Alzheimer's Trials Research Articles

Current Bioactive Compounds in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract: Worldwide, more than 44 million individuals are living with Alzheimer's disease (AD), making it the most common type of dementia. Because neuroinflammation is so important in the development of AD, anti-inflammatory tactics may be a promising avenue for treatment. Searches were conducted in Scopus, the Web of Science, and PubMed using the following keywords: phytoconstituents, AD, traditional medicine, and Chinese herbs. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to summarise the known phytochemistry and current state of the chosen plant species. However, there has been limited effectiveness in clinical trials for AD with currently available anti-inflammatory medicines. This study brings together the latest findings in the treatment of AD using natural substances, specifically phytochemicals, which have anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotective characteristics. Although there has been little success with existing anti-inflammatory medications, there is hope for targeting molecular pathways associated with AD, including Aβ overproduction, apoptosis, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction, through the use of natural bioactive chemicals such alkaloids, polyphenols, and terpenes. The promise of natural compounds as safer alternatives or supplementary therapies to current treatments for Alzheimer's disease is highlighted in this study, which focuses on their ability to alleviate major pathogenic processes in the disease. Their medicinal potential and effectiveness can be enhanced with additional research.

Informant characteristics influence Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes scores-based staging of Alzheimer's disease.

The Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) is a staging scale for Alzheimer's disease (AD)1 and is commonly used as an outcome in clinical trials2. It relies on information provided by the patient and an informant3. The CDR-SB should reflect only the patient's disease severity. However, we explored whether informant characteristics were associated with CDR-SB scores because that association might introduce bias in Alzheimer's disease research. We found that the CDR-SB was 0.20 higher when informants were female, 0.39 higher when the informant was a patient's child and 0.18 lower if the relationship was other than spouse or children. Regarding the frequency of contact, CDR-SB scores were 0.38 higher when contact was at least once a week, 0.65 higher when daily and 0.57 higher when living with the patient. Our analysis results suggest that informant characteristics can modify the CDR-SB scores and might introduce bias into Alzheimer's disease trials and research.

Enrichment for clinical trials of early AD: Combining genetic risk factors and plasma p-tau as screening instruments.

Identifying low-cost, minimally-invasive screening instruments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) trial enrichment will improve the efficiency of AD trials. A total of 685 cognitively normal (CN) individuals and individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) were grouped according to cutoffs of genetic risk factor (G) polygenic hazard score (PHS) and tau pathology (T) plasma phosphorylated tau-181 (p-tau181) into four groups: G+T+, G-T-, G+T-, and G-T+. We assessed the associations between group level and longitudinal cognitive decline and AD conversion. Power analyses compared the estimated sample size required to detect differences in cognitive decline. The G+T+ group was associated with faster cognitive decline and higher AD risk. Clinical trials enrolling G+T+ participants would benefit from significantly reduced sample sizes compared with similar trials using only single makers as an inclusion criterion. The combination of two low-cost, minimally-invasive measures-genetics and plasma biomarkers-would be a promising screening procedure for clinical trial enrollment. Participants with unimpaired or mildly impaired cognition were grouped based on cutoffs on genetic risk factors (G: polygenic hazardous score [PHS]) and Alzheimer's pathology (T: baseline plasma phosphorylated tau-181 [p-tau181]). Participants with high PHSs and plasma p-tau181 levels (G+T+) were at risk of faster cognitive decline and AD progression. The combination of PHS and plasma p-tau181 could enhance clinical trial enrichment more effectively than using single biomarkers.

