Bacterial Chemoreceptors Research Articles

Tuning a Bacterial Chemoreceptor with Protein−Membrane Interactions

Chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli are homodimeric transmembrane proteins that convert environmental stimuli into intracellular signals controlling flagellar motion. Chemoeffectors bind to the extracellular (periplasmic) domain of the receptors, whereas their cytoplasmic domain mediates signaling and adaptation. The second transmembrane helix (TM2) connects these two domains. TM2 contains an aliphatic core flanked by amphipathic aromatic residues that have specific affinity for polar-hydrophobic membrane interfaces. We previously showed that Trp-209, near the cytoplasmic end of TM2, helps maintain the normal baseline-signaling state of the aspartate chemoreceptor (Tar) and that Tyr-210 plays an auxiliary role in this control. We have now repositioned the Trp-209/Tyr-210 pair in single-residue increments about the cytoplasmic polar-hydrophobic interface. Changes from WY-2 to WY+1 modulate the baseline-signaling state of the receptor in predictable and incremental steps that can be compensated by adaptive methylation/demethylation. Greater displacements, as in WY-3, WY+2, and WY+3, bias the receptor to the off kinase-inhibiting state or the on kinase-stimulating state, respectively, to a degree that cannot be fully compensated by the adaptation system. Aromatic residues analogous to Trp-209/Tyr-210 are present in other chemoreceptors and many transmembrane sensor kinases, where they may serve a similar function.

Nanodiscs separate chemoreceptor oligomeric states and reveal their signaling properties.

Bacterial chemoreceptors are transmembrane homodimers that can form trimers, higher order arrays, and extended clusters as part of signaling complexes. Interactions of dimers in oligomers are thought to confer cooperativity and cross-receptor influences as well as a 35-fold gain between ligand binding and altered kinase activity. In addition, higher order interactions among dimers are necessary for the observed patterns of assistance in adaptational modification among different receptors. Elucidating mechanisms underlying these properties will require defining which receptor functions can be performed by dimers and which require specific higher order interactions. However, such an assignment has not been possible. Here, we used Nanodiscs, an emerging technology for manipulating membrane proteins, to prepare small particles of lipid bilayer containing one or only a few chemoreceptor dimers. We found that receptor dimers isolated in individual Nanodiscs were readily modified, bound ligand, and performed transmembrane signaling. However, they were hardly able to activate the chemotaxis histidine kinase. Instead, maximal activation and thus full-range control of kinase occurred preferentially in discs containing approximately three chemoreceptor dimers. The sharp dependence of kinase activation on this number of receptors per dimer implies that the core structural unit of kinase activation and control is a trimer of dimers. Thus, our observations demonstrate that chemoreceptor transmembrane signaling does not require oligomeric organization beyond homodimers and implicate a trimer of dimers as the unit of downstream signaling.

Conformational suppression of inter-receptor signaling defects

Motile bacteria follow gradients of attractant and repellent chemicals with high sensitivity. Their chemoreceptors are physically clustered, which may enable them to function as a cooperative array. Although native chemoreceptor molecules are typically transmembrane homodimers, they appear to associate through their cytoplasmic tips to form trimers of dimers, which may be an important architectural element in the assembly and operation of receptor clusters. The five receptors of Escherichia coli that mediate most of its chemotactic and aerotactic behaviors have identical trimer contact residues and have been shown by in vivo crosslinking methods to form mixed trimers of dimers. Mutations at the trimer contact sites of Tsr, the serine chemoreceptor, invariably abrogate Tsr function, but some of those lesions (designated Tsr*) are epistatic and block the function of heterologous chemoreceptors. We isolated and characterized mutations (designated Tar()) in the aspartate chemoreceptor that restored function to Tsr* receptors. The suppressors arose at or near the Tar trimer contact sites and acted in an allele-specific fashion on Tsr* partners. Alone, many Tar() receptors were unable to mediate chemotactic responses to aspartate, but all formed clusters with varying efficiencies. Most of those Tar() receptors were epistatic to WT Tsr, but some regained Tar function in combination with a suppressible Tsr* partner. Tar()-Tsr* suppression most likely occurs through compensatory changes in the conformation or dynamics of a mixed receptor signaling complex, presumably based on trimer-of-dimer interactions. These collaborative teams may be responsible for the high-gain signaling properties of bacterial chemoreceptors.

