Assessment Of Asthma Severity Research Articles

CRP Levels and Vitamin D as Predictors of Asthma Control: A Data-Driven Approach

Background: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways characterized by episodic exacerbations and airflow obstruction. Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels indicate systemic inflammation and are associated with increased disease severity in asthma. Additionally, vitamin D is thought to modulate immune responses and inflammation, potentially influencing asthma control. This study explores the relationships between CRP levels, vitamin D levels, and asthma control, as measured by the Asthma Control Test (ACT). Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to assess the correlation between CRP levels, vitamin D levels, and asthma control in adult patients with asthma. The study aimed to determine whether CRP and vitamin D could serve as predictive markers for asthma control. Methods: This single-center, prospective observational study enrolled 40 adult patients with confirmed asthma from the outpatient pulmonary clinic of ESIC Government Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India. Asthma control was evaluated using the ACT, with scores categorized as well-controlled (ACT ≥ 20) or poorly controlled (ACT < 20). Serum CRP and vitamin D levels were measured using the ELISA method. Pearson’s correlation coefficient and ANOVA were employed to analyze the relationships between these variables. Results: The study found a moderate negative correlation between CRP levels and ACT scores (r = -0.58), indicating that higher CRP levels were associated with poorer asthma control. Patients with CRP levels greater than 10 mg/dL had significantly lower mean ACT scores compared to those with lower CRP levels. In contrast, a strong positive correlation was observed between vitamin D levels and ACT scores (r = 0.879), with higher vitamin D levels associated with better asthma control. The ANOVA test revealed significant differences in ACT scores across different vitamin D and CRP categories (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The study suggests that elevated CRP levels are indicative of poorer asthma control, while higher vitamin D levels are associated with better control of asthma. CRP and vitamin D levels may serve as valuable biomarkers for assessing asthma severity and guiding treatment strategies. However, the variability in response to vitamin D supplementation highlighted the need for personalized approaches to asthma management. Further research is required to confirm these findings and explore the underlying mechanisms.

A protocol for adapting a clinical practice guideline for the treatment of paediatric asthma for the Egyptian Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee

AbstractIntroductionPaediatric asthma is a prevalent and chronic respiratory condition affecting children worldwide. This protocol outlines the methodology for developing a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the management of paediatric asthma. The goal of this guideline is to provide evidence‐based recommendations for healthcare professionals, improving the quality of care and health outcomes for paediatric patients with asthma.MethodsWe will use the ‘Adapted ADAPTE’ adaption method, a systematic approach to adapt existing guidelines, which consists of three phases (setup, adaptation and finalisation phases), nine modules and 24 steps, with adaptations to the process and tools to suit the Egypt healthcare context and resources.QuestionsClinical questions were prepared using the patient population, interventions, professionals, outcomes and healthcare context (PIPOH) model. This CPG protocol addresses critical clinical questions at the heart of effective asthma management in children. It focuses on the diagnosis of paediatric asthma, considering age‐specific clinical presentations and diagnostic tests, assessment of asthma severity, control medications like inhaled corticosteroids, long‐acting β‐agonists and others, with an emphasis on appropriate tools and criteria. The CPG also delves into the realm of long‐term control treatment, exploring the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions, while considering individualised needs. Furthermore, it examines strategies for monitoring and adjusting treatment plans over time, ensuring optimal care. These clinical questions form the foundation of the CPG, facilitating evidence‐based care delivery and enhancing health outcomes for paediatric asthma patients.

Improving asthma outcomes: Clinicians’ perspectives on peripheral airways

Disease of the peripheral (or small) airways is fundamental in asthma, being closely related to symptoms (or lack of control them), airway hyperresponsiveness, spirometric abnormalities, risk of loss of control or exacerbations and inflammation. Current technology now allows routine measurement of peripheral airway function. Having a working concept of peripheral airways disease in asthma is arguably, very useful to clinicians and beneficial to patients because it allows a more comprehensive assessment of asthma severity (rather than just symptoms alone which is the norm), tracking of progress or deterioration and assessing response to treatment. Oscillometry is a sensitive way to monitor the peripheral airways, while multiple breath nitrogen washout parameters are excellent measures of future risk. In the longer term, physiologic measurements will be crucial in research to define causes and find new, disease modifying treatments.

