Anemia In Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Articles

Prevalence of Anemia in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in European Countries

The main objective is to determine the overall prevalence of anemia in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in Europe. A systematic literature search in PubMed and Embase was performed for studies published between January 2007 and May 2012. Eligible studies were included if they were original full-paper publications originated from Europe and if the authors agreed to provide their data. An overall prevalence of anemia in IBD, disease specific, and age-gender stratified basis prevalences were estimated. The influence of disease entity (Crohn's disease/ulcerative colitis), gender, age, disease activity (remission/active disease), and IBD-specific treatment strategies on the prevalence of anemia was analyzed by a mixed logistic regression model. Thereby, the factor country of origin was included as a random effect. Data were available for 2192 patients, mainly treated in tertiary referral centers. The overall prevalence of anemia in IBD patients was 24% (95% confidence interval, 18-31). Age-gender stratified prevalences were estimated for the age strata 18 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 64, 65 to 74, >74 years and ranged from 18% to 35%. Patients receiving IBD-specific medication (P = 0.0002, odds ratio 1.54), and patients with active disease status (P < 0.0001, odds ratio 2.72) were significantly more likely to have anemia compared with patients not receiving IBD-specific medication or being in remission. Patients with ulcerative colitis tended to have anemia less likely than patients with Crohn's disease (P = 0.01, odds ratio 0.77). The overall prevalence of anemia in patients with Crohn's disease was 27% (95% confidence interval, 19-35) and 21% (95% confidence interval, 15-27) in patients with ulcerative colitis. Thereby, 57% of the anemic patients were iron deficient.

P434 Iron deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel disease: are we treating our patients efficiently?

P434 Iron deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel disease: are we treating our patients efficiently?

Anemia in inflammatory bowel disease: A neglected issue with relevant effects

Anemia, a common complication associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), is frequently overlooked in the management of IBD patients. Unfortunately, it represents one of the major causes of both decreased quality of life and increased hospital admissions among this population. Anemia in IBD is pathogenically complex, with several factors contributing to its development. While iron deficiency is the most common cause, vitamin B12 and folic acid deficiencies, along with the effects of pro-inflammatory cytokines, hemolysis, drug therapies, and myelosuppression, have also been identified as the underlying etiology in a number of patients. Each of these etiological factors thus needs to be identified and corrected in order to effectively manage anemia in IBD. Because the diagnosis of anemia in IBD often presents a challenge, combinations of several hematimetric and biochemical parameters should be used. Recent studies underscore the importance of determining the ferritin index and hepcidin levels in order to distinguish between iron deficiency anemia, anemia due to chronic disease, or mixed anemia in IBD patients. With regard to treatment, the newly introduced intravenous iron formulations have several advantages over orally-administered iron compounds in treating iron deficiency in IBD. In special situations, erythropoietin supplementation and biological therapies should be considered. In conclusion, the management of anemia is a complex aspect of treating IBD patients, one that significantly influences the prognosis of the disease. As a consequence, its correction should be considered a specific, first-line therapeutic goal in the management of these patients.

Anemia in inflammatory bowel disease: prevalence, differential diagnosis and association with clinical and laboratory variables.

Anemia is the most frequent extraintestinal complication of inflammatory bowel disease. This study aimed to: 1) determine the prevalence of anemia among patients with inflammatory bowel disease; 2) investigate whether routine laboratory markers are useful for diagnosing anemia; and 3) evaluate whether any association exists between anemia and clinical/laboratory variables. Cross-sectional at a federal university. 44 outpatients with Crohn's disease and 55 with ulcerative colitis were evaluated. Clinical variables (disease activity index, location of disease and pharmacological treatment) and laboratory variables (blood count, iron laboratory, vitamin B12 and folic acid) were investigated. Anemia and/or iron laboratory disorders were present in 75% of the patients with Crohn's disease and in 78.2% with ulcerative colitis. Anemia was observed in 20.5% of the patients with Crohn's disease and in 23.6% with ulcerative colitis. Iron-deficiency anemia was highly prevalent in patients with Crohn's disease (69.6%) and ulcerative colitis (76.7%). Anemia of chronic disease in combination with iron deficiency anemia was present in 3% of the patients with Crohn's disease and in 7% of the patients with ulcerative colitis. There was no association between anemia and disease location. In ulcerative colitis, anemia was associated with the disease activity index. Most patients present iron laboratory disorders, with or without anemia, mainly due to iron deficiency. The differential diagnosis between the two most prevalent types of anemia was made based on clinical data and routine laboratory tests. In ulcerative colitis, anemia was associated with the disease activity index.