Assessing clinical progression measures in Alzheimer's disease trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Assessing treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) relies on reliable tools for measuring AD progression. In this analysis, we evaluate the sensitivity of clinical progression measures in AD within randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with confirmed positive amyloid (Aβ+) status prior to trial enrollment. Excluding trials targeting non-cognitive symptoms, we conducted meta-analyses on progression measures from 25 selected RCTs using R version 4.2.0, along with the metafor and emmeans libraries. The Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) demonstrated the greatest sensitivity over 12weeks. Other cognitive measures demonstrated lower sensitivity. The integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) and Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) seemed more effective than their individual cognitive components. Neuropsychiatric measures were the least sensitive in measuring progression. Functional measures generally outperformed other measure categories. Purely cognitive domain-based measures were suboptimal for tracking early AD progression. Ideally, future measures should incorporate both cognitive and functional components to enhance sensitivity. Concerns remain regarding the limitations of current outcome measures used in AD clinical trials, particularly their sensitivity in the early and preclinical stages of the disease, which hampers their reliability as indicators of AD progression. The Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) demonstrated the most substantial weighted mean change over 12weeks, followed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Functional measures outperformed other measure categories. Composite scores of integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale and Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes are more sensitive to change than their individual cognitive components, possibly driven by the functional components of the score. Neuropsychiatric measures analyzed in this study appeared to be the least sensitive in measuring progression.

Analytic Challenges in Clinical Trials of Early Alzheimer’s Disease

Background: The heavily right-skewed data seen in recently reported Alzheimer’s disease (AD) clinical trials influenced treatment contrasts when data were analyzed via the typical mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM). Methods: An MMRM analysis similar to what is commonly used in AD clinical trials was compared versus robust regression (RR) and the non-parametric Hodges–Lehman estimator (HL). Results: Results in simulated data patterned after AD trials showed that imbalance across treatment arms in the number of patients in the extreme right tail (those with rapid disease progression) frequently occurred. Each analysis method controlled Type I error at or below the nominal level. The RR analysis yielded smaller standard errors and more power than MMRM and HL. In data sets with appreciable imbalance in the number of rapid progressing patients, MMRM results favored the treatment arm with fewer rapid progressors. Results from HL showed the same trend but to a lesser degree. Robust regression yielded similar results regardless of the ratio of rapid progressors. Conclusions: Although more research is needed over a wider range of scenarios, it should not be assumed that MMRM is the optimal approach for trials in early Alzheimer’s disease.

Brain Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease Trials.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) continues to lack definitive curative therapies, necessitating an urgent exploration of innovative approaches. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of recent clinical trials focusing on invasive and non-invasive brain stimulation techniques as potential interventions for AD. Deep brain stimulation (DBS), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) are evaluated for their therapeutic efficacy, safety, and applicability. DBS, though invasive, has shown promising results in mitigating cognitive decline, but concerns over surgical risks and long-term effects persist. On the other hand, non-invasive methods like rTMS, tDCS, and tACS have demonstrated potential in enhancing cognitive performance and delaying disease progression, with minimal side effects, but with varied consistency. The evidence hints towards an individualized, patient-centric approach to brain stimulation, considering factors such as disease stage, genetic traits, and stimulation parameters. The review also highlights emerging technologies and potential future directions, emphasizing the need for larger, multi-center trials to confirm preliminary findings and establish robust clinical guidelines. In conclusion, while brain stimulation techniques present a promising avenue in AD therapy, further research is imperative for more comprehensive understanding and successful clinical implementation. Through this review, we aim to catalyze the scientific discourse and stimulate further investigation into these novel interventions for AD.

Increases in amyloid-β42 slow cognitive and clinical decline in Alzheimer's disease trials.

