anti-TNF Group Research Articles

Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy and the Risk of Gestational Diabetes in Pregnant Women With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy may improve insulin sensitivity, and its impact during pregnancy remains unclear. We aimed to assess the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) associated with anti-TNF treatment among pregnant women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This nationwide cohort study included patients with IBD in Korea from 2010 to 2021. Anti-TNF exposure was identified from the last menstrual period (LMP) to LMP + 140 days. The development of GDM was assessed from LMP + 141 days to delivery. We performed overlap weighting to balance the covariates and used a generalized linear mixed model to measure the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The anti-TNF group was compared with the unexposed group, as well as with the immunosuppressant, 5-aminosalicylate, and untreated groups. A total of 3,695 pregnancies in women with IBD were identified, of which 338 (9.2%) were exposed to anti-TNFs. GDM was found in 7.1% of the pregnancies exposed to anti-TNFs as compared with 11.0% of those unexposed. The crude and weighted RRs for GDM risk were 0.64 (95% CI 0.43-0.96) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.55-0.84), respectively. The weighted RR when compared with the immunosuppressant, 5-aminosalicylate, and untreated groups was 0.70 (95% CI 0.41-1.18), 0.71 (95% CI 0.52-0.95), and 0.85 (95% CI 0.59-1.24), respectively. This nationwide cohort reported a decreased risk of GDM among patients who used anti-TNFs during early pregnancy compared with those unexposed. GDM risk may become a consideration in the decision-making process when choosing treatment options for pregnant women with a risk factor for GDM.

Comparative real-world outcomes between ustekinumab, infliximab, and adalimumab in bio-naïve and bio-experienced Crohn’s disease patients: a retrospective multicenter study

BackgroundNumerous studies have compared the efficacy of ustekinumab (UST) and anti-TNF agents [infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab(ADA)] in moderate to severe Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. This study aims to compare the efficacy of UST, IFX, and ADA while differentiating between bio-naïve and bio-experienced patients, which is an underexplored aspect, particularly in Asia.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective multi-center study from 2012 to 2023, categorizing patients into bio-naïve and bio-experienced groups. We evaluated clinical remission rates after induction therapy and clinical outcomes, including CD-related hospitalization, intestinal resection, and drug discontinuation during maintenance therapy.ResultsAmong the 214 bio-naïve CD patients, 60 received UST, 108 received IFX, and 46 received ADA. After 1:1 propensity score matching between UST and anti-TNF agents groups, 59 patients were analyzed in each group (45 in the IFX group and 14 in the ADA group). We found no significant differences in clinical remission rates (P = 0.071), CD-related hospitalization (P = 0.800), intestinal resection (P = 0.390), or drug discontinuation (P = 0.052) between the UST, IFX, and ADA groups in bio-naïve CD patients. In bio-experienced CD patients, with 35 in the UST group and 13 in the anti-TNF agents group, the UST group showed a lower risk of drug discontinuation (P = 0.004) than the anti-TNF agents group.ConclusionsThis study suggests that UST, IFX, and ADA are equally effective in bio-naïve CD patients, while in bio-experienced patients, mostly with previous exposure to anti-TNF agents, UST may offer superior drug durability.

De-escalating therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: Results from an observational study in clinical practice

Background and objectivesCombination therapy with an immunomodulator (IMM) and an anti-TNF is commonly recommended in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. However, little is known about relapse rates after therapeutic de-escalation. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of relapse in a cohort of UC and CD patients with long-standing clinical remission after discontinuation of IMM or anti-TNF and to identify predictive factors for relapse. MethodsThis retrospective study included patients with UC or CD on combination therapy and clinical remission for at least 6 months. IMM or anti-TNF was stopped upon physician decision. Primary objective was to evaluate the relapse rates after discontinuation of IMM or anti-TNF and to analyze predictors of relapse. ResultsThe study included 88 patients, 48 patients (54.5%) discontinued IMM and 40 (45.5%) anti-TNF. During follow-up, relapse rates were 16.7% and 52.5% in the IMM discontinuation group and anti-TNF discontinuation group, respectively (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that anti-TNF discontinuation (HR=3.01; 95% CI=1.22–7.43) and ileal CD location (HR=2.36; 95% CI=1.02–5.47) were predictive factors for relapse while inflammatory CD phenotype was a protective factor (HR=0.32; 95% CI=0.11–0.90). Reintroduction of anti-TNF upon relapse was effective and safe. ConclusionAnti-TNF discontinuation led to significantly higher relapse rates compared to IMM discontinuation in UC and CD patients on combination therapy. Anti-TNF discontinuation and ileal CD location were identified as predictive factors for relapse while inflammatory CD phenotype was a protective factor. Retreatment after anti-TNF discontinuation was effective and safe.

Impact of antitumour necrosis factor therapy on surgery in inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study

ObjectiveIt is unclear whether widespread use of biologics is reducing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) surgical resection rates. We designed a population-based study evaluating the impact of early antitumour necrosis factor...

