Antitachycardia Pacing In Patients Research Articles

Characteristics of successful termination of atrial fibrillation by atrial antitachycardia pacing in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Asymptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is often found in patients implanted with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Second-generation atrial antitachycardia pacing (A-ATP) is effective in managing AF in patients implanted with CIEDs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of A-ATP in patients implanted with CIEDs. This was a single-center retrospective study involving 91 patients (male 46 patients, mean age 74 ± 9years) implanted with Reactive A-ATP equipped devices (84 patients with pacemakers, 6 with ICDs, and 1 with a CRT-D). The AF burden, rate of AF termination, and details of the activation of the A-ATP were analyzed in each patient. During a mean follow-up period of 21 ± 13months, A-ATP was activated in 45 of 91 patients (49.5%). No patients had adverse events. Although the efficacy of the A-ATP varied among the patients, the median rate of AF termination was 44%. In comparison to the A-ATP start time, "0min" had a higher AF termination rate by the A-ATP (39.4% vs. 24.4%, P = 0.011). The rate of termination by the A-ATP was high for AF with a long cycle length and a relatively regular rhythm. A-ATP successfully terminated AF episodes in some patients implanted with CIEDs. The optimal settings of the A-ATP will be determined in future studies.

Characteristics of successful reactive atrial-based antitachycardia pacing in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: History of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation as a predictor of high treatment efficacy.

Reactive atrial-based antitachycardia pacing (rATP) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) suppresses the progression of atrial fibrillation (AF) to the persistent form. However, the clinical factors associated with successful reactive atrial-based antitachycardia pacing (rATP) treatment are unknown. This study aimed to examine the predictors of high rATP efficacy in patients with CIEDs. The data of 101,325 rATP-treated atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT/AF) episodes in 51 patients, obtained through remote monitoring and device interrogation, were analyzed. The study population was divided into the high and low efficacy groups based on the overall median success rate of rATP. Clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups. During a follow-up period of 28.6 ± 8.6 months, the median success rate was 43.7% (31.5%-64.9%). The prevalence of a history of catheter ablation of AF was significantly higher in the high efficacy group than in the low efficacy group (73.0% vs. 44.0%, p = .048) and was the only independent predictor of high rATP efficacy (odds ratio, 3.45; p = .038). The rATP success rate in patients with (n = 30) and without (n = 21) a history of catheter ablation was 53.9% (40.0%-67.5%) and 36.4% (22.2%-47.7%), respectively (p = .012). The effect of rATP after ablation was more pronounced in patients with long cycle length episodes (≥75% of AT/AF sequences having a cycle length of 200-449 ms) (67.3% [46.0%-73.6%] vs. 30.6% [18.1%-60.3%], p = .027). The high efficacy group had a significantly lower incidence of AT/AF lasting ≥1, ≥7, and ≥30 days than the low efficacy group. rATP combined with catheter ablation therapy is effective in suppressing AT/AF.

Safety and efficacy of anti-tachycardia pacing in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy implanted with an ICD.

In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients implanted with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), clinical outcomes of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) have been poorly explored. In a retrospective analysis of a cohort of consecutive HCM patients implanted with an ICD, we aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and clinical value of ATP. The cohort of HCM patients implanted with a transvenous ICD and followed in our center was assessed for device intervention from implantation to last clinical follow-up. Overall 77 patients (45 males; mean age: 46±16 years) were analyzed. After 67±41 months, 24 patients had 49 ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) appropriately treated (5.8% per year). Among 39 monomorphic VTs, ATP was effective in 27 (success rate: 69%). Mean time from VT onset to ATP delivery was 9.1±4.9s. The only clinical variable improving ATP success was use of beta-blockers (81%vs 50%; P=.04). Out of 12 ineffectively treated VTs, one was immediately shocked, four self-terminated after 18±12s, and seven (18%) were accelerated to a new VT. ATP was also delivered for 27 of 42 inappropriately detected episodes and induced two de novo VTs (7%). In the per patient analysis, 14 out 77 (18%) patients had one or more appropriate and effective ATP (3.4% per year), and only six (8%; 1.4% per year) received more than one ATP. ATP is moderately effective for the treatment of monomorphic VTs in HCM patients. However, the rate of appropriate ATP therapies is low, ATP is often prematurely delivered, and ATP-induced arrhythmia degeneration is of concern.