Feasibility and value of a domiciliary spirometry programme in the assessment of severe asthma: a real-world evaluation.

Domiciliary spirometry (DS) is a novel tool that is widely employed in the assessment of respiratory disease. We assessed real-world feasibility, effectiveness and value of a physiologist-led home spirometry programme in patients with treatment-refractory severe asthma. Patients were referred and provided with a hand-held DS device. Patients completed baseline measurements in a physiologist-led virtual clinic and were instructed to provide further values during any periods of respiratory symptoms. Outcome measures included prevalence of new obstructed events, DS adherence and uptake of this approach. 112 patients were enrolled from November 2020 to January 2023. 102 individuals, mean±sd age 44±13 years (86% female) with median (IQR) forced expiratory volume in 1 s % predicted 88% (77-97%), successfully recorded baseline spirometry values. During follow-up (24 months), 11 (11%) were identified with new obstructive spirometry and were subsequently able to be commenced on biologic therapy. Patient engagement was poor with median (IQR) of 4 (2-6) attempts of contact made before baseline values were recorded, and 2 (1-3) attempts required to record technically acceptable values. Continued DS use was suboptimal; 34% failed to use their device after baseline and only 10% continued at the end of the study period. The cost of DS measurements was greater than a single hospital-based visit but enables multiple event capture. Overall, DS measurement uptake was poor, with a minority of patients continuing to use the device at the end of the study period. However, for those that engage, DS provides an alternative approach to traditional hospital-based spirometry measurements that can alter clinical management.

Validation of asthma management approach according to risk factors

Background Although studies show that most people successfully control their asthma, polls consistently show that this is not the case in real life. The present study aimed to validate assessment of asthma control using a risk stratification approach in comparison with global strategy for asthma management and prevention (GINA) guidelines with particular attention to high-risk group of asthmatic patients. Patients and methods This was a prospective interventional cohort trial that enrolled 30 patients with asthma in the outpatient department of Ain Shams University Hospital between January 2019 and January 2020. There were 10 female patients and 20 male patients, with a mean age of 51.43 ± 14.94 years. They were enrolled and randomly grouped 1: 1 into group A, which followed asthma risk stratification therapy (ARST), and group B, with the standard GINA approach, within 1-year follow-up period. Following visit 1 in a 2-week interval as a washout period, there were five consecutive visits on 3 months apart, and then visit 6 at the end of treatment at a 2-week interval. All patients were subjected to the Asthma Control Test Questionnaire for assessment of asthma control by GINA approach and to objective control assessments in ARST by Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 for adherence assessment, pulmonary function test for evaluation of annual decline of forced expiratory volume in the first second, and the annual rate of exacerbations. Results The results obtained from visits 1 to 6 showed nonstatistically significant differences in forced expiratory volume in the first second (75 vs. 81.82 ml, P=0.820) and in adherence scale (Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8) on visits 2–5 (40 vs. 17, P=0465), or the rate of exacerbation (two exacerbations in each group), with no statistically significant differences (0 vs. 13.3%, P=0.143) in group A and group B, respectively. On the contrary, the assessment of severity tools in ARST was based on the level of sustainability of the asthma stepwise categorization among the duration therapy. Using ARST for the aims of control and severity assessments on the studied group, in comparison with the GINA assessment approach, there were highly significant statistical differences in numbers of controlled patients as well as numbers of patients with mild and moderate asthma for severity assessments (t=13.263, P=0.001 vs. t=22.941, P=0.0001, respectively). It could be concluded that applying the GINA approach on studied group A revealed underestimation of control and probably overestimation of asthma severity, or better called asthma stability. Conclusion ARST is noninferior to the GINA approach in the norms of asthma control when objectivity was measured, whereas the levels of sustainability or stability among the duration therapy for assessment of asthma severity were statistically overestimated when measured by GINA. These measures could help most patients with asthma, and there should be a concerted action for their implementation in epidemiological research.

