Arthroscopic Suture Anchor Research Articles

Arthroscopic Suture Anchor Scapholunate Capsulodesis

Abstract Background: A retrospective review was performed of 15 adult patients who underwent arthroscopic suture anchor scapholunate capsuloligamentous repair between 2021 and 2023. Patient/Methods/Results: There were 12 male and 3 female patients, with a mean age of 44.9 years. Eight patients had European Wrist Arthroscopy Society (EWAS) II (Geissler II), four patients had EWAS IIIC (Geissler III), and three patients had EWAS IV (Geissler IV). After a follow-up of 12 months (12–26), the mean grip strength significantly improved by 131% compared with presurgery. There was a significant improvement in the visual analog scale score from 6 to 1.2, the Mayo Wrist Score from 43.5 to 86.5, and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire score from 65.9 to 6.5. Two EWAS IV patients had recurrent symptomatic scapholunate diastasis requiring scapholunate ligamentoplasty. Conclusion: The arthroscopic dorsal scapholunate capsuloligamentous repair with suture anchors is a reliable and safe technique with minimal complications. It is recommended for reducible acute or chronic injury to the scapholunate ligament complex with suspected avulsion injury. Level Of Evidence: Level IV

Arthroscopic suture anchor fixation results in similar clinical outcomes, less range of motion limitation, but poorer quality of reduction compared to open screw fixation for acute large anterior glenoid rim fractures

BackgroundThe purpose of the present study was to retrospectively compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic suture anchor fixation and open screw fixation for acute large anterior glenoid rim fractures. MethodsThis study enrolled patients with acute large anterior glenoid rim fractures treated with arthroscopic suture anchor fixation (group A) or open screw fixation (group O) from January 2013 to June 2020 with a minimum follow-up of＞2 years. The Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Rowe score, Constant score, range of motion (ROM), recurrent instability rate, and complications were recorded as clinical results. The quality of the postoperative reduction, reconstructed glenoid sizes, rate of fracture healing, and progression of osteoarthritis (OA) were evaluated as radiological outcomes. ResultsThis retrospective study included 66 patients, including 37 in Group A and 29 in Group O with a mean follow-up of 46.9 (range, 24.3-94.2) months and a mean patient age of 46.8 (range, 21-69) years. No significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes between the two groups. A significant ROM limitation in all planes was found in both groups and group O showed more limitations in external rotation at the side (ERs) (18° vs. 10°, P = 0.002). The reduction quality was better in group O (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of reconstructed glenoid size (101.6% ± 4.6% vs. 100.6% ± 7.1%, P = 0.460) and the rate of OA progression (26.9% vs. 20%, P = 0.525). ConclusionArthroscopic suture anchor fixation and open screw fixation achieved similar clinical outcomes, reconstructed glenoid sizes, and OA progression in patients with acute large anterior glenoid rim fractures. Arthroscopic suture fixation showed a poorer quality of reduction but less ERs limitations.

Arthroscopic pullout repair versus suture anchor repair for medial meniscus posterior root tear combined with high tibial osteotomy

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of pullout repair with a metal button and suture anchor repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears in patients undergoing high tibial osteotomy with varus alignment. MethodsPatients who underwent arthroscopic pullout repair (P group) and suture anchor repair (SA group) in combination with open-wedge high tibial osteotomy between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively examined. Patients who received second-look arthroscopy at 1 year and at least 2 years of follow up were included. Structural healing (complete/partial or failed healing) and chondral lesions at the initial surgery and the second-look arthroscopy, radiographic parameters around the knee, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale (before and 2 years after surgery) were compared. ResultsA total of 88 patients (68 women/20 men, mean age 61.1 ± 7.9 years old) were included in the analysis. Of these, 51 patients underwent pullout repair, while the other 37 underwent suture anchor repair. The SA group showed a significantly higher rate of complete healing (64.9%) than the P group (21.6%, P < 0.001). The Lysholm score significantly improved after surgery in both treatment groups. At the final follow up, the SA group had a significantly higher Lysholm score (89.6 ± 10.7) than the P group (80.9 ± 17.4, P = 0.011). ConclusionArthroscopic suture anchor repair had superior healing status and Lysholm Score in comparison with pullout repair with a metal button, as it achieved better tension adjustment. This result is meaningful particularly when medial meniscus root repair and high tibial osteotomy are performed simultaneously.