Significance of clinical ventricular tachycardias induced by antitachycardia pacing in patients with prior myocardial infarction

In patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), ventricular tachycardia (VT) can occur spontaneously or as a result of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) that changes, rather than terminates, a spontaneous VT to a different VT. The relevance of ATP-induced VTs is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical relevance of ATP-mediated VTs in patients undergoing VT ablation procedures. Stored ICD electrograms of 162 consecutive patients with prior myocardial infarction referred for VT ablation (mean age 67.5 ± 9.2 years; 150 men; median ejection fraction 25% [IQR 20%-35%]) were reviewed. Clinical VTs were classified as spontaneous or ATP-induced. All VTs were targeted during the ablation procedures. Of 554 ICD-recorded clinical VTs, 157 (28%) were ATP-induced (63 patients) and 397 (72%) were spontaneous. ATP-induced VTs were faster (cycle length 316 ± 62 ms vs 369 ± 83 ms; P < .001), less commonly inducible with invasive programmed stimulation (35% vs 52%; P < .001), and less commonly had identifiable target sites (21% vs 40%; P<.001) than were spontaneous VTs. During a median follow-up of 368 days [IQR: 68-1106] postablation, 71 VTs recurred (39 patients), none of which was a previously documented ATP-induced VT. A history of ATP-induced VT was associated with an increase in VT recurrence. ATP-induced VTs occur frequently in patients with prior myocardial infarction presenting for VT ablation procedures. The presence of ATP-induced VT is associated with a higher VT recurrence rate postablation. None of the ATP-induced VTs recorded before the ablation procedure recurred postablation, and therefore ATP-induced VTs represent a marker rather than the cause of VT recurrence.

Antitachycardia pacemakers in congenital heart disease.

Many patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) acquire rhythm abnormalities related to their repair, most commonly intraatrial reentrant tachycardia (IART). Treatment of IART in CHD is often multifaceted, and may include medication, ablation, and pacing. Evidence regarding the use of antitachycardia pacing therapies is limited. The aim of the study is to define the use and efficacy of antitachycardia pacing in patients with CHD at a single center. Eighty implants were performed on 72 patients between 2000 and 2010. Follow-up data of more than 3 months were available for 56 patients; median follow-up time was 2.8 years. Twenty (36%) patients received successful antitachycardia pacing at a median 1.3 years postimplant. For those patients with IART after implant, antitachycardia pacing was successful in 57%. Patients with two-ventricle repairs were more likely to have successful antitachycardia pacing than those with one-ventricle palliation (45% vs. 17%, P = .04). Patients with documented IART had more successful antitachycardia pacing than those with no documented atrial tachycardia prior to implant (46% vs. 7%, P = .006). Early complications of antitachycardia pacemaker implant occurred in six patients (11%); late complications after implant occurred in three patients (5.6%). Of the initial 72 patients implanted, there were six deaths (8%). Antitachycardia pacing therapies were successful in the majority of CHD patients who had IART after implant. Patients without documented atrial tachycardia prior to implant were unlikely to require or receive successful therapy from antitachycardia pacemaker. Those patients postatrial switch procedure who had documented IART prior to implant had the highest incidence of successful antitachycardia pacing therapies. Antitachycardia pacemaker implantation is an adjunct to the management of IART in CHD patients, but may not benefit patients who have not yet demonstrated IART.

Proarritmia de desfibrilador implantable relacionada con la estimulación antitaquicardia durante la carga

Antitachycardia pacing in patients with pacemakers helps to minimise the number of shocks received by the patients, due to being able terminate a very high proportion of sustained ventricular tachycardia episodes. A case of proarrhythmia associated with antitachycardia pacing is presented in a patient with discontinuous T wave oversensing.

Local Activation Time Derived from Stored EGM is Associated with Failure of Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Implantable Defibrillator

Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) is an effective treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, persistent failure of ATP in some patients is well recognized. A method of deriving the local activation time from stored intracardiac electrograms in implantable cardioverter defibrillators is described. Using a case-control design, the local activation times were compared between patients with persistent unsuccessful ATP with comparable controls with successful ATP. The local activation times during VT in patients with failed ATP were longer at 120-180 ms compared with corresponding control patients with successful ATP (60-80 ms). The local activation time expressed as a proportion of VT cycle length in patients with failed ATP compared with patients with successful ATP were 0.40 +/- 0.08 versus 0.19 +/- 0.08 (P = 0.012). A novel method of deriving local activation time is described, and delayed local activation time may explain failure of ATP in terminating VT in some patients.

The Magnitude of Sinus Cycle Length Change During Ventricular Tachycardia is Predictive of Successful Antitachycardia Pacing