Clinical profiles, healthcare given and hospital outcomes of children hospitalised for acute asthma at a tertiary hospital in Harare, Zimbabwe: a 2010-2020 chart review

Background: Acute asthma is among the commonest medical emergencies that cause repeated presentation to the emergency department and hospitalisation. Several guidelines exist on the management of acute asthma in children. Despite this, evidence from high income countries suggests that practice deviates from standard of care. In low-income countries including most African countries there is paucity of data on the clinical profiles, healthcare given and hospital outcomes of children hospitalised for acute asthma.
 Objectives: This retrospective chart review reports on the clinical profiles, health care given and hospital outcomes of children presenting with acute asthma at a tertiary hospital.
 Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was done on consecutive case files of patients hospitalised for acute asthma in the period January 2010 to December 2020. A standardized electronic data collection tool (REDCap) was used for data abstraction. The data was uploaded onto a REDCap server then onto an excel spreadsheet. Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 16 (SPSS 16.0) was used for descriptive statistics and to test for association between clinical profiles and length of hospital stay. This review was approved by the Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe and Institutional Joint Research Ethical Committee.
 Results: A total of 214 case files were reviewed. The ages of the study participants ranged from2months to 17 years, the median was 3years (Q1=1, Q3=6) and 69% were below 5 years. Of the study population, 15% had their asthma diagnosis made before one year of age and 94% by 6 years. Newly diagnosed asthmatics accounted for 101(47%) of the study population while111(52%) were known asthmatics. Cough, fast breathing, and wheeze were universal presenting symptoms. Severe acute asthma was present in 81% of those who had their asthma severity assessed. Up to 73% of the study population had comorbidities. All patients received nebulised Short Acting B2 Agonist (SABA) in the emergency department and in hospital. Oxygen therapy was given to all the patients who had SpO2 measurement less than 92%. However, assessment of asthma severity was done in only 42%, looking for triggers in only 9%, health education was given to 52%, asthma action plan was given to only 5% and review dates were given to 77% of the study population. The median hospital stay was 3 days (Q1=2,Q3=4) and 2 patients died during the period under review. Having newly diagnosed asthma, younger age, low oxygen saturation at presentation and presence of comorbid conditions was significantly associated with severe acute asthma. Patients with severe acute asthma had longer hospital stay.
 Discussion: This review has revealed that most children with asthma present by 6 years, most have severe acute asthma, co-morbidities, and recurrent hospitalizations due to acute asthma. The care given to children with acute asthma fell short of the standard of care.
 Conclusions: The chart review acts as the basis for corrective interventions including; development of clinical decision-making algorithms, education of health workers, capacitation of health facilities and guidance of future research.

Application of a Cold Dry Air Provocation Test in Pediatric Patients with Asthma.

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease characterized by reversible airway obstruction and airway hyperreactivity. We proposed a cold dry air (CDA) provocation test and investigated its application in pediatric patients with asthma. We enrolled 72 children and adolescents older than 5 years who presented to our hospital with chronic cough, shortness of breath, and wheezing. We analyzed the results of allergy, pulmonary function, methacholine provocation, and CDA provocation tests. The FEV1 change 5 min after the provocation was recorded as CDA5 dFEV1; that after 15 min was recorded as CDA15 dFEV1. PT10 was the provocation time causing a 10% decrease in FEV1; a decrease of >10% in dFEV1 was considered a positive CDA test. Among the 72 subjects, 51 were diagnosed with asthma. A positive CDA test in patients with asthma correlated with non-eosinophilic asthma. In patients with asthma, sputum eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels of the patients with a positive CDA test were significantly lower than those of patients with a negative test. CDA5 dFEV1 correlated with PC20 and total immunoglobulin E. CDA15 dFEV1 correlated with PC20, sputum eosinophils, and ECP. PT10 became shorter as the peripheral blood eosinophil, FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and FEF25-75 decreased. The CDA provocation test showed airway hyperreactivity to non-specific stimuli, a high correlation with non-eosinophilic asthma, and the possibility of assessing asthma severity via PT10.

