Antiretroviral Therapy-naive Patients Research Articles

Fosamprenavir: a review of its use in the management of antiretroviral therapy-naive patients with HIV infection.

Fosamprenavir (GW433908, Lexiva, Telzir) is an oral prodrug of the protease inhibitor (PI) amprenavir, with a reduced daily pill burden. Fosamprenavir, in combination with other antiretroviral agents, is indicated for the treatment of patients with HIV infection, particularly those who have not previously received antiretroviral therapy. Viral load reductions were at least as great with fosamprenavir-based regimens as those achieved with nelfinavir-based regimens in two large, 48-week, randomised, multicentre trials in antiretroviral therapy-naive patients with HIV infection. In the NEAT study, more patients receiving twice-daily fosamprenavir in combination with abacavir and lamivudine achieved HIV RNA levels <400 copies/mL than those receiving a similar nelfinavir-based regimen. Results of the SOLO study showed similar reductions in viral load among patients who received once-daily ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir and those treated with twice-daily nelfinavir, both in combination with twice-daily abacavir and lamivudine. In both trials, virological failure rates were at least twice as high with the nelfinavir-based regimen as they were with the fosamprenavir-based regimen. Fosamprenavir was generally well tolerated in clinical trials. The most common adverse events among patients treated with fosamprenavir, with or without ritonavir, plus abacavir and lamivudine were diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, drug hypersensitivity and skin rash. The incidence of diarrhoea was significantly lower with fosamprenavir-based therapy than with nelfinavir-based therapy in the NEAT and SOLO trials. The resistance profile of fosamprenavir is consistent with that of amprenavir. Amprenavir-resistant viral isolates from patients experiencing treatment failure with fosamprenavir-based therapy in the NEAT study showed little or no cross-resistance to several other PIs, and protease mutations commonly selected for by various other PIs were not observed. In the SOLO study, protease resistance mutations were not observed in viral isolates from patients experiencing treatment failure with ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir-based therapy. In conclusion, fosamprenavir-based regimens have shown good antiviral efficacy and are generally well tolerated in antiretroviral therapy-naive patients with HIV infection. Available data on the resistance profile of the drug suggest that it may be used early in the course of therapy without compromising a range of future treatment options. The relatively low pill burden and lack of food restrictions with fosamprenavir may improve adherence to therapy. Further studies are needed to compare fosamprenavir with other PIs and to establish the long-term efficacy of fosamprenavir-based regimens. In conclusion, fosamprenavir appears to be a promising agent for the treatment of antiretroviral therapy-naive patients with HIV infection.

The molecular epidemiology and drug resistance determination of HIV type 1 subtype B infection in Barbados.

To better understand the emergence of HIV-1 variants in Barbados and the association with transmission modes, we analyzed phylogenetic relationships and genetic variability among HIV-1 strains collected in 1996 from 36 antiretroviral therapy-naive patients. Only subtype B variants were present in this sampling, based on analysis of HIV-1 envelope (env) C2V3, protease (PR), and reverse transcriptase (RT) sequences. The genetic diversity of env sequences was broad (13.9%; range, 5.9-24.9%), suggesting multiple introductions of distinct HIV-1 strains to the island. The frequency of subtype B HIV-1 variants with similar env V3 features, including the tetrameric tips, GPGR and GPGK, the threonine deletion at position 23, and the substitution of threonine to arginine at position 22, was comparable in heterosexual, bisexual, and homosexual patients. Analyses of amino acid variations in PR sequences revealed a lack of major drug resistance-conferring mutations and a high (90%) prevalence of secondary mutations at positions 36, 63, 71, and 77. While the occurrence of 361, 63P, and 71T mutations in Barbadian strains was similar to the global prevalence for subtype B variants, the frequency (64%) of the V77I mutation was more than three times that seen worldwide. Only two RT antiretroviral resistance mutations (M41L and T215Y) were observed, both from a single patient. This comprehensive genetic analysis documents a broad diversity within HIV-1 subtype B in Barbados and suggests a lack of association between particular subtype B variants and transmission modes.

Lopinavir/ritonavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection.

Lopinavir/ritonavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection.

High prevalence of genotypic resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors among therapy-naive individuals from the Warsaw cohort.