Despite the wide use of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), predictors of ATP success remain poorly understood. We hypothesize that the degree of sympathoexcitation, as measured by the sinus cycle length (SCL) shortening during ventricular tachycardia (VT), is a predictor of ATP success. The charts of 462 patients with dual-chamber ICDs were reviewed. A total of 88 events in 26 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The mean SCL during the 4 seconds preceding the VT onset (SCL-baseline), and during the 4 seconds prior to ATP delivery (SCL-VT) was measured. The percent shortening in SCL was calculated as ((SCL-baseline) - (SCL-VT))/(SCL-baseline) x 100. Patients were classified into the ATP-success and ATP-failure groups depending on the VT(s) response to ATP. Using a t-test analogue for clustered data, patients in the ATP-success group exhibited a greater shortening in SCL when compared with the ATP-Failure group (5.8% compared to 4.7%, P = 0.007). The successful ATP events displayed an average SCL shortening of 6.0% compared to 1.8% in the unsuccessful ATP events (P = 0.029). When the events were analyzed, the sensitivity and specificity of a shortening in SCL of >10% in predicting ATP success were 0.29 and 1. We have shown that the SCL change during VT, a marker of the autonomic changes that accompany a tachycardia, is useful in predicting ATP success. Our findings suggest that analysis of the SCL during VT might play a role in future programming of ATP in patients with ICDs.

Right Ventricular versus Biventricular Antitachycardia Pacing in the Termination of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia in Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The ADVANCE CRT‐D Trial

The purpose of this investigation is to compare the efficacy of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) delivered via the right ventricular (RV) lead versus ATP delivered simultaneously via the right and left ventricular leads (biventricular [BiV]) in the termination of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with ICD capabilities. The ADVANCE CRT is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, parallel trial evaluating RV versus BiV ATP in the termination of VT in CRT patients. The study will test the hypothesis that BiV ATP is superior to RV ATP in the termination of VT and fast VT. All patients with class I and IIa indications for an ICD implantation and CRT are included. The sample size has been estimated to 400 participants followed for 12 months to show a 10% benefit of BiV versus RV ATP. The efficacy of BiV ATP to terminate all VT presents the primary endpoint. The investigation is expected to be completed in 2007. The ADVANCE CRT trial is the first large randomized clinical investigation evaluating the efficacy of BiV ATP in patients under CRT and ICD therapy.

Clinical Predictors and Efficacy of Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: The Importance of the Patient's Sex

The ICD has become accepted as primary therapy for malignant ventricular arrhythmias. The incorporation of antitachycardia pacing into ICDs has provided a better tolerated alternative to shocks but has the potential disadvantage of delaying definitive therapy. Accordingly, we sought to delineate the characteristics of patients likely to experience unsuccessful termination of pacing and to identify ineffective pacing strategies. Of 519 patients who received ICDs, 11 clinical and tachycardia characteristics in the 162 who received antitachycardia pacing therapy for sustained ventricular arrhythmias were evaluated. Tachycardia episodes were grouped according to outcome of pacing (successful, unsuccessful, acceleration). Of 1,946 episodes, 1,502 (77.2%) were successfully reverted with pacing, 322 (16.5%) were unsuccessful, and 121 (6.2%) were accelerated. Antitachycardia pacing was less successful in women, patients with a history of myocardial infarction, those with more severe left ventricular dysfunction, those who received antiarrhythmic drugs, and those programmed to ramp pacing. Tachycardia acceleration was inversely related to tachycardia cycle length and was more frequent in patients programmed to more aggressive ramp pacing protocols. Women had an almost threefold incidence of tachycardia acceleration compared with men (14% vs 5%, P < 0.001). Antitachycardia pacing is generally successful in terminating ventricular tachycardia and has a low incidence of tachycardia acceleration. Caution should be used with rapid tachycardias and aggressive ramp pacing protocols because of an increased risk of acceleration. Antitachycardia pacing appears less successful and has a higher incidence of complications in women.

Antitachycardia burst pacing for pleomorphic reentrant ventricular tachycardias associated with non-coronary artery diseases: a morphology specific programming for ventricular tachycardias.

To study the role of antitachycardia burst pacing in patients with reentrant pleomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) associated with non-coronary artery diseases, the efficacy of antitachycardia pacing and appropriate antitachycardia pacing cycle length were evaluated in each pleomorphic VT morphology of seven patients. Seven patients were included in this study. Clinically documented pleomorphic VTs were reproduced in an electrophysiologic study. For each VT, rapid ventricular pacing was attempted from the apex of the right ventricle at a cycle length which was 20 ms shorter than that of VT and repeated after a decrement of the cycle length in steps of 10 ms until the VT was terminated or accelerated. All 16 VTs could be entrained by the rapid pacing, and 13 of the 16 VTs (81%) were terminated, whereas pacing-induced acceleration was observed in the other 3 VTs of the 3 patients. VT cycle length (VTCL), block cycle length (BCL) which was defined as the longest VT interrupting paced cycle length, %BCL/VTCL and entrainment zone which was defined as VTCL minus BCL, varied in each VT morphology of each patient. In two patients, antitachycardia pacing was effective in all VT morphologies and the maximum difference of the %BCL/VTCL among the pleomorphic VTs was less than 10%. Thus, antitachycardia pacing seemed to be beneficial for these patients. In the other 5 patients, a difference of more than 10% in %BCL/VTCL was observed among the pleomorphic VT morphologies and/or at least one VT morphology showed pacing-induced acceleration. Compared to the 13 terminated VTs, three accelerated VTs had a wide entrainment zone [160 +/- 44 vs 90 +/- 48 ms, p < 0.04] and small %BCL/VTCL [61 +/- 6 vs 77 +/- 11%,p<0.03]. In pleomorphic VTs associated with non-coronary artery diseases, responses to rapid pacing was not uniform; VT might be terminable or accelerated even in the same patient. We need to pay close attention when programming antitachycardia pacing in patients with pleomorphic VT.