Differential Recognition of Citrate and a Metal-Citrate Complex by the Bacterial Chemoreceptor Tcp

The chemoreceptor Tcp of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium can sense citrate and a metal-citrate complex as distinct attractants. In this study, we tried to investigate the molecular mechanism of this discrimination. That citrate binds directly to Tcp was verified by the site-specific thiol modification assays using membrane fractions prepared from Escherichia coli cells expressing the mutant Tcp receptors in which single Cys residues were introduced at positions in the putative ligand-binding pocket. To determine the region responsible for the ligand discrimination, we screened for mutations defective in taxis to magnesium in the presence of citrate. All of the isolated mutants from random mutagenesis with hydroxylamine were defective in both citrate and metal-citrate sensing, and the mutated residues are located in or near the alpha1-alpha2 and alpha3-alpha4 loops within the periplasmic domain. Further analyses with site-directed replacements around these regions demonstrated that the residue Asn(67), which is presumed to lie at the subunit interface of the Tcp homodimer, plays a critical role in the recognition of the metal-citrate complex but not that of citrate. Various amino acids at this position differentially affect the citrate and metal-citrate sensing abilities. Thus, for the first time, the abilities to sense the two attractants were genetically dissected. Based on the results obtained in this study, we propose models in which the discrimination of the metal-citrate complex from citrate involves cooperative interaction at Asn(67) and allosteric switching.

Helical distribution of the bacterial chemoreceptor via colocalization with the Sec protein translocation machinery

In Escherichia coli, chemoreceptor clustering at a cell pole seems critical for signal amplification and adaptation. However, little is known about the mechanism of localization itself. Here we examined whether the aspartate chemoreceptor (Tar) is inserted directly into the polar membrane by using its fusion to green fluorescent protein (GFP). After induction of Tar–GFP, fluorescent spots first appeared in lateral membrane regions, and later cell poles became predominantly fluorescent. Unexpectedly, Tar–GFP showed a helical arrangement in lateral regions, which was more apparent when a Tar–GFP derivative with two cysteine residues in the periplasmic domain was cross-linked to form higher oligomers. Moreover, similar distribution was observed even when the cytoplasmic domain of the double cysteine Tar–GFP mutant was replaced by that of the kinase EnvZ, which does not localize to a pole. Observation of GFP–SecE and a translocation-defective MalE–GFP mutant, as well as indirect immunofluorescence microscopy on SecG, suggested that the general protein translocation machinery (Sec) itself is arranged into a helical array, with which Tar is transiently associated. The Sec coil appeared distinct from the MreB coil, an actin-like cytoskeleton. These findings will shed new light on the mechanisms underlying spatial organization of membrane proteins in E. coli.

2P326 Direct observation of the movement of the bacterial chemoreceptor through the cytoplasmic membrane(42. Sensory signal transduction,Poster Session,Abstract,Meeting Program of EABS & BSJ 2006)

2P326 Direct observation of the movement of the bacterial chemoreceptor through the cytoplasmic membrane(42. Sensory signal transduction,Poster Session,Abstract,Meeting Program of EABS & BSJ 2006)

12 Reversible methylation of glutamate residues in the receptor proteins of bacterial sensory systems

The methyltransferase CheR catalyzes methyl group transfer from S-adenosyl-l-methionine to specific glutamic acid side chains of bacterial chemoreceptors, referred to as the methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). A second enzyme, the methylesterase CheB, catalyzes ester hydrolysis. Together, CheR and CheB facilitate a reversible receptor methylation process that is essential for sensory adaptation. This property of adaptation has been most extensively studied in free-swimming Escherichia coli and Salmonella, where it serves as a rudimentary short-term memory during chemotaxis in gradients of attractants and repellents. The methylation-demethylation process allows the bacterium to compare and respond to changes in the current concentration relative to thoseof the past three to four seconds. The feedback loop in which CheR participates facilitates perfect or near-perfect adaptation over a large range of chemoeffector concentrations, generating the means by which the cell remains responsive to small changes in chemoeffector concentration. The structures of Salmonella CheR and the methyl-accepting domain of the serine receptor (Tsr) from E. coli, with biochemical data, paint a relatively detailed picture of receptor methylation, which proceeds by transmethylation in E. coli and Salmonella. Beyond E. coli and Salmonella, the diversity of receptor organization and the roles of methylation are still emerging. This diversity is likely to be large, given the wide range of ecological niches that prokaryotes occupy.

