Anterior Instability Of Glenohumeral Joint Research Articles

Capsulolabral Reconstruction During the Open Latarjet Procedure

Surgical treatment of anterior glenohumeral joint instability can be challenging and carries the inherent risk of recurrent instability, dislocation arthropathy, and postoperative loss of external rotation. In the current manuscript, a technique for combined reconstruction of anterior labrum and capsule, with concomitant reduction of the humeral head during anterior capsule reconstruction in open Latarjet procedure, is presented. Analogous to other techniques, the coracoid graft is fixed on the anteroinferior part of the glenoid between 3 and 5 o'clock. However, for this technique, reattachment of the labrum is performed between the native glenoid and the bone graft. Additionally, during the reconstruction of the anterior capsule on the coracoacromial ligament, while the operated arm is held in external rotation to avoid the postoperative rotational deficit, the humeral head is reduced posteriorly in the center of the glenoid during adduction, slight anterior forward flexion, and a posterior lever push. By doing so, the inherent theoretical risks of persistent instability and dislocation arthropathy are believed to be decreased. Further studies are needed to clarify the long-term consequences of this surgical technique in the clinical setting.

Anterior glenohumeral instability: Current review with technical pearls and pitfalls of arthroscopic soft-tissue stabilization.

The glenohumeral joint (GHJ) allows for a wide range of motion, but is also particularly vulnerable to episodes of instability. Anterior GHJ instability is especially frequent among young, athletic populations during contact sporting events. Many first time dislocators can be managed non-operatively with a period of immobilization and rehabilitation, however certain patient populations are at higher risk for recurrent instability and may require surgical intervention for adequate stabilization. Determination of the optimal treatment strategy should be made on a case-by-case basis while weighing both patient specific factors and injury patterns (i.e., bone loss). The purpose of this review is to describe the relevant anatomical stabilizers of the GHJ, risk factors for recurrent instability including bony lesions, indications for arthroscopic vs open surgical management, clinical history and physical examination techniques, imaging modalities, and pearls/pitfalls of arthroscopic soft-tissue stabilization for anterior glenohumeral instability.

The clinical and functional outcome of arthroscopic bankart repair in recurrent shoulder dislocation

Background: Study aimed to assess the functional and clinical outcome of arthroscopic bankart’s repair in recurrent shoulder dislocation using UCLA & SST scoring system.Methods: It is a prospective cohort study conducted on the 28 patients undergoing arthroscopic bankart’s repair for recurrent shoulder dislocation in the department of orthopaedics at vydehi institute of medical sciences and research centre, bengaluru from September 2017 to October 2019. Patients aged between 18-50 years of both genders undergoing arthroscopic bankart repair with anterior instability of glenohumeral joint with at least ≥2 episode of dislocation/subluxation, a positive clinical apprehension test and radiological evidence of glenohumeral instability and glenoid bone loss < 25% were included in the study and patients with glenoid bone loss >25%, contact sports athletes, previously failed arthroscopy or open surgery, seizure disorder, multidirectional instability/habitual dislocation were exclueded. Each case was followed post operatively for atleast 1 year.Results: This series consisted of 28 patients, with the mean follow up period of 12 months, the mean pre-operative UCLA score of 18 improved to 31.75 post operatively, the mean pre-operative SST score of 4.89 improved to 10.96 post operatively. Out of 28 patients none had episodes of recurrent dislocation and anterior translation or apprehension. External rotation in 90º of abduction improved in 25 patients (89%).Conclusion: we conclude that arthroscopic bankart’s repair in recurrent shoulder dislocation with suture anchors is a reliable procedure with respect to shoulder function, recurrence rate and range of movement.

Osseous Healing With Nonrigid Suture Fixation in the Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure.