Arthroscopic Bone Block Cerclage Suture Fixation of Fresh Distal Tibial Allograft for Anterior Glenoid Reconstruction

Glenoid bone loss in patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability poses a unique challenge to treating surgeons. Various bone block procedures have been used to reconstruct the glenoid, including autologous coracoid transfer, iliac crest autograft, distal clavicle autograft, and distal tibia allograft. Distal tibia allograft has been increasingly used because of its advantages over autologous graft sources. Having started out as an open procedure, glenoid reconstruction with distal tibia allograft has now found its way to evolving into an arthroscopic procedure. Various techniques have been devised for arthroscopic distal tibia allograft fixation, including screw, suture anchor, and suture button. This technical note describes an arthroscopic distal tibia allograft fixation technique, using a transglenoid parallel drill guide and 2 cerclage tape sutures that are fastened using a tensioner. This technique provides strong graft fixation while avoiding the potential complications and technical challenges of metal screw fixation.

Comparison between arthroscopic suture anchor fixation and open plate fixation in the greater tuberosity fracture of the proximal humerus.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (OR/IF) using a plate or patients undergoing an arthroscopic suture anchor fixation for the greater tuberosity (GT) fracture of the proximal humerus. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing OR/IF or an arthroscopic suture anchor fixation for the GT fracture. Between January, 2010 and December, 2020, 122 patients with GT fracture underwent operative fixation. Either OR/IF using proximal humeral locking plate (50 patients) or arthroscopic suture anchor (72 patients) fixation was performed. Fourteen patients were lost to follow-up and finally, 108 patients were enrolled in this study. We divided these patients into two groups: (1) OR/IF group (Group I: 44 patients) and arthroscopic anchor fixation group (Group II: 64 patients). The primary outcome was subjective shoulder function (shoulder functional scale). Secondary outcomes were range of motion, and complications including GT fixation failure, fracture migration, or neurologic complication. Also, age, sex, BMI, operation time, shoulder dislocation, fracture comminution, AP (anteroposterior), SI (superoinferior) size and displacement were evaluated and compared between two groups. Both groups showed satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Between 2 groups, there were no significant differences in age, sex, BMI, presence of shoulder dislocation or comminution. Group II showed higher clinical scores except VAS score (p < 0.05) and longer surgical times (95.3 vs. 61.5min). Largest fracture displacement (Group I vs. II: SI displacement: 40 vs. 13mm, and AP displacement: 49 vs. 11mm) and higher complication rate (p = 0.049) was found in Group I. Both arthroscopic anchor fixation and open plate fixation methods showed satisfactory outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Among them, OR/IF is preferred for larger fracture displacement (> 5mm) and shorter operation time However, arthroscopic anchor fixation group showed better clinical outcomes and less complications than the OR/IF group. Level 4, Case series with subgroup analysis.

Original surgical technique for the treatment of patellofemoral instability after failure of conservative treatment

IntroductionAcute patellar dislocation is a common but serious injury that can significantly impact a patient's functional prognosis. The objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and plication of the medial patellar retinaculum using suture anchors in adolescent patients with first-time acute patellar dislocation (APD) and MPFL insertion injury. HypothesisTightening repair of the medial retinaculum complex can result in favorable clinical and functional outcomes in this patient population. Materials and methodsA total of 84 adolescent patients with first-time APD and with an average age of 15.5 years (10-22) were included in the study. Of these patients, 61 (7 male and 54 female) underwent arthroscopic suture anchor plication for medial patellar retinaculum, while the other 23 were successfully treated non-operatively. Radiographic outcomes, including the congruence angle (CA), lateral patellofemoral angle (LPA), and patellar tilt angle (PTA), were evaluated preoperatively and at the last follow-up visit in the surgical group. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Lille Patello-Femoral Score, Lysholm Score, and Kujala Score at the same time points. In addition, the surgical and non-operative treatment success groups were compared in terms of both radiographic and functional outcomes. ResultsMean follow-up was 40.9 months (24–60). Fifty-nine knees showed excellent or good results postoperatively, 2 patients had a recurrent patellar subluxation. The Lille Patello-Femoral Score was 96.9±4.7 at the last follow-up. The subjective Lysholm Score and Kujala Score improved significantly, from 58.6 to 91.9 and from 60.4 to 88.9, respectively. The radiographic CA, LPA and PTA improved significantly, from 19.8±2.1° to –6.7±1.7°, from –7.4±2.2° to 5.7±1.8° and from 23.8±2.9° to 12.3±2.3°, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in functional and radiographic assessments between the success with non-operative treatment group and the surgery group. ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that arthroscopic MPFL insertion reconstruction and plication using suture anchors, which is less invasive and improves patella stability, can lead to favorable clinical and functional outcomes in adolescent patients with first-time acute patellar dislocation and insertion injury. This treatment approach should be considered as a viable option for this patient population. Level of evidenceIV; monocentric retrospective descriptive study.