Positive effects of new anti-amyloid-β (Aβ) monoclonal antibodies in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been attributed to brain amyloid reduction. However, most anti-Aβ antibodies also increase the CSF levels of the 42-amino acid isoform (Aβ42). We evaluated the associations of changes in CSF Aβ42 and brain Aβ-PET with cognitive and clinical end points in randomized trials of anti-Aβ drugs that lowered (β- and γ-secretase inhibitors) or increased CSF Aβ42 levels (anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies) to test the hypothesis that post-treatment increases in CSF Aβ42 levels are independently associated with cognitive and clinical outcomes. From long-term (≥12 months) randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of anti-Aβ drugs published until November 2023, we calculated the post-treatment versus baseline difference in ADAS-Cog (cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale) and CDR-SB (Clinical Dementia Rate-Sum of Boxes) and z-standardized changes in CSF Aβ42 and Aβ-PET Centiloids (CL). We estimated the effect size [regression coefficients (RCs) and confidence intervals (CIs)] and the heterogeneity (I2) of the associations between AD biomarkers and cognitive and clinical end points using random-effects meta-regression models. We included 25 966 subjects with AD from 24 trials. In random-effects analysis, increases in CSF Aβ42 were associated with slower decline in ADAS-Cog (RC: -0.55; 95% CI: -0.89, -0.21, P = 0.003, I2 = 61.4%) and CDR-SB (RC: -0.16; 95% CI: -0.26, -0.06, P = 0.002, I2 = 34.5%). Similarly, decreases in Aβ-PET were associated with slower decline in ADAS-Cog (RC: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.89, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%) and CDR-SB (RC: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.33, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%). Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. Higher CSF Aβ42 levels after exposure to anti-Aβ drugs are independently associated with slowing cognitive impairment and clinical decline. Increases in Aβ42 may represent a mechanism of potential benefit of anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies in AD.

Community recruitment of underrepresented populations to the AHEAD 3-45 preclinical AD trial using novel partnerships with nursing and community-based organizations: Lessons and outcomes.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) disproportionately affects minoritized populations who remain underrepresented in AD trials. We partnered with local nursing community-based organizations to implement a culturally tailored educational intervention and recruit Hispanic/Latino American, Filipino American, and Korean American adults aged 55 to 80 for the AHEAD study, a preclinical AD trial, at the University of California, Irvine. We engaged 654 individuals across 21 events, leading to 71 prescreenings: 21.1% Filipino, 11.2% Hispanic/Latino, and 67.6% Korean adults. Ineligibility due to age and language barriers was common among Hispanic/Latino and Korean adults, respectively. Filipino adults often withdrew interest or were lost to follow-up. Ultimately, 25 participants enrolled: eight Filipino, two Hispanic/Latino, and 15 Korean adults. Tailored, culturally relevant content significantly contributed to the engagement success. This study demonstrates the value and impact of novel partnerships with health-related provider organizations that provide trusted care and access to underrepresented communities. Six hundred and fifty fourunderrepresented individuals were reached, and 25 enrolled in the AHEAD 3-45 trial. Twenty-one community events were held via partnerships with nursing and community organizations. The study engaged 21% Filipino, 11% Hispanic/Latino, 68% Korean adults. Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) principles enhanced the recruitment process. Transparent communication and joint planning were key.

Lecanemab and Vascular-Amyloid Deposition in Brains of People With Down Syndrome

Anti-β-amyloid immunotherapy using lecanemab is becoming increasingly available to patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) develop AD neuropathology by age 40 years, representing a significant cohort of genetically determined AD. To investigate the binding properties of lecanemab in the brains of people with DS, in anticipation of their inclusion in clinical trials or access to antiamyloid immunotherapies. The study included cases of postmortem brain tissue analysis from 15 individuals with DS aged 43 to 68 years that were acquired from Alzheimer Disease research centers at the University of California, Irvine and the University of Kentucky from 2008 to 2021. Data were analyzed from August 2023 through May 2024. The binding properties of lecanemab were assessed in brain tissue. The primary outcome was the extent of lecanemab binding to amyloid plaques and brain blood vessels. Tissue from 15 people (8 were female [53%]) with DS ranging in age from 43 to 68 (mean, 56.6) years were included in the study. Lecanemab-labeled amyloid plaques appeared in all 15 DS cases studied, indicating potential target engagement. However, extensive binding of lecanemab to brain blood vessels in DS was observed, raising significant safety concerns. These findings underscore the necessity for clinical trials of lecanemab in people with DS to evaluate both safety and efficacy, particularly in individuals older than 43 years. These findings suggest significant binding of lecanemab to cerebral amyloid angiopathy in DS. Lecanemab should be rigorously tested in clinical trials for AD in the DS population to determine its safety and efficacy, especially in those older than 43 years.