Background:The Latarjet procedure is a popular means to surgically address anterior glenohumeral joint instability. Although the Latarjet procedure is becoming increasingly common, challenges persist and include postoperative complications secondary to use of the conventional 2 bicortical fixation screws. Recently, a novel surgical technique using a guided surgical approach for graft positioning with nonrigid fixation via a suture suspensory system has been described.Purpose:To evaluate healing rates and stability of the grafts in patients who underwent this new Latarjet technique.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:We retrospectively gathered anonymized computed tomography (CT) data sets from a total of 107 patients who underwent nonrigid suture fixation using a cortical button fixation for anterior glenohumeral instability. Of the 107 patients, 45 had CT scans performed at 2 different time periods. The CT scans of each patient were compared by 2 fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists. Data recorded included age, sex, date of scan, initial graft position on the glenoid, presence and degree of graft migration relative to the equator on follow-up scan, and percentage of osseous healing (as assessed by osseous bridging) on the follow-up scan. Descriptive statistics were calculated to evaluate the average migration and average percentage of healing at both time points.Results:Our population (n = 45) consisted of 38 men (84.4%) and 7 women (15.6%). The mean age was 27.1 ± 1.1 years. The mean time between initial CT scan (2 weeks postoperatively) and follow-up CT scan was 26 ± 2 weeks. On follow-up scan, reviewer 1 found 75.6% of patients had greater than 75% healing, and reviewer 2 found 70.2% of patients had greater than 75% healing. The center of the graft was measured at or below the equator on follow-up examination in 43 of 45 (95.6%) patients by reviewer 1 and 44 of 45 (97.8%) patients by reviewer 2.Conclusion:Based on these findings, nonrigid suture fixation using a cortical button device offers an effective alternative to traditional screw fixation for the Latarjet procedure with a high level of osseous healing and minimal graft migration.

Early postoperative complications after Latarjet procedure: a single-institution experience over 10 years

The Latarjet procedure is an effective procedure for the treatment of anterior glenohumeral joint instability; however, the complications are concerning. The purpose of this study was to review a single institution's experience with the Latarjet procedure for recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability specifically focusing on early complications. This was a retrospective review of all Latarjet procedures performed at a single institution from August 2008 to July 2018. The 90-day complication rate and associated risk factors for all complications and graft failure were recorded. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed for coracoid graft position and screw divergence. During the study period, 190 Latarjet procedures were performed with 90-day follow-up. The average age was 28.7 ± 11.3 years, male patients comprised 84.2% of the population, and 62.6% of patients had undergone a prior stabilization procedure. We observed 15 complications, for a 90-day complication rate of 9.0%; of the patients, 8 (4.2%) underwent reoperations. Graft or hardware failure occurred in 9 patients (4.7%) with loosened or broken screws, and 6 required reoperations (revision Latarjet procedure in 4, distal tibia allograft in 1, and iliac crest autograft in 1). Fixation with only 1 screw (P < .001) and an increased screw divergence angle (37° ± 8° vs. 24° ± 11°, P = .0257) were statistically associated with graft failure, whereas the use of cannulated screws (P = .487) was not. There were 6 nerve injuries (3.2%), including 2 combined axillary and suprascapular nerve injuries, 1 musculocutaneous nerve injury, 1brachial plexopathy, 1 peripheral sensory nerve deficit (likely axillary), and 1 sensory plexopathy. Suprascapular nerve injury at the spinoglenoid notch was associated with a longer superior screw (41.0 ± 1.4 mm vs. 33.5 ± 3.5 mm, P = .035) and increased screw divergence angle (40° ± 6° vs. 24° ± 11°, P = .0197). The coracoid graft was correctly positioned in the axial plane in 71% of cases and in the coronal plane in 73% of cases. The Latarjet procedure is a procedure that can reliably restore shoulder stability; however, graft- and nerve-related complications are relatively common. Two-thirds of the graft failures required reoperations, and half of the nerve injuries in this study led to residual symptoms. Fixation with only 1 screw and an increased screw divergence angle were significant predictors of graft failure. Suprascapular nerve injury at the spinoglenoid notch was associated with an increased screw divergence angle and longer superior screw.