Severe asthma treatment patterns: A multicenter observational study in the Gulf region

BackgroundWhile crucial to the assessment and improvement of asthma control, insights on treatment practices in patients with severe diseases across Gulf nations are lacking. This observational study describes the treatment patterns of adolescents and adults with severe asthma across four countries of the Gulf region and evaluates current levels of asthma control; quality of life (QoL); exacerbation frequency; and the application of cellular, protein, and respiratory biomarkers in assessing asthma severity and inflammation. MethodsPatients (aged >12 years, body weight ≥40 kg) with clinician-diagnosed, severe asthma (guided by the 2018 Global Initiative for Asthma definition) were included in this cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study conducted in the four Gulf countries of Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. Data on demographics, treatment patterns, and laboratory parameters (blood eosinophil count [BEC], levels of serum immunoglobulin E [IgE], and fractional exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO]) were extracted from the medical records of patients during a 12-month retrospective period and transcribed onto case report forms. At the Enrollment visit, patients assessed their asthma control and QoL with the self-administered Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and a standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ(S)), respectively. ResultsAmong the 243 patients analyzed, (mean [standard deviation (SD)] age, 48.4 [13.9] years; female, 67.5%), the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2 agonist (LABA) combination was the most prescribed asthma medication (n = 240; 98.8%). Most patients were classified as “uncontrolled,” (n = 173; 71.2%) and the majority (n = 206; 84.8%) experienced ≥1 exacerbation(s) in the preceding 12 months. The mean (SD) ACQ score was 2.1 (1.2), which indicated uncontrolled asthma, and the mean (SD) total AQLQ(S) score was 4.7 (1.4), suggesting “some limitation” in overall QoL. BECs during the 12-month period were elevated in most patients (>300 cells/μL [n = 183; 41.7%], 150–300 cells/μL [n = 138; 31.4%], <150 cells/μL [n = 118; 26.9%]), suggesting an eosinophilic asthma phenotype, although no standardized threshold by which to define eosinophilia has yet been confirmed. This study revealed that the biomarkers BEC, serum IgE, and FeNO concentrations were obtained inconsistently by the participating centers. ConclusionsDespite recommended ICS/LABA therapy being prescribed to most patients for their severe disease, the majority experienced uncontrolled asthma and exhibited elevated BECs. These findings indicate the need for enhanced treatment strategies to improve and sustain asthma control in the Gulf region.

Partnering to Improve Pediatric Asthma Quality.

Partnering to Improve Pediatric Asthma Quality.

MicroRNAs-A Promising Tool for Asthma Diagnosis and Severity Assessment: A Systematic Review.

Micro RNAs (miRNAs) are short, non-coding RNAs (Ribonucleic acids) with regulatory functions that could prove useful as biomarkers for asthma diagnosis and asthma severity-risk stratification. The objective of this systematic review is to identify panels of miRNAs that can be used to support asthma diagnosis and severity-risk assessment. Three databases (Medline, Embase, and SCOPUS) were searched up to 15 September 2020 to identify studies reporting differential expression of specific miRNAs in the tissues of adults and children with asthma. Studies reporting miRNAs associations in animal models that were also studied in humans were included in this review. We identified 75 studies that met our search criteria. Of these, 66 studies reported more than 200 miRNAs that are differentially expressed in asthma patients when compared to non-asthmatic controls. In addition, 16 studies reported 17 miRNAs that are differentially expressed with differences in asthma severity. We were able to construct two panels of miRNAs that are expressed in blood and can serve as core panels to further investigate the practicality and efficiency of using miRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers for asthma diagnosis and severity-risk assessment, respectively.

Pathways to Improve Pediatric Asthma Care: A Multisite, National Study of Emergency Department Asthma Pathway Implementation