The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Clinical Core.

The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Clinical Core is responsible for coordination of all clinical activities at the ADNI sites, including project management, regulatory oversight, and site management and monitoring, as well as the collection of all clinical data and management of all study data. The Clinical Core is also charged with determining the clinical classifications and criteria for enrollment in evolving AD trials and enabling the ongoing characterization of the cross-sectional features and longitudinal trajectories of the ADNI cohorts with application of these findings to optimal clinical trial designs. More than 2400 individuals have been enrolled in the cohorts since the inception of ADNI, facilitating refinement of our understanding of the AD trajectory and allowing academic and industry investigators to model therapeutic trials across the disease spectrum from the presymptomatic stage through dementia. HIGHLIGHTS: Since 2004, the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Clinical Core has overseen the enrollment of > 2400 participants with mild cognitive impairment, mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, and normal cognition. The longitudinal dataset has elucidated the full cognitive and clinical trajectory of AD from its presymptomatic stage through the onset of dementia. The ADNI data have supported the design of most major trials in the field.

The ADNI PET Core at 20.

The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) PET Core has evolved over time, beginning with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of a subsample of participants with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET, adding tracers for measurement of β-amyloid, followed by tau tracers. This review examines the evolution of the ADNI PET Core, the novel aspects of PET imaging in each stage of ADNI, and gives an accounting of PET images available in the ADNI database. The ADNI PET Core has been and continues to be a rich resource that provides quantitative PET data and preprocessed PET images to the scientific community, allowing interrogation of both basic and clinically relevant questions. By standardizing methods across different PET scanners and multiple PET tracers, the Core has demonstrated the feasibility of large-scale, multi-center PET studies. Data managed and disseminated by the PET Core has been critical to defining pathophysiological models of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and helped to drive methods used in modern therapeutic trials. HIGHLIGHTS: The ADNI PET Core began with FDG-PET and now includes three amyloid and three tau PET ligands. The PET Core has standardized acquisition and analysis of multitracer PET images. The ADNI PET Core helped to develop methods that have facilitated clinical trials in AD.

The utility of recruitment incentives in early Alzheimer's disease trials.

Amid recent approvals, early Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains an active area of treatment development. We performed a conjoint experiment to compare preferences among 26 patients with mild cognitive impairment for four trial features including designs incorporating active aducanumab-control (vs. placebo), returning tau positron emission tomography (PET) results (vs. no disclosure), remote study partner participation (vs. in person), and increased risk of brain swelling (vs. lower risk). We used a generalized estimating equation to model the utility of factor levels. Returning tau PET results had the highest utility (est: 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13, 0.81; P=0.007); remote study partner participation showed a similar trend (est: 0.29; 95% CI: -0.05, 0.63; P=0.097). Trials with active-controlled design (est: 0.01; 95% CI: -0.33, 0.35; P=0.956) did not demonstrate utility and higher risk of brain swelling had negative utility (est: -0.64; 95% CI: -0.99, -0.30; P<0.001). Returning additional biomarker results may increase willingness to enroll in early AD trials. We compared mild cognitive impairment participant preferences for four trial design features. Returning tau positron emission tomography results had the highest utility. Remote study partner participation showed a positive, albeit non-significant, trend. No utility was observed for an active aducanumab-control design.

Reasons for undergoing amyloid imaging among diverse enrollees in the A4 study.

