Administration Of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Research Articles

Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge after immune-related adverse events: a retrospective study from VigiBase update in 2024 looking for emergent safety signals

ObjectivesLimited information is available on the safety of a rechallenge with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) after occurrence of an immune-related adverse event (irAE). We aim to identify potential emergent...

Effects of sex and obesity on immune checkpoint inhibition-related cardiac systolic dysfunction in aged mice.

Despite accumulating data on underlying mechanisms, the influence of sex and prevalent cardio-metabolic co-morbidities on the manifestation and severity of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced cardiotoxicity has not been well defined. To elucidate whether sex and prevalent cardio-metabolic co-morbidities affect ICI-induced cardiotoxicity, we randomized 17-month-old male and female mice to receive control diet (CON) or high-fat diet (HFD) + L-NAME-a well-established mouse model of cardio-metabolic co-morbidities-for 17weeks (n = 5-7), and evaluated markers of T-cell function in the spleen. As expected, HFD + L-NAME significantly increased body- and heart weight, and serum cholesterol levels, and caused no systolic dysfunction, however, led to diastolic dysfunction, cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, and increased fibrosis only in males compared to corresponding CON. Western blot analyses of splenic immune checkpoint protein levels showed differential expression depending on sex and prevalent cardio-metabolic co-morbidities, suggesting T-cell exhaustion in both sexes on HFD + L-NAME, but more pronounced in males. In a sub-study with a similar setup, we tested cardiotoxic manifestations of ICI by treating mice with anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (ICI) for the last 2weeks of diet administration (n = 5-7). After 2weeks of ICI treatment, cardiac systolic functions significantly decreased in CON, but not in HFD + L-NAME groups of both sexes compared to baseline (before ICI administration). In conclusion, in this exploratory study using aged mice, we describe for the first time that ICI-related systolic dysfunction is diminished in both sexes when obesity and hypercholesterolemia are present, possibly due to obesity-related T-cell exhaustion.

The administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors via an elastomeric pump versus conventional intravenous infusion: an economic perspective

BackgroundRecent studies have underscored the potential of innovative administration methods to mitigate the capacity burden on healthcare systems, without compromising the quality of care. This study assessed and compared the resource utilization and associated costs of two distinct administration modes of immune checkpoint inhibitors: the innovative elastomeric pump and conventional intravenous infusion. This comparison can inform sustainable healthcare practices and healthcare decision-making to optimize treatment efficiency in an era of escalating healthcare demands.MethodsIn this micro-costing study, data on resource use and time allocation for drug preparation and administration were collected using an observational, non-interventional study design. Data were registered at the oncology daycare unit and hospital pharmacy. Cost categories included drug acquisition, disposable materials, healthcare professional time for drug administration, drug preparation, and patient time spent at the oncology day care unit.ResultsDrug administration through the elastomeric pump resulted in substantially lower healthcare costs when compared to conventional infusion, particularly due to reduced labor and chair time. The elastomeric pump reduced the total chair time by 78% and nurse time by 55%. Total average costs (excluding drug costs) were €103,47 and €77.99 for conventional infusion and the elastomeric pump, respectively, showcasing potential savings of €25.48 (P < 0.001) per administration.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that the elastomeric pump not only offers substantial cost savings but also enhances the treatment capacity of the oncology day care unit. These findings support the adoption of the elastomeric pump in clinical settings as a cost-saving and efficient alternative to conventional infusion.Trial registrationThis study has been registered in the National Trial Register (NTR), with the reference number NTR NL9473. Registration date: 05-05-2021.

Emerging Strategies for Local Delivery of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors to Potentiate Cancer Immunotherapy: Current Status and Future Prospects.