Diagnostic cross‐linking of paired cysteine pairs demonstrates homologous structures for two chemoreceptor domains with low sequence identity

Hundreds of bacterial chemoreceptors from many species have periplasmic, ligand-recognition domains of approximately the same size, but little or no sequence identity. The only structure determined is for the periplasmic domain of chemoreceptor Tar from Salmonella and Escherichia coli. Do sequence-divergent but similarly sized chemoreceptor periplasmic domains have related structures? We addressed this issue for the periplasmic domain of chemoreceptor Trg(E) from E. coli, which has a low level of sequence similarity to Tar, by combining homology modeling and diagnostic cross-linking between pairs of introduced cysteines. A homology model of the Trg(E) domain was created using the homodimeric, four-helix bundle structure of the Tar(S) domain from Salmonella. In this model, we chose four pairs of positions at which introduced cysteines would be sufficiently close to form disulfides across each of four different helical interfaces. For each pair we chose a second pair, in which one cysteine of the original pair was shifted by one position around the helix and thus would be less favorably placed for disulfide formation. We created genes coding for proteins containing four such pairs of cysteine pairs and investigated disulfide formation in vivo as well as functional consequences of the substitutions and disulfides between neighboring helices. Results of the experimental tests provided strong support for the accuracy of the model, indicating that the Trg(E) periplasmic domain is very similar to the Tar(S) domain. Diagnostic cross-linking of paired pairs of introduced cysteines could be applied generally as a stringent test of homology models.

Changing the Specificity of a Bacterial Chemoreceptor

The methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins are a family of receptors in bacteria that mediate chemotaxis to diverse signals. To explore the plasticity of these proteins, we have developed a simple method for selecting cells that swim to target attractants. The procedure is based on establishing a diffusive gradient in semi-soft agar plates and does not require that the attractant be metabolized or degraded. We have applied this method to select for variants of the Escherichia coli aspartate receptor, Tar, that have a new or improved response to different amino acids. We found that Tar can be readily mutated to respond to new chemical signals. However, the overall change in specificity depended on the target compound. A Tar variant that could detect cysteic acid still showed a strong sensitivity to aspartate, indicating that the new receptor had a broadened specificity relative to wild-type Tar. Tar variants that responded to phenylalanine or N-methyl aspartate, or that had an increased sensitivity to glutamate showed a strong decrease in their response to aspartate. In at least some of the cases, the maximal level of sensitivity that was obtained could not be attributed solely to substitutions within the binding pocket. The new tar alleles and the techniques described here provide a new approach for exploring the relationship between ligand binding and signal transduction by chemoreceptors and for engineering new receptors for applications in biotechnology.

Insights into the organization and dynamics of bacterial chemoreceptor clusters through in vivo crosslinking studies

The team signaling model for bacterial chemoreceptors proposes that receptor dimers of different detection specificities form mixed trimers of dimers that bind the cytoplasmic proteins CheA and CheW to form ternary signaling complexes clustered at the cell poles. We used a trifunctional crosslinking reagent targeted to cysteine residues in the aspartate (Tar) and serine (Tsr) receptors to obtain in vivo snapshots of trimer composition in the receptor population. To analyze the dynamics of trimer formation, we followed the appearance of mixed trimers when cells expressing Tar were induced for the expression of Tsr and treated with the crosslinker shortly after the onset of induction. In the absence of CheA or CheW, preformed Tar trimers exchanged partners readily with newly made Tsr. Conversely, in the presence of CheA and CheW, receptor trimers seldom exchanged partners, irrespective of the presence or absence of attractants. The C-terminal receptor-coupling domain of the CheA kinase, which contains binding determinants for the CheW protein, was essential for conferring low exchangeability to the preformed trimers of dimers. CheW also was required for this effect, but, unlike CheA, overexpression of CheW interfered with trimer formation and chemotactic behavior. The CheW effect probably occurs through binding interactions that mask the receptor sites needed for trimer formation. We propose that clustered receptors are organized in mixed trimers of dimers through binding interactions with CheA and CheW, which play distinctly different architectural roles. Moreover, once complete signaling teams have formed, they no longer undergo dynamic exchange of receptor members.