Understanding attitudes toward participation among diverse preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) trial participants could yield insights to instruct future recruitment. Using data from the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic AD (A4) Study, we examined differences among mutually exclusive racial and ethnic groups in views and perceptions of amyloid imaging (VPAI), a measure of motivations to undergo amyloid biomarker testing in the setting of preclinical AD. We used linear regression to quantify differences at baseline. Compared to non-Hispanic or Latino (NH) White participants, Hispanic or Latino (3.52 points, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [2.61, 4.42]); NH Asian (2.97 points, 95% CI: [1.71, 4.22]); and NH Black participants (2.79 points, 95% CI: [1.96, 3.63]) participants demonstrated higher levels of endorsement of the VPAI items at baseline. Differences may exist among participants from differing ethnic and racial groups in motivations to undergo biomarker testing in the setting of a preclinical AD trial. Representative samples in AD clinical trials are vital to result in generalizability. We assessed motivations to undergo amyloid imaging in a preclinical AD trial. Racial and ethnic minority groups showed higher endorsement of VPAI items. Differences were driven by perceived risk, plan/prepare, and curiosity domains. Few observations among racial and ethnic groups changed after biomarker disclosure.

Care partner-informed meaningful change thresholds for the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes for trials of early Alzheimer's disease.

Consensus definitions of meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) on the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) are needed. Existing estimates use clinician-rated anchors in clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease (AD) populations. Incorporating the care partner perspective offers important insights, and evaluating biomarker-confirmed cohorts aligns estimates with ongoing trials. Anchor-based analyses were conducted to evaluate MWPC on the CDR-SB in early AD (Tauriel; NCT03289143) using Caregiver Global Impression of Change in memory or daily activities. Across time points and anchors, mean CDR-SB changes associated with the "somewhat worse" category ranged from 1.50 to 2.12 in early AD, 1.07 to 2.06 in mild cognitive impairment-AD, and 1.79 to 2.25 in mild AD. The proposed ranges are appropriate to define meaningful progression on the CDR-SB in similar cohorts and support the interpretation of treatment benefit through MWPC analyses. Thresholds should be calibrated to the context of use; lower/higher thresholds may be applicable in studies of earlier/later disease over shorter/longer durations. Within-patient CDR-SB change thresholds are provided using caregiver-rated anchors. 1.5 to 2.5 points may be an appropriate range in early AD trials of similar durations. Cumulative distribution function plots illustrate the benefit of a given treatment. When selecting thresholds, the target population and study design should be considered.

APOLLOE4 Phase 3 study of oral ALZ-801/valiltramiprosate in APOE ε4/ε4 homozygotes with early Alzheimer's disease: Trial design and baseline characteristics.

The approved amyloid antibodies for early Alzheimer's disease (AD) carry a boxed warning about the risk of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIAs) that are highest in apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4/ε4 homozygotes. ALZ-801/valiltramiprosate, an oral brain-penetrant amyloid beta oligomer inhibitor is being evaluated in APOE ε4/ε4 homozygotes with early AD. This Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 78-week study of ALZ-801 administered as 265mg twice per day tablets, enrolled 50- to 80-year-old homozygotes with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 22 and Clinical Dementia Rating-Global Score 0.5 or 1.0. The study is powered to detect a 2.0 to 2.5 drug-placebo difference on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale 13-item Cognitive subscale primary outcome with 150 subjects/arm. The key secondary outcomes are Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; volumetric magnetic resonance imaging and fluid biomarkers are additional outcomes. The APOLLOE4 Phase 3 trial enrolled 325 subjects with a mean age of 69 years, 51% female, MMSE 25.6, and 65% mild cognitive impairment. Topline results are expected in 2024. APOLLOE4 is the first disease-modification AD trial focused on APOE ε4/ε4 homozygotes. Oral ALZ-801 has the potential to be the first effective and safe anti-amyloid treatment for the high-risk APOE ε4/ε4 population. The APOLLOE4 Phase 3, placebo-controlled, 78-week study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ALZ-801 265mg twice per day in early Alzheimer's disease (AD) subjects with the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4/ε4 genotype.The enrolled early AD population (N=325) has 51% females, a mean age = 69 years, and a mean Mini-Mental State Examination = 25.6, with the majority being mild cognitive impairment subjects, a similar disease stage to the lecanemab Phase 3 AD trial (Clarity AD).The primary outcome is the cognitive Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale 13-item Cognitive subscale, with two functional measures as key secondary outcomes (Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes, Amsterdam-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living), and with hippocampal volume and fluid biomarkers as additional outcomes.The study is unique in allowing a large number of microhemorrhages or siderosis at baseline magnetic resonance imaging, lesions that indicate concomitant cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA).At baseline, 32% of the enrolled population had at least 1 microhemorrhage, 24% had 1 to 4, and 8% had > 4 microhemorrhages; 10% had at least 1 siderosis lesion; with more males than females having microhemorrhages (63% vs. 37%) and siderosis (68% vs. 32%).Study results will become available in the second half of 2024 and, if positive, ALZ-801 may become the first oral drug to demonstrate a favorable benefit/risk profile in APOE ε4/ε4 AD subjects.