The purpose of this study was to recognize nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-resistant HIV-1 strains among a group of therapy-naive patients, and subsequently to guide the choice of antiretroviral therapy. HIV strains present in sera of 128 antiretroviral therapy-naive patients were tested for NRTI resistance-associated mutations. The RT-PCR amplified HIV rt regions were analyzed with an INNI-LiPA-HIV-1 RT assay. The number and pattern of resistance-associated mutated codons were determined and interpreted as resistance to particular drugs. Mutated codons were detected in 66 (51.5%) out of 128 tested samples. In 54 (81.8%) out of 66 samples, a K70R mutation was identified, which was followed by an M184V mutation in 22 cases (33.3%). For a majority of these samples, mixed wild/mutant populations were recognized in 44 (66.6%) cases. The interpretation of hybridization data revealed drug-resistant strains in 37 (28.9%) out of all samples tested. The determined resistance to particular drugs was as follows: 20 strains were resistant to zidovudine (ZDV), ten to lamivudine (3TC) and six to didanosine (ddI)/zalcitabine (ddC)/abacavir (ABC). In one case, a ZDV/3TC-resistant HIV strain was found. The prevalence of mutations associated with NRTI resistance was high in the tested cohort. The key reasons for that were most probably needle and drug sharing within the group of intravenous drug users (IVDUs) and the use of ZDV in monotherapeutic regimes in the early 1990s.

Incidence of and risk factors for severe hepatotoxicity associated with antiretroviral combination therapy.

This retrospective cohort study investigated whether particular antiretroviral agents are associated with a higher risk for developing grade 4 liver enzyme elevations (LEEs) in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 infection who are starting to receive highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Grade 4 LEE was defined as aminotransferase levels >10 times the upper limit of normal and >200 U above baseline levels. A multivariate Cox model was used to identify risk factors. The incidence of LEE was 6.3%. No patients died of LEE consequences. Risk factors were higher baseline alanine aminotransferase levels, chronic hepatitis B or C virus infection, antiretroviral therapy-naive patients undergoing their first HAART regimen, recent start of a regimen of nevirapine or high-dose ritonavir, and female sex. In hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected patients, discontinuing lamivudine (3TC) use was a risk factor. In 97% of cases, >or=1 risk factor was present. In HBV-coinfected patients using 3TC, continued use of 3TC should be considered, even if 3TC-resistant HIV strains develop.

Identification of genotypic changes in human immunodeficiency virus protease that correlate with reduced susceptibility to the protease inhibitor lopinavir among viral isolates from protease inhibitor-experienced patients.

The association of genotypic changes in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease with reduced in vitro susceptibility to the new protease inhibitor lopinavir (previously ABT-378) was explored using a panel of viral isolates from subjects failing therapy with other protease inhibitors. Two statistical tests showed that specific mutations at 11 amino acid positions in protease (L10F/I/R/V, K20M/R, L24I, M46I/L, F53L, I54L/T/V, L63P, A71I/L/T/V, V82A/F/T, I84V, and L90M) were associated with reduced susceptibility. Mutations at positions 82, 54, 10, 63, 71, and 84 were most closely associated with relatively modest (4- and 10-fold) changes in phenotype, while the K20M/R and F53L mutations, in conjunction with multiple other mutations, were associated with >20- and >40-fold-reduced susceptibility, respectively. The median 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC(50)) of lopinavir against isolates with 0 to 3, 4 or 5, 6 or 7, and 8 to 10 of the above 11 mutations were 0.8-, 2.7-, 13.5-, and 44.0-fold higher, respectively, than the IC(50) against wild-type HIV. On average, the IC(50) of lopinavir increased by 1.74-fold per mutation in isolates containing three or more mutations. Each of the 16 viruses that displayed a >20-fold change in susceptibility contained mutations at residues 10, 54, 63, and 82 and/or 84, along with a median of three mutations at residues 20, 24, 46, 53, 71, and 90. The number of protease mutations from the 11 identified in these analyses (the lopinavir mutation score) may be useful for the interpretation of HIV genotypic resistance testing with respect to lopinavir-ritonavir (Kaletra) regimens and may provide insight into the genetic barrier to resistance to lopinavir-ritonavir in both antiretroviral therapy-naive and protease inhibitor-experienced patients.

Avanti 3: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lamivudine plus Zidovudine versus Lamivudine plus Zidovudine plus Nelfinavir in HIV-1-Infected Antiretroviral-Naive Patients