Clinical and humoral response after SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection in patients receiving immunosuppressant therapy

BackgroundDespite impaired humoral responses in patients treated with immunosuppressants (ISPs), recent studies found similar severity of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections compared to controls. One potential explanation is the rapid generation humoral responses upon infection, but evidence is lacking. ObjectivesTo investigate longitudinal dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 antibody repertoire after SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron breakthrough infections in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) on ISPs and controls. MethodsAs prospective sub-study of the national Target-to-B! (T2B!) consortium, we included IMID patients on ISPs and controls who reported SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections between July 1, 2021, and April 1, 2022. To get an impression of the dynamics of the antibody repertoire, three antibody titers of wild-type RBD, wild-type S, and omicron RBD were measured at four time points after SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections. ResultsWe included 302 IMID patients on ISPs and 178 controls. Antibody titers increased up to 28 days after breakthrough infections in both groups. However, in IMID patients on anti-CD20 therapy and sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor (S1P) modulators, antibody titers were considerably lower compared to controls. In the anti-TNF group, we observed slightly lower antibody titers in the early stages and a faster decline of antibodies after infection compared to controls. Breakthrough infections were mostly mild and hospitalization was required in less than 1% of the cases. ConclusionsMost ISPs do not influence the dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 antibody repertoire and exhibit a rapid recall response with cross-reactive antibody clones towards new viral variants. However, in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapy or S1P modulators, the dynamics were greatly impaired, and to a lesser extent in those anti-TNF. Nevertheless, only a few severe breakthrough cases were reported.

P610 Ustekinumab demonstrates superior treatment persistence over anti-TNF in Crohn’s disease patients previously treated with vedolizumab

Abstract Background With the rise in biologic therapies to manage moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), determining the optimal treatment sequence has become crucial. This aids in the selection of the next biologic agent after prior exposure or unresponsiveness to a previous regimen. Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-specific α4β7-integrin inhibitor recognized for its efficacy in treating moderate to severe IBD. Yet, only a few studies have assessed the comparative effectiveness of alternative biologics, such as ustekinumab (UST) and antitumor necrosis factor agents (anti-TNF), following VDZ exposure. Methods In our retrospective study conducted at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, a leading 3700-bed medical facility in Taiwan, we examined 110 IBD patients who underwent treatment with UST or anti-TNF agents (including adalimumab and infliximab) from May 2019 to September 2023. UST's standard maintenance dosing in Taiwan is every 12 weeks. We utilized Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the 52-week treatment retention of UST versus anti-TNF. Results Of the 110 participants, 40 were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC), and 70 with Crohn’s disease. The demographics between the anti-TNF and UST groups regarding age, gender, and body mass index were comparable. The primary reason for vedolizumab discontinuation in both groups was secondary non-response (Table 1). UST exhibited a notably higher 52-week retention in overall IBD (HR: 5.36, 95% CI: 1.84-15.62, P = 0.002, Figure 1a) and in Crohn’s disease patients (HR: 10.75, 95% CI: 1.34-86, P = 0.025, Figure 1b) compared to anti-TNF. While UST also showed superior persistence at 52 weeks in UC patients, the difference was not statistically significant (HR: 2.25, 95% CI: 0.63-8, P = 0.211, Figure 1c). At the 52-week mark, 73.5% of the anti-TNF group and 81% of the UST group were not on steroids. Secondary non-response was the predominant cause for discontinuation of the current biologic. Notably, UST required more frequent dose adjustments than anti-TNF. The safety profile of both treatments was comparable. Conclusion UST showed superior treatment persistence, compared to anti-TNF in Crohn's disease patients who had previously been exposed to vedolizumab. However, UST required more frequent dosing adjustments compared to anti-TNF.

P085 Tc17 cells with a distinct immune signature do not correlate with response to therapy with ustekinumab or TNF antibodies in active Crohn’s Disease

