Geochemical anomalies involve complex geological and geochemical processes. Integrating metallogenic processes into the interpretation of geochemical data can promote mineral exploration. In this study, 3080 subsamples were collected from the western Xicheng ore field and combined into 1312 composite samples using the tectono-geochemistry method. Nineteen elements were analyzed for each composite sample. Factor analysis based on the CLR-transformed data yielded four factors, including the Ag–Sb–Hg–Pb–Au–(B–Ba) association of F1, Zn–Cd–Pb association of F2, Bi–Sn–(Au–As) association of F3, and W–Sn–(Cu) association of F4. Thresholds of each factor were obtained using the concentration–number (C–N) fractal model. Six targets were delineated based on the factor anomaly maps, and one Pb–Zn and two Au deposits were discovered in Targets I and II, respectively. These discoveries and the good spatial correspondence between known deposits and anomalies provide compelling evidence for the effectiveness of the tectono-geochemistry method in the study area. More importantly, a model for the genetic relationship between geochemical anomalies and metallogenesis was constructed. The late tectonic-magmatic-hydrothermal transformation dominated the geochemical pattern in the study area. The degree of interaction between the Au-rich magmatic-hydrothermal fluids and SEDEX-style Pb–Zn mineralizations yielded leakage halos with various elemental assemblages. In addition, W–Sn anomalies may serve as auxiliary exploration indicators for Au mineralizations.
Read full abstract