Advanced EGFR-mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Amivantamab, Both in Combination With Lazertinib, in Refractory Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Primary Results From the Phase III PALOMA-3 Study.

Phase III studies of intravenous amivantamab demonstrated efficacy across epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A subcutaneous formulation could improve tolerability and reduce administration time while maintaining efficacy. Patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC who progressed after osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive subcutaneous or intravenous amivantamab, both combined with lazertinib. Coprimary pharmacokinetic noninferiority end points were trough concentrations (Ctrough; on cycle-2-day-1 or cycle-4-day-1) and cycle-2 area under the curve (AUCD1-D15). Key secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS) was a predefined exploratory end point. Overall, 418 patients underwent random assignment (subcutaneous group, n = 206; intravenous group, n = 212). Geometric mean ratios of Ctrough for subcutaneous to intravenous amivantamab were 1.15 (90% CI, 1.04 to 1.26) at cycle-2-day-1 and 1.42 (90% CI, 1.27 to 1.61) at cycle-4-day-1; the cycle-2 AUCD1-D15 was 1.03 (90% CI, 0.98 to 1.09). ORR was 30% in the subcutaneous and 33% in the intravenous group; median PFS was 6.1 and 4.3 months, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the subcutaneous versus intravenous group (hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.92; nominal P = .02). Fewer patients in the subcutaneous group experienced infusion-related reactions (IRRs; 13% v 66%) and venous thromboembolism (9% v 14%) versus the intravenous group. Median administration time for the first infusion was reduced to 4.8 minutes (range, 0-18) for subcutaneous amivantamab and to 5 hours (range, 0.2-9.9) for intravenous amivantamab. During cycle-1-day-1, 85% and 52% of patients in the subcutaneous and intravenous groups, respectively, considered treatment convenient; the end-of-treatment rates were 85% and 35%, respectively. Subcutaneous amivantamab-lazertinib demonstrated noninferiority to intravenous amivantamab-lazertinib, offering a consistent safety profile with reduced IRRs, increased convenience, and prolonged survival.

Subcutaneous amivantamab and lazertinib as first-line treatment in patients with EGFR-mutated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results from the phase 2 PALOMA-2 study.

LBA8612 Background: Amivantamab (ami), an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody with immune cell-directing activity, is approved as an intravenous (IV) formulation. IV ami + lazertinib (laz), a 3rd-generation EGFR TKI, demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with treatment-naïve, advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC vs osimertinib (Cho Ann Oncol 2023). Subcutaneous (SC) ami substantially reduced infusion-related reactions (16% vs 67%) and administration time (≤7 mins vs 2–4 hours) vs historical IV experience (Minchom JCO 2023). PALOMA-2 (NCT05498428) evaluated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of first-line SC ami+laz. Methods: Cohorts 1 and 6 enrolled pts with treatment-naïve, EGFR Ex19del or L858R-mutated advanced NSCLC. Prophylactic anticoagulation for the first 4 months (mo) of treatment was recommended in cohort 1 and mandatory in cohort 6. SC ami was administered by manual injection in the abdomen at 1600 mg (≥80 kg: 2240 mg) weekly for the first 4 weeks and every 2 weeks thereafter. Laz was dosed orally at 240 mg daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of 6 Jan 2024, 68 and 58 pts were enrolled in cohorts 1 and 6, respectively. Overall, median age was 59 years, 60% were female, and 68% Asian. The median follow-up was 10 mo for cohort 1 and 6 mo for cohort 6. ORR (confirmed responses) in cohort 1 was 68% (95% CI, 55–79) by investigator and 72% (95% CI, 60–82) by independent central review. ORR in cohort 6 was 64% (95% CI, 49–78) and 73% (95% CI, 58–85), respectively. At data cutoff, 40/46 responders in cohort 1 and 29/29 responders in cohort 6 were receiving ongoing treatment. Best overall response rates (includes unconfirmed responses) were 81% (95% CI, 70–89) for cohort 1 and 76% (95% CI, 61–87) for cohort 6. Median time to response was 2 mo (range, 1.4–5.3). Median duration of response, PFS, and overall survival were not estimable. Administration-related reactions (ARRs) were reported in 13 (19%) pts in cohort 1 and 6 (11%) pts in cohort 6, all grade 1–2. EGFR- and MET-related AEs were primarily grade 1–2. Total of 71% of pts in cohort 1 and 100% in cohort 6 received prophylactic anticoagulation. Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) were reported in 18% and 7% of pts in cohorts 1 and 6, respectively. There were no dose reductions or discontinuations due to VTE. Rate of bleeding was 2% among pts receiving anticoagulation. Mean ami concentrations on cycle 2 day 1 were 328 µg/mL (n=49) in cohort 1 and 371 µg/mL (n=41) in cohort 6, consistent with historic IV levels. Conclusions: SC ami+laz showed a response rate similar to historic IV ami+laz in first-line EGFR-mutated NSCLC, with an improved safety profile that included significantly lower ARR rates. Further, prophylactic anticoagulation can be safely implemented and reduced incidence of VTE. Clinical trial information: NCT05498428 .

