Award Papers Research Articles

Mapping Progress in Toxicology Research by the Content of the Best Papers Published in Society of Toxicology Journals: A Synopsis of the Best Paper Awardees (1974-2011)

In 1973, an anonymous donor contributed funds in honor of Dr Frank Blood for an award that would bring recognition to the best paper published in the Society of Toxicology journal. As time was needed to establish criteria for the award and review papers, the first award was bestowed in 1974. At its inception, responsibility for selecting the best paper was assigned to the Awards Committee, but over time, this role was transferred to the Board of Publications. Members are encouraged to nominate papers for consideration, but the Editorial offices have also played an active role in selecting papers for consideration. In general, articles selected as the best paper are recognized because they contain novel, new data, represent significant progress in understanding mechanisms of toxicity and/or advance the protection of human and environmental health. A total of 51 papers have been awarded best paper honors in Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (specifically designated as the Frank R. Blood awardee), Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, and Toxicological Sciences since 1974. The complete list of the papers selected as the best manuscripts published in Society of Toxicology journals is presented in Table 1. It is not possible to provide a full account of the scope and significance of each manuscript recognized as the best paper since 1974. Rather, the purpose of this article is to highlight the content of these papers as they reflect on fundamental tenets in toxicology. Additionally, this collection of papers also serves to illustrate important advances in toxicologic research. Although the papers are diverse in content, several general themes emerged while reviewing the collection of best papers, and these themes served to organize the content, scope, and significance of the articles. The general themes by which the papers are discussed in this article include the following:

Presented Abstracts from the Twenty‐Eighth Annual Education Conference of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (Atlanta, Georgia, November 2009)

s have been arranged by the Abstract Workgroup into the following categories: I. Award Papers II. Late-Breaking Papers III. Cancer IV. Communication V. Consumers’ Perspectives VI. Genetic Testing VII. Pediatrics VIII Preand Perinatal IX. Service Provision X. The Genetic Counselor Experience XI. Posters

AHR Moving forward

It is with growing sadness (but with expectations of time for some new activities in my life) that I announce that this is my final issue as editor of Australian Health Review (AHR). The new editor, Dr Gary Day from Griffith University in Queensland, is well suited to take over, with continued support from Dr Deborah Roberts, the Models of Care editor, and from the Editorial Board. Australian Health Review is over 30 years old and has achieved growing recognition both nationally and internationally. It has been a pleasure to have contributed to this excellent journal. The landscape of Australian health policy and management journals has changed over the past few years and further changes, to better meet the needs of authors and readers, are in store for AHR in 2010 and beyond. Over my tenure as editor, with much assistance from Professor Judith Dwyer, Dr Deborah Roberts, Dr Gary Day, Prue Power and the Editorial Board, and the publishing team at the Australasian Medical Publishing Company, we have achieved many milestones. Amalgamation of AHR with other journals will continue to strengthen the Australian presence in international scholarly publications. The online manuscript service has proved an efficient and effective mechanism for authors, reviewers and editors. The number of papers submitted for consideration has continued to grow, with over 100 papers submitted each year, of which about 60% are published. This large number of papers has meant that I am enormously grateful to the AHR reviewers. The 2009 reviewers are acknowledged in this issue (page 696). Thank you for volunteering your precious time to this most important task. The large number of papers has also meant that the page numbers of each issue have crept up to try to ensure authors do not have to wait too long to see their work in print. This year we established the Australian Health Review student paper awards, and in this issue we have published the undergraduate (page 541) and postgraduate (page 549) student award papers. Please ensure you read these excellent papers by Australian students. We have had an impressive set of guest editors who demonstrate the importance of AHR in Australian health policy and management and who enabled the journal to present at the forefront of key developments in these areas. This issue has a wide variety of papers on topics such as health information, health service utilisation, models of care, public health, quality and safety and workforce ? areas of critical importance for health policy and management now and into the future. Best wishes for the future. Signing off now, Sandra G Leggat, Editor Australian Health Review.