In this quasi-experimental quality improvement study, researchers examined the effects of clinical pathway implementation on pediatric asthma care in a diverse, national sample of emergency departments (EDs).A total of 83 EDs (37 children’s hospitals and 46 community sites) were enrolled in this study, and 61 participated for the full 15-month study period. These EDs varied in size, location, geography, and ownership. A total of 22 963 children aged 2 to 17 years with a primary diagnosis of asthma were evaluated, with 12 870 treated before and 10 093 treated after pathway implementation. The 2 groups did not differ significantly by age, sex, inhaled steroid use, or insurance type.Each ED received a pathway implementation toolkit including sample evidence-based pathways and order sets. Educational materials included asthma severity tools, chest radiograph ordering criteria, and indications for administering corticosteroids. Participating EDs were also provided additional quality improvement training, educational seminars, a mobile application to view pathway content, and feedback sessions. Before pathway implementation, data on patient encounters were collected retrospectively from chart review. During the pathway implementation period, data were prospectively collected.Pathway implementation was associated with an increased odds of systemic corticosteroid administration within the first hour of ED arrival (odds ratio [OR]: 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02 to 1.55) and increased odds of asthma severity assessment at triage (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.22 to 1.90). Data also revealed a weak but statistically significant decrease in odds of hospital admission (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95 to 0.99). This represents an overall 1% decrease in hospital admissions and/or ED transfers. There was no change observed in the use of chest radiographs or ED length of stay.Overall, this study revealed that clinical pathway implementation can improve adherence to guideline-directed management by increasing the rate of asthma severity assessment and improve patient outcomes by decreasing time to corticosteroid administration across a diverse array of ED settings. Although this study revealed a statistically significant decrease (1%) in hospital admission and/or ED transfer on aggregate, the data reveal a highly variable impact on individual EDs.Previous single-site studies have revealed that pathway implementation and targeted education measures can improve quality of pediatric asthma care. This study, which included both academic and community EDs, is the first to reveal the generalizability of pathway implementation on asthma management. Further studies are needed to determine which specific pathway components are most impactful in improving pediatric asthma care in the ED setting.

Managing an acute asthma exacerbation in children.

Children and youth with acute asthma exacerbations frequently present to an emergency department with signs of respiratory distress. The most severe episodes are potentially life-threatening. Effective treatment depends on the accurate and rapid assessment of disease severity at presentation. This statement addresses the assessment, management, and disposition of paediatric patients with a known diagnosis of asthma who present with an acute asthma exacerbation. Guidance includes the assessment of asthma severity, treatment considerations, proper discharge planning, follow-up, and prescription for inhaled corticosteroids to prevent exacerbation and decrease chronic morbidity.

The predective role of neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio in bronchial asthma

Abstract Background Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is an easy and rapid biomarker measured in peripheral blood, and plays a helpful role in assessing prognosis of bronchial asthma and its severity. Aim To assess NLR levels among atopic asthmatics, non-atopic asthmatics and healthy controls. Patient and methods The study included 120 asthmatic patients and 60 healthy control. Results A highly significant difference was observed between asthmatic patients and healthy controls regarding neutrophil\lymphocyte ratio (p &amp;lt; 0.0001). Conclusion Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is useful to assess asthma severity.

Impact of prehospital pediatric asthma management protocol adherence on clinical outcomes

Objective: To evaluate the frequency of EMS protocol non-adherence during pediatric asthma encounters and its association with emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) and hospital admission. Methods: This is a retrospective review of asthma encounters aged 2–17 years transported by EMS to a pediatric ED from 2012 to 2017. Our primary outcome was hospital admission based on prehospital protocol adherence defined as: (1) bronchodilator administration, (2) treatment of hypoxia with oxygen, or (3) administration of intramuscular (IM) epinephrine in encounters with high severity of distress. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the association between protocol non-adherence and hospital admission. Results: During the study period, 290 EMS encounters met inclusion criteria. Median age was 9 years (IQR 5–12), 63% were male, 40% had moderate to severe exacerbations, and 24% were admitted. Protocol non-adherence occurred in 32% of encounters with failure to administer bronchodilators in 27% and failure to administer IM epinephrine when indicated in 83%. Prehospital steroids were administered in 8% of encounters. After adjusting for covariates, protocol non-adherence was not statistically associated with likelihood of inpatient admission (OR 1.3; 95% CI: 0.6–2.6). Conclusions: Among prehospital pediatric asthma encounters, EMS protocol non-adherence is common but not associated with a higher frequency of hospital admission. Hospital admission was associated with acute exacerbation severity suggesting further research is needed to develop a valid prehospital asthma severity assessment scoring tool. Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at publisher’s website.

