Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis Research Articles

Clinical and radiographic characterization of three-dimensional gait profiles of patients with knee osteoarthritis

BackgroundPrevious authors have utilized gait kinematics to categorize knee osteoarthritis patients into four distinct profiles: (1) flexed knee; (2) externally rotated knee; (3) stiff knee; and (4) knee varus thrust and rotational rigidity. However, the relationship between these gait profiles and patients’ characteristics remains poorly understood. Thus, this study aimed to investigate whether differences in clinical and radiographic characteristics were associated with these four gait profiles. MethodsThis cross-sectional study used available data from a previous biomechanical study. Data on the four gait profiles were collected from 42 patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis. Three-dimensional kinematics of the knee was recorded during gait using an optoelectronic system. Subjects were evaluated for knee strength, range of motion, tibial slope, femorotibial angle, radiographic severity, anthropometric measurements, and patient-reported outcomes. Multiple comparisons were made using Dunn's test. The level of significance was set at 5%, and the effect size was calculated. FindingsBody mass index (BMI) was the only variable associated with a specific gait profile: profile 4 (P = 0.01; effect size = P1 × P4: −0.62; P2 × P4: −0.41; P3 × P4: −0.40). InterpretationOur findings suggest that most clinical and radiographic characteristics commonly measured in clinical practice did not differ significantly among knee osteoarthritis patients with the four different gait profiles. The only exception was a higher BMI noted in those with gait profile 4; however, it remains unclear whether it can cause varus thrust or rotation rigidity. The incorporation of three-dimensional motion analysis to identify gait profiles provided clinical insights beyond the limitations of traditional clinical assessments.

What Is the Correlation between Clinical and Radiographic Findings in Patients with Advanced Osteoarthritis of the Knee?

Knee range of motion and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are often used as screening tools to assess the severity of knee osteoarthritis and guide the decision to refer patients to an arthroplasty clinic. However, there is little understanding regarding the correlation between these factors. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between patient-reported clinical function measured with the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), pain assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), knee range of motion (ROM), and characteristic radiographic features in patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the knee. A prospective analysis of a consecutive series of 138 patients with advanced unilateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee was performed. The severity of radiographic OA was classified according to the most commonly used Kellgren and Lawrence classification (K&L). Spearman's rank correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were performed. The OKS was used as a dependent variable and was adjusted for pain, ROM, and nine standardized radiographic parameters on multiple views of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint. OKS and pain correlated weakly with the K&L grade (r = -0.289; p = 0.001; r = 0.258; p = 0.002). K&L grade and the degree of patellofemoral joint space narrowing were identified as independent factors being associated with a poorer OKS (coefficient -4.528, p = 0.021; coefficient -2.211, p = 0.038). Slightly worse results were identified for OKS and pain in patients with K&L grade 4 osteoarthritis compared to patients with K&L grade 3 osteoarthritis (∆OKS 5.5 points, p < 0.001; ∆VAS 1.7 points, p = 0.003). There was no significant difference for passive range of motion between patients with K&L grade 3 or 4. When counseling patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis who may be eligible for knee arthroplasty, it is essential to give primary consideration to pain levels and self-reported limitations experienced during daily activities. Relying solely on knee ROM and PROMs is not an effective screening method for guiding the decision to refer patients to an arthroplasty clinic.

Error of intraoperative measurement of stem anteversion is decreased by measuring in neutral hip position during total hip arthroplasty