Shoulder arthroplasty to address the sequelae of anterior instability arthropathy and stabilization procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chronic anterior glenohumeral joint instability is a common situation and can lead to progressive cartilage deterioration and ultimately instability arthopathy. Progressive cartilage deterioration can occur despite conservative or surgical treatment and the sequelae of these conditions are often addressed with total shoulder arthroplasty. Aims of the present study were to analyze the available literature to describe the technical aspects of this particular operation and to report outcomes and complication rates. The hypothesis was that shoulder arthropalsty in the sequelae of instability had lower outcomes and higher complication rates than arthroplasties for primary arthritis. A systematic review of the literature was performed, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Reviews, and Google Scholar were comprehensively searched using a combination of the following keywords: shoulder arthroplasty, reverse shoulder arthroplasty, dislocation arthropathy, capsulorrhaphy arthropathy and stabilization procedures. Thirteen studies with 365 patients met inclusion criteria. Since 13 patients were lost to follow-up, 352 were reviewed at an average follow-up of 53.4months. The average Constant-Murley (CM) and American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) scores improved from 35.6 and 35.7 to 72.7 and 77, respectively. The overall complication rate was 25.7% and the reoperation rate was 18.5%. Radiographs at follow-up revealed radiolucent lines on the humerus in 12.4% of cases and radiolucent lines or notching on the glenoid side in 22.7% of cases. The average Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies Score (MINORS) was 12.9 for non-comparative studies and 21.3 for comparative studies. Shoulder arthroplasty to address the sequelae of instability arthropathy and stabilization procedures can be a challenging procedure as a consequence of the distorted anatomy and severe glenohumeral joint pathology. Complication and reoperation rates are higher compared to shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral joint arthritis; however, the difference is not statistically significant. When reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSA) were considered as a subgroup and compared to anatomic shoulder replacements (total shoulders and hemiarthroplasties), they showed a lower revision rate.

Alternative Management of the Capsule in the Bristow-Latarjet Procedure

The Bristow-Latarjet procedure is considered the current gold standard for the management of anterior glenohumeral joint instability in which significant glenoid bone loss is present, and numerous techniques have been proposed for capsular management after the bony augmentation component of the procedure. These techniques for capsular management include excision of the capsule and labrum, 2-flap elevation, T-capsulotomy, or an L-shaped incision into the capsule. Capsular management during open shoulder procedures may vary among surgeons and may or may not include capsulolabral repair after the Bristow-Latarjet procedure. The purpose of this Technical Note was to illustrate an alternative approach to capsular management, focusing on the elevation of the capsulolabral complex as a sleeve along with augmentation using the coracoacromial ligament during the Bristow-Latarjet procedure in patients with anterior glenohumeral instability. The proposed technique provides the benefit of improvement in visualization to more reliably identify the ideal location for bone block placement and allows for the surgeon to perform a large inferior-to-superior capsular shift to prevent inferior subluxation or instability.

A patient with cervical spinal canal stenosis and anterior glenohumeral joint instability who experienced pain when undressing

A patient with cervical spinal canal stenosis and anterior glenohumeral joint instability who experienced pain when undressing

Current concepts in the management of recurrent anterior gleno-humeral joint instability with bone loss.

The management of recurrent anterior gleno-humeral joint instability is challenging in the presence of bone loss. It is often seen in young athletic patients and dislocations related to epileptic seizures and may involve glenoid bone deficiency, humeral bone deficiency or combined bipolar lesions. It is critical to accurately identify and assess the amount and position of bone loss in order to select the most appropriate treatment and reduce the risk of recurrent instability after surgery. The current literature suggests that coracoid and iliac crest bone block transfers are reliable for treating glenoid defects. The treatment of humeral defects is more controversial, however, although good early results have been reported after arthroscopic Remplissage for small defects. Larger humeral defects may require complex reconstruction or partial resurfacing. There is currently very limited evidence to support treatment strategies when dealing with bipolar lesions. The aim of this review is to summarise the current evidence regarding the best imaging modalities and treatment strategies in managing this complex problem relating particularly to contact athletes and dislocations related to epileptic seizures.

Differences in glenohumeral joint morphology between patients with anterior shoulder instability and healthy, uninjured volunteers

Traumatic glenohumeral joint (GHJ) dislocations are common, resulting in significant shoulder disability and pain. Previous research indicates that bony morphology is associated with an increased risk of injury in other joints (eg, the knee), but the extent to which bony morphology is associated with traumatic GHJ dislocation is unknown. This study assessed GHJ morphology in patients with anterior GHJ instability and in a control population of healthy volunteers. Bilateral computed tomography scans were used to measure GHJ morphology in both shoulders of 11 patients with instability and 11 control subjects. Specific outcome measures included the glenoid radius of curvature (ROC) in the anterior/posterior (A/P) and superior/inferior (S/I) directions, humeral head ROC, A/P and S/I conformity index, and A/P and S/I stability angle. Compared with the control subjects, the glenoid of the instability the injured shoulder in patients with instability was flatter (ie, higher ROC) in the A/P (P=.001) and S/I (P=.01) directions and this finding was also true for uninjured, contralateral shoulder (A/P: P=.01, S/I: P=.03). No differences in GHJ morphology were detected between the instability patients' injured and contralateral shoulders (P>.07). Similarly, no differences in GHJ morphology were detected between the control subjects' dominant and nondominant shoulders (P>.51). There are significant differences in GHJ morphology between healthy control subjects and both shoulders (injured and uninjured, contralateral) of patients diagnosed with anterior instability after GHJ dislocation. These findings are important clinically because they suggest that glenoid morphology may influence the risk of GHJ dislocation.