Abstract Background IL-17 producing CD8+ T cells (Tc17) expressing a specific immune signature (CD6high, CD39, CD69, PD-1, CD27low) were shown to be associated with active Crohn’s Disease (CD) and inform flare free survival. Here, we addressed the question whether Tc17 cells and their signature also correlate with response of CD patients to therapies with antibodies targeting TNFα or IL-12/23. Methods Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were longitudinally collected from CD patients prior to and up to 35 weeks after initiation of therapy with either TNF antibodies or ustekinumab and CD8+ T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results were correlated with clinical outcomes. Results We analyzed dynamic changes during treatment in blood samples of 36 CD patients initiating anti-TNF (n = 14) or ustekinumab therapy (N = 22). Baseline Tc17 frequencies differed between ustekinumab and anti-TNF treatment groups, with significantly higher frequencies in the ustekinumab group. This may be due to differences in the baseline patient characteristics; while ustekinumab treated patients were all previously treated with anti-TNF-antibodies, most of the anti-TNF treated patients were naïve to biologics. Indeed, Tc17 frequencies increased during anti-TNF treatment, while Tc17 frequencies were reduced at follow up in the ustekinumab group. However, Tc17 frequencies in the peripheral blood at baseline did not correlate with response to either therapy, nor did the frequencies of Tc17 cells expressing Tc17 signature proteins. The expression of Tc17 signature proteins by IL-17A producing CD8+ T cells did not change significantly during follow up, suggesting that the Tc17 signature was preserved during anti-TNF and ustekinumab therapy. We did not observe major changes in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines by Tc17 cells during therapy. Conclusion Our data suggest that despite playing a pathogenic role in CD, Tc17 cells with a distinct immune signature do not directly correlate with response to therapy with anti-TNF agents or ustekinumab. However, anti-TNF therapy may skew CD8 T cell differentiation towards a Tc17 phenotype, which may have an impact on long term disease outcomes and should be investigated further.

Study of thyroid disorders in ankylosing spondylitis patients on anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a systemic rheumatic disease characterized mainly by involvement of sacroiliac joints and axial skeleton. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors are biologic agents which are Food and Drug Administration approved to treat AS and also act as a key factor in the treatment of autoimmune thyroid disease. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the thyroid gland disorders (functions and thyroid autoantibodies) in AS patients on anti-TNF-α biologics and their relation to disease activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This comparative cross-sectional study included 75 AS patients classified into two groups: Group I: treated with NSAIDs (n = 30) and Group II: treated with anti-TNF-α biologics (n = 45). Thyroid function tests, thyroid autoantibodies, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and human leukocytic antigen B27 were measured. AS disease activity was assessed by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) scores. Thyroid ultrasonography was used to detect any thyroid gland nodularity and echogenicity. RESULTS: There were significant differences between both groups regarding BASDAI (P = 0.005), CRP (P = 0.005), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) (P = 0.001), and anti-thyroid peroxidase (anti-TPO) (P = 0.007). A significant difference was found regarding the thyroid status, with more normal thyroid and more hyperthyroid patients in the anti-TNF-treated group (P = 0.003). There were statistically significant positive correlations between BASDAI and CRP (P = 0.007), TSH (P = 0.004), and thyroid anti-TPO antibody (P = 0.008) in the anti-TNF-treated patients. By ultrasound examination of the thyroid gland, 75.6% of the anti-TNF group had normal thyroid gland compared to 56.6% of the other group, and the reported nodules were mostly of benign TIRADS classification. Comparing different subgroups of thyroid nodularity with different treatment regimens revealed significant differences in BASDAI and different laboratory investigations in favor of the anti-TNF-treated patients. CONCLUSION: From this cohort study, we can conclude that thyroid autoimmune disease and thyroid nodules in AS patients can be controlled by treatment with anti-TNF-α biologic drugs better than NSAIDs alone.

Vedolizumab does not increase risk of clostridium difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease using vedolizumab: A retrospective cohort study

IntroductionSeveral studies have shown increased incidence, recurrence, and severity of Clostridium difficileinfection (CDI) over the last decade. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who develop CDI are more prone to morbidity and mortality than CDI in patients without IBD. This study seeks to evaluate whether IBD patients who use vedolizumab are at increased risk of CDI compared to IBD patients using other therapies. MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study, and 684 patients with confirmed IBD (228 on vedolizumab, 228 on anti-TNF, and 228 on 5- Aminosalicylates acid therapy) were enrolled from January 2009 to August 2019 at a tertiary referral IBD center at McMaster University Medical Centre (MUMC) in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The primary outcome was time to the development of CDI in IBD patients using different therapies. Secondary outcomes included rates of CDI and the association between baseline variables and risk of CDI. A Cox proportional hazards (PH) model was used to evaluate baseline factors and development of CDI. ResultThere was no difference in time to CDI between the three treatment groups (log rank p-value 0.37). CDI occurred in 16 patients (2.3%), specifically four patients (1.75%) in the vedolizumab group, four patients (1.75%) in the anti-TNF group, and eight patients (3.5%) in the 5-ASA group. The Cox PH model found current smoking, older age, and concomitant immunomodulator use as risk factors for CDI, after adjustment for other covariates. Vedolizumab was not associated with increased risk of CDI in the model. ConclusionBiologic therapy with vedolizumab or anti-TNF did not impact risk of CDI. Risk factors for CDI in IBD patients included smoking, older age at the onset of medication, and immunomodulator therapy. Clinicians should have high degree of suspicion for CDI in IBD patients presenting with diarrhea, particularly in those with risk factors identified in this study.