BackgroundIntraoperative stem anteversion, which is the angle between the lower leg axis and the trial-stem axis with hip flexion and adduction, is generally evaluated by the surgeon's visual estimation during total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the conventional approach can be influenced by knee osteoarthritis or uncertain surgeon's observation point. Therefore, we developed a new method for measuring the stem anteversion angle in the neutral hip position using an original rod attached to the trial-stem perpendicular to the long axis and parallel to the stem neck. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of our method in comparison with the conventional method of measuring intraoperative stem anteversion angle. MethodsWe measured the intraoperative stem anteversion angle in consecutive 106 hips of 106 patients who underwent cementless primary THA with a tapered wedge stem. Absolute error in the stem anteversion angle was expressed as the difference between intraoperative (common vs. neutral hip positions) and postoperative computed tomography measurements, i.e., true stem anteversion. Additionally, we investigated the factors affecting these errors. ResultsThe absolute error of measurement was significantly smaller in the neutral hip position than in the common position (3.0° ± 2.5° vs. 8.0° ± 3.9°; p < 0.0001). The factor associated with the error was advanced knee osteoarthritis in the common position, whereas it was not statistically significant in the neutral hip position. ConclusionsThis study suggests that the error in the intraoperative measurement of stem anteversion is decreased by measuring in the neutral hip position during THA.

Early Postoperative Results in Robotic-Arm-Assisted Total Knee Replacement versus Conventional Technique: First Latin American Experience.

Early results with robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are encouraging; nevertheless, literature might be unrepresentative, as it comes mostly from American, European, and Asian countries. There is limited experience and no comparative clinical reports in Latin America, a region of mainly low- and middle-income countries with limited access to these promising technologies. This study aims to compare the early postoperative results of the first Latin American experience with robotic-arm-assisted TKA versus conventional TKA. A cohort study was performed, including 181 consecutive patients (195 knees) with advanced symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing primary TKA between March 2016 and October 2019. The cohort included 111 consecutive patients (123 knees) undergoing conventional TKA, followed by 70 consecutive patients (72 knees) undergoing robotic-arm-assisted TKA. The same surgical team (surgeon 1 and surgeon 2) performed all procedures. Patients with previous osteotomy, posttraumatic OA, and revision components were not considered. The same anesthetic and rehabilitation protocol was followed. The investigated clinical outcomes (for the first 60 postoperative days) were: surgical tourniquet time, time to home discharge, time to ambulation, postoperative daily pain (Visual Analog Scale), opioid use, range of motion, blood loss, complications, and postoperative mechanical axis. The early clinical postoperative results of this first Latin American comparative experience of robotic-arm-assisted TKA versus conventional technique showed lower opioids requirements and faster functional recovery of ambulation in those patients operated with the robotic system; nevertheless, surgical times were higher, without differences in total postoperative complications and other clinical outcomes.

Patellar Resurfacing and Assessment of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients in King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital

The most effective surgical procedure for treating advanced knee osteoarthritis is total knee arthroplasty. On radiographs, knee osteoarthritis was present in about 37% of individuals over the age of 60. This study, a retrospective cohort study, compared the anterior knee pain, range of motion, and abnormal sound among patients who underwent total knee replacement surgery with or without postoperative patellar resurfacing. The King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, has an orthopedic department where the study will be carried out. This study included 80 patients who had undergone total knee replacement surgery, either with or without patellar resurfacing.&#x0D; They were chosen in accordance with specific inclusion criteria, including being elderly patients (over 50) with knee osteoarthritis that was not responding to conservative treatment. Total knee arthroplasty is an effective treatment for advanced knee arthritis, particularly when the contentious patellar resurfacing procedure is used. Non-patellar resurfacing total knee arthroplasty demonstrated in compression a high rate of pain and an inability to achieve full range of motion. Our research supports our main goal, and numerous studies have agreed that patellar resurfacing provides painless treatment and better outcomes for people with knee arthritis.

Perioperative complications of legally blind patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A national inpatient sample database study