Secondary publication in the Japan Journal of Nursing Science

The following excerpt about the secondary publication of articles has been obtained from the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, 2006): Certain types of articles, such as guidelines produced by governmental agencies and professional organizations, may need to reach the widest possible audience. In such instances, editors sometimes choose deliberately to publish material that is also being published in other journals, with the agreement of the authors and the editors of those other journals. Secondary publication for various other reasons, in the same or another language, especially in other countries, is justifiable, and can be beneficial, provided all of the following conditions are met. 1 The authors have received approval from the editors of both journals; the editor concerned with secondary publication must have a photocopy, reprint, or manuscript of the primary version. 2 The priority of the primary publication is respected by a publication interval of at least one week (unless specifically negotiated otherwise by both editors). 3 The paper for secondary publication is intended for a different group of readers; an abbreviated version could be sufficient. 4 The secondary version faithfully reflects the data and interpretations of the primary version. 5 The footnote on the title page of the secondary version informs readers, peers, and documenting agencies that the paper has been published in whole or in part and states the primary reference. A suitable footnote might read: “This article is based on a study first reported in the [title of journal, with full reference].” Permission for such secondary publication should be free of charge. 6 The title of the secondary publication should indicate that it is a secondary publication (complete republication, abridged republication, complete translation, or abridged translation) of a primary publication. Of note, the National Library of Medicine does not consider translations to be “republications”, and does not cite or index translations when the original article was published in a journal that is indexed in MEDLINE. The Japan Journal of Nursing Science (JJNS) Editorial Board and the Editorial Board of the Journal of Japan Academy of Nursing Science (JJANS) agreed in 2003 that JJNS will publish an English translation of papers that have been published in JJANS as a secondary publication. The paper must have been previously published in Japanese in JJANS and is suitable to be translated into English for the global audience as they are suggestive and the contribution to nursing is massive. Under the current situation, a secondary publication in principle is limited to the papers that won awards at the Japan Academy of Nursing Science (JANS) assembly held during the annual academic conference and the selection among the award papers rests with the JJNS editorial board. We have published the following award papers as a secondary publication so far: Effects of a flexed posture in the prone position with boundaries following endotracheal suction in very low birthweight infants. Yoshie KONDOH. JJNS, 1, 47–55. What moral requirements cause ethical dilemmas among nurse executives? Yumiko KATSUHARA. JJNS, 2, 57–65. Practical application and evaluation of a care model for informing and reassuring children undergoing medical examinations and/or procedures (part 2): Methods of relating and practical nursing techniques that best bring out the potential of children. Naomi MATSUMORI, Keiko NINOMIYA, Michiko EBINA, Noriko KATADA, Hitomi KATSUDA, Yukie KOSAKO, Shinobu SASAKI, Tomomi MATSUBAYASHI, Ayami NAKANO, Mayumi TSUTSUI, Naoko IIMURA, Rina EMOTO, Atsuko SUZUKI, Hiromi NARAGINO, Sayako TAKAHASHI, Namiko KISUGI, and Makiko HUKUCHI. JJNS, 3, 51–64. Competencies of genetic nursing practice in Japan; A comparison between basic and advanced Levels. Naoko ARIMORI, Satoko NAKAGOMI, Michiko MIZOGUCHI, Minako MORITA, Hiroto ANDO, Akiko MORI, Shigeko HORIUCHI and William L. HOLZEMER. JJNS, 4, 45–55.

Presented Abstracts from the Twenty‐Fifth Annual Education Conference of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (Nashville, Tennessee, November 2006)

s have been arranged by the Abstract Committee into the following categories: I. Award Papers II. Adult III. Cancer IV. Counseling and Psychoscial Issues V. Education VI. Genetic Testing VII. Pediatrics VIII. Prenatal and Perinatal IX. Professional Issues

The 75th Anniversary of Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

In celebration of the 75th anniversary of The Research Quarterly/Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (RQ/RQES) an analysis was conducted comparing RQ/RQES to numerous other journals in the field with regard to impact factors and citation rates. A series of analyses was conducted from the first publication of RQ/RQES in 1930 through this 75th edition to identify total citations by decade, the top 10 cited papers, top cited papers by decade, the top three papers in 5-year intervals from the 50th anniversary issue in 1980 through 2001, and the outstanding research writing award papers since this award began 23 years ago.

Introduction to the 2004 AIS Award Papers on Innovation in Information Systems Education

This article describes the 2004 AIS Award Papers on Innovation in Information Systems Education. It includes the rationale for the awards and lists the papers selected and the selection committee.