Does the immediate repair of Bankart lesion following first dislocation reduce the chances of recurrence after arthroscopic repair in soldiers?

The study attempted to compare the effects of immediate and delayed arthroscopic Bankart repair on the shoulder dislocation recurrence. In total, 465 soldiers with first-time anterior shoulder dislocation were included in the study. Of the total, 285 soldiers underwent a quick arthroscopic Bankart repair procedure, whether 180 soldiers underwent a delayed repair procedure. The initial dislocation was traumatic in both groups and operated using the standard arthroscopic suture anchor repair technique. Patient's age, repair time since the first dislocation, number of dislocations before surgery, number of suture anchors used during the repair, duration of surgical procedure, duration from surgery to return to work, and recurrence of dislocation after surgery were recorded. Rowe score, Constant score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score were used for clinical assessment. The operating time and recurrence rate were higher in the group subjected to delayed repair procedure than in the group subjected to immediate repair procedure. Repair timing was found to be crucial for a successful outcome. The findings suggest that Bankart repair must be performed immediately to minimize recurrence and other degenerative changes, which may require an additional surgical procedure for satisfactory repair. More studies are required to reach a definitive conclusion. Level III.

Comparative outcomes between all-inside arthroscopic suture anchor technique versus arthroscopic transosseous suture technique in patients with triangular fibrocartilage complex tear: a retrospective comparative study

BackgroundTriangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) has become an interest over the last few decades, discovering its understanding in anatomy, pathomechanism, biomechanics, and management in treatments. Currently, TFCC does not have a golden standard procedure, and not one surgical procedure is superior to the other. This study is to evaluate the comparative outcomes in TFCC patients that underwent either in all-inside arthroscopic suture anchors or the arthroscopic transosseous suture technique.MethodFrom 2017 to 2019, 30 patients were analyzed. Eight patients were in an arthroscopic transosseous group and 22 patients were in an all-inside arthroscopic group. Comparison between patients’ flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and visual analog pain scale (VAS) preoperative and six-month follow-up were analyzed.ResultThere were significant increases in flexion ROM, extension ROM, and VAS between preoperative and postoperative in all-inside arthroscopic and arthroscopic transosseous. Only the all-inside arthroscopic group had a significant increase in grip strength. Postoperative flexion ROM had a significant difference between all-inside arthroscopic and arthroscopic transosseous.ConclusionBoth the all-inside arthroscopic suture anchor technique and the arthroscopic transosseous suture technique are appropriate treatments to treat patients with TFCC. Both procedures have achieved the ultimate goal of improved longevity and optimal function.Level of evidenceLevel III; retrospective comparative cohort study.