De-escalating therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: Results from an observational study in clinical practice

Background and objectivesCombination therapy with an immunomodulator (IMM) and an anti-TNF is commonly recommended in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. However, little is known about relapse rates after therapeutic de-escalation. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of relapse in a cohort of UC and CD patients with long-standing clinical remission after discontinuation of IMM or anti-TNF and to identify predictive factors for relapse. MethodsThis retrospective study included patients with UC or CD on combination therapy and clinical remission for at least 6 months. IMM or anti-TNF was stopped upon physician decision. Primary objective was to evaluate the relapse rates after discontinuation of IMM or anti-TNF and to analyze predictors of relapse. ResultsThe study included 88 patients, 48 patients (54.5%) discontinued IMM and 40 (45.5%) anti-TNF. During follow-up, relapse rates were 16.7% and 52.5% in the IMM discontinuation group and anti-TNF discontinuation group, respectively (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that anti-TNF discontinuation (HR=3.01; 95% CI=1.22–7.43) and ileal CD location (HR=2.36; 95% CI=1.02–5.47) were predictive factors for relapse while inflammatory CD phenotype was a protective factor (HR=0.32; 95% CI=0.11–0.90). Reintroduction of anti-TNF upon relapse was effective and safe. ConclusionAnti-TNF discontinuation led to significantly higher relapse rates compared to IMM discontinuation in UC and CD patients on combination therapy. Anti-TNF discontinuation and ileal CD location were identified as predictive factors for relapse while inflammatory CD phenotype was a protective factor. Retreatment after anti-TNF discontinuation was effective and safe.

Early Ileocecal Resection for Crohn’s Disease Is Associated With Improved Long-term Outcomes Compared With Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Early Crohn's disease (CD) treatment involves anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, whereas ileocecal resection (ICR) is reserved for complicated CD or treatment failure. We compared long-term outcomes of primary ICR and anti-TNF therapy for ileocecal CD. Using cross-linked nationwide registers, we identified all individuals diagnosed with ileal or ileocecal CD between 2003 and 2018 and treated with ICR or anti-TNF agents within 1 year of diagnosis. The primary outcome was a composite of ≥1 of the following: CD-related hospitalization, systemic corticosteroid exposure, CD-related surgery, and perianal CD. We conducted adjusted Cox's proportional hazards regression analyses and determined the cumulative risk of different treatments after primary ICR or anti-TNF therapy. Of 16,443 individuals diagnosed with CD, 1279 individuals fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, 45.4% underwent ICR and 54.6% received anti-TNF. The composite outcome occurred in 273 individuals (incidence rate, 110/1000 person-years) in the ICR group and in 318 individuals (incidence rate, 202/1000 person-years) in the anti-TNF group. The risk of the composite outcome was 33% lower with ICR compared with anti-TNF (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.83). ICR was associated with reduced risk of systemic corticosteroid exposure and CD-related surgery, but not other secondary outcomes. The proportion of individuals on immunomodulator, anti-TNF, who underwent subsequent resection, or were on no therapy 5 years post-ICR was 46.3%, 16.8%, 1.8%, and 49.7%, respectively. These data suggest that ICR may have a role as first-line therapy in CD management and challenge the current paradigm of reserving surgery for complicated CD refractory or intolerant to medications. Yet, given inherent biases associated with observational data, our findings should be interpreted and applied cautiously in clinical decision making.

Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy is associated with attenuated humoral response to SARS-COV-2 vaccines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BackgroundImmunosuppressive therapy used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is known to reduce vaccine immunogenicity. AimsThis study aimed to 1) predict the humoral response elicited by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in IBD patients based on their ongoing treatment and other relevant patient and vaccine characteristics and 2) assess the humoral response to a booster dose of mRNA vaccine. MethodsWe conducted a prospective study in adult IBD patients. Anti-spike (S) IgG antibodies were measured after initial vaccination and again after one booster dose. A multiple linear regression model was created to predict anti-S antibody titer following initial complete vaccination in different therapeutic groups (no immunosuppression, anti-TNF, immunomodulators and combination therapy). A two-tailed Wilcoxon test for two dependent groups was performed to compare anti-S values before and after the booster dose. ResultsOur study included 198 IBD patients. The multiple linear regression identified anti-TNF and combination therapy (versus no immunosuppression), current smoking, viral vector (versus mRNA) vaccine and interval between vaccination and anti-S measurement as statistically significant predictors of the log anti-S antibody levels (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between no immunosuppression and immunomodulators (p = 0.349) and between anti-TNF and combination therapy (p = 0.997). Statistically significant differences for anti-S antibody titer before and after the booster dose of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were found, both for non-anti-TNF and anti-TNF groups. ConclusionsAnti-TNF treatment (either alone or in combination therapy) is associated with lower anti-S antibody levels. Booster mRNA doses seem to increase anti-S both in non-anti-TNF and anti-TNF treated patients. Special attention should be paid to this group of patients when planning vaccination schemes.