The Stabilizing Mechanism of the Latarjet Procedure

The Latarjet procedure has been used commonly for extra-articular treatment of anterior glenohumeral joint instability. Recently, the technique also has been used as a bone-grafting procedure to repair large glenoid defects. The "sling effect" and the "bone-block effect" have been proposed as the stabilizing mechanisms of this procedure. The aim of this study was to determine the stabilizing mechanisms of this procedure. Eight fresh-frozen shoulders were prepared and tested with use of a custom testing machine instrumented with a load cell. With a 50-N axial force applied to the humerus, the humeral head was translated anteriorly. Translational force was measured at both the end-range and the mid-range arm positions, with the capsule intact, after creation of a Bankart lesion, after creation of a large glenoid defect, and after the Latarjet procedure with no load and then three different sets of loads applied to the subscapularis and conjoint tendons. Then, these two tendons were removed to observe the contribution of the sling effect to the stability. Finally, the sutures attaching the coracoacromial ligament to the capsular flap were removed in order to observe the effect of that attachment. The translational force, which decreased significantly after creation of a Bankart lesion or a large glenoid defect, returned to the intact-condition level after the Latarjet procedure was performed. At the end-range arm position, the contribution of the sling effect by the subscapularis and conjoint tendons was 76% to 77% as the load changed, and the remaining 23% to 24% was contributed by the suturing of the capsular flap. At the mid-range position, the contribution of the sling effect was 51% to 62%, and the remaining 38% to 49% was contributed by the reconstruction of the glenoid. The main stabilizing mechanism of the Latarjet procedure was the sling effect at both the end-range and the mid-range arm positions. The Latarjet procedure remains an effective procedure for restoring stability to an unstable glenohumeral joint, particularly when there is glenoid bone deficiency.

Scapular Orientation During Planar and Three-dimensional Upper Limb Movements in Individuals with Anterior Glenohumeral Joint Instability

The purpose of the study was to investigate whether individuals with anterior glenohumeral joint (GHJ) instability exhibit different scapular orientation from individuals with healthy shoulders in a planar shoulder movement and a functional three-dimensional (3D) reaching task. This is a between-groups study with repeated measures. Ten people with anterior GHJ instability and 15 people with healthy shoulders participated in the study. For the planar shoulder movement task, participants were asked to abduct the shoulder from the resting position to pre-determined target angles (45°, 90°, and 135° of shoulder abduction) in the frontal plane. For the 3D reaching task, participants were asked to move the unconstrained arm to a remembered target location in space. Scapular orientation about three rotational axes was analysed at the target location and compared between the two groups of subjects. For planar abduction, participants with GHJ instability and those with healthy shoulders exhibited similar scapular orientation changes in upward-downward rotation, anterior-posterior tipping and medial-lateral rotation. For 3D reaching, participants with GHJ instability and those with healthy shoulders also exhibited similar scapular orientation changes pointing to targets at various locations. Results of this study show that scapular orientation changes associated with shoulder abduction and functional reaching activities were similar in people with GHJ instability and those with healthy shoulders. The current study suggests that anterior GHJ instability has little impact on scapular kinematics during upper limb movements in a chronic condition without pain, muscle weakness or limited range of motion. Altered scapular kinematics may not contribute to the high recurrence rate of anterior GHJ dislocation.