Arthroscopic Suture Anchor Design Finite Element Study

AIM: This in-vitro study investigated arthroscopic suture anchors’ main design parameters effect on surrounding bone. METHODS: Thirty-dimensional arthroscopic suture anchor designs’ models were created on engineering CAD software by changing thread profile, pitch, and anchor tip profile as design parameters. These models were imported into ANSYS Workbench for finite element analysis. Bone was simplified and modeled as two coaxial cylinders. Tensile vertical load of 300 N, and oblique at 45º to the vertical axis, were applied to each model as two loading conditions while the simplified bone base was fixed in place as a boundary condition. RESULTS: The finite element analyses on all models under both loading conditions showed stresses within physiological limits on bone. Trapezoidal teeth and inclined cut teeth designs showed the lowest values of stresses and deformations respectively on the bone under oblique loads, while curved tooth and square tooth designs showed the lowest values of stresses and deformations respectively on the bone under vertical loads. General ascending or descending trend was recorded by increasing pitch from 1.2 to 1.5 to 1.8 mm on the total deformation and maximum Von Mises stress on bone and anchor body. Tapered tip slightly increased bone and anchor stresses. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic anchors thread profile has minor affect on cortical bone behavior. Trapezoidal teeth, square tooth, and inclined cut teeth profiles showed the lowest values of stresses and deformations on cortical bone. Increasing thread pitch of arthroscopic suture anchors increases or decreases stress on the bone, and anchor body according to thread profile edges. Anchor tip profile negligibly affects both deformations and stresses on bone and anchor body.

A retrospective comparative study on arthroscopic suture anchors repair and tendon debridementversusarthroscopic tendon debridement for treatment of recalcitrant lateral epicondylitis

Aim:To compare the outcomes between the arthroscopic debridement of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) tendon alone and repairs to the ECRB tendon with suture anchor for the treatment of refractory lateral epicondylitis (LE).Methods:We retrospectively reviewed our patients who underwent arthroscopic surgical treatment for refractory LE by a single surgeon from January 2008 to June 2018 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The visual analog scale (VAS), the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) scale, the Verhaar scoring system and the time of back to work were compared between two groups.Results:Both groups showed a significant postoperative improvement regarding the VAS, MEPS, DASH, PRTEE and the Verhaar scoring system (p < 0.05). The repair group showed better results regarding the MEPS, DASH, PRTEE and Verhaar scoring system comparing with the debridement group, which were statically significant (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the VAS both at rest and activity at the final follow-up. There were no significant differences for the average time for return to work (p = 0.229). There were 11 patients in the debridement group and six patients in the repair group, who completed the MRI evaluation at 6 months postoperatively.Conclusion:Compared with arthroscopic release and debridement of the ECRB tendon, arthroscopic suture anchor repairing of the origin of the ECRB tendon provides better outcomes when addressing the refractory LE.Level of Evidence:Case Series: Level IV

Arthroscopic repair of acute bony Bankart lesions: An analysis of risk factors for instability recurrence

Purpose. To determine clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with acute bony Bankart lesions treated via the arthroscopic approach and evaluate the hypothesis that instability recurrence is associated with fragment reduction quality and/or glenoid defect. Material and Methods . Between 2008 to 2013, 27 patients (mean age 24.3 years) were examined before, and (on average) 29 months after, arthroscopic repair. Inclusion criteria were acute bony Bankart lesions, glenoid osseous defects of less than 20%, and postoperative follow-up period of at least 24 months. Functional recovery was assessed using the Rowe, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), and UCLA shoulder rating scales. Computed tomography scans were used to evaluate reduction and healing of bony fragments. Cases of instability recurrence were documented. Results. Postoperative mean Rowe score was 90.4 points (range, 35 to 100 points), the mean WOSI was 282.0 (range, 25-1100 points), and the mean UCLA was 28.5 points (range, 15 to 35 points). The recurrence rate of shoulder instability was 7.4% (2/27), which only occurred in cases of fragment malposition. The average loss of external rotation was 5o at 0o of abduction, and 7o at 90o of abduction. Twenty three patients (85.19%) returned to preinjury sport level. Radiological assessment revealed complete union of the bony fragment in all cases. Conclusion . Arthroscopic reduction and suture anchor fixation of acute bony Bankart lesions yield excellent outcomes providing a low recurrence instability and high bone union rates. In addition, non-anatomical reduction of the bony fragment is a reliable risk factor for instability recurrence in acute cases.