IntroductionVision impairment is a significant health concern that leads to increased morbidity and mortality globally. Significantly, legally blind (LB) patients have higher rates of hospitalization, cost, and orthopedic-related complications. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is commonly used to treat advanced knee osteoarthritis. However, there is limited literature reporting the demographic and hospitalization characteristics and operative outcomes of patients with LB who underwent TKA. This study addresses this gap in literature. MethodWe conducted a retrospective study using a Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. We assessed perioperative complications, length of stay (LOS), and healthcare expenditure among legally blind and control cohort patients who underwent TKA. Propensity matching was conducted to identify factors associated with perioperative complications. ResultsBetween 2016 and 2020, there were 558,371 patients underwent TKA, with 0.1% of patients documented as legally blind. Of this cohort, the average age was significantly older than the control, 70.01 years versus 66.72 years (p < 0.001), respectively. Patients from the LB cohort had a longer length of stay (2.9 ± 1.7 days) than those from the control cohort (2.4 ± 1.3 days) (p < 0.001). Significantly, patients in the legally blind group incurred higher expenditures than those in the control group ($68,936 versus $64,808, respectively; p < 0.001). (Table 2). Propensity matching yields similar results. Analysis of TKA-associated operative complications suggested that legally blind patients had a higher proportion of blood loss anemia (20.97%, p < 0.05), required blood transfusions secondary to surgery (3.1%, p < 0.05), and periprosthetic fractures (2.6%, p < 0.05) than the control group (15.3%, 1.5%, and 0.42%, respectively). ConclusionWe report that LB patients are, on average, older and have an extended LOS, higher expenditure, and higher rates of specific TKA-associated operative complications than those without legal blindness. To date, this is the first study of its kind to provide large, population-based data on the demographics, costs, and TKA-operative complications in patients with LB and, as such, provides a purposeful basis for future research.

Management of proximal tibial stress fracture associated with advanced knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review

PurposeTibial stress fracture associated with knee osteoarthritis is an unusual and difficult clinical scenario. There is no clear existing treatment guideline for this uncommon clinical disease. The aim of this study is to review the impact of various treatment options for patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis associated with proximal tibial stress fracture. MethodsThe study was performed using the databases of PubMed and Scopus. Methodological index for non-randomized studies score was used to evaluate the included studies’ bias. The concluded data included the treatment approach, reported outcome measure, and time to fracture union. The literature search was started in December 2021 and accomplished in January 2022. A narrative description of the different methods and comparison of their results were done. ResultsOut of total assessed 69 studies, 9 studies were included in our review. The commonest treatment approach used was total knee arthroplasty by long tibial stem extension. The mean preoperative knee society score and knee functional score were 30.62 and 23.17, respectively. The mean postoperative knee society knee score was 86.87, while the functional score was 83.52. The average reported time to achieve fracture union was 4 months (a range of 2.07 – 5.50 months). ConclusionThe optimal clinical outcome for treating either acute or mobile tibial stress fracture in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis can be achieved with long stem total knee arthroplasty. However, due to heterogeneity of data, comparison of different treatment options for chronic proximal tibial stress fracture mal-union/non-union coexisting with knee osteoarthritic and such inferences need to be judged cautiously.

Extra-articular location of the three-dimensional mechanical axis in advanced knee osteoarthritis: an upright computed tomography study.

One of the most widely used benchmarks of lower-limb alignment is the mechanical axis (MA), which passes through the centers of the femoral head and the ankle in the weight-bearing position. However, where the MA passes through three-dimensionally (3D) is unclear. We investigated the MA in 3D (3D-MA) in knee osteoarthritis (OA) using upright computed tomography (CT). This study included 66 varus OA knees from 38 patients [age 70.0 (64.8-77.0) years; median (interquartile range)]. The 3D-MA was determined using upright CT data and compared among Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades. Further, correlations between the 3D-MA and other parameters were evaluated. The 3D-MA was located at 5.3 (1.3-14.4)% medially and 7.1 (0.7-15.3)% posteriorly on the tibial plateau in KL-1, and was translated medioposteriorly with increased KL grade. The 3D-MA in KL-3 [30.6 (22.6-42.6)% medially and 50.9 (45.8-80.2)% posteriorly] and KL-4 [56.7 (48.5-62.9)% medially and 92.3 (50.2-127.1)% posteriorly] was located extra-articularly. The mediolateral position of the 3D-MA correlated with the femorotibial angle [correlation coefficient (CC) = -0.85, p < 0.001], and the anteroposterior position of the 3D-MA correlated with the knee flexion angle (CC = -0.93, p < 0.001). Our analysis demonstrated that the 3D-MA in low-grade OA knees passes slightly medial and posterior to the knee center, and the 3D-MA is translated medioposteriorly with the progression of knee OA. Further, the 3D-MA is translated medially with varus progression and posteriorly with the progression of knee flexion contracture.