The objective of our randomized, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to investigate the safety, tolerability, and antiretroviral and immunological effect of double and triple combination therapy regimens. A total of 105 antiretroviral therapy-naive patients were randomized to receive either zidovudine (300 mg twice per day) plus lamivudine (150 mg twice per day) plus nelfinavir placebo (three times per day) (n=52), or zidovudine/lamivudine (dose as before) plus nelfinavir (750 mg three times per day) (n=53) for 28 weeks. After this time, patients were allowed to switch to open-label zidovudine/lamivudine/nelfinavir. The overall log10 reduction from baseline in plasma HIV-1 RNA was significantly greater in the zidovudine/lamivudine/nelfinavir group than the zidovudine/lamivudine group (P=0.001; median treatment difference, -1.01 log10 copies/ml; 95% confidence interval -1.23 to -0.79), as measured by the average area under the curve minus baseline over 28 weeks. Increases from baseline in CD4 cell counts were statistically significantly greater in the zidovudine/ lamivudine/nelfinavir group (101.5 cells/ml) than the zidovudine/lamivudine group (47.0 cells/ml; P=0.027) at week 28. Of note, the addition of nelfinavir from weeks 28-52 led to an increase in the proportion of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/ml from 17% (9/52 patients on zidovudine/lamivudine) to 50% (13/26 patients who switched to zidovudine/lamivudine/nelfinavir). Incidence of drug-related adverse events was similar in the two groups, except for nausea (more common in zidovudine/lamivudine group; 40 versus 17%) and diarrhoea (more common in zidovudine/lamivudine/nelfinavir group; 45 versus 14%). In conclusion, our study confirms the efficacy of triple combination therapy with two nucleoside analogues and a protease inhibitor compared with double-nucleoside therapy. Interestingly, the addition of nelfinavir to zidovudine/lamivudine, even after 6 months of double nucleoside therapy, led to a substantial virological benefit that was sustained over 24weeks in a subset of patients.

Abacavir: a review of its clinical potential in patients with HIV infection.

Abacavir is a carbocyclic 2'-deoxyguanosine nucleoside analogue. It is metabolised intracellularly to a 2'-deoxyguanosine nucleoside analogue which competitively inhibits HIV reverse transcriptase and terminates proviral DNA chain extension. In double-blind trials in antiretroviral therapy-experienced or -naive patients, reductions in HIV RNA levels were greater and more prolonged in patients receiving abacavir in combination with other antiretroviral drugs than in those receiving placebo in combination with the same agents. Furthermore, abacavir in combination with lamivudine and zidovudine reduced viral load to below detectable levels in a proportion of patients, and to a similar extent to the protease inhibitor indinavir in combination with lamivudine and zidovudine. Greatest viral load reductions were seen in antiretroviral therapy-naive patients. Preliminary results suggest that the viral suppression achieved with a protease inhibitor plus 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) can be maintained as effectively with abacavir in combination with 2 NRTIs as it can be by continuing the protease inhibitor-containing treatment regimen. Initial virological data from studies of combination regimens including abacavir and protease inhibitors appear promising but larger controlled trials are required to confirm these observations. Nausea is the most frequently reported adverse event in patients receiving abacavir-containing combination therapy. Adverse events tend to be reported most frequently soon after starting treatment; the majority of events are mild or moderate in intensity and transient. Other adverse events reported in >5% of patients include vomiting, malaise and fatigue, headache, diarrhoea, sleep disorders, cough, anorexia and rash. A major cause of abacavir treatment discontinuation is the development of a hypersensitivity reaction which has been reported in 3 to 5% of patients. The reaction usually occurs within 6 weeks of commencing treatment, shows evidence of multiorgan system involvement and typically includes fever and/or rash. Symptoms resolve rapidly after discontinuation of treatment. Continuing treatment or rechallenge can result in more severe symptoms, life-threatening hypotension and even death. Abacavir used in combination with other antiretroviral drugs effectively reduces viral load in both adults and children with HIV infection. Although these responses are greatest in individuals with little or no previous antiretroviral treatment, useful responses are still sometimes achieved in heavily pretreated individuals. Abacavir in combination with lamivudine and zidovudine provides a simple and convenient dosage regimen which is generally well tolerated, able to produce sustained suppression of viral replication and has the advantage of sparing other classes of antiretroviral drugs for subsequent use. This triple combination represents an alternative antiretroviral regimen for patients intolerant to protease inhibitors or those wishing to retain the option of protease inhibitors for later use. Further clinical studies are needed to define the activity of abacavir in combination with protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Emergence of Dual Resistance to Zidovudine and Lamivudine in Clinical HIV-1 Isolates from Patients Receiving Zidovudine/Lamivudine Combination Therapy

Susceptibility to zidovudine and lamivudine was determined on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates obtained from patients who added lamivudine after 6 months of treatment with zidovudine. Lamivudine-resistant isolates that were also zidovudine-resistant were recovered from 13/16 (81%) patients after 6 months of dual therapy. In contrast to findings in anti-retroviral therapy-naive patients, these results suggest that dual resistance to zidovudine and lamivudine emerges relatively quickly when lamivudine is added to zidovudine as a single agent in the majority of patients with extensive prior zidovudine treatment.