Commentary: anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease – the most common and ignored extra intestinal manifestation

Commentary: anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease – the most common and ignored extra intestinal manifestation

Treatment of Anemia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease– Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundAnemia is considered the most common systemic complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to provide all available evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of therapy existing today to correct anemia in IBD.MethodsSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared any treatment for anemia in patients with IBD. We searched electronic databases, conference proceedings and clinical trials registries. Two reviewers independently extracted data from included trials. The primary outcome was the effect of treatment for anemia in IBD on the hemoglobin (Hb) response, defined as rate of patients who achieved an increase of 2 g/dl in Hb concentration at the end of the follow-up. Secondary outcomes included disease severity scores, iron indices, Hb levels, inflammatory markers, adverse effects, and mortality. Dichotomous data were analysed by calculating the relative risk (RR) for each trial with the uncertainty in each result being expressed using 95% confidence intervals (CI). A fixed effect model was used, except in the event of significant heterogeneity between the trials (P<0.10, I2>40%), in which we used a random effects model.ResultsNine trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria, to a total of 973 patients. We were able to perform meta-analysis for intravenous (IV) versus oral iron and for ESAs versus placebo. IV iron was associated with a higher rate of achieving Hb response in comparison to oral iron; RR 1.25 (95% CI 1.04–1.51, I2 = 2%, 4 trials), CRP levels and disease activity indexes were not significantly affected by IV iron. IV iron was associated with a decrease in adverse events that required discontinuation of intervention and without an increase in serious adverse.DiscussionTreatment for anemia in IBD should include IV iron and not oral iron replacement, due to improved Hb response, no added toxicity and no negative effect on disease activity.

Editorial: Intravenous Iron for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency in IBD: the Pendulum Is Swinging

Intravenous (IV) iron therapy has been a major asset in the management of refractory iron-deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and other diseases. However, the cost-effectiveness of parenteral substitution as the first-line treatment of this condition in IBD has been questioned. A study published by Reinisch et al. in this issue of the journal fails to show non-inferiority of iron isomaltose 1,000, a novel high-dose IV preparation, compared to oral iron sulfate.

Anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based 10-year follow-up

The point prevalence estimates of anaemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) range between 6% and 74%. The variation is probably due to differences in the definition of anaemia and the study populations. To retrospectively determine the prevalence of anaemia at diagnosis and at the 1-, 5- and 10-year follow-ups in patients with IBD from a prospectively followed, population-based inception cohort (the IBSEN Study). To compare the prevalence of anaemia after a 10-year disease course with the prevalence of anaemia in the background population, and to assess clinical factors associated with anaemia at diagnosis and during follow-up. Newly diagnosed IBD patients were included in a population-based, prospective cohort. Follow-up was performed at 1, 5 and 10years. All visits included clinical examinations and blood samples. Anaemia was defined according to the WHO. A total of 756 patients (UC, n=519 and CD, n=237) were included; 48.8% of CD and 20.2% of UC patients were anaemic at diagnosis (P<0.001). The proportion of patients with anaemia decreased during the disease course in all patients, except in women with CD. After 10years of disease, the relative risk for anaemia was increased in all groups, except for women with UC. The variables associated with anaemia were generally unchanged during the disease course, and elevated CRP was the strongest predictor of risk. Anaemia was more common in CD than in UC. The prevalence of anaemia decreased during the disease course. Women with CD were at high risk for anaemia. Elevated CRP was independently associated with anaemia.