Impact of PD-L1 Expression on the Overall Survival of Caucasian Patients with Advanced EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Treated with Frontline Osimertinib.

The treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring an oncogenic epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm) is currently based on osimertinib, a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). High Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50% demonstrated to be a negative prognostic factor, mostly among Asian populations treated with 1st/2nd generation TKI. We investigated the impact of PD-L1 expression on the progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) within a cohort of patients receiving osimertinib as first-line treatment. Our bi-centre French retrospective study included all newly diagnosed patients with an advanced EGFRm (common and uncommon) NSCLC, between May 2018 and November 2022, treated with osimertinib. The primary endpoint was OS according to tumor proportion score PD-L1 expression (low/intermediate < 50% vs high ≥ 50%). Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox model for adjusted multivariate analysis. Of 96 patients, median age was 71 (IQR 62-76), 70 were women (72.9%), 81 had a performance status (PS) 0-1 (84.3%). Median follow-up was 22.6 months (95% CI 20.5-24.7). Twenty patients (20.8%) had high PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed based on PD-L1 status. Patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% had significant shorter PFS and OS than those with PD-L1 < 50%, respectively 9.3 vs 17.5 months (p = 0.044 months) and 14.3 vs 26.0 months (p = 0.025). Multivariable adjustment for baseline characteristics found that PS ≥ 2 (HR 2.79, 95% CI 1.12-6.93, p = 0.027), PD-L1 ≥ 50% (HR 2.61, 95% CI 1.31 to 5.22, p = 0.007) and uncommon EGFR mutation (HR 4.59, 95% CI 1.95-10.80, p = <0.001) were associated with a shorter OS. Brain metastases at diagnosis and age ≥ 65 were not, respectively HR 1.66 (95% CI 0.90-3.06, p = 0.11) and HR 0.95 (95% CI 0.50-1.80, p=0.9). Our study found that PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% was associated with a shorter OS in EGFRm NSCLC patients treated with first line osimertinib. Further research is warranted to understand the underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms of this correlation.

Amivantamab plus lazertinib vs osimertinib in first-line EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with biomarkers of high-risk disease: A secondary analysis from the phase 3 MARIPOSA study.

8504 Background: Amivantamab (ami) is an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody with immune cell-directing activity. Lazertinib (laz) is a CNS-penetrant, 3rd-generation EGFR TKI. In MARIPOSA (NCT04487080), first-line ami+laz provided a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) vs osimertinib (osi) in patients (pts) with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC (HR, 0.70; P&lt; 0.001), including in pts with a history of brain metastases (HR, 0.69; Cho Ann Oncol 2023;34:S1306, LBA14). Pts with TP53co-mutations, detectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and baseline brain or liver metastases have poor prognoses. We evaluated outcomes for pts in these high-risk subgroups from MARIPOSA. Methods: MARIPOSA enrolled pts with treatment-naïve, EGFR-mutant (Ex19del or L858R) advanced NSCLC. This analysis included pts randomized to ami+laz (n = 429) or osi (n = 429). Pathogenic alterations were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of baseline blood ctDNA with Guardant360 CDx. Ex19del and L858R ctDNA in blood was analyzed at baseline and Cycle (C) 3 Day (D) 1 with Biodesix droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Results: Baseline ctDNA for NGS analysis of pathogenic alterations was available for 636 pts (ami+laz, n = 320; osi, n = 316). Among pts with TP53 co-mutation, mPFS was 18.2 months (mo) for ami+laz vs 12.9 mo for osi (HR, 0.65; P= 0.003). Pts with TP53 wild-type had a trend favoring ami+laz for mPFS (HR, 0.75; P =0.11). In pts with ddPCR-detectable ctDNA at baseline, ami+laz significantly prolonged mPFS vs osi (20.3 vs 14.8 mo; HR, 0.68; P= 0.002). Further, ami+laz significantly improved mPFS vs osi in pts with ctDNA clearance at C3D1 (24.0 vs 16.5 mo; HR, 0.64; P= 0.004) and in pts who did not clear ctDNA (16.5 vs 9.1 mo; HR, 0.48; P= 0.014). For pts with liver metastases at baseline, ami+laz significantly prolonged mPFS vs osi (18.2 vs 11.0 mo; HR, 0.58; P= 0.017), which is consistent with the improved PFS for ami+laz vs osi in pts with a history of brain metastases. Conclusions: Ami+laz demonstrated significantly improved mPFS vs osi in pts with biomarkers of high-risk disease. Given these features can occur in up to 85% of pts, ami+laz represents an important new standard of care for treatment-naïve EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT04487080 . [Table: see text]