Prediction of future cognitive decline among cognitively unimpaired individuals using measures of soluble phosphorylated tau or tau tangle pathology.

Plasma p-tau217 and Tau-PET are strong prognostic biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but their relative performance in predicting future cognitive decline among cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals is unclear. In this head-to-head comparison study including 9 cohorts and 1534 individuals, we found that plasma p-tau217 and medial temporal lobe Tau-PET signal showed similar associations with cognitive decline on a global cognitive composite test (R2 PET=0.32 vs R2 PLASMA=0.32, pdifference=0.812) and with progression to mild cognitive impairment (Hazard ratio[HR]PET=1.56[1.43-1.70] vs HRPLASMA=1.63[1.50-1.77], pdifference=0.627). Combined plasma and PET models were superior to the single biomarker models (R2=0.36, p<0.01). Furthermore, sequential selection using plasma p-tau217 and then Tau-PET reduced the number of participants required for a clinical trial by 94%, compared to a 75% reduction when using plasma p-tau217 alone. We conclude that plasma p-tau217 and Tau-PET showed similar performance for predicting future cognitive decline in CU individuals, and their sequential use (i.e., plasma p-tau217 followed by Tau-PET in a subset with high plasma p-tau217) is useful for screening in clinical trials in preclinical AD.

Biomarkers as Endpoints in Clinical Trials for Alzheimer's Disease.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease that imposes economic and societal burden. Biomarkers have played a crucial role in the recent approval of aducanumab and lecanemab as disease-modifying therapies which marked a significant milestone for the treatment of AD. The inclusion of biomarkers in AD trials facilitates precise diagnosis, monitors safety, demonstrates target engagement, and supports disease modification. This study analyzed the utilization state and trends of biomarkers as endpoints in AD trials. In this retrospective study, trials were collected by searching clinicaltrials.gov using the term "Alzheimer". Primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed separately for each phase. Among the 1,048 analyzed trials, 313 (29.87%) adopted biomarkers as primary endpoints and 364 (34.73%) as secondary endpoints, mainly in phases 1 and 2. The top three biomarkers adopted as primary endpoints in phases 1, 2, and 3 were amyloid-PET, tau-PET, and MRI. The top three biomarkers adopted as secondary endpoints, in phase 1, were cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-β (Aβ), blood Aβ and amyloid-PET; in phase 2, they were MRI, CSF Aβ, and CSF phospho-tau; and in phase 3, they were amyloid PET, MRI, and blood Aβ. There was a statistically significant increase in the adoption of biomarkers as primary endpoints in phase 2 trials (p = 0.001) and secondary endpoints in phase 3 trials (p = 0.001). The growing recognition of the importance of biomarkers in AD trial' design and drug development is evident by the significant steady increase in biomarkers' utilization in phases 2 and 3.

A Strategy for Allowing Earlier Diagnosis and Rigorous Evaluation of BACE1 Inhibitors in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease.

