Sir, I read the article written by Parab et al. on the utility of lung ultrasonography to improve the accuracy of traditional clinical methods to confirm position of left sided double lumen tube in elective thoracic surgeries, with great interest.[1] I congratulate them for their magnificent work. I would like to make a few comments. First, in their article, Parab et al. assert “lung ultrasonography (LU) does not detect selective lobar atelectasis. Hence, patients with right-sided double lumen tube (DLT) or with bronchial blocker were not included in this study.” Acosta et al. have tested the accuracy of transthoracic LU for diagnosing anaesthesia-induced atelectasis in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging studies while breathing spontaneously, under sevoflurane anaesthesia. They reported that small anaesthesia-induced atelectasis was represented by juxtapleural consolidations associated with static air bronchograms, absence of A-lines and presence of B-lines. In large atelectatic areas, the absence of lung sliding (LS) and presence of lung pulse sign (LP) could be seen.[2] In critically ill patients, dynamic air bronchogram and LP are two sonographic signs which can be used to distinguish atelectasis from pneumonia. In 2014, Ponsonnard et al. described the value of LU to control right DLT location in 23 patients.[3] They found that for a diagnosis of left lung isolation, sensitivity (S), specificity (E) and negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV) of sonography were 100%. The S of sonographic diagnosis of the right upper lobe (RUL) isolation was 91.67%, E was 100%, NPV and PPV were 91.67% and 100%, respectively. According to them, an isolated RUL cannot be detected when high tidal volumes are used. The hyper insufflation of the lung can reveal LS when actually, it does not exist. Another condition of false positivity (FP) was described by Kaldirim et al.[4] They reported how LS might be a cause of of FP in an oesophageal intubation. They attributed it to a high thoracic pressure induced by increased air in the stomach. LS depends on pulmonary compliance and tidal volume. To solve that problem, one can use a power colour Doppler technique by power slide sign. However, this is time-consuming and it requires some technical skill.[5] On the other hand, LP sign is more commonly seen on the left hemithorax than the right due to the proximity of the heart. For these reasons, one can use a combination between diaphragmatic motion, LS and LP to improve the accuracy of LU to confirm the position of any kind of endotracheal tube.[6] Second, bronchial blockers should be placed under visual guidance of fibreoptic bronchoscope, as a suggestion made by manufacturers and medical literature. To sum up, more studies are needed to determine the role of LU for detecting acute selective lobar atelectasis in thoracic anaesthesia.
Read full abstract