Age-adjusted Alignment Research Articles

Full-Body Analysis of Adult Spinal Deformity Patients' Age-Adjusted Alignment at 1 Year.

Previous studies have built a foundation for understanding compensation in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) by using full-body stereographic assessments. These mechanisms, in relation to age-adjusted alignment targets, have yet to be studied fully. The aim of this study was to assess lower-limb compensatory mechanisms of patients failing to meet age-adjusted alignment goals. Patients with ASD ≥40 years with full body baseline and follow-up radiographs were included. Patients were stratified by age (40-65 years, >65 years) and spinopelvic correction. Lower-limb compensation parameters (pelvic shift, hip extension, knee flexion [KA], ankle flexion [AA], and global sagittal angle [GSA]) for patients who matched and failed to match age-adjusted alignment targets were compared with analysis of variance and t-test analysis. In total, 108 patients were included. At 1 year, AA increased with age in the "match" pelvic tilt (PT) andspinopelvic mismatch (PI-LL) cohorts (PT: AA, 5.6-7.8, P= 0.041; PI-LL: 4.9-8.8, P= 0.026). KA, AA, and GSA increased with age in the "match" sagittal vertical axis (SVA) cohort (KA: 3.8-13.1, P= 0.002; AA: 5.8-10.2, P=0.008; GSA: 3.9-7.8, P < 0.001), as did KA and GSA in the "match" T1 pelvic angle group (KA: 1.8-8.7, P= 0.020; GSA: 2.6-5.7, P= 0.004). Greater compensation captured by KA and GSA was associated with age progression in the "match" SVA and T1 pelvic angle cohorts. In addition, older SVA, PT, and PI-LL "match" cohorts used increased AA, suggesting that ideal postoperative alignment of aged individuals with ASD involves increased compensation.

Under Correction of Sagittal Deformities Based on Age-adjusted Alignment Thresholds Leads to Worse Health-related Quality of Life Whereas Over Correction Provides No Additional Benefit.

Retrospective review of prospectively-collected database. This study aims to compare 2-year clinical outcomes of patients who underwent surgical reconstructions based on their achievement to age-adjusted alignment ideals. Recent research in sagittal plane has proposed age-adjusted alignment thresholds. However, the impact of these thresholds on postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is yet to be investigated. Patients were included if they were more than 18-years old and underwent surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with a complete 2-year follow-up. Patients were stratified into three groups based on achievement of age-adjusted thresholds in pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). First group included patients who reached the exact age-adjusted threshold ± 10 years (MATCHED), other two groups included patients who were over corrected (OVER), and under corrected (UNDER). Clinical outcomes including actual value and offset from age-adjusted Oswestry Disability Index, Short-Form-36 (SF-36) -physical component summary, and Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r) were compared between groups at 2 years follow-up. A total of 343 patients (mean, 57 yrs and 83% females) were included. Sagittal profile of the population was: PT = 23.6°, SVA = 65.8 mm, and PI-LL = 15.6°. At 2-year follow-up, there was significant improvement in all sagittal modifiers with 25.7%, 24.3%, and 33.1% of the patients matching their age alignment targets in terms of PT, PI-LL, and SVA, respectively. For PT and PI-LL, the three groups (MATCHED, OVER, and UNDER) had comparable values and offsets from age-adjusted patient reported outcome. However, for SVA groups, patients in UNDER had significantly worse HRQOL than the two other groups. Patients in PT, PI-LL, and SVA UNDER groups were significantly younger than the other groups, P < 0.05. At 2 years after adult spinal deformity surgical treatment, only 24.3% to 33.1% of the patients reached age-adjusted alignment thresholds. Those under corrected in SVA demonstrated worse clinical outcomes. No significant improvements were found between matched and overcorrected patients, with overcorrection being an established risk for proximal junctional kyphosis. These results further emphasize the need for patient specific operative planning. 3.

Age-Adjusted Alignment Goals Have the Potential to Reduce PJK.