Real-world outcomes of pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy plus osimertinib after progression on first-line osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

e20531 Background: First-line pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy + osimertinib (Pem-Plat-Osi) improves progression free survival as compared to osimertinib (Osi) alone in advanced epidermal growth factor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, many patients are hesitant to commence chemotherapy upfront. We describe the outcomes of patients who receive Pem-Plat-Osi after progression on first-line Osi in 2 tertiary cancer centres. Methods: Patients with advanced EGFR-mutated (ex19del/L858R) NSCLC who had Pem-Plat-Osi between 1/7/2018-30/9/2023 after progression on first-line Osi at National Cancer Centre Singapore and Chinese University of Hong Kong were identified. Primary endpoints were time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier. Results: A total of 60 patients were included. Median age at diagnosis was 62, 53% (32/60) were male and 77% (46/60) were never smokers. Ex19del comprised 57% (34/60) and L858R 43% (26/60). Baseline central nervous system (CNS) metastases were present in 67% (40/60). Median TTF1 on Osi was 12 months (m) and median time to initiation of Pem-Plat-Osi was 41 days (d) (range 0-652) after progression on Osi. CNS failure occurred in 10 patients (16.7%). Partial response (PR) to Pem-Plat-Osi was achieved as best response in 45% (27/60), stable disease in 37% (22/60) and progressive disease in 18% (11/60). Three of 4 patients with CNS PD on Osi who did not undergo brain radiotherapy achieved PR/SD to Pem-Plat-Osi. At median follow up of 31m, median TTF2 on Pem-Plat-Osi was 6m, median TTF1+TTF2 was 20m and median OS was 34m. Comparing ex19del and L858R, there was no significant difference in median TTF1 (10m vs 12m, p=0.63), TTF1+TTF2 (19m vs 21m, p=0.50) and OS (34m vs 36m, p=0.40). Median TTF1+TTF2 (19m vs 20m, p=0.84) and OS (31m vs 36m, p=0.68) were similar in patients with or without baseline CNS metastases. There was no significant difference in TTF2 comparing patients who had TTF1&lt;12m versus TTF1≥12m (both median 6m, p=0.56). Patients who started Pem-Plat-Osi within 20d of progression on Osi had significantly longer TTF2 as compared to patients who started after 20d (median 8m versus 5 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.89, p=0.016) although there was no significant difference in OS (median 31m versus 34 months, p=0.35). Achieving PR was predictive of superior TTF2 (median 8m vs 5m, HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.84, p=0.005) but not OS (median 36m vs 32m, p=0.45). Conclusions: Our real-world data supports the efficacy of Pem-Plat-Osi after progression on first line Osi, including among L858R subtype and patients with baseline CNS metastases. Chemotherapy initiation within 20d of Osi progression and achieving PR were significantly associated with superior TTF2. Sequential approach of adding chemotherapy upon osimertinib failure is a plausible treatment option.

Safety and efficacy of osimertinib plus consolidative stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) in advanced EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results from a multi-center phase II trial.

8518 Background: Despite high response rates to EGFR inhibitors, patients with advanced EGFR mutant NSCLC generally experience disease progression within two years (osimertinib median PFS 18.9 months, median OS 38.6 months). We sought to determine whether administration of SABR to residual sites of disease at the time of expected best response to EGFR inhibition could prolong disease control. Methods: This was a multi-center single-arm phase 2 study. Eligible patients had advanced EGFR mutant (exon 19 or 21) NSCLC not restricted by number, site, or size of metastases; ECOG 0-2; no prior treatment with EGFR inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors; and no history of interstitial lung disease. Patients with stable or responding disease after 8 weeks of osimertinib received SABR to persisting lesions, followed by continued osimertinib until progression or intolerance. At subsequent progression, patients could receive further SABR and continue osimertinib if deemed clinically feasible and appropriate. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included duration on osimertinib, toxicity, and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 43 patients (32 women, 11 men) were enrolled and initiated osimertinib, of whom 29 (67%) received SABR. Reasons SABR was not administered included inadequate response (9%), insufficient residual disease (19%), and other (5%). At a median follow-up of 35.7 months (95% CI, 28.8, 37.6), 42 evaluable patients had a median PFS of 32.6 months and a median OS of 45.7 months. The median duration of osimertinib was 31.5 months. Grade ≥3 toxicities included one incidence each (2%) of the following: pain at the site of radiation, paronychia, liver enzyme elevation, fatigue, hyponatremia, diarrhea, and pneumonitis. Conclusions: Osimertinib plus consolidative SABR appears to provide a PFS and OS benefit when considered against historical data with osimertinib alone. This treatment strategy may offer a well-tolerated and practical approach to improving outcomes for patients with advanced EGFR mutant NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT03667820 .

Amivantamab plus lazertinib in atypical EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results from CHRYSALIS-2.