Anti-mouse CD52 monoclonal antibody ameliorates iron-deficient anaemia in IL-10 knockout mice

Approximately 50% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) suffer from anaemia, with Fe deficiency being the most common cause. CD52 monoclonal antibody (mAb) targets the cell surface CD52 and is effective in depleting lymphocytes through cytolytic effects in vivo. The aim of the present study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of anti-mouse CD52 mAb on Fe-deficient anaemia in IBD. IL-10 knockout mice (IL-10-/-) of 12 weeks with established colitis were treated with anti-mouse CD52 mAb once per week for 2 weeks. Severity of colitis, blood T lymphocytes, blood Hb, haematocrit, plasma erythropoietin (EPO), serum Fe concentration, transferrin saturation, splenic Fe stores, expression of liver hepcidin mRNA, Western blotting of the phosphorylated form of Smad1/5/8 and total Smad1 were measured at the end of the experiment. IL-10-/- mice treated with CD52 mAb showed a reduction in the percentage of CD4+ and CD4+CD45+ T cells in blood and weight loss typically associated with colonic inflammation, serum levels of EPO, the expression of liver hepcidin mRNA and total Smad1 protein, while they showed an increase in Hb concentrations, haematocrit, levels of serum Fe, transferrin saturation and splenic Fe stores. The present results indicated that anti-CD52 therapy may ameliorate Fe-deficient anaemia by reducing colonic inflammation. These findings may open novel horizons in the treatment of patients with IBD by resetting of immunological homeostasis in the gut by depleting the activated T cells in the gut mucosa.

A Randomized, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Study of Intravenous Iron Isomaltoside 1,000 (Monofer) Compared With Oral Iron for Treatment of Anemia in IBD (PROCEED)

OBJECTIVES:In the largest head-to-head comparison between an oral and an intravenous (IV) iron compound in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) so far, we strived to determine whether IV iron isomaltoside 1,000 is non-inferior to oral iron sulfate in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA).METHODS:This prospective, randomized, comparative, open-label, non-inferiority study was conducted at 36 sites in Europe and India. Patients with known intolerance to oral iron were excluded. A total of 338 IBD patients in clinical remission or with mild disease, a hemoglobin (Hb) <12 g/dl, and a transferrin saturation (TSAT) <20% were randomized 2:1 to receive either IV iron isomaltoside 1,000 according to the Ganzoni formula (225 patients) or oral iron sulfate 200 mg daily (equivalent to 200 mg elemental iron; 113 patients). An interactive web response system method was used to randomize the eligible patient to the treatment groups. The primary end point was change in Hb from baseline to week 8. Iron isomaltoside 1,000 and iron sulfate was compared by a non-inferiority assessment with a margin of −0.5 g/dl. The secondary end points, which tested for superiority, included change in Hb from baseline to weeks 2 and 4, change in s-ferritin, and TSAT to week 8, number of patients who discontinued study because of lack of response or intolerance of investigational drugs, change in total quality of life (QoL) score to weeks 4 and 8, and safety. Exploratory analyses included a responder analysis (proportion of patients with an increase in Hb ≥2 g/dl after 8 weeks), the effect of regional differences and total iron dose level, and other potential predictors of the treatment response.RESULTS:Non-inferiority in change of Hb to week 8 could not be demonstrated. There was a trend for oral iron sulfate being more effective in increasing Hb than iron isomaltoside 1,000. The estimated treatment effect was −0.37 (95% confidence interval (CI): −0.80, 0.06) with P=0.09 in the full analysis set (N=327) and −0.45 (95% CI: −0.88, −0.03) with P=0.04 in the per protocol analysis set (N=299). In patients treated with IV iron isomaltoside 1,000, the mean change in s-ferritin concentration was higher with an estimated treatment effect of 48.7 (95% CI: 18.6, 78.8) with P=0.002, whereas the mean change in TSAT was lower with an estimated treatment effect of −4.4 (95% CI: −7.4, −1.4) with P=0.005, compared with patients treated with oral iron. No differences in changes of QoL were observed. The safety profile was similar between the groups. The proportion of responders with Hb ≥2 g/dl (IV group: 67% oral group: 61%) were comparable between the groups (P=0.32). Iron isomaltoside 1,000 was more efficacious with higher cumulative doses of >1,000 mg IV. Significant predictors of Hb response to IV iron treatment were baseline Hb and C-reactive protein (CRP).CONCLUSIONS:We could not demonstrate non-inferiority of IV iron isomaltoside 1,000 compared with oral iron in this study. Based on the dose–response relationship observed with the IV iron compound, we suggest that the true iron demand of IV iron was underestimated by the Ganzoni formula in our study. Alternative calculations including Hb and CRP should be explored to gauge iron stores in patients with IBD.