Determination of Heterogeneous Proteomic and Metabolomic Response in anti-TNF and anti-IL-6 Treatment of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Reduction in tumor necrosis factor (αTNF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) activities is a widely utilized strategy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with a high success rate. Despite both schemes targeting the deprivation of inflammatory reactions caused by the excessive activity of cytokines, their mechanisms of action and the final output are still unequal. This was a comparative longitudinal study that lasted for 24 weeks and aimed to find the answer to why the two schemes of therapy can pass out of proportion in attitude of their efficiency. What are the differences in metabolic and proteomic responses among patients who were being treated by either the anti-TNF or anti-IL-6 strategy? We found increased levels of immunoglobulins A and G (more than 2-fold in anti-IL-6 and more than 4-5-fold in anti-TNF groups) at the final stage (24 weeks) of monitoring but the most profound increase was determined for µ-chains of immunoglobulins in both groups of study. Metabolomic changes displayed main alterations with regard to arginine metabolism and collagen maintenance, where arginine increased 8.86-fold (p < 0.001) in anti-TNF and 5.71-fold (p < 0.05) in anti-IL-6 groups but patients treated by the anti-TNF scheme suffered a higher depletion of arginine before the start of therapy. Some indicators of matrix and bone tissue degradation also increased 4-hydroxyproline (4-HP) more than 6-fold (p < 0.001) in anti-TNF and more than 2-fold (p < 0.05) in the anti-IL-6 group, but the growth dynamics in the anti-IL6 group was delayed (gradually raised at week 24) compared to the anti-TNF group (raised at week 12) following a smooth reduction. The ELISA analysis of IL-6 and TNFα concentration in the study population supported proteomic and metabolomic data. A positive correlation between ΔCDAI and ΔDAS28 indicators and ESR and CRP was established for the majority of patients after 24 weeks of treatment where ESR and CRP reduced by 20% and 40% finally, respectively. A regression model using the Forest Plot was estimated to elucidate the impact of the most significant clinical, biochemical, and anthropometric indicators for the evaluation of differences between considered anti-TNF and anti-IL-6 schemes of therapy.

P801 Maintenance phase effectiveness and persistence after two years in biologic-naïve ulcerative colitis patients treated with vedolizumab or anti-TNF (VEDO-IBD-study)

Abstract Background In this two-arm prospective real-world-evidence (RWE) study with propensity score adjustment, we aimed to analyse the persistence of biologic therapy in biologic-naïve ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and to compare the 2-year effectiveness of vedolizumab (VEDO) and anti-TNF. Methods Between 2017 and 2020, 1200 consecutively enrolled biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients with UC and CD (Crohn’s disease) were prospectively included in the VEDOIBD study from 45 IBD-experienced centres across Germany. After the exclusion of biologic-experienced patients, CD, and missing outcomes, the final sample consisted of 314 biologic-naïve UC patients with 2-year follow-up data. In this mITT analysis switching was considered as outcome failure, and clinical remission and (steroid-free) remission rates (pMayo ≤1 plus a bleeding subscore=0 - and no systemic use of steroids or oral budesonide at two years) at two years were predefined as outcomes. To reduce the effect of confounders, propensity score (PS) adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was implemented. A weighted logistic regression was used, and the results were reported as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results The two-year maintenance phase effectiveness of 182 VEDO and 132 anti-TNF (ADA: 25.8%; IFX: 58.3%; GOL 15.9%) biologic-naïve UC patients were analysed in this prospective RWE-comparison of VEDO vs anti-TNF. Significantly more patients switched to another biologic in the anti-TNF group when compared to the VEDO group up to 2 years (54% vs 29%; p&amp;lt;0.0001) (Fig. 1). In the mITT analysis after 2 years a statistically significant higher clinical remission rate of 43.2% was found for VEDO vs 25.8% for anti-TNF (OR 95% 2.18 (1.19-3.99), p=0.011) (Fig. 2). Considering the two-year effectiveness of ADA and IFX the response rates of VEDO were numerically higher than those of ADA (45.2% vs 37.9%) but not statistically significant. In contrast, for VEDO versus IFX, there was a clear difference in favour of VEDO that resulted in a clinical remission rate of 43.1% versus 16.5% for IFX (p=0.0003). Conclusion As shown previously, in the induction phase, there is comparable effectiveness for VEDO and anti-TNF, although the remission rates are relatively low and similar to the range reported in RCTs. Over one year, the effectiveness tends to improve in favour of VEDO, potentially due to better treatment persistence. After two years, the clinical remission rate in the VEDO group is statistically significantly higher than in the anti-TNF group. The higher treatment persistence of VEDO vs anti-TNF and the higher effectiveness may suggest VEDO as a first-line biologics therapy option in UC patients.