Use of the composite asthma severity index in a pediatric subspecialty clinic

BackgroundThe Composite Asthma Severity Index (CASI) is a comprehensive tool to assess asthma severity, which has been applied in the research setting. ObjectiveTo evaluate, in an outpatient setting, whether a CASI score accurately predicts asthma severity or control as determined by means of subspecialist assessment. Asthma Control Test (ACT) and childhood ACT (C-ACT) scores were generated to provide additional context for CASI scores in relationship to assessments using another clinical tool. MethodsChildren aged 5 to 18 years with a physician diagnosis of persistent asthma were recruited from a tertiary care center. A pediatric pulmonologist made determinations on each participant’s asthma severity and control during a clinic visit. A CASI and ACT/C-ACT score was generated for each patient. Logistic regression and Spearman correlations were used to determine how well CASI scores predicted physician assessments. Agreement between ACT/C-ACT scores and physician assessment of asthma control was determined in supplemental analyses. ResultsCASI scores strongly predicted physician assessment of severity (Spearman correlation = 0.61, P < .001); unadjusted odds ratio (OR) equal to 36.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.83-152.34); and adjusted OR equal to 32.76 (95% CI: 85.70-188.44). In supplemental analyses, ACT/C-ACT scores strongly predicted physician assessment of control (Spearman correlation = 0.72, P < .001) with an unadjusted OR equal to 42.12 (95% CI: 13.34-133.00) and adjusted OR equal to 55.34 (95% CI: 13.62-224.89). ConclusionUse of the CASI was feasible and accurately predicted physician assessments of asthma severity and control in this sample, which are not distinct entities. The CASI is a robust tool that may be used successfully in ambulatory pediatric asthma care.

Quality of care in the management of asthmatic children with regard to compliance with the guidelines in in-ward setting in a district of Sri Lanka: a descriptive study

Introduction: The quality of paediatric asthma management in the in-ward settings has not been assessed in Sri Lanka. Objectives: To describe the quality of care in the management of asthmatic children with regard to compliance with the guidelines Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out in state hospitals with paediatric units in a district of Sri Lanka. A sample of 577 children diagnosed by a consultant paediatrician was selected. Eleven indicators were chosen by modified Delphi technique. Data collection instruments were an interviewer-administered questionnaire and a record sheet. Compliance with guidelines according to 11 indicators was expressed in percentages. Results: The assessment of acute severity was 100%. The use of systemic corticosteroid at first prescription was 88.9% (n=513), whereas it was 69% (n=398) with oral steroid therapy and 54.5% (n=315) with long-term use of steroid inhaler. Assessment of chronic asthma severity was 31.2% (n=180). Caregivers who had received health education on triggering factors of asthma, on what to do during an asthma attack, and how to use the inhaler were 62.0% (n=358), 37.1% (214) and 68.8% (n=217), respectively. All patients have been issued a diagnosis card on discharge and among them, 74.4% (n=429)received a complete discharge summary and 90.6% (n=523) were scheduled for follow up appointments. Conclusions: Assessment of acute severity of asthma and the provision of diagnosis card on discharge were exceptional. Assessment of the severity of chronic asthma and providing health education for caregivers should be improved. Prescribing long term use of a steroid inhaler is to be revised.

Are the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Guidelines Being Correctly Used to Diagnose Severe Asthma in the UAE?

ObjectivesWe aimed to identify the percentage inaccuracy in classifying asthma severity as severe asthma based on the 2019 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines criteria, at Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, and make recommendations to improve the assessment of asthma severity.MethodsAll asthma patients that attended the Pulmonology clinic or the Allergy clinic from May 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed to identify which asthma patients classified as having severe asthma according to the 2019 GINA guidelines criteria. We then calculated the percentage inaccuracy associated with giving diagnoses of severe asthma.ResultsWe retrospectively analyzed a total of 902 patients, and out of those, we identified 334 as patients with severe asthma according to the 2019 GINA guidelines criteria. Of those 334 patients, 218 were given an incorrect asthma severity of either mild (N=14), moderate (N=203), or unspecified asthma severity (N=1) in the hospital’s electronic records. This represents a percentage inaccuracy of 65.3% in classifying asthma severity as severe asthma. Fluticasone propionate-salmeterol was the most used ICS-LABA (inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta-agonist) medication in the severe asthma group (58.1%). Fluticasone furoate-vilanterol was identified as the most incorrectly prescribed ICS-LABA medication (68.2%).ConclusionWe identified an inaccuracy of 65.3% in classifying asthma severity as severe at our hospital. This inaccuracy is associated with a lack of understanding of the GINA guidelines by clinicians, as well as a lack of acceptance of some of the criteria in the GINA guidelines by patients. We have made recommendations to help improve the accuracy of asthma severity assessment, in order to be fully adherent to the GINA guidelines criteria.

