the bag towards the patient. This concept has been compared to standard adult bag-valve devices earlier in bench models but not in patients. Methods An anaesthetist who was blinded to all monitor tracings ventilated the lungs of 40 apnoeic patients during routine anaesthesia induction either with a standard bag-valve device or with the mouth-to-bag resuscitator in a random order. Study endpoints were peak inspiratory flow rates, peak airway pressure, tidal volumes and inspiratory time. Results Peak inspiratory flow was 40 ± 10 l min −1 for the standard bag-valve device versus 33 ± 13 l min −1 for the mouth-to-bag resuscitator ( P < 0.0001); peak airway pressure was 17 ± 5 cmH 2O versus 14 ± 5 cmH 2O ( P < 0.0001); inspiratory tidal volume was 477 ± 133 ml versus 644 ± 248 ml ( P < 0.001) and inspiratory time was 1.1 ± 0.3 s versus 1.9 ± 0.6 s ( P < 0.0001). Conclusion Employing the mouth-to-bag resuscitator during simulated ventilation of a non-intubated patient in respiratory arrest significantly decreased peak inspiratory flow and peak airway pressure and increased inspiratory tidal volume and inspiratory times compared to a standard bag-valve device.

Ventilation Strategies in the Obstructed Airway in a Bench Model Simulating a Nonintubated Respiratory Arrest Patient

The Smart Bag MO(R) is an adult flow-limited bag-valve device designed to reduce the risk of stomach inflation in an unprotected airway. Its properties in severe airway obstruction are as yet unknown. In a bench model, we evaluated respiratory mechanics and delivered tidal volumes although ventilating at airway resistances of 4, 10, and 20 cm H(2)O . L(-1) . s(-1) once with a flow-limited bag-valve device and once with a standard bag-valve device to simulate a respiratory arrest patient with an unprotected airway. Inspiratory times were always longer with the flow-limited bag-valve device than with the standard bag-valve device. Lung tidal volume in the simulated unobstructed airway was 750 +/- 70 mL using the flow-limited bag-valve device versus 780 +/- 30 mL using the standard bag-valve device (n.s.); in the simulated medium obstructed airway it was 800 +/- 70 versus 850 +/- 20 mL (n.s.), and in the simulated severely obstructed airway it was 210 +/- 20 versus 170 +/- 10 mL (P < 0.01). Peak airway pressure in the simulated unobstructed airway was 15 +/- 2 cm H(2)O using the flow-limited bag-valve device versus 22 +/- 4 cm H(2)O using the standard bag-valve device (P < 0.01); in the simulated medium obstructed airway it was 22 +/- 1 versus 39 +/- 7 cm H(2)O (P < 0.01), and in the simulated severely obstructed airway it was 26 +/- 1 versus 61 +/- 3 cm H(2)O (P < 0.01). Stomach inflation in the simulated unobstructed airway was 0 mL/min using both bag-valve devices; in the simulated medium obstructed airway it was 0 mL/min for the flow-limited bag-valve device versus 200 +/- 20 mL/min for the standard bag-valve device (P < 0.01), and in the simulated severely obstructed airway it was 0 versus 1240 +/- 50 mL/min (P < 0.01). In a simulated severely obstructed unprotected airway, the use of a flow-limited bag-valve device resulted in longer inspiratory times, higher tidal volumes, lower inspiratory pressures, and no stomach inflation compared with a standard bag-valve device.

Current Practice in Airway Management: A Descriptive Evaluation

Ventilator-associated pneumonia, a common complication of mechanical ventilation, could be reduced if health care workers implemented evidence-based practices that decrease the risk for this complication. To determine current practice and differences in practices between registered nurses and respiratory therapists in managing patients receiving mechanical ventilation. A descriptive comparative design was used. A convenience sample of 41 registered nurses and 25 respiratory therapists who manage critical care patients treated with mechanical ventilation at Sharp Grossmont Hospital, La Mesa, California, completed a survey on suctioning techniques and airway management practices. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. Significant differences existed between nurses and respiratory therapists for hyperoxygenation before suctioning (P =.03). In the 2 groups, nurses used the ventilator for hyper-oxygenation more often, and respiratory therapists used a bag-valve device more often (P =.03). Respiratory therapists instilled saline (P <.001) and rinsed the closed system with saline after suctioning (P =.003) more often than nurses did. Nurses suctioned oral secretions (P <.001) and the nose of orally intubated patients (P =.01), brushed patients' teeth with a toothbrush (P<.001), and used oral swabs to clean the mouth (P <.001) more frequently than respiratory therapists did. Nurses and respiratory therapists differed significantly in the management of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. To reduce the risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia, both nurses and respiratory therapists must be consistent in using best practices when managing patients treated with mechanical ventilation.