High burden of iron deficiency and different types of anemia in inflammatory bowel disease outpatients in Scandinavia: A longitudinal 2-year follow-up study

Objective. The prevalence of anemia in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been broadly described. The recurrence, type and burden of anemia remain unenlightened. The primary objective was to describe this. The secondary objective was to evaluate the implementation of European guidelines. Materials and methods. This longitudinal follow-up study included 300 IBD outpatients from six centers in Scandinavia. Patients were enrolled in a research cohort, in which each center included 5% of their IBD cohort. The study was prospectively planned, while data were retrospectively collected. The burden of anemia was calculated as number of months with anemia. A Markov model was used to calculate the probabilities of transitioning between stages. The European guidelines were used as the standard for anemia management. Results. Anemia affected > 50% of IBD outpatients during the 2-year observation period. Totally, 20% of the total observation time was spent in anemia. Over the 7200 months of observation, anemia was found in 1410 months. The most frequent type was combined anemia (63%). Combined anemia covers both anemia of chronic disease (ACD) and iron-deficiency anemia (IDA). Pure ACD was present in 21% of burden time, while pure IDA was present in 16% of burden time. The European guidelines have mainly been implemented. Conclusion. Anemia affected a majority of the IBD outpatients. One in five months, the patients were anemic. Anemia related to inflammation dominated the different types of anemia. Pure IDA was found in for 16%. These findings, despite a fair implementation of guidelines.

Association between thrombocytosis and iron deficiency anemia in inflammatory bowel disease

Thrombocytosis and iron deficiency anemia are frequent complications of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between iron deficiency anemia and thrombocytosis in IBD patients. A total of 198 consecutive IBD patients and 102 healthy controls participated in the study. The parameters investigated were: platelets (PLT), mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width, plateletcrit, hematocrit (HCT) levels, hemoglobulin (Hb) levels, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), red cell distribution width (RDW), ferritin levels, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) levels, the sTfR-F index (sTfR-F=sTfR/log10 ferritin), and vitamin B12 and folate levels. Thrombocytosis was defined as an absolute number of PLT greater than 400k/μl. Disease activity indices (Crohn's Disease Activity Index for Crohn's disease and Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index for ulcerative colitis) as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) were also correlated with the study parameters. The IBD patients demonstrated decreased HCT levels, Hb levels, MCV, mean platelet volume, and ferritin levels and an increased absolute PLT count, RDW, platelet distribution width, plateletcrit, sTfR and sTfR-F index (P<0.0001) compared with healthy controls. Twenty-seven patients exhibited thrombocytosis (13.6%). The median value for PLT (interquartile range) was 289 (228-355)k/μl, for Hb levels was 13.4 (12.0-14.7) g/dl, for ferritin levels was 36.6 (19.7-80.7) ng/ml, and for sTfR-F was 0.82 (0.61-1.37) mg/l. The PLT in IBD patients correlated with HCT levels, Hb levels, MCV, RDW, Fe levels, ferritin levels, sTfR, sTfR-F, CRP levels, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index, and Crohn's Disease Activity Index (Spearman's ρ correlation). In the multivariate analysis, only Hb levels, RDW, CRP levels, ferritin levels, and sTfR-F remained significant (P<0.05). None of the aforementioned was observed in the control group. The absolute PLT count seems to correlate with iron deficiency anemia parameters and disease activity in IBD patients. Controlling the inflammation and managing iron deficiency could lead to reversal of thrombocytosis in IBD patients.

G201(P) Survey of Management of Iron Deficiency Anaemia in Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the UK

AimTo study the current practise of management of iron deficiency anaemia in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the hospitals across the United Kingdom.Methods We conducted an internet based...

PWE-094 The Prevalence of Anaemia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Relation to Disease Activity, as Stratified by Faecal Calprotectin

IntroductionThe prevalence of anaemia in IBD varies significantly between published studies, ranging from 6–74%. However, underlying disease activity, a potential explanation for this variability, has not been accurately correlated with...