Cancer constitutes a significant threat to patients' lives worldwide. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that boost antitumor immunity by targeting immune checkpoint components, has emerged as a promising strategy for its treatment in recent years. However, the objective response rates of the ICIs are unsatisfactory. As the primary route, systemic administration of ICIs is often accompanied by immune-related adverse events. Local delivery of ICIs serves as a potential therapeutic strategy that can improve the efficacy while simultaneously reducing side effects through precise drug release at the tumor site. Initial validation of direct local application of ICIs for tumors in clinical trials has indicated reduced side effects and improved efficacy, while low bioavailability remains a challenge. Furthermore, research on various carriers, including nanoparticles, microneedles, hydrogels, combined platforms, and implantable devices for local release of ICIs has exhibited applying potential in treating murine tumors, among which combined platforms such as combined hydrogel system hold the highest promise due to their encompassment of the advantages of multiple carriers. These carriers, by incorporating ICIs and other therapeutics, could manage cancers more potently, which needs to be confirmed in clinical trials after the refinement of their biocompatibility. This review summarizes the latest research advancements regarding local administration of ICIs, with a particular focus on the carriers for local delivery as well as the combination therapies, thus providing novel insights and research guidance for scholars to enhance the efficacy of locally delivered ICIs on managing multiple cancers in the future.

The mechanisms and salvage treatment strategies underlying positive relapse following CD19 CAR-T cell therapy in B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Approximately 50% of patients suffering from relapsed/refractory B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL), experience relapse within one year, with around 60% of these relapses being antigen-positive, despite the transformative impact of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. The mechanisms underlying relapse are primarily associated with tumor heterogeneity, CAR-T cell dysfunction, subopimal in vivo expansion and persistence, and an inhibitory immune microenvironment. This review aims to investigate salvage strategies designed to enhance outcomes for patients undergoing relapse or disease progression following the CAR-T cell therapy. These strategies include a second CAR-T cell infusion that targets either the same antigen or an alternative target, the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and the utilization of novel targeted therapies including monoclonal antibodies, antibody-conjugated drugs and small molecule compounds aimed at mitigating CD19-positive relapse or overcoming CAR-T cell resistance. Nevertheless, achieving improved long-term survival for these patients continues be challenging.

Efficacy of timing‑dependent infusion of nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Although an association exists between the timing of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration and therapeutic efficacy in several types of cancer, to the best of our knowledge, no reports exist regarding this relationship in gastric cancer (GC). The present study aimed to evaluate the optimal timing of ICI (nivolumab) administration in patients with advanced GC. A total of 58 consecutive patients with advanced GC who received nivolumab monotherapy after ≥2 chemotherapy regimens were retrospectively evaluated. These patients were divided into two groups according to the median time of nivolumab administration: i) Early-timing and (ii) late-timing groups, and the efficacy was assessed in both groups. The early-timing group had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than the late-timing group [median OS 8.2 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.2-12.9 vs. median OS 5.4 months; 95% CI, 3.6-6.1]. Moreover, patients in the early-timing group had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those in the late-timing group (median PFS 2.6 months; 95% CI, 1.3-3.9 months vs. median PFS 1.6 months; 95% CI, 0.9-2.1 months). Furthermore, univariate analysis showed that early timing, immune-related adverse events and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration were associated with longer OS and PFS. Cutoff Finder analysis revealed that the optimal timing of nivolumab administration for achieving better outcomes was before 12:06 p.m. Nivolumab administration in the morning, especially before 12:06 p.m., had a better clinical impact on patients with advanced GC.

Outcomes with initiation of inpatient immunotherapy.