P742 Real-world evidence comparison on the effectiveness of ustekinumab vs anti-TNF or vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis: induction phase results from the prospective, observational RUN-UC study

Abstract Background Observational real-world evidence (RWE) studies on the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab (UST) in ulcerative colitis (UC) are required in addition to RCTs, which are usually confined to selected patients and thus may not represent distinct treatment patterns and everyday clinical practice. For this reason, the prospective, controlled, propensity score (PS)-adjusted RUN-UC study was conducted in UC patients starting a newly initiated biologics therapy with a follow-up period of 3 years. The aim of the present analysis was to investigate the induction phase effectiveness of UST vs anti-TNF vs vedolizumab (VEDO) in UC in terms of clinical and steroid-free remission. Methods Between 2020-2022, 507 UC patients starting a new therapy with UST or other biologics were enrolled in 34 IBD-experienced centres across Germany. After exclusion of small molecules and missing outcomes, the final sample consisted of 317 patients. Response modified (reduction of partial Mayo score (pMayo) by ≥ 3 points from baseline to week-16 and a reduction of at least 30% or reaching remission at week-16), clinical remission (pMayo ≤ 1 plus a bleeding subscore=0), and steroid-free remission (pMayo ≤ 1, bleeding subscore=0 and no systemic use of steroids or oral budesonide during the last 8 weeks) were considered as outcomes. To reduce the effect of confounders, PS adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was implemented. A weighted logistic regression was used, and the results were reported as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Health-related quality of life was assessed by using the self-reported visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) of the EQ-5D. Changes in EQ-VAS from baseline to week-16 were assessed with a linear model. Results 101 UST (bio-naïve: 6), 106 anti-TNF (ADA: 24.5%, IFX: 65.1%, GOL: 10.4%) (bio-naïve: 70) and 110 VEDO (bio-naïve: 73) UC-patients were included. PS adjustment removed systematic differences between the three groups (UST/anti-TNF/VEDO: 44.9/43.8/48.1% males, 6.7/9.9/5.5% smokers, 7.9/12.5/9.3% EIM). The effectiveness of UST in terms of response, clinical and steroid-free remission was comparable to that of anti-TNF and VEDO at week 16 (Tab. 1). We observed a significant increase in EQ-VAS within all three groups (Tab. 2). The increase in the UST group was significantly higher than in the VEDO group and numerically higher than in the anti-TNF group. Conclusion In this prospective RUN-UC study, with propensity score weighted groups, UST showed similar induction phase effectiveness in comparison with anti-TNF and VEDO. Quality of life was significantly improved in the UST group vs VEDO and was numerically higher than anti-TNF after the induction phase.

OP36 Real-world evidence on comparative effectiveness of Ustekinumab vs anti-TNF in Crohn’s disease with propensity score adjustment: two-year maintenance phase results from the prospective observational RUN-CD study

Abstract Background Within the framework of the prospective real-world RUN-CD registry on the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab (UST) in Crohn’s disease (CD), a total of 901 CD-patients undergoing a newly initiated biologics therapy were enrolled in 44 IBD-experienced centers from all over Germany between 2017-2020 with a follow-up of 3 years. Here, the results on the effectiveness of the maintenance therapy over 24 months are presented as a real-world evidence (RWE) comparison of CD-patients with UST vs anti-TNF. Methods After exclusion of other biologics than UST and anti-TNF and missing outcomes (HBI), the final sample consisted of 550 CD patients. Clinical remission (HBI ≤ 4) was the predefined endpoint at month 24 and additionally, switching of biologics therapy was considered as an outcome failure. Patients were analysed on a modified intent-to-treat basis (mITT; switchers considered as outcome failure). To reduce the effect of confounders, propensity score (PS) adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was implemented. A weighted logistic regression was used, and the results were reported as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Quality of life was assessed using the self-reported visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) of the EQ-5D with changes from baseline to 2 years. Results 308 UST (naïve: 27) and 242 anti-TNF (naïve: 162) CD-patients were included (ADA: 61.2%, IFX: 38.8%). The number of switches within 24 months was significantly lower with UST than with anti-TNF (27.6% vs 37.1%; p=0.038), and especially with IFX, whereby the difference between UST and IFX (27.6% vs 46.7%; p=0.003) proves to be statistically significant (Fig. 1). Clinical remission at two years was not statistically different for the overall UST vs anti-TNF groups (51.2% vs 54.4) (numerically higher in biologic-naïve UST- vs anti-TNF-patients, without statistically significance) (Tab. 1). Remission rates were similar for UST vs ADA, while they were significantly higher for UST vs IFX (54.4% vs 37.9%; p=0.008) (Tab. 2), and also significantly higher for ADA vs. IFX (58.2% vs 37.9%; p=0.003). As a sign of an improved QoL we observed a significant increase in EQ-VAS within both treatment groups. However, a similar increase in EQ-VAS was observed with UST and anti-TNF (+14.2 vs +12.3; p=0.147). Conclusion In this prospective two-year RWE comparison clinical remission was, also due to more frequent switches within the IFX group, significantly higher with UST when compared with IFX and higher with ADA than with IFX. Considering the effectiveness results of UST and the proven favourable safety profile, UST can be considered a first-line targeted therapy for CD.