Cooperative Signaling among Bacterial Chemoreceptors

Four chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli mediate responses to chemicals in the environment. The receptors self-associate and localize to the cell poles. This aggregation implies that interactions among receptors are important parameters of signal processing during chemotaxis. We examined this phenomenon using a receptor-coupled in vitro assay of CheA kinase activity. The ability of homogeneous populations of the serine receptor Tsr and the aspartate receptor Tar to stimulate CheA was directly proportional to the ratio of the receptor to total protein in cell membranes up to a fraction of 50%. Membranes containing mixed populations of Tar and Tsr supported an up to 4-fold greater stimulation of CheA than expected on the basis of the contributions of the individual receptors. Peak activity was seen at a Tar:Tsr ratio of 1:4. This synergy was observed only when the two proteins were expressed simultaneously, suggesting that, under our conditions, the fundamental "cooperative receptor unit" is relatively static, even in the absence of CheA and CheW. Finally, we observed that inhibition of receptor-stimulated CheA activity by serine or aspartate required significantly higher concentrations of ligand for membranes containing mixed Tsr and Tar populations than for membranes containing only Tsr (up to 10(2)-fold more serine) or Tar (up to 10(4)-fold more aspartate). Together with recent analyses of the interactions of Tsr and Tar in vivo, our results reveal the emergent properties of mixed receptor populations and emphasize their importance in the integrated signal processing that underlies bacterial chemotaxis.

Large increases in attractant concentration disrupt the polar localization of bacterial chemoreceptors

In bacterial chemotaxis, the chemoreceptors [methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs)] transduce chemotactic signals through the two-component histidine kinase CheA. At low but not high attractant concentrations, chemotactic signals must be amplified. The MCPs are organized into a polar lattice, and this organization has been proposed to be critical for signal amplification. Although evidence in support of this model has emerged, an understanding of how signals are amplified and modulated is lacking. We probed the role of MCP localization under conditions wherein signal amplification must be inhibited. We tested whether a large increase in attractant concentration (a change that should alter receptor occupancy from c. 0% to > 95%) would elicit changes in the chemoreceptor localization. We treated Escherichia coli or Bacillus subtilis with a high level of attractant, exposed cells to the cross-linking agent paraformaldehyde and visualized chemoreceptor location with an anti-MCP antibody. A marked increase in the percentage of cells displaying a diffuse staining pattern was obtained. In contrast, no increase in diffuse MCP staining is observed when cells are treated with a repellent or a low concentration of attractant. For B. subtilis mutants that do not undergo chemotaxis, the addition of a high concentration of attractant has no effect on MCP localization. Our data suggest that interactions between chemoreceptors are decreased when signal amplification is unnecessary.

Adaptational assistance in clusters of bacterial chemoreceptors

Sensory adaptation of low-abundance chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli requires assistance from high-abundance receptors, because only high-abundance receptors carry the carboxyl-terminal pentapeptide sequence NWETF that enhances adaptational covalent modification. Using membrane vesicles containing both high-abundance receptor Tar and low-abundance receptor Trg, we observed effective assistance in vitro for all three adaptational modifications: methylation, demethylation and deamidation. These results demonstrated that adaptational assistance involves not only the previously documented assistance for methylation but also assistance for the two CheB-catalysed reactions. We determined rates of assisted methylation and demethylation at many ratios of assisting to assisted receptor. Analysis by a model of assistance indicated one Tar dimer could assist seven Trg dimers in methylation or five in demethylation, defining assistance neighbourhoods. These neighbourhoods were larger than a trimer of homodimers, required only receptors and were minimally affected by formation of signalling complexes. Time courses of assisted Trg methylation in membranes with low amounts of Tar showed that assisting receptors did not diffuse beyond initial neighbourhoods for at least two hours. Taken together, these observations indicate that chemoreceptors can form stable neighbourhoods larger than trimers in the absence of other chemotaxis proteins. Such interactions are likely to occur in natural receptor clusters in vivo.