Antitachycardia pacing in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: how many attempts are useful?

The purpose of this study was to determine the termination and acceleration rates for 1 to 6 attempts of antitachycardia pacing [ATP] delivered by ICD in order to terminate spontaneously occurring VTs. Twenty-four ICD recipients with active ATP programs, including a maximum of six ATP sequences and spontaneously occurring VTs during follow-up, were investigated. During a mean follow-up of 42 +/- 15 months (range, 17-63 months) 413 spontaneous VT episodes (17 +/- 14; range, 1-49 per patient) resulting in appropriate ATP delivery by the ICD occurred. ATP successfully terminated 328 episodes (80%) with a mean number of 1.6 +/- 1.1 pacing sequences. Eighty episodes (19%) were accelerated by ATP and 5 (1%) were unresponsive to ATP. The ATP success decreased until the third ATP sequence (59%-->31%-->24%), but increased again in the fourth to sixth attempt (46%-->46%-->29%). The acceleration rate increased from sequence one to sequence three (8%-->13%-->28%), but decreased significantly in further ATP attempts (19%-->0%-->0%). The mean time delays until redetection or termination after 4, 5, and 6 attempts of ATP were 22 +/- 5 seconds, 37 +/- 2 seconds, and 41 +/- 9 seconds, respectively. Nine patients (37%) used > or = 3 ATP attempts during follow-up and all of them had a therapeutic benefit from it. Five out of 13 VTs (38%) treated with > or = 4 attempts could ultimately be terminated by ATP. The results of this study demonstrate that the first ATP sequence is the most effective and that > 4 ATP attempts may be useful in a minority of patients. There seems to be a low risk of VT acceleration by the fourth to sixth ATP sequence. Because of the associated time delay, a high number of ATP attempts should only be programmed in patients with hemodynamically well-tolerated stable VTs.

Antitachycardia Pacing: Which Patients and Which Methods?

This article is a review on the value of antitachycardia pacing in patients with implantable cardiac-defibrillators (ICD). Antitachycardia pacing is highly effective in terminating monomorphic ventricular tachycardias, with a success rate of 80–90%. Which algorithm is used for termination seems to be of less importance, with respect to both efficacy and safety. Spontaneous episodes of ventricular tachycardia are slower and more easily convertible than those induced by programmed stimulation. It is thus possible that fine-tuning of the antitachycardia pacing algorithm, using induced episodes, is of limited value with respect to efficacy during follow-up. Prospective studies need to be performed to resolve this issue. Spontaneous monomorphic ventricular tachycardia can also occur in patients who are noninducible. Antitachycardia pacing should therefore also be considered for such patients. Inappropriate therapy, most often due to supraventricular arrhythmias, has been reported in up to 25% of patients. The sensitivity and specificity of algorithms developed to differentiate supraventricular from ventricular tachycardias still require validation. (Am J Cardiol 1996;78(suppl 5A):92–97)

Clinical efficacy of antitachycardia pacing in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias with implanted third-generation cardioverter-defibrillators

Clinical efficacy of antitachycardia pacing in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias with implanted third-generation cardioverter-defibrillators

Atrial Antitachycardia Pacing in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia: Clinical Experience with the Intertach Pacemaker

During a 3-year period, 22 patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia have been treated with antitachycardia pacemakers (Intermedics Intertach, 262-12, n = 17, and Intertach II, 262-16, n = 5). Eighty-two percent were female, the mean age was 44 +/- 14 years; 86% had atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. Symptoms had occurred over 11.8 +/- 7.1 years, with 3.6 hospital admissions per patient, despite 4.7 +/- 2.1 antiarrhythmic drugs. Following pacemaker implantation, during a follow-up of 14.8 +/- 11.5 months, only two patients have been readmitted to a hospital because of supraventricular tachycardia (mean 0.1 per patient). One patient is taking an antiarrhythmic agent, and four are taking beta adrenergic blocking agents. Thus, 23% are taking cardioactive drugs (it was anticipated that two patients would continue on drugs after pacemaker implantation). There have been no serious complications. Atrial antitachycardia is thus an effective therapy in carefully selected patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia, reducing hospital admissions for supraventricular tachycardia and reducing the need for antiarrhythmic drugs.