Sir,We read with interest a recent paper by Kartal-Kaess andcolleagues [3] reporting a child who had episodic andprogressive heterotopic ossification along with congenitallymalformed great toes. On the basis of these findings, aclinical diagnosis of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva(FOP) was made and was confirmed by DNA sequenceanalysis which revealed the classical FOP mutation in theACVR1 gene (c.617G>A). The authors concluded that allclassically affected patients have congenital malformationsof the great toe, and this finding helps in establishing thediagnosis of FOP.Recently, a few studies [1, 2] analyzed phenotypicvariations in patients with FOP along with mutations inthe ACVR1 gene. In the largest study on FOP, so far,Kaplan [2] identified 20 patients with atypical phenotypes,of which five had normal great toes (clinically andradiologically). Also, in a study of Italian patients withFOP, Bocciardi [1] described a patient of FOP with normaltoes. All these patients were diagnosed with FOP butexperienced episodes of heterotopic soft tissue ossificationof milder severity and had mutations in the ACVR1 geneother than the classical c.617G>A. All the above patients[1, 2] were in their second or third decade of life. We had asimilar experience when a child was referred to us forstaging of a suspected sarcoma. In addition to sheets ofcalcification in the paraspinal region on imaging, we notedshort broad femoral necks bilaterally with an osteochon-droma in the right femur neck and short and broad firstmetatarsal. Both great toes however were clinically andradiologically normal. A diagnosis of FOP was thenrendered based on the clinicoradiologic features; a mutationanalysis was however not performed.The report by Kartal-Kaess et al. [ 3]shouldthusbeinterpreted with the important caveat that although almost allpatients with FOP have great toe abnormalities, the diagnosiscan by no means be ruled out in patients with normal greattoes. These patients, particularly those presenting after thefirst decade, can have a FOP variant with milder clinicalcourse. In such patients, the diagnosis can be based on theclinical history and other characteristic-associated skeletalabnormalities, as seen in our patient. In equivocal cases, theDNA sequence analysis can provide confirmation, thusavoiding a potential missed diagnosis of FOP.
Read full abstract