Nothing is less reliable, is less clear today than word 'archive.' So declared Jacques Derrida in his well-known address to 1994 international conference on Memory: Question of Archives. Fittingly, conference took place in Sigmund Freud's last in London, England, now international centre of Freud studies and repository-arkheion, Greek word for domicile, address, and residence-of his archives. Derrida's lecture, The Concept of Archive: A Freudian Impression, appeared following year under title Mal d'archive: Une impression freudienne (1995). Its English language translation, Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression (1996), has provided tremendous impetus to renewed, if not feverish, interest in archives, archival research, and archival theory, no less in Canada than throughout world of scholarship. This collection of essays aims to contribute to debates and discussions. Central to Derrida's discussion is term archive itself, from Greek arkhe-the commencement and commandment... there where things commence ... there where men and gods command (Derrida 1996, 1). It is place of inter section between commencement and commandment in archives that this collection proposes to explore. Notwithstanding Carolyn Steedman's contention that nothing starts in ever at all (2002, 45), archives mark point where, among other commencements, scholars begin what can prove to be lengthy, sometimes lifelong, attachment to unpublished legacy of their research subject. act of commandment is, at least in its earliest stage, work of archons, archival professionals, guardians under whose house arrest archives speak (Derrida 1996,2). Our purpose here is to examine this uncommon place, where law and singularity intersect in privilege (3) from points of view of its two most visible and most powerful inhabitants, scholar and archivist, and in particular, their shared enterprise as it relates to Canadian literature. There is distinctly Canadian tradition of scholarly interest in nature of communication, an area in which archival record plays an essential part. Its most prominent trajectories have been traced work of Harold Innis, George Grant, and Marshall McLuhan. Innis, historian and pioneering communications theorist, saw in Canada representation of balance between civilization and power. Grant, in contrast, found a lack of morality and vision in this technological dynamo, which also incorporated technocratic bureaucracies, while McLuhan concerned himself with the impact of technological media, which include media of record, on user (Taylor 2003, 174).' Arthur Kroker, more recent contributor to discourse on communication technology, has described Canada's unique situation midway between future of New World and of European (1984, 7). He sees Canada by virtue of historical circumstance and geographical accident to be forever marginal to 'present mindedness' of American culture (a society which ... does not enjoy recriminations of historical remembrance) and as incapable of being more than ambivalent on cultural legacy of our European past (8). We will be considering archive here in context both of cultural communication and of what Ursula Franklin has called technology as practice (1999, 2), involving organization, procedures, symbols, new words, equations, and, most of all, mindset (3). This volume will also demonstrate that ready availability of more material elements of technology, particularly Internet, has both illuminated and complicated archival space for scholars and archivists alike. In special issue of English Studies in Canada (ESC), The Event of Archive, (March 2004), co-editors Michael O'Driscoll and Edward Bishop commence with necessary question: just what do we mean term archive? …
Read full abstract