Quantification of HIV-1 viral load in lymphoid and blood cells: assessment during four-drug combination therapy.

To assess the antiretroviral effect of a combination of zidovudine, didanosine, lamivudine and saquinavir in plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and lymph-node mononuclear cells (LNMC) after 8 weeks. Ten HIV-1 antiretroviral therapy-naive patients were given a combination of oral zidovudine (200 mg three times daily), oral didanosine (200 twice a day), oral lamivudine (150 mg twice a day) and oral saquinavir (600 mg three times daily). HIV-1 plasma RNA was measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase (RT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Infectious HIV-1 in PBMC and LNMC was measured by a coculture technique. HIV-1 RNA in PBMC and LNMC was quantified by RT-PCR. Proviral DNA titres in PBMC and LNMC were measured by endpoint dilution PCR. CD4 T-cells were analysed by flow cytometry. CD4 cell counts rose in all patients (mean increase of 125 +/- 71 CD4 cells x 10(6)/l) and the benefit was greater for patients with fewer than 350 CD4 cells x 10(6)/l (mean increase of 159 +/- 74 CD4 cells x 10(6)/l). Plasma HIV-1 RNA decreased exponentially in all patients (mean decrease of 3.1 log10 after 8 weeks with a mean half-life of 2.2 +/- 0.6 days). HIV-1 RNA showed a decrease of 3.07 log10 in PBMC and of 2.1 log10 in LNMC. The decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA was consistently associated with the decrease in LNMC. These data were supported by a concomitant drop of HIV-1 infectious titres in PBMC (mean decrease of 1.41 log10) and in LNMC (mean decrease of 2.54 log). These data show a significant antiretroviral effect of this four-drug combination in blood and lymphoid tissues. However, a greater decrease in HIV-1 RNA was observed in PBMC and in plasma than in lymph node cells.

Safety and Efficacy of Lamivudine-Zidovudine Combination Therapy in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients

Objective.-To compare safety and efficacy of lamivudine-zidovudine combination therapy with zidovudine monotherapy in treating human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected, antiretroviral therapy-naive patients. Design.-Double-blind, randomized, multicenter, comparative trial of 129 patients throughout 24 weeks followed by 24 weeks of open-label lamivudine in combination with zidovudine. Setting.-Outpatients from 14 hospitals in Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom were enrolled within 6 months. Patients.-HIV-1-positive, antiretroviral-naive (less than or equal to 4 weeks prior zidovudine use) patients aged at least 18 years with CD4(+) cell counts between 0.10 x 10(9)/L and 0.40 x 10(9)/L (100-400/mu L). Intervention.-Patients received either 300 mg of lamivudine every 12 hours in combination with 200 mg of zidovudine every 8 hours for 24 weeks or zidovudine monotherapy for 24 weeks. All patients were then allowed to receive zidovudine in combination with open-label lamivudine (300 mg every 12 hours). Main Outcome Measures.-Efficacy was assessed by changes in CD4(+) cell counts, beta(2)-microglobulin, neopterin, HIV-1 immune-complex dissociated (ICD) p24 antigenemia, and HIV-1 viral load. Safety was assessed by incidence of adverse clinical events and defined laboratory-measured toxic effects. Results.-Combination therapy showed superior treatment effects compared with monotherapy during the first 24 weeks as documented by changes in CD4(+) cell counts (increase of 0.08 x 10(9)/L vs 0.02 x 10(9)/L, P<.001), ICD p24 (-88% vs -49%; P=.04), cellular viremia (-1.27 vs -0.20 log(10) median tissue-culture infected dose [TCID50] per 10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells; P=.001), and viral load measured by HIV-1 RNA polymerase chain reaction using a Roche method (-1.33 vs -0.57 log(10) copies/mL; P=.001) or an immune-capture method (-0.6 vs -0.14 log,, copies/mL; P=.008). Observed changes were sustained to 48 weeks for patients continuing to receive combination therapy. Patients switching to receive combination therapy at week 24 showed improvements in CD4(+) cell count and viral load to week 48. Mutation results suggested that mutations associated with zidovudine resistance may have developed more slowly over the first 24 weeks in patients receiving combination therapy. In contrast, mutations associated with lamivudine resistance appeared to develop rapidly, despite sustained antiviral treatment effect. However, the number of patients evaluated for genotypic changes was small, and confirmation of these results is needed in larger studies. No statistically significant differences in incidence or severity of clinically manifested or laboratory-measured toxic effects were noted between treatment groups. Conclusions.-The combination of lamivudine and zidovudine results in a potent and sustained antiviral effect in antiretroviral-naive patients that is superior to that observed with zidovudine monotherapy.