Hirelings: African American Workers and Free Labor in Early Maryland. By Jennifer Hull Dorsey. (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011. Pp. 224. Cloth, $45.00.)Reviewed by Jewel SpanglerJennifer Hull Dorsey means to fill what she calls an inexplicable gap in African American studies by closely examining relationship between First Emancipation and the nascent wage labor in early national countryside (ix). Drawing her inspiration from predominant strains in Reconstruction historiography, Dorsey reveals much about working lives of free and freed post- Revolutionary African Americans in agricultural counties of Maryland's upper Eastern Shore, as well as exploring familiar, closely related themes of migration, family, and community.It is well known that Maryland's farmers and planters began to shift from tobacco to commercial grain production (and, to a lesser extent, other foodstuffs) well before American Revolution, and concomitantly were increasingly drawn into economic orbit of Baltimore and Philadelphia, from which these crops were shipped to Atlantic and Caribbean markets. While slave labor initially produced much of this agricultural surplus, rural free labor expanded after independence. Manumissions rose after war, and Marylanders, unlike other southerners, left process virtually unregulated for a long period. This meant immediate freedom for some, and emergence of a complex system of self-purchase, redemption, and term slavery for others, and created an unusual potential labor force of slaves, freedmen, free born, and those in transition to freedom.Organized thematically, Hirelings turns first to question of work. Rural Marylanders enjoyed rising grain prices between 1790s and 1810s that put free African American labor in demand. Some became cottagers, but wage labor was more typical. Grain production masculinized in this period, and rural freedwomen's wage-labor opportunities became limited largely to spinning and miscellaneous farm work. Some free people also made a living from nonagricultural work in household production, trades, herding, peddling, and transportation and service occupations. In many respects, free African Americans faced limits to economic opportunity reminiscent of challenges of Reconstruction. Economic independence through land ownership was an unattainable dream for most, and manumission itself, Dorsey illustrates, was contingent upon slaveholders' belief that ex-slaves would remain an integral part of labor force that benefitted, and was controlled by, landholders.Turning to migration, this book demonstrates that, as with general emancipation in 1860s, some early national freedpeople sought to improve their economic lot by relocating. Dorsey illustrates emergence of a regional labor market that enticed predominantly young adult men and women to leave home singly, in search of more desirable work in urban centers or neighboring counties. Others migrated out of United States entirely (to Africa or Caribbean) in this period, typically traveling in family groups. While during Reconstruction ex-slaves used migration as a tool of labor negotiation, Dorsey's findings suggest that continuation of slavery in early republic reduced effectiveness of this tactic.Slavery's interference with free labor negotiations is nowhere clearer than in Dorsey's discussion of family and community. She examines how ex-slaves and their children fought to build autonomous households and contributions of religious institutions (especially AME Church) to emergence of sustained free African American communities in region. …
Read full abstract