The test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of performance-based task tests in patients with knee osteoarthritis

BackgroundThe measurement tool used for an accurate balance assessment should produce valid and reliable results in the population in which it is used. ObjectivesTo examine whether two performance-based task tests are a reliable and valid measurement test to assess balance in patients with early and advanced knee osteoarthritis (KO). DesignReliability and concurrent validity research. MethodTest-retest reliability by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the first and second trial periods of performance-based task tests (Alternate Step Test & Pen Pick up Test); their correlations with the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) were calculated and their concurrent validity in balance assessment were examined. ResultsA total of 100 patients (75% women, 25% men, mean 59 ± 10 years) with KO, 50 early (54 ± 7 years, 34 women, 16 men) and 50 advanced (64 ± 9 years, 41 women, 9 men), participated in the study. The ICC values for the Alternate Step Test (AST) and Pen Pick up Test (PPT) in patients with early KO are 0.881 (0.747–0.939, 95% confidence intervals) and 0.815 (0.689–0.892, 95% confidence intervals), respectively, while it is 0.852 (0.752–0.913, 95% confidence intervals) and 0.861 (0.756–0.922, 95% confidence intervals) in patients with advanced KO. Pearson correlation coefficient between AST & PPT times and TUGT time in patients with early and advanced KO was in the range of 0.535–0.746 (p < 0.01). ConclusionsBoth task tests are reliable and valid clinical measurement tests that can be used to assess balance in patients with both early and advanced KO.

Low Correlation between Gait and Quality of Life in Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis

Advanced knee osteoarthritis patients’ gait usually undergoes alterations leading to decreased mobility and lower functional performance, which can result in a worsening of their quality of life (QoL). While several authors have reported a moderate correlation between gait parameters and QoL assessed by generic questionnaires, the literature is scarce. This study aimed to explore the relationship between gait and QoL parameters assessed by a generic and a disease-specific questionnaire in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis. In this single-centre, prospective, observational study, 129 patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis scheduled for elective total knee replacement were selected. The patients’ gait was evaluated by means of a validated wireless device while they walked 30 m at a comfortable speed. Patient function was also analysed using the Knee Society Score (KSS). QoL was measured with the EQ-5D and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaires. Patients showed a mean walking speed of 0.95 ± 0.19 m/s, a mean cadence of 105.6 ± 9.9 steps/min, and a mean stride length of 1.25 ± 0.17 m on both legs. They presented poor knee status (KSS &lt; 60) and poor QoL, with an EQ-5D of 0.44 ± 0.24 and a total KOOS of 29.77 ± 13.99. Positive low correlations (r &lt;0.5, p &lt;0.5) were found only between the speed, propulsion and stride length of both legs, and the overall and ADLs subscale scores of the total KOOS questionnaire. In conclusion, several gait parameters have a significant low correlation with the QoL of patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis, as assessed by an osteoarthritis-specific questionnaire.

Does Sarcopenia Accompanying End-Stage Knee Osteoarthritis Affect the Outcomes following Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA), and to assess whether sarcopenia accompanying OA affects patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after TKA. We evaluated which predisposing factors could influence the development of sarcopenia in patients with advanced knee OA. Material and Methods: A total of 445 patients whose body composition, muscle strength, and physical performance could be measured before primary TKA were enrolled. Sarcopenia was defined according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria. Patients were categorized into sarcopenia (S, n = 42) and non-sarcopenia groups (NS, n = 403). PROMs were investigated using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Additionally, postoperative complications and predisposing factors for sarcopenia were evaluated. Results: The incidence of sarcopenia in the entire sample was 9.4%; the prevalence was higher in men (15.4%) than in women (8.7%), and significantly increased with advancing age (p < 0.001). At the six-month follow-up, PROMs in group S were significantly inferior to those in group NS, except for the pain score; however, at the 12-month follow-up, no significant difference was observed between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that age, body mass index (BMI), and a higher modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (mCCI) were predisposing factors for sarcopenia. Conclusions: A higher prevalence of sarcopenia was observed in men with progressive knee OA. Up to six months after primary TKA, PROMs in group S were inferior to those in group NS, except for the pain score; however, no significant difference was observed between the groups at 12 months. Age, BMI, and higher mCCI were predisposing factors for sarcopenia in patients with OA.

