The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery combined with the rectal inversion and specimen extraction (RIES) technique for rectal cancer, focusing on both short-term and long-term outcomes. A retrospective comparative analysis was performed on 120 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical excision for rectal cancer from June 2017 to June 2021. Patients were categorized into two groups: Group RIES ([Formula: see text]), which received the novel RIES technique, and Group AIES ([Formula: see text]), which underwent the conventional abdominal incision for specimen extraction. Short-term outcomes, such as postoperative pelvic sepsis, temporary ileus, anastomotic leakage, and anastomotic stricture, were meticulously recorded. Long-term efficacy was evaluated through the 3-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and local recurrence rate (LRR). The RIES group demonstrated a 3-year OS, DFS, and LRR of 86.2%, 77.6%, and 8.6%, respectively, with a low incidence of short-term complications. Comparatively, the AIES group showed a 3-year OS, DFS, and LRR of 83.9%, 74.2%, and 19.4%, respectively, with slightly higher rates of postoperative complications. Statistical analysis using the Student’s t-test, the chi-square ([Formula: see text]) test revealed no significant differences in the primary outcomes between the two groups, and suggested the noninferiority of the RIES technique. The study suggests that the RIES technique is a safe, feasible, and potentially functional and oncological superior approach to rectal cancer treatment, without compromising clinical efficacy. Further research is warranted to validate these findings in a larger, multicenter, and randomized controlled trial.
Read full abstract