Retrospective cohort. To explore proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) as a function of age-adjusted surgical correction goals. Recent adult spinal deformity (ASD) studies show that alignment targets are age-specific. Despite recognizing age and malalignment as PJK risk factors, no study has assessed the age-specific effects of alignment on PJK. ASD patients with fusions to the pelvis were included and stratified into three groups: young adults (YA <40 years old), middle aged (MA: 40-65 years old), and the elderly (ED >65 years old). Analysis of variance compared the groups with respect to 1-year postoperative alignments and 1-year offsets from age-specific alignment targets. A total of 679 patients were enrolled (mean age = 61 years old, 77% female, body mass index = 28.1). At 1 year postoperatively, there was a significant decrease in pelvic tilt (PT; 29-23°), spinopelvic mismatch (pelvic incidence [PI]-lumbar lordosis [LL]) (28-5°), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA; 110-37 mm); overall incidence of PJK was 45.1%. Stratification by age (YA, n = 28; MA, n = 389; ED, n = 262) revealed an increase in PJK incidence with age: YA = 17.9%, MA = 43.8%, and ED = 50.2% (P < 0.001). PJK patients had smaller postoperative PI-LL mismatches (ED 0.8° vs. 9.8°, MA 3.1° vs. 7.3°) than non-PJK patients, without any significant differences in PT or SVA. Analysis of the postoperative offsets from age-specific norms revealed that PJK patients in the two older subgroups and in the study cohort as a whole were overcorrected as compared to non-PJK patients (PI-LL offset-all: -5.2° vs. 2.8°, MA: -1° vs. +4°, ED: -11° vs. -2°; SVA offset-all: -10 mm vs. 7 mm, MA: -3 mm vs. 10 mm, ED: -18 mm vs. -6 mm). The correlation coefficients between PJK angles and the offsets from age-adjusted objective were small (0.320 for PI-LL, 0.114 for PT, and 0.136 for SVA). Overall, this study suggests that PJK patients were overcorrected when compared to age-adjusted alignment goals. Certainly, elderly patients are subject to independent risk factors for PJK, making the prevention of PJK complex. However, individualized optimization of surgical alignment can improve outcomes. This emphasizes the need for surgeons to incorporate age-specific alignment targets into the standard preoperative planning process. 3.

Full-Body Analysis of Age-Adjusted Alignment in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients and Lower-Limb Compensation.

Single-center retrospective review. The present study evaluates the effect of increasing spinal deformity deviation from age-adjusted alignment ideals on lower extremity compensation. Although current understanding of compensatory mechanisms in adult spinal deformity (ASD) is progressing due to full-body stereographic assessment, the effect of age-adjusted deformity targets on lower-limb compensation remains unexamined. ASD patients 18 years or older with biplanar full-body stereographic x-rays were included. Patients were stratified into age cohorts: younger than 40 years, 40-65 years, 65 years or older. Age-specific alignment goals (IDEAL) for pelvic tilt (PT), spinopelvic mismatch (PI-LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and T1 pelvic angle (TPA) were calculated for each patient using published formulas and compared to patients' real (ACTUAL) radiographic parameters. The difference between ACTUAL and IDEAL alignment (OFFSET) was calculated. Analysis of variance compared ACTUAL, IDEAL, and OFFSET between age groups, and OFFSET was correlated with lower-limb compensation (sacrofemoral angle, pelvic shift, knee angle, ankle angle). Seven hundred seventy-eight patients with (74.1% female) were included. ACTUAL and IDEAL alignments matched for PT (P = 0.37) in patients younger than 40 years, SVA (P = 0.12) in patients 40 to 65 years and PT, SVA, and TPA (P > 0.05) in patients 65 years or older. SVA and TPA OFFSETs decreased significantly with increasing age (P < 0.001). Hip extension correlated with all OFFSETs in patients younger than 40 years (positively with PT, PI-LL, TPA; negatively with SVA). Knee flexion correlated with PI-LL, SVA, and TPA, across all age groups with strongest correlations (0.525 < r < 0.605) in patients 40 to 65 years. Ankle dorsiflexion only correlated positively with PT and PI-LL offsets in older (older than 40 years) age groups. Posterior pelvic displacement correlated positively with all OFFSET groups, and was highest (0.526 < r <0.712) in patients ages 40 to 65 years. Age-adjusted ideals for sagittal alignment provide targets for patients with ASD. Offsets from actual alignment (more severe sagittal deformity) revealed differential recruitment of lower-limb extension, which varied significantly with age. 3.

Age-Adjusted Alignment Goals Have the Potential to Reduce Proximal Junctional Kyphosis

Age-Adjusted Alignment Goals Have the Potential to Reduce Proximal Junctional Kyphosis