Countless miles of aged interstate highway pavement in the United States and significant expenditures associated with reconstruction highlight the importance of cost-effective rehabilitation measures. However, the prescription of ill-posed rehabilitation strategies due to improper assessment can be costly. This paper details a forensic investigation of a 22.5-km (14-mi) stretch of interstate highway in Oklahoma, consisting of multiple asphalt concrete (AC) overlays accumulated over a 40-year period. A thorough nondestructive investigation was carried out using falling weight deflectometer testing and ground penetrating radar. This was followed by a detailed invasive investigation involving coring, drilling and sampling, laboratory testing, and trenching. The pavement profile deduced from nondestructive test results alone failed to reveal a significantly weakened subsurface AC layer that was clearly revealed during invasive testing. Mechanistic analysis of the perceived pavement and actual pavement profiles reveal a significant difference in fatigue life. The reliance on nondestructive testing alone for pavement analysis and rehabilitation design would have been in significant error.
Read full abstract