Ruxolitinib was recently approved as a treatment for steroid refractory acute GVHD (aGVHD) and is used in adults for the treatment of chronic GVHD (cGVHD). As a JAK-1/JAK-2 inhibitor, it reduces T-cell proliferation and trafficking and leads to a potent anti-inflammatory effect. There is limited data of its use in pediatric and adolescent/young adult (AYA) patients. We report our single center experience with ruxolitinib in this population. Data on patients treated with ruxolitinib at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital between 8/1/18 and 8/31/19 were retrospectively analyzed after institutional IRB approval. aGVHD was graded according to the Modified Glucksberg scale, while cGVHD was scored as limited or extensive based on Seattle criteria. Only patients on ruxolitinib for ≥14 days were evaluated for response, which was defined as a reduction by at least one grade in severity of aGVHD. Ability to reduce other GVHD medications, especially steroids, and/or symptomatic improvement was considered a response in cGVHD. 15 patients (median age 18, range: 11-29 years) received ruxolitinib: 5 for aGVHD and 10 for cGVHD. Standard starting dose was 5 mg twice a day. Patients in the aGVHD group were steroid refractory with ≥ Grade III GVHD and had received a median of 3 (range: 2-5) different agents prior to ruxolitinib. Patients received treatment for a median of 46 days (range: 23-332). 4 of 5 patients had a partial response (PR) with one non-responder, for an overall response rate (ORR) of 80%. All patients experienced at least one episode of infection- CMV reactivation (n=2), adenovirus (n=1), viral gastroenteritis (n=1), bacterial infections (n=3) and probable fungal infection (n=1). Dose-limiting cytopenia was the only toxicity observed in 3 patients (60%), requiring dose reduction or discontinuation. 2 patients had TRM, both related to GVHD and infections. 10 patients treated for cGVHD (6 limited, 4 extensive) had received a median of 3 (range: 2-6) different agents prior to ruxolitinib. One patient required early cessation of therapy due to a severe allergic reaction and in another patient ruxolitinib was stopped due to leukemia relapse. Of the eight patients evaluable for response, treatment duration was for a median of 195 days (range: 59-372) with an ORR of 88%. 5 (63%) patients developed infections: CMV reactivation (n=2), respiratory infections (n=4), bacterial infection (n=1). Only one patient required dose reduction due to GI side effects and cytopenias. Ruxolitinib is an effective salvage therapy for severe GVHD. It was well tolerated in our patient population, with myelosuppression as the dose limiting toxicity, especially in aGHVD patients. A high rate of infections was noted during ruxolitinib treatment and concomitant antimicrobial prophylaxis is strongly recommended.
Read full abstract