8516 Background: Afatinib is the only EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved to treat patients (pts) with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC harboring atypical mutations (eg, S768I, L861Q, G719X), excluding exon 20 insertion mutations (Ex20ins). In a retrospective analysis of 38 TKI-naïve pts, 27 had a response to afatinib, with a median duration of response (mDoR) of 11.1 months (mo) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 10.7 mo (Yang Lancet Oncol 2015;16(7):830-8). Amivantamab (ami) is an EGFR- MET bispecific antibody with immune-cell directing activity. Lazertinib (laz) is a CNS-penetrant, 3rd-generation EGFR TKI. This combination was evaluated among pts with atypical EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. Methods: Cohort C of the CHRYSALIS-2 study (NCT04077463) enrolled pts with atypical EGFR mutations, excluding Ex20ins, who were treatment-naïve or had ≤2 prior lines, which may have included a 1st/2nd-generation EGFR TKI. Pts with Ex19del or L858R co-mutations were excluded. Ami was intravenously administered at 1050 mg (1400 mg, ≥80 kg) weekly for the first 4 weeks and then biweekly. Laz was given orally at 240 mg daily. Response was assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of 4 Dec 2023, 105 pts received ami+laz, with a median follow-up of 13.8 mo (range, 0.1–30.2). The median age was 64 years, 50% were female, 68% Asian, 30% White, and 35% had CNS lesions at baseline. The most common mutations were G719X (54%), L861Q (24%), and S768I (22%). The ORR was 51% (95% CI, 41–61). In the treatment-naïve subset (n = 49), ORR was 55% (95% CI, 40–69), with mDoR not estimable (NE; 95% CI, 9.9 mo–NE) and mPFS of 19.5 mo (95% CI, 11.0–NE). Among responders, 78% (21/27) had DoR ≥6 mo. The ORR for pts harboring solitary mutations at G719 (n = 13), L861 (n = 8), and S768 (n = 2) was 54%, 63%, and 100%, respectively. The ORR for pts with compound atypical mutations (n = 17) was 41%, with DoR ≥6 mo for all 7 responders. Among pts treated with prior afatinib (n = 40), ORR was 45% (95% CI, 29–62), with mDoR of 8.9 mo (95% CI, 2.8–NE) and mPFS of 5.7 mo (95% CI, 4.2–10.7). Among the 18 responders, 56% had DoR ≥6 mo. The most common AEs were primarily EGFR- and MET-related toxicities, primarily grade 1-2. Discontinuations of both ami and laz due to treatment-related AEs occurred in 9% of pts. The incidence of VTE was 30% (31/105), with the majority of events, 71% (22/31), occurring in the first 4 mo of treatment. The vast majority of pts, 97% (30/31), were not on anticoagulation at time of first VTE. The rate of pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease was 6%. Biomarker analyses are ongoing; updated results will be presented at time of meeting. Conclusions: In the largest, single-cohort, prospective study of atypical EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, ami+laz demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable antitumor activity in pts who were treatment-naïve or had disease progression on afatinib. Clinical trial information: NCT04077463 .

The efficacy and safety of furmonertinib in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC and leptomeningeal metastases.

e20525 Background: Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a common and fatal complication in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) mutation. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of furmonertinib in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated ( EGFRm) NSCLC and LM. Methods: Eligible patients with confirmed advanced EGFRm NSCLC and LM were treated with furmonertinib. The primary endpoints were LM response rate and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). Results: This retrospective study analyzed the efficacy and safety of 31 EGFRm advanced NSCLC patients with LM at two hospitals between February 2020 to March 2023. The median age was 56 years (rang: 31-75), 22 (71.0%) were females. 19 (61.3%) patients had ECOG PS≥2 and all 31 patients (100%) had adenocarcinoma histology. For the treatment of LM, 19 (61.3%) patients received furmonertinib as first-line treatment, 8 (25.8%) patients as second-line treatment. 16 (51.6%) patients were treated with 240 mg of furmonertinib and 12 (38.7%) patients with 160 mg of furmonertinib. The median follow-up duration was 16.80 months (95% CI 12.71-20.89 months). LM objective response rate (ORR) was 75.0% and LM disease control rate (DCR) was 95.0% according to RANO-LM radiologic criteria. Overall ORR was 22.6% and DCR was 96.8%. Median LM duration of response (DoR) was 12.00 months (95% CI 7.40-16.60 months) and median overall DoR was 7.20 months (95% CI 3.60-10.80 months). 23 (74.2%) of the 31 patients had progressed or died by data cutoff. The median PFS was 11.70 months (95% CI 9.48-13.92 months) and the median OS was 18.40 months (95% CI 12.49-24.21 months). There was no significant difference in survival (median PFS: 11.70 months vs 10.90 months, p = 0.335; median OS: 18.40 months vs 13.50 months, p = 0.196) between the 19 patients who treated with furmonertinib as first-line therapy and those who treated with furmonertinib as second-line therapy. Although data on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) clearance were not available, we observed improved neurologic function in 18 (75%) of 24 patients with baseline neurologic abnormalities. Logistic regression analysis showed that the therapeutic dose of furmonertinib was a positive predictor of OS in NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutation with LM [HR: 2.679 (1.004-7.147), P = 0.049]. The most common AEs were rash, diarrhea and decreased appetite. However, most AEs were grade 1-2. Conclusions: Our study provides real-world clinical evidence that furmonertinib shows an encouraging efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with EGFRm NSCLC and LM.

