BackgroundCorrection of asymmetry and irregularity deformities with autologous grafts, without osteotomies, offers advantages to both plastic surgeons and patients with severe deviation. Various autologous tissues such as fat, bone, and cartilage grafts are viable options for this purpose. ObjectivesThis study aims to compare the efficacy of three autologous filling materials in patients with bone asymmetry. MethodsA retrospective evaluation was conducted on 297 patients seeking aesthetic nose surgery between 2015 and 2022. Only primary patients without prior surgery, those with bone asymmetry from trauma, dorsum protrusion less than 3 mm, and no osteotomy were included. Patients were divided into fat, cartilage, and bone groups. Grafts were applied to the concave side during closed rhinoplasty, and evaluations were done at 12 months post-surgery by blinded plastic surgeons and patients using established assessment tools. ResultsFat, cartilage, and bone grafts were utilized in 74, 127, and 96 patients respectively, with mean follow-up of 19 months. Mean graft volumes were 1.0 cc (bone), 1.3 cc (cartilage), and 1.6 cc (fat). Patient self-assessment scores were 75%, 84.9%, and 86.6% respectively. Asher-McDade averages were 77.2%, 86.7%, and 88.4%. Cartilage and bone graft results were statistically similar in patient self-evaluation, both significantly higher than fat grafts. Blinded assessments showed no significant difference between cartilage and bone groups. ConclusionPlacing autologous grafts on the concave side for patients with minimal nasal bone protrusion (<3 mm) yields successful results. Cartilage grafts offer advantages in volume, result estimation, and preparation time, suitable for larger patient cohorts.
Read full abstract