Decreased Skeletal Muscle Mass as Indicated By the Sarcopenia Index Correlates With Decreased ADL In Patients With Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis

Decreased Skeletal Muscle Mass as Indicated By the Sarcopenia Index Correlates With Decreased ADL In Patients With Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis

Asymmetric Flexion Contracture is Associated With Leg Length Inequality in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether knee flexion contracture (FC) was associated with leg length inequality (LLI) and/or morbidity in knee osteoarthritis (OA). DesignWe accessed 2 databases: (1) the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) cohort, including participants with, or at-risk of OA, and (2) the Ottawa Knee Osteoarthritis cross-sectional database (OKOA), including participants with primary advanced knee OA. Both included demographics, radiographic data, knee range of motion, leg length, pain, and function scales. SettingTertiary care academic rheumatology and orthopedic clinics. ParticipantsPatients with or at-risk of primary OA. We included 881 OAI and 72 OKOA participants (N=953). InterventionNot applicable. Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome tested the association between the difference in knee extensions of the OA and contralateral knees (the knee extension difference, or KExD) and LLI. This was evaluated using bivariate regression, followed by a multivariable linear regression model. ResultsOAI participants had less severe knee OA [Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) score 1.9±1.3] vs OKOA (KL score 3.4±0.6). The KExD correlated with LLI for both databases (OAI: R=0.167; P≤.001; OKOA: R=0.339; P=.004). Multivariable regression showed an effect of KExD on LLI in both databases (OAI: β=0.37[0.18,0.57]; P<.001, OKOA: β=0.73[0.20,1.26]; P=.007). When broken down by subgroup, the OAI moderate-severe OA group showed a significant effect of KExD on LLI (β=0.60 [0.34,0.85]; P<.001). ConclusionsOA-related loss of knee extension was associated with LLI for those with moderate-severe OA. Because LLI correlates with worse knee OA symptoms, discovering an FC should cue clinicians to evaluate for LLI, an easily-treatable finding that may help reduce OA-associated morbidity for those approaching the need for arthroplasty.

Arthroscopic cartilage regeneration facilitating procedure can modify the clinical course of knee osteoarthritis.

The effectiveness of arthroscopic treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA) has been controversial. This study compares the clinical outcomes of the arthroscopic cartilage regeneration facilitating procedure (ACRFP) and conservative treatment. During the year of 2016, 524 patients (882 knees) who were older than 40years of age and diagnosed with different stages of knee OA were scheduled for ACRFP under the protocol of knee health promotion option (KHPO) for knee OA. Of those, 259 patients (413 knees) eventually received ACRFP (the ACRFP group), and 265 patients (469 knees) didn't receive ACRFP but received conservative treatment (the non-ACRFP group). A telephone questionnaire was used to evaluate the subjective satisfaction and the incidence of receiving arthroplasty for these patients. After the mean follow-up period of 61.6months (SD 4.5), there were 220 patients (374 knees, 90.6%) in the ACRFP group and 246 patients (431 knees, 90.0%) in the non-ACRFP group completed the outcome study. The satisfactory rate was statistically higher for the ACRFP group (90.64%) than for the non-ACRFP group (70.3%) and the difference in subjective satisfaction was more obvious in patients with more advanced knee OA. As for the incidence of patients having subsequently received arthroplasty, it was higher (13.46%) in the non-ACRFP group than in the ACRFP group (4.28%). Compared with conservative treatment, ACRFP could satisfy more patients with knee OA and modify their natural course by decreasing the incidence of subsequent arthroplasty.