Supraspinatus tendon transosseous vs anchor repair surgery: a comparative study of mechanical recovery in the rabbit

BackgroundSupraspinatus (SSP) tendon ruptures requiring surgical repair are common. Arthroscopic suture anchor fixation has gradually replaced transosseous repair in supraspinatus tendon tear. Our objective was to compare mechanical properties between transosseous and anchor supraspinatus repair in the first 6 postoperative weeks in a rabbit model.MethodsOne hundred and fifty-two rabbits had one supraspinatus tendon repaired either with an anchor suture 1 week after detachment or with transosseous sutures. Rabbits were euthanized at 0, 1, 2, 4 or 6 postoperative weeks. Experimental and contralateral tendons (304 tendons) were mechanically tested to failure. Data are expressed as percent of contralateral.ResultsAnchor repair had higher loads to failure compared to transosseous repair, at immediate repair (week 0, 52 ± 21% vs 25 ± 17%, respectively; p = 0.004) and at 1 postoperative week (64 ± 32% vs 28 ± 10%; p = 0.003) with no difference after 2 weeks. There was no difference in stiffness. Transosseous repairs showed higher rates of midsubstance failures compared to anchor repairs at 1 (p = 0.004) and 2 postoperative weeks (p < 0.001). Both transosseous and anchor repairs restored supraspinatus mechanical properties after 4 postoperative weeks.ConclusionAnchor repair provided better initial tensile strength while transosseous repair led to a faster normalization (namely, midsubstance) of the mode of failure. Research to optimize supraspinatus repair may need to consider the advantages from both surgical approaches.

Traumatic avulsion of the anterior medial meniscus root combined with PCL injury: a case report

BackgroundAvulsion of the anterior medial meniscus root (AMMR) has a low incidence rate, especially when it is combined with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury, which hasn’t been reported in any literature to date. The aim of this study was to share our experience in the diagnosis and treatment of a patient with traumatic avulsion of AMMR combined with PCL injury.Case presentationThis article reports a 26-year-old male patient diagnosed with traumatic avulsion of the AMMR with PCL injury. After arthroscopic surgery, he achieved remission of symptoms and recovery of functions.ConclusionsAnterior meniscus root injuries are relatively rare. Its diagnosis can be made preliminarily based on clinical manifestations, physical examinations, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and then confirmed by arthroscopic exploration. Arthroscopic suture anchor fixation of the injured anterior meniscus horn shows a good therapeutic effect.

The Arthroscopic “Montgolfier Double-Row Knotless” Rotator Cuff Repair Technique

Contemporary arthroscopic double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repairs have superior biomechanics compared with prior iterations. Numerous techniques have been described, but consensus regarding value has yet to be established. We describe an effective and easily reproducible technique: the arthroscopic “Montgolfier double-row” repair technique. This knotless construct has an evenly distributed, load-sharing, radially oriented suture limb configuration much like the envelope cables of a Montgolfier hot-air balloon, its namesake. Other advantages include the ability to apply manual, progressive and calculated tension on each suture limb and easy intraoperative modification depending on tear size, shape, and delamination, as well as tissue tension and quality. Future studies are needed to validate the biomechanics and clinical outcomes of this technique.

Arthroscopic Knotless, Tensionable All-Suture Anchor Bankart Repair

Surgical management for glenohumeral instability has advanced to provide stronger fixation and to be less invasive. Arthroscopic suture anchor repair has been the gold standard for isolated capsulolabral tears over the years. Despite the ability of the solid suture anchors to handle physiologic load, they can present challenges such as chondral damage due to anchor size and imperfect angulation, osteolysis, anchor breakage, revision drilling, difficulty of revision surgery with accompanied bone loss, and compromised postoperative magnetic resonance imaging quality. Recently, knotless all-suture anchors have been introduced as a technique to overcome these challenges. These anchors lack a rigid component and can be placed in a tunnel of smaller diameter, thereby allowing for maintenance of glenoid bone stock. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe our preferred surgical technique with a minimally invasive approach for the fixation of capsulolabral tears using a knotless all-suture anchor construct.

