Akron Abrasion Research Articles

Preparation and properties of cast polyurethane elastomers with molecularly uniform hard segments based on 2,4-toluene diisocyanate and 3,5-dimethyl-thioltoluenediamine

A series of three cast polyurethane elastomers were prepared from 2,4-toluene diisocyanate (TDI) and 3,5-dimethyl-thioltoluenediamine (D MTDA) chain extender, with polyethylene adi-pate (PEA), polyoxytetramethylene glycol (PTMG) and polycaprolactone (PCL) soft seg-ments. The polyol molecular weights em-ployed was 2000g/mol. The polyurethane elastomers were characterized by an elec-tronmechanical universal testing machine, an Akron abrasion loss tester, a LX-A Shore du-rometer, a rebound resilience equipment and a Dynamic- Mechanical analyzer. In addition, fractured surface of the polyurethane elas-tomers was investigated by a field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The test results showed the PCL based elastomer ex-hibits the excellent tear and stress-strain properties that polyester based elastomers offer, while retaining superior compression set and resilience similar to polyether based elas-tomers. The static and dynamic properties of the PCL based elastomer were more suitable for dynamic applications. The SEM micro-graphs of all polyurethane samples indicated the existing of the microphase separation structure. Particles of the dispersed phase formed by the hard phase and crystalline part of the soft phase grows bigger with the in-creasing crystallinity of the soft segments. The hard domains are irregular shapes and with the sizes of a few micrometers.

Abrasion Property of Epoxidized Natural Rubber

The abrasion resistance of two grades of epoxidized natural rubber (ENR 25 and ENR 50) and one grade of styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) were studied using an Akron abrasion tester. An accelerated sulfur vulcanization system with 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT) as the accelerator is used throughout the study. Carbon black (N 330), precipitated silica, and calcium carbonate were chosen as the fillers. The range of sulfur and filler loadings was from 1 to 5 phr and 10 to 50 phr, respectively. Mixing was done on a two-roll mill. Results obtained show that for all the rubbers studied, the volume loss due to abrasion decreases with increasing sulfur loading and passes through a minimum at about 3 phr of sulfur. This observation is attributed to the changes of cross-link types from monosulfidic to polysulfidic crosslink as sulfur concentration is increased. However, further sulfur loading would cause a “tight” cure, thus increasing the abrasion loss. For sulfur loading less than 3 phr, ENR 25 indicates the highest abrasion loss, followed by SBR and ENR 50. For the filled stock, minimum loss is observed at about 35–40 phr of filler. Reinforcing filler such as carbon black exhibits better abrasion resistance than calcium carbonate, a nonreinforcing filler. The abrasion loss increases at higher filler loading due to the dilution effect of fillers. Ozone plays an important role in the abrasion property of unsaturated rubbers, as reflected by the higher abrasion loss in the presence of ozone.

Studies on Tire Wear. I. Correlation between Laboratory Abrasion Tests and Road Tests

Abstract The correlation between laboratory abrasion tests and road tests were studied and the following results were obtained for SBR and BR tread compounds. 1. The Akron, the Pico and the Williams abrasion test results correlate well with the road test results, especially the Pico abrasion test results, even when formulations and polymers are varied. 2. In Williams abrasion tests, the differences among compounds are much more magnified than in the case of the road tests and they are less magnified in the order of Akron > Pico. These differences might be ascribed to the different severity of each abrasion machine according to Gelinas??? theory. The severity of each abrasion test decreases in the following order: Williams abrasion ≪ Akron abrasion > Pico abrasion The severity of Pico abrasion most approaches that of road tests. 3. The Akron and the Pico abrasion test results on aged samples are well correlated with the road test results as in case of the test results on samples before aged. The differences among compounds are smaller in case of the laboratory test results on aged samples than in case of the results on samples before aging, and approach those of the road test results.