Rotator Cuff Weakness Is Not a Risk Factor for First-Time Anterior Glenohumeral Instability

Background:Shoulder instability is a common problem in young athletes and can lead to pain and decreased ability to participate in high-level activities. Little is known about the modifiable risk factors for glenohumeral joint instability.Hypothesis:Isometric shoulder strength at baseline would be a modifiable risk factor associated with subsequent first-time anterior instability events.Study Design:Cohort study.Methods:Study participants were freshmen entering the United States Military Academy in June 2006. All participants completed bilateral isometric strength evaluations with a hand-held dynamometer at baseline upon entry into the study. Variables measured included internal and external rotation at 0° (IR0, ER0) and internal and external rotation at 45° of abduction (IR45, ER45). All subjects were followed for subsequent glenohumeral joint instability events until graduation in May 2010. Independent t tests were used to analyze the data.Results:Baseline strength data were available for 1316 shoulders with no prior history of instability, of which 26 went on to have an acute first-time anterior shoulder instability event while the individuals were at the academy. There were no significant differences in mean strength between shoulders that did not go on to develop instability (uninjured; n = 1290) and those that did develop anterior instability (injured; n = 26). The mean strength values in pounds of force for uninjured and injured shoulders, respectively, were as follows: IR0 (49.80 vs 49.29; P = .88), ER0 (35.58 vs 33.66; P = .27), IR45 (47.38 vs 46.93; P = .88), and ER45 (40.08 vs 38.98; P = .59).Conclusion:No association was found between isometric shoulder strength measures at baseline and subsequent first-time anterior glenohumeral joint instability within the high-risk athletic population studied in this prospective cohort.

A simple method for quantitative evaluation of the missing area of the anterior glenoid in anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint

The objective of this study was to describe and validate a simple method to quantitatively calculate the missing area of the anterior part of the glenoid in anterior glenohumeral instability. The calculations were developed from three-dimensional (3D)-reconstructed computerized tomography en face images of the glenoid with "subtraction" of the humeral head in 13 consecutive cases with known anterior glenohumeral joint instability diagnosed by history and clinical examination. The inferior portion of the glenoid was approximated to a true circle whose center was determined by means of a femoral head gauge. The eroded anterior area was calculated as the ratio between the depth (a perpendicular line from the center of the circle to the eroded edge of the anterior glenoid) and the radius of the inferior glenoid circle. This data was then compared to the results obtained by two additional different methods: direct computerized measurements of the missing area and direct computerized measurement of the ratio between the radius and depth, on two dimensional computed tomography (CT) en face view reconstructions of the glenoid. We provide a function that correlates the ratio between depth and radius of the inferior glenoid circle and the area of the missing anterior glenoid. The results obtained by three different methods were comparable. Simple trigonometric calculations showed that a 5% area defect corresponds to 0.8 (12.5%) of the radius of the inferior glenoid, while a 20% area defect corresponds to 0.5 (50%) of the same radius (Table 1). Table 1 Results according to each different method Patient Sex Side CA1 MA1 PAM1 R2 D2 PAM2 R3 D3 PAM3 1 M R 738 19.1 2.58 15.1 13.4 2.45 16 14 2.6 2 M R 462.6 30.5 6.59 11.9 9.7 4.83 16 10 12.97 3 F L 359 24.5 6.82 17 11.8 9.86 11.8 17 9.86 4 M L 522 59.4 11.37 12.7 9.1 8.95 16 10 12.97 5 M L 670 93.1 13.89 13.6 7.6 16.84 16 9 16.31 6 M R 659 137.5 20.8 14.3 7.1 20.10 20 8 25.23 7 M L 520 137 26.34 11.6 5.1 23.49 16 8 19.55 AVG 12.63 12.36 14.21 SD 8.46 7.92 7.20 CA1 Area of circle directly measured by MPR software, MA1 missing area of circle measured by MPR software, PAM1 calculated (100 x MA1/CA1) percentage area missing for method 1, R2 radius of the circle measured by MPR software, D2 depth from the missing edge to the center of the circle measured by MPR software, PAM2 calculated Percentage area missing from R2 and D2 using the function "q" (Appendix), R3 radius of the circle measured with a femoral gauge, D3 depth from the missing edge to the center of the circle measured with a femoral gauge, PAM3 calculated Percentage area missing from R3 and D3 using the function "q" (Appendix), AVG average, SD standard deviation Using this simple method and the function provided, the eroded area of the anterior part of the glenoid in anterior glenohumeral instability can be calculated preoperatively using a 3D CT reconstruction of the glenoid with "subtraction" of the humeral head, obviating the need for sophisticated software to obtain this critical information for preoperative decision making.