2P236 大腸菌極クラスター内での走化性受容体ダイマーの配向変化とゲインコントロール(細胞生物的課題(接着・運動・骨格・伝達・膜)))

2P236 大腸菌極クラスター内での走化性受容体ダイマーの配向変化とゲインコントロール(細胞生物的課題(接着・運動・骨格・伝達・膜)))

Chemotaxis-guided movements in bacteria.

Motile bacteria often use sophisticated chemotaxis signaling systems to direct their movements. In general, bacterial chemotactic signal transduction pathways have three basic elements: (1) signal reception by bacterial chemoreceptors located on the membrane; (2) signal transduction to relay the signals from membrane receptors to the motor; and (3) signal adaptation to desensitize the initial signal input. The chemotaxis proteins involved in these signal transduction pathways have been identified and extensively studied, especially in the enterobacteria Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium. Chemotaxis-guided bacterial movements enable bacteria to adapt better to their natural habitats via moving toward favorable conditions and away from hostile surroundings. A variety of oral microbes exhibits motility and chemotaxis, behaviors that may play important roles in bacterial survival and pathogenesis in the oral cavity.

Functional interactions between receptors in bacterial chemotaxis.

Bacterial chemotaxis is a model system for signal transduction, noted for its relative simplicity, high sensitivity, wide dynamic range and robustness. Changes in ligand concentrations are sensed by a protein assembly consisting of transmembrane receptors, a coupling protein (CheW) and a histidine kinase (CheA). In Escherichia coli, these components are organized at the cell poles in tight clusters that contain several thousand copies of each protein. Here we studied the effects of variation in the composition of clusters on the activity of the kinase and its sensitivity to attractant stimuli, monitoring responses in vivo using fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Our results indicate that assemblies of bacterial chemoreceptors work in a highly cooperative manner, mimicking the behaviour of allosteric proteins. Conditions that favour steep responses to attractants in mutants with homogeneous receptor populations also enhance the sensitivity of the response in wild-type cells. This is consistent with a number of models that assume long-range cooperative interactions between receptors as a general mechanism for signal integration and amplification.

Crosslinking snapshots of bacterial chemoreceptor squads.

The team signaling model for bacterial chemoreceptors proposes that receptor dimers of different detection specificities form mixed trimers of dimers. These receptor "squads" then recruit the cytoplasmic signaling proteins CheA and CheW to form ternary signaling teams, which typically cluster at the poles of the cell. We devised cysteine-directed in vivo crosslinking approaches to ask whether mixed receptor squads could form in the absence of CheA and CheW and, if so, whether the underlying structural interactions conformed to trimer-of-dimers geometry. One approach used cysteine reporters at positions in the serine (Tsr) and aspartate (Tar) receptors that should form disulfide-linked Tsr approximately Tar products when juxtaposed at the interface of a mixed trimer. Another approach used a cysteine reporter with trigonal geometry near the trimer contact region and a trifunctional maleimide reagent with a spacer length appropriate for capturing the three axial subunits in a trimer of dimers. Both approaches detected mixed receptor-crosslinking products in cells lacking CheA and CheW. Under these conditions, receptor methylation and ligand-binding state had no discernable effect on crosslinking efficiencies. Crosslinking with the trigonal reporter was rapid and did not increase with longer treatment times or higher reagent concentrations, suggesting that this method produces a short-exposure snapshot of the receptor population. The extent of crosslinking indicated that most of the cell's receptor molecules were organized in higher-order groups. Crosslinking in receptor trimer contact mutants correlated with their signaling behaviors, suggesting that trimers of dimers are both structural and functional precursors of chemoreceptor signaling teams in bacteria.

Side chains at the membrane-water interface modulate the signaling state of a transmembrane receptor.