The Design for a Phase II, Randomized, Multicenter Study of CtDNA-Guided Treatment With Furmonertinib Combined Therapy or Furmonertinib Alone for Untreated Advanced EGFR Mutant Non–small-cell Lung Cancer Patients: The FOCUS-C Study

BackgroundThird-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have significant antitumor activity to advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with classic EGFR mutations. However, EGFR-TKI monotherapy shows poor efficacy in patients whose circulating tumor cell DNA (ctDNA) of EGFR mutations cannot be rapidly cleared. Materials and MethodsAs a third-generation TKI, furmonertinib has shown superior antitumor activity and minor toxicity. The FOCUS-C study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (NCT05334277) to explore the efficacy and safety of furmonertinib plus pemetrexed-platinum doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab versus furmonertinib monotherapy in untreated advanced EGFR mutant NSCLC patients without EGFR clearance after the induction therapy of furmonertinib. Patients with EGFR clearance will still receive furmonertinib as Arm A. Patients without ctDNA clearance will be randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio as Arm B1 (furmonertinib), Arm B2 (furmonertinib combined with carboplatin and pemetrexed for 4 cycles, and then furmonertinib and pemetrexed as maintenance therapy) and Arm B3 (Arm B2 regimen plus bevacizumab). The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) in Arm B2/B1. Secondary endpoints include PFS in Arm B3/B1, PFS in Arm A/B1, PFS in Arm B3/B2, objective response and disease control rate, overall survival and safety in all Arms. Exploratory endpoints are focused on the efficacy based on plasma NGS at different timepoints. ConclusionThis study will evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of furmonertinib plus carboplatin and pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab verses furmonertinib alone in untreated patients with advanced EGFR mutant NSCLC without EGFR clearance.

Phase 1/2 clinical trial of JIN-A02, a 4th generation EGFR-TKI, in patients with 3rd generation EGFR-TKI resistance in EGFR mutated advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

TPS8658 Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are the most common driver mutations in NSCLC. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the recommended front-line option for EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC patients, but patients invariably develop acquired resistance and face disease progression. JIN-A02, a 4th generation EGFR-TKI intended for oral administration, selectively and reversibly binds to EGFR mutations, including the C797S and/or T790M mutation that causes resistance to 3rd generation of EGFR-TKIs. Pre-clinical studies with EGFR C797S and/or T790M mutated cell lines showed that JIN-A02 can inhibit cell growth in a dose dependent manner and has a high degree of selectivity over wild-type EGFR. In vivo studies showed that administration of JIN-A02 dose-dependently inhibited tumor growth in the C797S+ xenograft mice model. Moreover, JIN-A02 shown to penetrate blood-brain barrier and exhibit anti-tumor activity in an intracranial tumor model. The strong potency and high selectivity of JIN-A02 for mutant EGFR may offer improved therapeutic window in the clinical setting vs available EGFR-TKIs. Methods: JIN-A02 is being evaluated in this Phase 1/2, multicenter, an open-label trial (NCT05394831) for subjects with advanced NSCLC harboring C797S and/or T790M mutation as a monotherapy. The primary object of this study is to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor effect for determining the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of JIN-A02. The inclusion criteria are that the subject (≥ 18 years) must have an advanced or metastatic NSCLC showed progress disease (PD) after receiving approved standard EGFR-TKI therapies and/or platinum-based anticancer chemotherapy is allowed up to 1 time after using EGFR-TKI treatment with ECOG status 0 or 1. Before enrollment in the study, the EGFR mutation status is determined using either tumor tissue and/or plasma ctDNA. This study comprises three parts, dose escalation (Part A), dose exploration (Part B), and dose expansion (Part C). In Part A, dose escalation, comprised of 5 cohorts ranged from a starting dose of 12.5 mg P.O, QD to a top dose of 150 mg P.O, QD with every three subjects, is carried out where the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is evaluated in subjects with 28-day cycles. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are evaluated for 21 days. In Part B, dose exploration is carried out to evaluate the safety of JIN-A02 further and to determine the RP2D using 2 preliminary effective dose levels from Part A in subjects. In Part C dose-expansion study, subjects (n=36 for each cohort) are divided into 5 different cohorts based on the EGFR mutation (both or single positive of C797S and T790M), and the anti-tumor activity of JIN-A02 is evaluated according to RECIST v1.1 at RP2D. Clinical trial information: NCT05394831 .

ATTLAS, IMpower151 and ORIENT-31: Dusting off IMpower150 for Post-Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC?

Treatment strategies for post-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an ongoing challenge. Previously, the IMPRESS trial comparing platinum doublet chemotherapy with or without EGFR-TKI did not demonstrate any progression-free survival (PFS) benefit. The retrospective subgroup analysis of IMpower150 indicated that the quad regimen (carboplatin, paclitaxel, bevacizumab, atezolizumab) improved PFS and overall survival (OS) in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who progressed on first-generation EGFR-TKIs. Given the retrospective nature of the analysis, the IMpower150 regimen is not approved in the US for post-EGFR-TKI treatment. Currently, osimertinib or other third-generation (3G) EGFR-TKIs is the first-line standard of care for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. MARIPOSA-2 provided the first randomized trial post-osimertinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with another quad regimen (platinum, pemetrexed, lazertinib, amivantamab). The IMpower150 and MARIPOSA-2 quad regimens differ in the principle of whether to continue or even "double-down" on EGFR inhibition. Recently, three prospective randomized trials conducted in Asia offered promising results, showing that a quad regimen of doublet platinum chemotherapy plus anti-angiogenesis agent and ICI may be as efficacious as MARIPOSA-2 with a lower rate of toxicities and accounting for the PFS difference if 1L chemotherapy plus osimertinib instead of osimertinib monotherapy. In particular, the median PFS achieved by the quad regimens of ATTLAS and IMpower151 is 8.5 months. However, only 8.2% and 17.9% of the EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who received the quad regimens progressed on 3G EGFR-TKI, respectively. Here, we discuss how the results of IMpower151 and ATTLAS may rejuvenate interest in a non-EGFR containing quad regimen as a potential post-osimertinib monotherapy treatment. Randomized trials comparing the results of these studies, including the quad regimen of MARIPOSA-2 versus the quad regimen of IMpower151/Impower150/ATTLAS in post-osimertinib (or other 3G EGFR-TKI) progression, are urgently needed.