P111 Efficacy of a novel long-acting lipidated interleukin-22, alone and in combination with anti-TNF treatment, in a murine chronic DSS colitis model

Abstract Background Most current treatments and new agents in clinical development for Inflammatory Bowel Disease focus on inhibition of excessive inflammation. However, to break the ceiling on current clinical remission rates, new approaches, for example targeting mucosal healing, are needed. The cytokine interleukin-22 (IL-22) plays a key role in epithelial healing and has early proof-of-concept as a potential drug class in a phase 1 trial in Ulcerative Colitis. Here we present results from a mouse model of colitis demonstrating the efficacy of IL-22 agonism and complementarity with existing immunomodulatory treatment options. Methods Eight-week-old female C57Bl/6N mice (n=56) were subjected to a DSS-induced model of colitis; mice were given 2% (weight/volume) DSS in the drinking water for three 7-day cycles followed by 7 days of regular drinking water. Mice were treated from day 18 until the end of study with either vehicle, lipidated IL-22, an anti-murine TNF antibody at a suboptimal dose, a combination of the lipidated IL-22 and anti-TNF, and, as positive control, anti-murine TNF at an optimal dose. Colitis severity was monitored during the study and at study end endoscopic scoring was performed. Colon length and weight were measured, and histological analysis on formalin-fixed paraffin sections performed by a blinded pathologist. Results At termination, all treatment groups showed reduced body weight loss and improved DAI scores compared to vehicle treated animals, which was significant for all but the suboptimal anti-TNF group. Combination treatment resulted in an additive treatment effect compared to single treatment alone, with mean DAI improving by 13% and 48% for the anti-TNF and IL-22 groups alone versus 68% in combination. Similar effects were observed for the endoscopic and histological scores. The compositive endoscopic score improved by 21% (anti-TNF) and 55% (IL-22) versus 66% for the combination, and histological scores 22% and 52% versus 66%. These combination results likely represent the maximum response that can be achieved in the model, since the improvements obtained are the same as those for the treatment positive control for the model (68% and 62% improvements in endoscopic and histological scores, respectively). Conclusion A novel long-acting lipidated IL-22, which acts on epithelial repair mechanisms, demonstrated strong and significant improvements on all measured parameters in a chronic DSS model of colitis. Combining the IL-22 mode-of-action with an immunomodulatory agent, exemplified by a murine anti-TNF antibody, demonstrated the complementarity of IL-22 agonism to existing treatment options. Clinical trials to assess safety and tolerability of lipidated IL-22 are expected to commence at the start of 2023.

P435 Real-world comparison of effectiveness between ustekinumab and a second anti-TNF agent in patients with symptomatic stenosing Crohn's disease after failure of a first anti-TNF agent: results of the USTEKNOSIS study

Abstract Background While surgery was considered as the reference for stricturing Crohn's disease (CD), anti-TNF agents are now the first-line treatment thanks to the CREOLE study. However, there is no efficacy data after anti-TNF failure. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of ustekinumab and a second anti-TNF agent after failure of a first anti-TNF in symptomatic stricturing Crohn’s disease (CD). Methods In this multicenter study, we retrospectively included all adult patients with CD treated with ustekinumab or anti-TNF for symptomatic stricture (confirmed on imaging or endoscopy) after prior exposure ≥ one anti-TNF for the current stricture, without surgery between the failure of the last anti-TNF and the study. The primary endpoint was clinical remission (composite endpoint) at 6 months was defined as no pain, no vomiting, no food restriction, no sub-occlusive episode, no steroid, no surgery or discontinuation of treatment. The long-term endpoints were discontinuation of treatment for failure, bowel damage progression and surgery. The comparisons were performed after using propensity score analysis adjusted on potential confounders. Results Overall, 70 patients were analyzed, including 34 in the ustekinumab group and 36 in the anti-TNF group (29 on infliximab and 7 on adalimumab). The two groups were similar for age (38.5 vs 37.6 years), CD duration (12.2 vs 13.5 years), female gender (41.2% vs 51.8%), CD location (p=0.43) and CD phenotype (p=0.38). Concomitant immunosuppressant was observed in 63.9% with an anti-TNF versus 8.8% with ustekinumab. The number (p=0.56) and the length (p=0.10) of stricture were also similar. The proportion of patients ≥ 2 prior biologics was higher in the ustekinumab group (41.2% vs 8.3%; p=0.001). The rate of primary failure to anti-TNF agent was comparable (16.7% vs 20.6%). After adjustment based on propensity scores, the rate of clinical remission at 6 months was 73.9% and 42.7% (p = 0.24), under ustekinumab and anti-TNF, respectively. The predictive factors of remission in patients receiving ustekinumab were prior bowel resection (p=0.001) and length of stricture &amp;lt; 12 cm (p=0.042), while no predictor was found in those treated with anti-TNF agent. The risk of treatment discontinuation for failure (HR =2.86 [1.33-6.15]; p=0.008) or bowel damage progression (HR=3.90 [1.64-9.24]; p=0.003) were significantly greater in patients receiving another anti-TNF agent compared to those on ustekinumab. We did not observe any significant difference concerning the risk of surgery (HR=2.60 [0.70-9.61]; p=0.15). Conclusion Ustekinumab seems to be more effective than a 2nd anti-TNF to treat symptomatic stricturing CD after failure of a first anti-TNF. However, these data need to be confirmed by independent prospective data.