Previous model studies of peptides and proteins have shown that protein-lipid interactions, primarily involving amino acid side chains near the membrane-water interface, modulate the position of transmembrane helices in bilayers. The present study examines whether such interfacial side chains stabilize the signaling states of a transmembrane signaling helix in a representative receptor, the aspartate receptor of bacterial chemotaxis. To examine the functional roles of signaling helix side chains at the periplasmic and cytoplasmic membrane-water interfaces, arginine and cysteine substitutions were scanned through these two interfacial regions. The chemical reactivities of the cysteine residues were first measured to determine the positions at which the helix crosses the membrane-water interface in both the periplasmic and cytoplasmic compartments. Subsequently, two antisymmetric in vitro activity measurements were carried out to determine the effect of each interfacial arginine or cysteine substitution on receptor signaling. Substitutions that stabilize the receptor on-state cause upregulation of receptor-coupled kinase activity and inhibition of methylation at receptor adaptation sites, while substitutions that stabilize the off-state have the opposite effects on these two activities. Notably, four substitutions at aromatic tryptophan and phenylalanine positions buried in the membrane near the membrane-water interface were found to stabilize the native on- or off-signaling state. The striking ability of these substitutions to drive the receptor toward a specific signaling state indicates that interfacial side chains are highly optimized to correctly position the native signaling helix in the membrane and to allow normal switching between the on- and off-signaling states. The analogous substitutions in model transmembrane helices are known to drive small piston-type displacements of the helix normal to the membrane. Thus, the simplest molecular interpretation of the present findings is that the signal-stabilizing substitutions drive piston displacements of the signaling helix, providing further support for the piston model for transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemoreceptors. More generally, the findings indicate that the interfacial phenylalanine, tryptophan, and arginine side chains widespread in the transmembrane alpha-helices of receptors, channels, and transporters can play important roles in modulating transitions between signaling and conformational states.

Quantitative Analysis of Aspartate Receptor Signaling Complex Reveals that the Homogeneous Two-state Model is Inadequate: Development of a Heterogeneous Two-state Model

The two-state model of receptor activation, in which a receptor population exists in equilibrium between a single on-state and a single off-state, has long been considered a viable model for the signaling behavior of bacterial chemoreceptors. Here, we show that this simple, homogeneous two-state model is adequate for a pure receptor population with just one adaptation state, but fails to account quantitatively for the observed linear relationship between the apparent attractant affinity (K1/2) and kinase activity (Vobsapo) as the adaptation state is varied. Further analysis reveals that the available data are instead consistent with a heterogeneous two-state model in which covalent modification of receptor adaptation sites changes the microscopic properties of the on-state or off-state. In such a system, each receptor molecule retains a single on-state and off-state, but covalent adaptation generates a heterogeneous population of receptors exhibiting a range of different on-states or off-states with different microscopic parameters and conformations. It follows that covalent adaptation transforms the receptor from a simple, two-state toggle switch into a variable switch. In order to identify the microscopic parameters most sensitive to covalent adaptation, six modified, two-state models were examined in which covalent adaptation alters a different microscopic parameter. The analysis suggests that covalent adaptation primarily alters the ligand-binding affinity of the receptor off-state (KD1). By contrast, models in which covalent adaptation alters the ligand-binding affinity of the receptor on-state, the maximal kinase stimulation of the on-state or off-state, cooperative interactions between receptors, or the assembly of the receptor-kinase signaling complex are inconsistent with the available evidence. Overall, the findings support a heterogeneous two-state model in which modification of the receptor adaptation sites generates a population of receptors with heterogeneous off-states differing in their attractant affinities.In the process of testing the effects of covalent adaptation on the assembly of the receptor-kinase signaling complex, a new method for estimating the stoichiometric ratio of receptor and CheA in the ternary signaling complex was devised. This method suggests that the ratio of receptor dimers to CheA dimers in the assembled complex is 6:1 or less.

サルモネラ菌クエン酸レセプターTcpのリガンド認識におけるAsn-67残基の役割

サルモネラ菌クエン酸レセプターTcpのリガンド認識におけるAsn-67残基の役割