Single versus double row suture anchor fixation for greater tuberosity fractures \u2013 a biomechanical study

BackgroundFractures of the humeral greater tuberosity (GT) are a frequent injury progressively treated with arthroscopic suture anchor repair. Yet, no biomechanical study has been performed comparing fixation strength of arthroscopic single- (SR) vs. double row (DR) fixation.MethodsStandardized fractures of the greater tuberosity were created in 12 fresh frozen proximal humeri. After random assignation to the SR or DR group the fixed humeri were tested applying cyclic loading to the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon. Load to failure and fragment displacement were assessed by means of an electrodynamic material testing machine using an optical tracking system.ResultsLoad to failure values were higher in the DR group (649 N; ±176) than in the SR group (490 N; ±145) however without statistical significance (p = .12). In greater tuberosity displacement of 3–5 mm surgical treatment is recommended. The fixing constructs in this study did not reach displacement landmarks of 3 or 5 mm before construct failure as shown in previous studies. Thus the applied traction force (N) at 1 mm displacement was analyzed. In the SR group the load at 1 mm displacement was 277 N; ±46 compared to 260 N; ±62 in the DR group (p = .65).ConclusionThe results suggest that both techniques are viable options for refixation of greater tuberosity fractures.Level of Evidence: Laboratory study.

Clinical research on suture anchor fixation for the treatment of avulsion fracture of tibial intercondylar eminence under arthroscopy

To evaluate the early clinical effects of suture anchor fixation for the treatment of avulsion fracture of tibial intercondylar eminence under arthroscopy. From July 2012 to January 2015, 22 patients with the avulsion fracture of tibial intercondylar eminence were treated with arthroscopic suture anchor fixation. There were 12 males and 10 females, with an average age of 22.8 years old(ranged, 18 to 33 years old). Nine patients had the fractures in the right knee and 13 patients had the fractures in the left knee. The mean duration from injury to surgery was 6.8 days(ranged, 3 to 11 days). According to the improved Meyers-McKeever classification, 13 cases were type II, 7 cases were type III, and 2 cases were type IV. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by the range of motion, the Lysholm score, the IKDC 2000 subjective knee score, the axial shift test, and the anterior drawer test. All the incisions healed by first intention, and no complications occurred. All the patients were followed up, and the mean duration was 32.8 months (ranged, 18 to 42 months). The knee range of motion was improved from preoperative (49.37±7.69) ° to (126.38±5.58) °at the latest follow-up(P<0.01). Lysholm score was improved from preoperative 43.4±5.6 to 79.2±6.2 at the latest follow-up(P<0.01). And the IKDC 2000 score was improved from preoperative 52.6±6.2 to 81.4±5.7 at the latest follow-up(P<0.01). At the latest follow-up, the patient underwent physical examination. One patient had a positive result of axial shift test at the 18th month after operation with grade II laxity of anterior cruciate ligament. One patient had a weakly positive result of anterior drawer test at the 24th month after operation. Absorbable suture anchor fixation for the treatment of avulsion fracture of tibial intercondylar eminence under arthroscopy can provide accurate reduction and stable fixation, which can be applied to treat all types of fractures including comminuted fracture, and it is not necessary to remove the implant in the second operation.

Clinical research of treating the avulsed fracture of humerus greater tuberosity using an arthroscopic double-row suture anchor fixation technique

To evaluate the early clinical effects of treating the avulsed fracture of humerus greater tuberosity using the double-row suture anchor fixation technique. Total 20 patients with the avulsed fracture of the greater tuberosity of the humerus were treated from September 2009 to January 2013. There were 12 males and 7 females, with an average age of 46.8 years old(24 to 69 years old). Eleven patients had injuries on right shoulder joint and 8 patients had injuries on left side. The injury mechanism included 10 cases of traffic accident, 6 cases of sports injury, and 3 cases of falls. The mean interval from injury to surgery was 34.9 d (ranged, 3 to 72 d). The affacted arm was suspended and fixed within 3 weeks after operation. The swing exercise of shoulder joint was performed from the 2nd day after operation. The strap was removed 3 weeks after operation, and painless active exercise was performed 6 weeks after operation. The patients were followed up in the outpatient department 6, 12 and 24 weeks after operation, and then every 6 months. AP and lateral X-ray films were taken at each follow-up time. At the latest follow-up, protractor was used to measure activity of patients; and VAS pain score, California University of Losangeles(UCLA) standard, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score were used to evaluate therapeutic effects. All the patients were followed up, with a mean duration of 35.2 months (ranged, 24 to 48 months). All the incisions were healed on the first stage without secondary acromion impingement and other complications. All the patients had bony union within 12 weeks. The movements of shoulder joints including flexion, abduction, external rotation, internal rotation were increased obviously(P<0.05). The UCLA score was increased from preoperative 15.2±5.3 to 35.6±6.1 at the latest follow-up. The ASES score was increased from preoperative 31.2±5.4 to 91.2±6.8 at the latest follow-up (P<0.05). It has satisfactory curative effects for the avulsed fracture of humerus greater tuberosity using the double-row suture anchor fixation technique, especially the cases of small or comminuted fractures. It has several advantages such as firm fixation, simple and secure operation as well as quick postoperative recovery. Finally, patient should take exercises actively after operations.