Efficacy of nivolumab in comparison to chemotherapy and gefitinib for advanced NSCLC

Background: Lung cancer is one of the major causes of cancer related death worldwide, while non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consists of 85% of all lung cancer cases. Despite adequate treatment, most of the NSCLC patients progress to advance stages. Single or doublet-chemotherapy are considered as standard care for advance NSCLC patients. Gefitinib is considered as standard therapy for EGFR mutant advanced NSCLC. Recently, a human monoclonal antibody called Nivolumab has shown encouraging efficacy for advanced NSCLC patients. The aim of this systematic review is to show the efficacy of nivolumab in comparison to single or doublet chemotherapy and gefitinib. Method: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library to identify primary research, published in English language between 2000 and 2018, involving Nivolumab, chemotherapy and gefitinib for advanced NSCLC patients. The primary outcome of interest was median overall survival (mOS). The secondary outcome of interest were progression free survival, objective response rate and grade-3 and treatment related adverse effects. Results: After screening 600 full-text articles, 17 clinical studies involving 9284 patients of advanced NSCLC were included. All treatment regimen seemed to be feasible. The mOS for nivolumab was ranging between 9.2 months and 16.2 months; for chemotherapy between 6 months and 18.8 months; and for gefitinib between 7.6 months and 30.5 months. Conclusion: Nivolumab is more effective and safe for EGFR non-mutant advanced NSCLC patients than either chemotherapy or gefitinib. However, gefitinib is more effective than nivolumab for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2024; 42: 176-188

Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of aumolertinib in real-world treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: This study aims to determine the efficacy and safety profile of aumolertinib in the real-word treatment setting for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 173 EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients who received aumolertinib treatment at Henan Cancer Hospital from April 2020 to December 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, while a Cox regression model was used for multifactorial analysis and prognostic factor assessment. Results: Among patients administered first-line aumolertinib (n = 77), the objective remission rate (ORR) of 77.92% was observed, along with a disease control rate (DCR) of 100%. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 24.97 months, which did not reach the median overall survival (mOS). The patients treated with aumolertinib after progression on prior EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy (n = 96) exhibited an ORR of 46.88%, a DCR of 89.58%, an mPFS of 15.17 months, and an mOS of 21.27 months. First-line treatment multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant impact of elevated creatine kinase on PFS (p = 0.016) and a similar significant influence of co-mutation on OS (p = 0.034). Furthermore, subsequent-line treatment multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a statistically significant impact of elevated creatine kinase on median PFS (p = 0.026) and a significant effect on the number of metastatic organs (p = 0.017), co-mutation (p = 0.035), and elevated creatine kinase (p = 0.014) on median OS. Conclusion: Aumolertinib has shown clinical significance and can safely be used in the real-world setting for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Abstract CT154: Phase 1/2 clinical trial of JIN-A02, a 4th generation EGFR-TKI, in patients with 3rd generation EGFR-TKI resistance in EGFR mutated advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Abstract Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are the most common driver mutations in NSCLC. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the recommended front-line option for EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC patients, but patients invariably develop acquired resistance and face disease progression. JIN-A02, a 4th generation EGFR-TKI intended for oral administration, selectively and reversibly binds to EGFR mutations, including the C797S and/or T790M mutation that causes resistance to 3rd generation of EGFR-TKIs. Pre-clinical studies with EGFR C797S and/or T790M mutated cell lines showed that JIN-A02 can inhibit cell growth in a dose dependent manner and has a high degree of selectivity over wild-type EGFR. In vivo studies showed that administration of JIN-A02 dose-dependently inhibited tumor growth in the C797S+ xenograft mice model. Moreover, JIN-A02 shown to penetrate blood-brain barrier and exhibit anti-tumor activity in an intracranial tumor model. The strong potency and high selectivity of JIN-A02 for mutant EGFR may offer improved therapeutic window in the clinical setting vs available EGFR-TKIs. Methods: JIN-A02 is being evaluated in this Phase 1/2, multicenter, an open-label trial (NCT05394831) for subjects with advanced NSCLC harboring C797S and/or T790M mutation as a monotherapy. The primary object of this study is to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and anti-tumor effect for determining the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of JIN-A02. The inclusion criteria are that the subject (≥ 18 years) must have an advanced or metastatic NSCLC showed progress disease (PD) after receiving approved standard EGFR-TKI therapies and/or platinum-based anticancer chemotherapy is allowed up to 1 time after using EGFR-TKI treatment with ECOG status 0 or 1. Before enrollment in the study, the EGFR mutation status is determined using either tumor tissue and/or plasma ctDNA. This study comprises three parts, dose escalation (Part A), dose exploration (Part B), and dose expansion (Part C). In Part A, dose escalation, comprised of 5 cohorts ranged from a starting dose of 12.5 mg P.O, QD to a top dose of 150 mg P.O, QD with every three subjects, is carried out where the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is evaluated in subjects with 28-day cycles. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are evaluated for 21 days. In Part B, dose exploration is carried out to evaluate the safety of JIN-A02 further and to determine the RP2D using 2 preliminary effective dose levels from Part A in subjects. In Part C dose-expansion study, subjects (n=36 for each cohort) are divided into 5 different cohorts based on the EGFR mutation (both or single positive of C797S and T790M), and the anti-tumor activity of JIN-A02 is evaluated according to RECIST v1.1 at RP2D. Citation Format: Sun Min Lim, Byoung Chul Cho, Ji Youn Han, Sang We Kim, Ki Hyeong Lee, Misako Nagasaka, Anna Jo, Ethan Seah, Choonok Kim, Thanyanan Reungwetwattana. Phase 1/2 clinical trial of JIN-A02, a 4th generation EGFR-TKI, in patients with 3rd generation EGFR-TKI resistance in EGFR mutated advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT154.