Assessment of asthma severity according to treatment steps in Japanese pediatric patients: a descriptive cross-sectional study using an administrative claims database

Objectives Japan has one of the highest asthma prevalence rates in Asia; however, there is a lack of epidemiological studies on asthma among children in Japan. This study aimed to describe the severity of asthma and the prescription patterns for its treatment among pediatric patients, by using a large-scale claims database. Methods The analysis datasets were extracted from the JMDC database for the period of April 1, 2009 to March 30, 2015; included records were restricted to patients between 2 and 15 years of age. The Japanese Pediatric Guidelines for the treatment and management of asthma (JPGL) steps were used as a proxy for asthma treatment and severity. We also described the characteristics of asthma in children by stratifying the prevalence and incidence cohorts by index years. Results In the prevalence cohort (56% male), from 2010 to 2014, approximately 80–90% of the children received step 1 or 2 treatment, with the remainder receiving step 3 or 4 treatment, as defined by the JPGL. The majority (approximately 90%) of patients visited clinics for asthma treatment, while a minority visited hospitals. Conclusions Our study showed the severity of asthma among Japanese pediatric patients, as well as their demographic characteristics, using a large-scale claims database. The majority of pediatric asthma patients received treatment for mild-to-moderate asthma, while less than 10% received treatment for severe asthma.

Post hoc analysis of initial treatments and control status in the INITIAL study: an observational study of newly diagnosed patients with asthma

BackgroundThe 12-week, multicentre, observational INITIAL study (NCT02143739) assessed asthma severity in newly diagnosed Chinese patients.MethodsPost hoc analysis of medication combinations prescribed per routine clinical practice at baseline, and the impact on control levels evaluated using 2012 vs 2018 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria.ResultsIn total, 4491 patients were included in the analysis. At baseline, intermittent, mild, moderate and severe asthma was reported in 3.9, 12.0, 22.6 and 61.6% of patients, respectively. Most patients (90.2%) were prescribed inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2 agonist (ICS/LABA). ICS/LABA plus ≥1 additional medication(s) was prescribed to 66.7% of patients, with leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA, 54.7%) being the most common additional medication. Distribution of ICS/LABA vs ICS/LABA+LTRA was comparable in patients with intermittent (3.2% vs 3.0%), mild (11.5% vs 9.7%), moderate (21.2% vs 19.9%) and severe asthma (64.1% vs 67.4%). Control levels among patients using ICS/LABA+LTRA vs ICS/LABA were comparable using GINA 2012 and lower using GINA 2018 criteria.The proportion of patients using ICS/LABA+LTRA vs ICS/LABA with intermittent, mild, moderate and severe asthma controlled at Week 12 (using GINA 2012) were 78.1% vs 80.0, 86.5% vs 85.8, 78.5% vs 71.3, and 59.6% vs 61.8%, respectively. Using GINA 2018 criteria proportions were 86.8% vs 95.9, 86.1% vs 93.2, 82.1% vs 85.3, and 71.9% vs 77.6%, respectively.ConclusionsAsthma control was not improved by adding LTRA to ICS/LABA and may have been unnecessary for some newly diagnosed patients. These findings were irrespective of the GINA criteria (2012 vs 2018) used and baseline severity.

The Correlation Between Asthma Severity and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio

Background—The prognosis is essential in management and follows up of asthmatic patients. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is considered as the common prognostic marker for many diseases especially the asthma. Aim of study—To assess the relationship between asthma severity and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in comparison to healthy controls. Patients and methods—This study is a cross sectional study conducted in Respiratory Consultancy Clinic in Baghdad Teaching Hospital in Medical City during the period from 1st of October, 2018 to 31st of March, 2019 on sample of 50 asthmatic patients and 50 healthy controls. The diagnosis of asthma was confirmed by the supervisor through clinical symptoms, signs, spirometery with reversibility test (according to GINA guideline.). Results—A highly significant difference was observed between asthmatic cases and controls regarding age (p&lt;0.001). A significant association was observed between obesity and asthmatic cases (p=0.001). There was a highly significant association between high neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and asthmatic cases (p&lt;0.001). The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio was significantly increased with advanced age, females, severe and uncontrolled asthma. Conclusions—The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is useful biomarker in assessment of asthma severity.