Given continued failure of BACE1 inhibitor programs at symptomatic and prodromal stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD), clinical trials need to target the earlier preclinical stage. However, trial design is complex in this population with negative diagnosis of classical hippocampal amnesia on standard memory tests. Besides recent advances in brain imaging, electroencephalogram, and fluid-based biomarkers, new cognitive markers should be established for earlier diagnosis that can optimize recruitment to BACE1 inhibitor trials in presymptomatic AD. Notably, accelerated long-term forgetting (ALF) is emerging as a sensitive cognitive measure that can discriminate between asymptomatic individuals with high risks for developing AD and healthy controls. ALF is a form of declarative memory impairment characterized by increased forgetting rates over longer delays (days to months) despite normal storage within the standard delays of testing (20-60 min). Therefore, ALF may represent a harbinger of preclinical dementia and the impairment of systems memory consolidation, during which memory traces temporarily stored in the hippocampus become gradually integrated into cortical networks. This review provides an overview of the utility of ALF in a rational design of next-generation BACE1 inhibitor trials in preclinical AD. I explore potential mechanisms underlying ALF and relevant early-stage biomarkers useful for BACE1 inhibitor evaluation, including synaptic protein alterations, astrocytic dysregulation and neuron hyperactivity in the hippocampal-cortical network. Furthermore, given the physiological role of the isoform BACE2 as an AD-suppressor gene, I also discuss the possible association between the poor selectivity of BACE1 inhibitors and their side effects (e.g., cognitive worsening) in prior clinical trials.

Predicting amyloid-PET and clinical conversion in apolipoprotein E ε3/ε3 non-demented individuals with multidimensional factors.

The apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 is a well-established risk factor of amyloid-β (Aβ) in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, because of the high prevalence of APOE ε3, there may be a large number of people with APOE ε3/ε3 who are non-demented and have Aβ pathology. There are limited studies on assessing Aβ status and clinical conversion in the APOE ε3/ε3 non-demented population. Two hundred and ninety-three non-demented individuals with APOE ε3/ε3 from ADNI database were divided into Aβ-positron emission tomography (Aβ-PET) positivity (+) and Aβ-PET negativity (-) groups using cut-off value of >1.11. Stepwise regression searched for a single or multidimensional clinical variables for predicting Aβ-PET (+), and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) assessed the accuracy of the predictive models. The Cox regression model explored the risk factors associated with clinical conversion to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD. The results showed that the combination of sex, education, ventricle and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume can accurately predict Aβ-PET status in cognitively normal (CN), and the combination of everyday cognition study partner total (EcogSPTotal) score, age, plasma p-tau 181 and WMH can accurately predict Aβ-PET status in MCI individuals. EcogSPTotal score were independent predictors of clinical conversion to MCI or AD. The findings may provide a non-invasive and effective tool to improve the efficiency of screening Aβ-PET (+), accelerate and reduce costs of AD trial recruitment in future secondary prevention trials or help to select patients at high risk of disease progression in clinical trials.

Racial and ethnic differences in plasma biomarker eligibility for a preclinical Alzheimer's disease trial.

In trials of amyloid-lowering drugs for Alzheimer's disease (AD), differential eligibility may contribute to under-inclusion of racial and ethnic underrepresented groups. We examined plasma amyloid beta 42/40 and positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid eligibility for the ongoing AHEAD Study preclinical AD program (NCT04468659). Univariate logistic regression models were used to examine group differences in plasma and PET amyloid screening eligibility. Of 4905 participants screened at time of analysis, 1724 were plasma eligible to continue in screening: 13.3% Hispanic Black, 24.7% Hispanic White, 20.8% non-Hispanic (NH) Asian, 24.7% NH Black, and 38.9% NH White. Plasma eligibility differed across groups in models controlling for covariates (odds ratio from 1.9 to 4.0 compared to the NH White reference group, P<0.001). Among plasma eligible participants, PET eligibility did not differ by group. These results suggest that prevalence of brain amyloid pathology differed, but that eligibility based on plasma was equally effective across racial and ethnic group members. Plasma amyloid eligibility is lower in underrepresented racial and ethnic groups. In plasma eligible adults, positron emission tomography eligibility rates are similar across race and ethnicity. Plasma biomarker tests may be similarly effective across racial and ethnic groups.