EGFR degraders in non-small-cell lung cancer: Breakthrough and unresolved issue.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been well validated as a therapeutic target for anticancer drug discovery. Osimertinib has become the first globally accessible third-generation EGFR inhibitor, representing one of the most advanced developments in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) therapy. However, a tertiary Cys797 to Ser797 (C797S) point mutation has hampered osimertinib treatment in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Several classes of fourth-generation EGFR inhibitors were consequently discovered with the aim of overcoming the EGFRC797S mutation-mediated resistance. However, no clinical efficacy data of the fourth-generation EGFR inhibitors were reported to date, and EGFRC797S mutation-mediated resistance remains an "unmet clinical need." Proteolysis-targeting chimeric molecules (PROTACs) obtained from EGFR-TKIs have been developed to target drug resistance EGFR in NSCLC. Some PROTACs are from nature products. These degraders compared with EGFR inhibitors showed better efficiency in their cellular potency, inhibition, and toxicity profiles. In this review, we first introduce the structural properties of EGFR, the resistance, and mutations of EGFR, and then mainly focus on the recent advances of EGFR-targeting degraders along with its advantages and outstanding challenges.

Abstract 2413: Mutated TP53 prevalence in EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases

Abstract Introduction: Approximately 50% of patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develops brain metastases (BM), which is associated with a poor prognosis. Mutations in TP53 are associated with earlier development of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but it is unclear whether patients who develops BM have a higher prevalence of TP53 mutations. Analyses of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in blood have been established as a good alternative to tissue biopsies to assess the genomic landscape of NSCLC. In this study, we aim to analyze ctDNA from patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC to investigate the prevalence of TP53 mutations in patients with BM, and to explore whether patients with BM exhibit a distinct ctDNA profile compared to patients without. Materials and Methods: Plasma samples collected before treatment commenced from 97 of the 100 patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC enrolled in the First-line Treatment With Osimertinib in EGFR-mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer study (The FIOL study: NCT03804580) were analyzed. Patients were split into cohorts with (n=44) and without BM (n=53) at baseline. The cell-free DNA was isolated and sequenced with targeted next-generation sequencing with the AVENIO ctDNA Surveillance Panel (Roche) containing 197 lung cancer-related genes. Results: Mutations in ctDNA were found in 83 patients (85.6%), with 6 patients with BM having no ctDNA mutations and 8 patients without BM having no ctDNA mutations. Besides EGFR mutations, TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene, with 42 patients (43.3%) harboring TP53 mutations. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of TP53 mutations between the cohort with BM (n=23) and the cohort without (n=19), (p=0.15). There was no difference in the number of identified mutations in the two cohorts (BM: median: 2 (range: 0-6), without BM: median: 2 (range: 0-11), p=0.71). Patients with BM had a numerically lower ctDNA level (median: 45.5 mutant molecules/mL), than patients without BM (median: 75.9 mutant molecules/mL), though the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.68). Conclusion: Prevalence of TP53 mutations in plasma collected before osimertinib treatment initiation in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC was similar between patients with and without BM at baseline. Furthermore, there was no difference in the ctDNA profile between these two cohorts. Future experiments will clarify the impact of TP53 mutations in patients with or without BM. Citation Format: Simone Stensgaard, Inger Johanne Z. Eide, Elin Marie Stensland, Åslaug Helland, Simon Ekman, Karin H. Hansen, Saulius Cicenas, Bjørn Henning Grønberg, Peter Meldgaard, Boe S. Sørensen, Odd Terje Brustugun. Mutated TP53 prevalence in EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2413.