Minimizing Stomach Inflation Versus Optimizing Chest Compressions

In a bench model, we evaluated a bag-valve device (Smart Bag MO) with limited maximum inspiratory gas flow developed to reduce the risk of stomach inflation in an unprotected airway. During simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation with uninterrupted chest compressions, ventilation with the "disabled" Smart Bag MO or an adult self-inflating bag-valve device provided only adequate tidal volumes if inspiratory time was 0.5 s. Ventilation with the "enabled" Smart Bag MO, even in ventilation windows of 0.5 s, provided inadequate tidal volumes during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation and would result in hypoventilation in a patient.

Positive-Pressure Ventilation with a Face Mask and a Bag-Valve Device

Providing positive-pressure ventilation with a face mask and a bag-valve device can be a lifesaving maneuver. Although seemingly simple, the technique requires an understanding of the airway anatomy, the equipment, and the indications. This video demonstrates the equipment and technique used to provide positive-pressure ventilation with a face mask and a bag-valve device.

The Combitube, Self-Inflating Bulb, and Colorimetric Carbon Dioxide Detector to Advance Airway Management in the First Echelon of the Battlefield

Combat lifesavers and Army medics are regular combat soldiers who possess skills that enable them to provide lifesaving assistance to combat casualties. Although their training is not equal to that of paramedics, combat lifesavers and Army medics are trained to assess casualties for airway obstruction, as well as the presence or absence of spontaneous ventilation. They are also familiar with the same basic airway maneuvers that are required for blind insertion of the esophageal-tracheal double-lumen airway (ETDLA). Use of the ETDLA in combination with an esophageal detector device and a colorimetric carbon dioxide detector would require skill similar to that which they already possess in performing many mission-essential and combat lifesaver tasks. Because the U.S. Army has introduced the ETDLA for use, it is important that providers at all echelons understand the dynamics of the ETDLA. Inclusion of the ETDLA, esophageal detector device, and colorimetric carbon dioxide detector in combination with the bag-valve ventilation device could provide a viable alternative to mouth-to-mouth rescue breathing with the oral airway, as currently used by combat lifesavers on the battlefield. Improved airway management, in conjunction with other lifesaving measures, could potentially improve survival rates for combat casualties and assist in stabilizing them for evacuation to higher echelons of combat medical care.

Efficacy and safety in patients on a resuscitator, oxylator EM-100, in comparison with a bag-valve device

The purpose of this study was to compare the OxylatorEM-100, a ventilator with a fixed flow and working pressure of 25 to 50 cm H 2O, with a bag-valve device with respect to safety, efficiency, and efficacy when used by professionals. We conducted a prospective, controlled, caregiver-blind single center study. Induction was followed by ventilation with a bag-valve device oxylator in manual and automatic modes. Steps were repeated under hypnosis, after muscle relaxation with mask, and with an endotracheal tube. Forty patients, aged 48.8 ± 13.5 years weighing 50 to 111 kg were studied. Airway management was consistently better with the bag-valve ( P <.0001). Normocapnia was maintained with the bag-valve in 88%, oxylator (manual) in 73%, but only 14% of cases in automatic mode with tidal volumes of 1200 mL and more. This device was associated with the potential for rapid hyperventilation in patients when used by professionals. Simplicity of airway management was not improved.