Abstracts from the Eighteenth Annual Education Conference of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (Oakland, California, October 1999)

s from the Eighteenth Annual Education Conference of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (Oakland, California, October 1999) Karen Wcislo and Leah Hoechstetter Abstracts have been arranged by the Abstract Committee into the following categories:s have been arranged by the Abstract Committee into the following categories: I. Award Papers II. Cancer Genetics III. Prenatal and Preconception Issues IV. Clinical Genetics V. Genetic Counseling and Genetic Counselors VI. Genetics Education

Special Section on the 1997 Visual Communications and Image Processing Award Papers

The <i>Journal of Electronic Imaging</i> (JEI), copublished bimonthly with the Society for Imaging Science and Technology, publishes peer-reviewed papers that cover research and applications in all areas of electronic imaging science and technology.

Creativity in MS/OR: Overcoming Barriers to Creativity

Over the years, Gene Woolsey and others have taught us that mathematics and models are not always necessary to solve important problems in MS/OR. Often, the best solutions are novel and unusual—that is, they are creative. The Edelman Award papers often illustrate how even mathematical models can be used creatively. Creativity is a fascinating subject. Years ago in teaching an undergraduate capstone course in management science, I found that learning the principles of creative thinking helped students to address unstructured cases and to apply the traditional operations research problem-solving techniques. I find these principles helpful in explaining, understanding, and enhancing what I do in teaching, research, and consulting. In this series of columns, I plan to discuss many principles of creative thinking and ways in which you can become more creative and enhance your problem-solving skills. I invite you to submit your examples, comments, and perspectives on creativity.

Editorial: On CT Scanning and Metrizamide Myelography. Response from the Authors to Letters Received

The study that received the 1984 Volvo Award in Clinical Science was published in SPINE as a two part report by Wiesel et al (Spine 9:549–551, 1984) and by Bell et al (Spine 9:552-556, 1984), giving the readership an unimpeded view of the work of these unimpeachable investigators. In reaction, the readership submitted a cluster of letters from diverse sources challenging certain aspects of the report. To guarantee an impartial airing of these alternate views, Spine published these letters in an Editorial (Spine 10:691–695,1985) without first presenting them to the authors of the Volvo Award papers. This action was taken to grant the letter writers free expression in their own space and is considered appropriate in light of the fact that the Editor-in-Chief of Spine sits on the Volvo Award Committee where he is free to vote as his judgement dictates. However, as an editor he cannot infer that publication of a work is tantamount to an endorsement, since this would demean the impartiality required to the position. In due course, the authors of the Volvo Award papers at issue have responsed to the Editorial, and Spine herewith provides them with unfettered space to voice their position. Please note that the letter of Dr. Wiesel to Dr. Raskin was his response only to Dr. Raskin's comments. Dr.Wiesel's response to the entire group of letters is included with those of his co-authors. In these times of high technology, there must be both broad and deep discussion of each new advance to establish a proper perspective Spine continues to offer itself as a forum for such exchange.

Scientific Papers to be Presented at the Thirtieth Annual Meeting of the Pacific Coast Fertility Society Mountain Shadows Resort, Scottsdale, Arizona October 13 to 17, 1982

In order to provide Fertility and Sterility readers with descriptive information on the Annual Meeting of the Pacific Coast Fertility Society and in order to assist those planning to attend the Meeting in selecting sessions, abstracts of the papers to be delivered are presented here. Abstracts within each session are published in the order of their scheduled presentation. Abstracts of special lectures, correlated seminars, and prize award papers are not included.

Young scholar award papers wanted

Young scholar award papers wanted

AVCR young scholar award papers are due now

AVCR young scholar award papers are due now

Prize Award Papers - 1967

Prize Award Papers - 1967

Abstracts of Unpublished 1962 Award Papers: THE CHEMISTRY OF INFLAMMATION

Transactions of the New York Academy of SciencesVolume 25, Issue 3 Series II p. 289-291 Abstracts of Unpublished 1962 Award Papers: THE CHEMISTRY OF INFLAMMATION J. C. Houck, J. C. Houck Honorable Mention for the A Cressy Morrison Award in Natural Science. 1962 Biochemical Research Laboratory, Children's Hospital Reaearch Foundation. Washington. D.C.Search for more papers by this author J. C. Houck, J. C. Houck Honorable Mention for the A Cressy Morrison Award in Natural Science. 1962 Biochemical Research Laboratory, Children's Hospital Reaearch Foundation. Washington. D.C.Search for more papers by this author First published: January 1963 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2164-0947.1963.tb01222.x AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Volume25, Issue3 Series IIJanuary 1963Pages 289-291 RelatedInformation

Discussion of Price Policy Award Papers

Discussion of Price Policy Award Papers