Additional local therapy before disease progression for EGFR-mutated advanced lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

International guidelines recommend the use of local therapy (LT) to limited progression in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the use of LT before disease progression has not been extensively analyzed. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of administering additional LT in conjunction with first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) before disease progression in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up until May 31, 2023. The LT group consisted of patients who received first-line EGFR-TKIs in conjunction with additional LT, while the TKI group comprised participants treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs alone. Studies comparing the survival outcomes of the LT and TKI groups were included in this analysis. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). This review was registered on PROSPERO (registration number CRD42023439913). Among the 11 investigated studies covering 1,313 patients, the LT modalities included radiotherapy, surgery, and ablation therapy, which accounted for 91%, 27%, and 27% of the studies, respectively. The pooled hazard ratios of median PFS and OS were 0.34 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22-0.53; P<0.001] and 0.42 (95% CI: 0.36-0.48; P<0.001), respectively, which indicated significant benefits for the LT group compared to the TKI group. There was no significant difference between the LT and TKI groups (P=0.473) regarding the incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events. This study suggests that the strategic use of additional LT before disease progression is a promising approach for the treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC.

Furmonertinib for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a glittering diamond in the rough of EGFR-TKI.

The third-generation EGFR-TKIs, such as osimertinib, aumolertinib, and furmonertinib, have been recommended as the preferred treatment for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Among them, furmonertinib shows several advantages in terms of clinical efficacy. Firstly, compared to osimertinib and aumolertinib, furmonertinib was the first EGFR-TKI with median progression-free survival (mPFS) of over 20.0m (20.8m) for advanced NSCLC with classical EGFR-mutations. Furthermore, furmonertinib achieved a mPFS of 18.1m in advanced NSCLC with unfavorable prognostic factors, such as the 21 L858R mutation and central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, which is unrivalled by osimertinib. Secondly, furmonertinib is the only FDA-approved EGFR-TKI for breakthrough therapy in newly-diagnosed advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins mutation. Thirdly, the relatively longer mPFS of 20.8m was observed in furmonertinib compared to osimertinib and aumolertinib (15.2m and 15.3m) in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC with CNS metastases. More importantly, the efficacy of furmonertinib increases within the dose range of 80-240mg per day. Finally, furmonertinib can be an optional treatment for advanced NSCLC patients who develop resistance to osimertinib or aumolertinib. In conclusion, furmonertinib may be a glittering star in the field of EGFR-TKI, which requires further exploration and expansion.

Overall Survival From the EORTC LCG-1613 APPLE Trial of Osimertinib Versus Gefitinib Followed by Osimertinib in Advanced EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Osimertinib has been established as a standard of care for patients with common sensitizing EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) although the sequential approach (first-generation inhibitor gefitinib followed by osimertinib) has not been formally compared. The phase II APPLE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02856893) enrolled 156 treatment-naïve patients, and two treatment strategies were evaluated: osimertinib up front or the sequential treatment approach with gefitinib up front followed by osimertinib at the time of progression, either molecular progression (detection of plasma T790M resistance mutation) regardless of the radiologic status or just at the time of radiologic progression. Patients' characteristics were well balanced, except for the higher proportion of baseline brain metastases in the sequential approach (29% v 19%). Per protocol, 73% of patients switched to osimertinib in the sequential arm. Up-front treatment with osimertinib was associated with a lower risk of brain progression versus the sequential approach (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54 [90% CI, 0.34 to 0.86]), but a comparable overall survival was observed between both strategies (HR, 1.01 [90% CI, 0.61 to 1.68]), with the 18-month survival probability of 84% and 82.3%, respectively. The APPLE trial suggests that a sequential treatment approach is associated with more frequent progression in the brain but a similar survival in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

EGFR-TKIs Combined with Allogeneic CD8+ NKT Cell Immunotherapy to Treat Patients with Advanced EGFR-Mutated Lung Cancer.

Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of allogenic CD8 + natural killer T (CD8+ NKT) immunotherapy combined with gefitinib in the treatment of advanced or metastatic EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: This study is prospective. The NSCLC patients with exon 19 (Ex19del) or exon 21 L858R point mutations, and response to gefitinib treatment were enrolled into the trial to be randomly assigned into the gefitinib arm and the gefitinib/NKT arm. Allogenic CD8+ NKT cells were cultured in vitro and adaptive transferred into the patients via vein in the gefitinib/NKT arm. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoint analysis included time to disease progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), levels of serum tumour markers for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in the blood, the response rate and safety. From July 2017 to June 2021, 19 patients were randomly assigned to the gefitinib arm (n = 8) and the gefitinib/NKT arm (n = 11). Results: The estimated median survival PFS in the gefitinib/NKT arm was significantly longer than that of the gefitinib arm (12 months vs 7 months). Similar results were also observed for the median TTP. Moreover, the gefitinib/NKT arm had better CEA control than the gefitinib arm. Clinical grade 3 adverse reactions occurred in 64% and 39% of patients in the gefitinib/NKT arm and the gefitinib arm, respectively. The most common grade 3 adverse events in the gefitinib/NKT arm included abnormal liver function in 8 cases (73%) and diarrhoea in 1 case (9%), both of which resolved after drug intervention. Conclusion: The PFS of EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC treated with allogenic CD8+ NKT cells combined with gefitinib was longer than that of gefitinib alone. No obvious serious adverse reactions occurred, and the patients compliance and survival status were good.