Morphologic Changes and Outcomes After Arthroscopic Acetabular Labral Repair Evaluated Using Postoperative Computed Tomography Arthrography

To investigate smaller sized labra after acetabular labral repair comparing preoperative and postoperative computed tomography arthrography (CTA) and to assess the correlation between the anatomic changes and clinical outcomes. The design and protocol of this retrospective study were approved by the institutional review board of our hospital. The inclusion criteria included age older than 18years and hip pain associated with mechanical symptoms. Patients with previous hip surgery, avascular necrosis, rheumatologic disorders, or advanced arthritis were excluded. All tears with femoroacetabular impingement were treated with bumpectomy or acetabuloplasty and repaired using arthroscopic suture anchors. We evaluated clinical outcomes using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and the morphologic changes and radiologic outcomes (labral retear and leakage of dye) using CTA at a minimum 2-year follow-up. The paired t test was performed to detect changes in labral height, labral width, and mHHS. Forty labral tears in 40 patients (mean age, 32.1 ± 9.2years) underwent labral repair, with femoroplasty in 20 hips and acetabuloplasty in 17 hips, and no patients required capsular repair after capsulotomy. No leakage of contrast dye was detected during the follow-up CTA procedure. No labral retears were observed after labral refixation at the postoperative CTA evaluation. However, the mean width and height of the labrum changed from 8.1mm and 4.9mm, respectively, preoperatively to 6.7mm and 4.4mm, respectively, at the postoperative follow-up (decreasing by 19% and 11%, respectively; both P < .001). In addition, the mean mHHS for the 36 patients in the complete repair group improved from 61 ± 16.0 to 90 ± 9.6 (P= .01). Four hips showed incomplete repairs. Repaired labra are well maintained after capsulotomy based on follow-up CTA after arthroscopic labral repair. In addition, decreased height and width of the labra do not affect the clinical outcomes. Level IV, therapeutic study (case series [no, or historical, control group]).

Arthroscopic refixation of acute proximal anterior cruciate ligament rupture using suture anchors

Arthroscopic assisted suture anchor refixation combined with microfracturing of the femoral ACL insertion zone in cases of acute proximal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture to restore anatomical and biomechanical properties of the native ACL. Acute proximal ACL rupture/avulsion, multiligament injury of the knee CONTRAINDICATIONS: Chronic (>6weeks) proximal ACL rupture, intraligamentary rupture, as well as previous ACL surgery. Arthroscopic examination of the knee joint, debridement of the femoral insertion zone, examination of the ligament quality by aprobe, insertion of acurved lasso through the ACL to place the sutures and use of adrill guide to place the anchor in the middle of the femoral ACL insertion. Microfracturing holes around the femoral footprint were made by an awl to enhance healing properties of the ACL. Partial weight bearing was permitted and crutches were used for 6weeks, knee brace limited for the first 2weeks 0‑0-0°, then 0‑0-90° for the following 4weeks. Atotal of 20patients who underwent acute proximal ACL suture anchor refixation were evaluated after amean follow-up of 28months. Regarding stability, mean values of the KT-1000 arthrometer indicated stable results (<3mm), 3patients had a1+ Lachman and 4patients had a1+ pivot shift. IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) score indicated that 17 cases were very good to good (12A, 4B) and in 3 cases the results were satisfactory (3C). Magnetic resonance imaging showed that the ALC was found to be intact in 17cases. The total rate of revision was 15 % (3/20) because of recurrent instability.