Effects of decreasing peak flow rate on stomach inflation during bag-valve-mask ventilation

Reducing inspiratory flow rate and peak airway pressure may be important in order to minimise the risk of stomach inflation when ventilating an unprotected airway with positive pressure ventilation. This study was designed to yield enough power to determine whether employing an inspiratory gas flow limiting bag-valve device (SMART BAG, O-Two Medical Technologies Inc., Ontario, Canada) would also decrease the likelihood of stomach inflation in an established bench model of a simulated unintubated respiratory arrest patient. The bench model consists of a training lung (lung compliance, 50 ml/cm H2O; airway resistance, 4 cm H2O/l/s) and a valve simulating lower oesophageal sphincter opening at a pressure of 19 cm H(2)O. One hundred and ninety-one emergency medicine physicians were requested to ventilate the manikin utilising a standard single-person technique for 1 min (respiratory rate, 12/min; Vt, 500 ml) with both a standard adult bag-valve-mask and the SMART BAG. The volunteers were blinded to the experimental design of the model until completion of the experimental protocol. The SMART BAG versus standard bag-valve-mask resulted in significantly (P < 0.001) lower (mean +/- S.D.) mean airway pressure (14 +/- 2 cm H2O versus 16 +/- 3 cm H2O), respiratory rates (13 +/- 3 breaths per min versus 14 +/- 4 breaths per min), incidence of stomach inflation (4.2% versus 38.7%) and median stomach inflation volumes (351 [range, 18-1211 ml] versus 1426 [20-5882 ml]); lung tidal volumes (538 +/- 97 ml versus 533 +/- 97 ml) were comparable. Inspiratory to expiratory ratios were significantly (P < 0.001) increased (1.7 +/- 0.5 versus 1.5 +/- 0.6). In conclusion, the SMART BAG reduced inspiratory flow, mean airway pressure and both the incidence and actual volume of stomach inflation compared with a standard bag-valve-mask device while maintaining delivered lung tidal volumes and increasing the inspiratory to expiratory ratio.

Can first responders achieve and maintain normocapnia when sequentially ventilating with a bag-valve device and two oxygen-driven resuscitators? A controlled clinical trial in 104 patients

To evaluate the capability of first responders to achieve and maintain normal ventilation of the lungs of victims employing a bag-valve device and two oxygen-driven resuscitators. Prospective, controlled, blinded, single-centre clinical trial using a bag-valve device and one of two FR-300 devices, with 20 cmH2O working pressure, and flows of either 24 or 30 L min(-1). One hundred and four patients were analysed. Induction of anaesthesia followed by ventilation of the lungs with a bag-valve device and an Oxylator in manual and automatic modes performed by a fireman first responder. Each series was repeated for three conditions (anaesthesia; anaesthesia plus muscle relaxation, both with facemask; anaesthesia plus relaxation using an endotracheal tube). Patients age 49 +/- 17 yr; 47% males, 48-132 kg. Normocapnia was achieved and maintained in 66% (bag-valve device), 82% (Oxylator). The use of an oxygen-driven device improves the ability of first responders to achieve and maintain normocapnia even when distracted. Use of the Oxylators improves performance (P < 0.001) vs. the bag-valve device significantly.

Can first responders achieve and maintain normocapnia when sequentially ventilating with a bag-valve device and two oxygen-driven resuscitators? A controlled clinical trial in 104 patients

Background and objective: To evaluate the capability of first responders to achieve and maintain normal ventilation of the lungs of victims employing a bag-valve device and two oxygen-driven resuscitators. Methods: Prospective, controlled, blinded, single-centre clinical trial using a bag-valve device and one of two FR-300® devices, with 20 cmH2O working pressure, and flows of either 24 or 30 L min−1. One hundred and four patients were analysed. Induction of anaesthesia followed by ventilation of the lungs with a bag-valve device and an Oxylator® in manual and automatic modes performed by a fireman first responder. Each series was repeated for three conditions (anaesthesia; anaesthesia plus muscle relaxation, both with facemask; anaesthesia plus relaxation using an endotracheal tube). Results: Patients age 49 ± 17 yr; 47% males, 48-132 kg. Normocapnia was achieved and maintained in 66% (bag-valve device), 82% (Oxylator®). Conclusions: The use of an oxygen-driven device improves the ability of first responders to achieve and maintain normocapnia even when distracted. Use of the Oxylators® improves performance (P < 0.001) vs. the bag-valve device significantly.

Airway management by first responders when using a bag-valve device and two oxygen-driven resuscitators in 104 patients

Airway management by first responders when using a bag-valve device and two oxygen-driven resuscitators in 104 patients

Lost child

Lost child