Mo1260 The Prevalence of Anaemia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Relation to Disease Activity, As Stratified by Faecal Calprotectin

Introduction The prevalence of anaemia in IBD varies significantly between published studies, ranging from 6–74%. However, underlying disease activity, a potential explanation for this variability, has not been accurately correlated with the frequency of anaemia to date. Faecal calprotectin (FC) is a surrogate marker of underlying mucosal inflammation. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of anaemia and its correlation with disease activity in IBD, in a large cohort of patients with matched full blood count (FBC) and FC data. Methods Patients with confirmed IBD from the Edinburgh faecal calprotectin registry (EFCR) were identified. Where multiple FCs were available, the most recent result was taken as reference. Blood test results were obtained from the electronic record covering a period one month either side of the FC. The WHO criteria was used to define anaemia (Hb Results 1226 patients (771 CD, F = 65%, 455 UC, F = 35%) with matched FC and FBC data were analysed. The median age was 44y (IQR 31–57), median disease duration 102 months (IQR 31–207). Overall, 314/1226 patients (25.6%) were anaemic, 185/314 (58.9%) of which were female. Anaemia was observed more frequently in patients with active as opposed to inactive CD (110/328 [33.5%] vs 65/443 [14.7%], p Conclusion In this cohort over 25% of patients with IBD were anaemic. There is a clear correlation between disease activity and anaemia in both CD and UC, but this is unrelated to disease distribution in CD. Anaemia in asymptomatic patients should alert clinicians to the possibility of subclinical active mucosal inflammation. These data and the ROC analysis provide further support for optimising disease treatment in IBD, targeting a FC level of Disclosure of Interest None Declared.

Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of anemia in inflammatory bowel disease

Anemia is a common and severe complication in inflammatory bowel disease. Anemia can induce impaired cardiovascular and renal functions, and lead to a significantly decreased quality of life. This review is dedicated to explain the underlying mechanism, diagnosis and management of anemia in inflammatory bowel disease.

P318 The prevalence of anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease in relation to disease activity, as stratified by faecal calprotectin

P318 The prevalence of anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease in relation to disease activity, as stratified by faecal calprotectin

P593 A patient's perspective on anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease

P593 A patient's perspective on anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease

What is the Optimal Treatment for Anemia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease?

Anemia is common in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with a prevalence ranging from 8.8% to 73.7%. This wide range reflects the definitions used and the populations studied. Although many patients are reported to be asymptomatic, systematic studies have shown anemia to have a significant impact on quality of life. Consequently treatment should be instituted early. The commonest cause of anemia in IBD is iron deficiency, predominantly related to gastrointestinal blood loss. Anemia of chronic disease often occurs concomitantly, due to cytokine-mediated impaired erythropoiesis and dysregulated iron metabolism. Oral iron is a simple and effective method for treating iron deficiency, but requires long courses of treatment. It is also theoretically implicated with worsening intestinal inflammation, via the production of toxic reactive oxygen species. Intravenous iron avoids these concerns, especially with the development of ferric carboxymaltose, which allow up to 1000mg to be given rapidly. In patients failing to respond to intravenous iron, the anemia of chronic disease is most likely to be causative. In this setting evidence suggests that additional erythropoietin therapy can be effective. Blood transfusions should be avoided as part of routine management and reserved for patients with substantial acute gastro-intestinal bleeding, where there is a risk of hemodynamic compromise. This article discusses the underlying physiology of anemia in IBD, and presents the current evidence supporting treatment options available.

Low prevalence of anemia in inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based study in Sweden

Objective. Anemia is a well-known complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with a reported prevalence of 8.8–73.7%. However, knowledge is sparse about the anemia prevalence in a population-based cohort of patients affected by IBD. Materials and methods. The aim of this retrospective, descriptive, population-based study was to determine and analyze the prevalence of anemia for ambulatory (n = 485) as well as for hospitalized patients diagnosed with IBD in 2008 in the Highland Health Care District, Jönköpings County, Sweden. Results. The prevalence of anemia at the annual follow-up in the studied IBD population was 6%, 5% for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), and 9% for those with Crohn's disease (CD). There was a higher rate of anemia at the yearly check up in patients requiring inpatient care during the year. IBD patients, prescribed anti-TNF-α treatment, had a higher rate of anemia. Of the hospitalized UC and CD patients (n = 31), 35% and 50%, respectively, had anemia at admission and 6% and 4% had severe anemia (Hb <100 g/L), respectively. Conclusions. The prevalence of anemia in this population was lower than reported previously, probably due to inclusion of all IBD patients in the area in combination with a proactive follow-up model. The prevalence of anemia in this IBD population was similar to the prevalence in the general population. This may indicate that efforts by health care professionals to prevent, identify, and treat anemia in the IBD population have been successful.