OP11 Ileocecal resection for recently diagnosed ileocecal Crohn’s disease is associated with improved long-term outcomes compared to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy: a population-based study

Abstract Background Early treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD) often involves biologics such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents. Ileocecal resection (ICR), while a therapeutic option in early CD, is generally reserved for complicated CD or when medical treatment fails. We aimed to compare long-term outcomes of ICR and anti-TNF therapy as index treatment for ileocecal CD, initiated within one year of diagnosis, in the Danish nationwide cohort. Methods Using cross-linked nationwide registers, we identified all individuals who lived in Denmark and were diagnosed with ileal CD between 2003 and 2018. We included individuals who underwent ICR or received anti-TNF drugs as index treatment for ileocecal CD within one year of diagnosis. We excluded patients who did not have pathology information confirming disease in the ileocecal region. The primary outcome was a composite of CD-related hospitalization, systemic corticosteroid exposure, CD-related surgery, and perianal CD diagnosis. We conducted Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to compare outcomes in the two groups after adjusting for potential confounders. We also determined the proportion of individuals initiated on immunomodulator (IMM), anti-TNF, or no therapy at 5 years after ICR. Results Of the 16,443 individuals diagnosed with ileocecal CD between 2003 and 2018, 581 (3.5%) and 698 (4.2%) individuals with confirmed disease in the ileocecal region underwent ICR and received anti-TNF as the index treatment, respectively. The composite outcome occurred in 273 individuals (IR 110.3/100,0 person years (PY)) in the ICR group and in 318 individuals (IR 201.9/100,0 PY) in the anti-TNF group. The risk of the composite outcome was 33% lower in the ICR group compared to the anti-TNF group (aHR 0.67; 95% CI 0.54, 0.83), after adjusting for demographic and clinical variables. On analysis of individual outcomes, ICR was associated with reduced risk of systemic corticosteroid exposure and CD-related surgery, but not CD-related hospitalization or perianal CD diagnosis. Of individuals who underwent ICR, the proportion that was initiated on IMM, anti-TNF treatment or no treatment at 5 years of follow up was 47.5%, 17.1%, and 50.3%, respectively. Conclusion These data support the role of ICR as an index treatment for ileocecal CD and challenge the current paradigm of reserving surgery for complicated CD refractory or intolerant to medications. Further studies will help identify characteristics of individuals who needed no treatment after ICR.

P712 Real-World Efficacy And Safety Of Ustekinumab And Adalimumab In Patients With Crohn’s Disease: Propensity Matched Analysis

Abstract Background Ustekinumab (UST), an anti-IL-12/23 p40 monoclonal antibody, was shown to be as effective and safe as the anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody adalimumab (ADL) in the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). Most studies on UST in patients with CD have been conducted in the Western patients and lack in Asian patients with CD. This study aimed to compare real-world clinical efficacy and safety of UST with ADL in Korean CD patients with anti-TNF naïve and failure group. Methods The retrospective single-center cohort study was conducted on the adult patients with moderated to severe active Crohn’s disease, from 2010 to July 2022. Medical records was extracted from the Clinical Data Werehouse of Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Propensity-matched analysis was performed to evaluate patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based clinical remission (PRO3&amp;lt;13) at week 52 and 96 in patient treated with UST and ADL. Subgroup analysis was performed on the biologics-naïve and anti-TNF-failure patients. Results A total of 188 CD patients treated with UST and and 299 received with ADL were enrolled. In a propensity -matched cohort adjusted with age, sex, initial CDAI score, and Montreal classification, the clinical remission rate was higher in UST group than ADL at week 52 (Odds ratio [OR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-5.58, P = 0.007) and at week 96 (OR 12.0, 95% CI 1.56-92.29, p = 0.017). In subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in both group in biologics-naïve group, whereas UST group showed higher clinical remission compared with ADL group in anti-TNF failure group (OR 4.67, 95% CI 1.34-16.23, p = 0.016). Biochemical remission (CRP &amp;lt; 0.05) showed no significant difference between both groups at week 52 and 96. Severe adverse effects leading to biologics discontinuation was numerically high in UST group and ADL group (1, 0.53% vs. 7, 2.34%, p = 0.160). Conclusion Compared with ADL, UST showed comparable efficacy in biologic-naïve patients and superior efficacy in anti-TNF failure patients with CD in Korean patients with CD.