Arthroscopic Transtibial Repair of Acute Traumatic Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Tear

Background: The posteromedial meniscal root is a critical structure in maintaining balanced tibiofemoral contact stresses and joint stability. Studies have shown that posterior root tears are biomechanically equivalent to total meniscectomy and can lead to the rapid development of osteoarthritis. Our presentation focuses on the less common, acute, traumatic posteromedial meniscal root avulsion, although our technique is also applicable to the more common degenerative posteromedial meniscal root tears. Indications: Surgical indications include acute tears, as well as chronic or degenerative tears in patients without advanced osteoarthritis. Absolute surgical contraindications include subchondral bone collapse, substantial concurrent meniscal pathology, malalignment of &gt;5°, and advanced knee osteoarthritis. Technique Description: Once the tear is identified, the bone at the root insertion is prepared with a meniscal rasp. Two looped sutures are passed through the meniscal root in a cinch-type fashion using a knee scorpion. A tunnel is drilled at the root insertion using a specialized meniscal root repair guide. Approximately, 10 mm of bone are drilled in a retrograde fashion with a flip cutter deployed to 7 mm to decorticate the bone and enhance healing. The drill is then removed and a rubber tube with a retrieval suture is advanced through the drill guide into the joint. The loop suture is retrieved through the anteromedial portal and the repair sutures are passed through the retrieval loop. Under arthroscopic visualization, the root is then reduced to its anatomic insertion and the sutures secured to the tibia using a knotless suture anchor placed 1 cm distal to the transtibial tunnel. Results: Several recent studies have shown that meniscal root repair decreases rapid knee degeneration as gauged by meniscal extrusion, progression of Kellgren-Lawrence grade and rate of conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Discussion/Conclusion: Posteromedial meniscal root tears are increasingly being recognized as a distinct meniscal pathology that can lead to rapid arthritis if left unrepaired. Arthroscopic repair techniques continue to improve allowing orthopedic surgeons to more readily address this significant, but treatable pathology. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Gait, physical activity and tibiofemoral cartilage damage: a longitudinal machine learning analysis in the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study

ObjectiveTo (1) develop and evaluate a machine learning model incorporating gait and physical activity to predict medial tibiofemoral cartilage worsening over 2 years in individuals without advanced knee osteoarthritis and...

Acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a single-arm 12-week digital behavioral health intervention in patients with knee osteoarthritis

BackgroundDigital health interventions may improve osteoarthritis (OA) management. This study evaluated the acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a multimodal digital nutrition, exercise, and mindfulness intervention in adults with knee OA.MethodsAdults with advanced knee OA and an orthopaedic referral were invited to self-enroll in a pragmatic 12-week single-arm intervention. OA-focused nutrition and exercise resources were delivered weekly by email, and secondary components accessed on-demand (web-platform, webinars, and nutrition consultation). Acceptability was assessed by qualitative interview data and completion rates. Preliminary effectiveness on clinical outcomes was assessed by change in health-related quality of life, well-being, mindfulness, self-efficacy, and interest in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between baseline and 12-weeks.ResultsN = 102 patients self-enrolled (73.5% female, age 64 ± 7 years, body mass index 32.9 ± 7.3 kg/m2); n = 53 completed the 12-week intervention (71.7% female, age 65 ± 7 years, body mass index 33.4 ± 6.3 kg/m2). Acceptability was demonstrated by positive perceptions of tailored intervention resources. In study completers, health-related quality of life components of pain and physical functioning domains improved at 12-weeks [change in SF36 4.4 (95%CI 0.2–8.6), p = 0.016, and 6.7 (95%CI 2.7–10.7), p < 0.001, respectively]. Self-efficacy for managing daily activities improved [change in PROMIS T-score 4.4 (95%CI 2.8–6.0), p < 0.001].ConclusionA 12-week digital multimodal intervention for knee OA was acceptable to patients and shows preliminary effectiveness in improving self-efficacy, aspects of quality of life, and decreasing interest in TKA. Digital behavioral interventions for knee OA may be an acceptable approach to improve patient outcomes and OA self-management while potentially reducing utilization of costly health system resources.

KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan is Effective for Treating Advanced Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis up to Six Months Following a Single Intra-Articular Injection: A Post Hoc Analysis of Aproove Clinical Study

Background: Symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) is typically treated with hyaluronan-based intra-articular injections. Advanced knee OA patients are often unresponsive to hyaluronan. KiOmedine® Carboxymethyl-Chitosan (CM-Chitosan), a novel fluid implant, was safe and effective for treating symptomatic knee OA. Objective: The objective of this study is to describe the efficacy of a single injection of KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan in advanced knee OA. Methods: Patients with advanced knee OA enrolled in the APROOVE trial and treated with KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan were identified: subgroup-1, BMI &gt;30 kg/m2 and/or Kellgren Lawrence (KL) grade III (n=39), and subgroup-2, BMI &gt;30 kg/m2 and KL-grade III (n=8). Within-group analyses were performed using the WOMAC scores and OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria at 3 and 6 months. Results: In both subgroups, significant improvements in all WOMAC scores were observed at 3 and 6 months (p&lt;0.001 for all comparisons). A high responder rate was observed at 3 and 6 months in subgroup-1 (63.2% and 65.8%) and in subgroup-2 (57.1% and 62.5%). Conclusion: This post hoc analysis of the APROOVE trial showed that a single intra-articular injection with KiOmedine® CM-Chitosan could be an effective therapeutic option for patients with advanced knee OA. Clinical trial registration number: Clinicaltrial.gov identifier: Net30679208.

The test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of 360° turn test in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Purpose The aim of this study is to determine whether the 360° turn test is a reliable and valid evaluator that can be used to assess dynamic balance in patients with early (radiographic grades I and II) and advanced (radiographic grades III and IV) knee osteoarthritis. Materials and Methods This study is a methodological research. For the test time and step count of 360° turn test; test-retest reliability were determined by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient and concurrent validity in patients with knee osteoarthritis was investigated by correlation with the timed up and go test time. Results The final analysis was made on 117 participants. The intraclass correlation coefficient values for the test time and step count of 360° turn test in patients with early knee osteoarthritis are 0.931 and 0.902, respectively, while they are 0.923 and 0.943 in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the time and step count of 360° turn test and the test time of the timed up and go test in patients with early knee osteoarthritis, respectively; while they are 0.547 and 0.388, the correlation in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis are 0.697 and 0.700, respectively (p < 0.01). Conclusions The 360° turn test is a evaluator that has excellent test-retest reliability and moderate to strong concurrent validity in patients with both early and advanced knee osteoarthritis and can be used in the assessment of dynamic balance in this population.

Is There a Role for Ordering a DEXA (Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry) Scan for Patients with Symptomatic Advanced Knee Osteoarthritis?

Osteoarthritis of the knee (OA) and osteoporosis are two conditions that have a significant impact on society, have a great impact on quality of life, and can lead to functional impairment. However, the relationship between knee OA and osteoporosis is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine if there is a link between symptomatic advanced knee osteoarthritis and low bone mineral density. A total of 430 patients with symptomatic and advanced radiographic knee OA served as participants in this study. Plain radiographs were used to screen participants for osteoarthritis, and a Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan was used to determine each participant's bone mineral density (BMD). The lumbar spine, whole femur, and femoral neck BMD levels were statistically higher in the early OA (Kelldren-Lawrence (KL) I and II) group compared with the advanced (III and IV) OA group. Higher BMD at the whole femur and femoral neck but not at the lumbar spine was observed when comparing patients with grades I, II, and III with patients with grade IV after adjustment for body mass index. The findings of this study indicate that the degree of knee OA is correlated with a decline in BMD. These findings lend credence to the theory that the two conditions may be linked to one another. Our study concluded that patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis are at risk of developing osteoporosis. As a result, orthopedic doctors are required to screen for osteoporosis in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis to both prevent and treat osteoporosis at an earlier stage.