4536 Background: While tandem autografts are commonnly used to treat pts with advanced testes cancer, their value vs a single transplant is unknown. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all cases with detailed research data reported to the ABMTR between 1989–2001. Outcomes were analyzed by the actual number of transplants performed and by “intent to treat” for single vs tandem trasnplants. To remove waiting time bias for second transplant, calculations were based on pts alive at 4.3 mos, the longest time between 1st and planned 2nd transplant. Results: A total of 303 pts were reported; 259 were analyzed. Their median age was 32; median time from diagnosis to first transplant was 13 mos and median f/u of survivors was 62 months. Of the 259, 165(64%) underwent one planned transplant, 81 (31%) tandem transplants and 13(5%) underwent only one of two planned transplants. Of pts with non-seminoma, 19, 14 and 33% were in the good, intermediate and poor risk International Prognostic Score groups. First remission transplants were done in 14%, and 41, 20, and 14% were after 1, 2 or 3 salvage attempts. Prior to first transplant 20% were NED, 6% marker positive only, and 74% had measurable disease. Treatment related mortality was 2% at 1 year, while the PFS was 51, and 39% at 1 and 5 years, and the survival (OS) was 72 and 34% respectively. Recurrent cancer was the cause of death in 93%. The groups were balanced for performance status, risk group and seminoma histology. Those receiving one transplant were more likely to be platinum sensitive and to have received more than 2 prior regimens. In univariate analysis, the PFS for pts undergoing one vs both planned transplants was 43 and 34% at 1 and 5 years, and the 5 yr OS were 47 and 35% respectively. For the “intent to treat” analyses, those receiving one planned vs one or both planned tandem transplants, the PFS was 43 and 32% at 5 years, and the 5 yr OS was 47 and 33% respectively. The differences were not statistically different. Conclusions: Tandem transplants appear not to offer significant advantages compared to a single transplant. A prospective randomized trial is warranted. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Consultant or Advisory Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Bristol-Myers Squibb provided a research grant to the American Bone Marrow Transplant Registry for this study