7 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer care; however, studies establishing their benefit have been primarily conducted in robust patients (pts) with good performance status. Administration of ICI to hospitalized pts remains a subject of debate. While there is often a desire to reverse clinical course in patients who are acutely ill, previous studies show minimal benefit from anticancer therapy near the end of life with the potential for toxicity. While ICI are generally better tolerated than traditional cancer therapies, the median time to response ranges from 2-6 months and pts with a poor PS may not derive benefit. ICIs also bring significant financial burdens to pts and healthcare systems. The role of ICIs in the inpatient setting remains unclear. Methods: This study retrospectively examined pts who received PD-(L)1 inhibitors while IP between 2016 and 2023 at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital. Data were collected manually from institutional EMR. Descriptive statistics were used to depict the pt population and show their outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated survival probabilities from treatment initiation to follow-up or death, with 95% confidence intervals (α = 0.05). The Log rank non-parametric test compared survival distributions among ICIs. Results: Of the 38 pts who initiated ICI as an inpatient, 16 were male (42.1%) and 22 were female (57.9%). The median age was 60 years (31–88 years). Gastrointestinal malignancies were most common indication (31.6%), followed by thoracic/head and neck (21.1%) and hematologic (18.4%) cancers. Among the cohort, 26.3% received nivolumab, 68.4% received pembrolizumab, and 5.3% received a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab. PD-L1 status was unknown for the majority (79.0%) of pts at time of ICI; 15.8 % were known to be PD-L1 high. Only 14 of 35 (40.0%) patients went on to receive any additional immunotherapy after discharge. The median days to death after discharge was 16 days (0-376 days), with a mean of 36.4 days. The median overall survival was 137 days from IP treatment initiation. The survival probability at 91 days was 65.5% (95% CI: 45.4-79.7) and 31.0% (95% CI: 15.6-47.9) at 182 days. No significant differences were observed between the survival distributions by ICI type (p=0.966) or primary malignancy (p=0.488). Conclusions: Our findings underscore the complexities of initiating inpatient ICI treatment and question its appropriateness. Delaying ICI to outpatient settings may enhance pt tolerance, optimize outcomes, and potentially mitigate unnecessary costs. This approach may allow thorough consideration of performance status outside the hospital, possibly improving treatment effectiveness while reducing futile acute care costs.

Safety and Efficacy of Rechallenge With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Solid Tumor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have drastically shifted the current landscape toward a wide variety of malignancies. However, ICIs are interrupted owing immune-related adverse events (irAEs), therapy completion, and disease progression. The risk-benefit of rechallenged ICIs remains inconclusive. Herein, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICI rechallenge in the treatment of advanced solid tumor. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to analyze the efficacy and safety of ICI rechallenge. The study protocol was approved by the PROSPERO International Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022372222). The last updated search date was March 2, 2024. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and incidence rates of all- and high-grade irAEs were evaluated. A total of 41 retrospective studies comprising 2343 patients were ultimately enrolled for qualitative and quantitative assessments. A total of 1200 (51.2%) individuals were male and the median age was 66 years (range 18-97 years). The majority of the tumors was lung cancer (n = 898, 38.3%). The occurrence rates of all-grade and high-grade (grade 3 or 4) irAEs between initial and readministration ICIs were not significantly different (all-grade: OR, 0.75, 95% CI: 0.39-1.45, p = 0.40; I2 = 87%; high-grade: OR, 0.96, 95% CI: 0.62-1.49, p = 0.87, I2 = 65%). ICIs restart presented a decreased ORR and DCR compared to initial ICI administration (ORR: OR, 0.36, 95% CI: 0.23-0.56, p < 0.00001; I2 = 67%; DCR: OR, 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43-0.89, p = 0.010; I2 = 53%). Seven studies with 513 patients for survival analysis revealed a nonsignificant difference in OS between the ICIs rechallenge and discontinuation cohorts (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.35 to 1.35, p = 0.27). Rechallenging immunotherapy is feasible, and patients should be carefully evaluated by a multidisciplinary team prior to initial therapy for close monitoring and assessment of the risk-benefit ratio. Therefore, prospective trials are essential to guide clinicians in the decision-making process. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022372222.

Safety and Efficacy of Salvage Surgery after Treatment With Immune-Checkpoint Adjuvant Inhibitors for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicentric Study.

In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can achieve significant clinical responses. This raises the question of whether to consider salvage surgery as a curative treatment option. Few case series reported encouraging results in terms of pathological response. However, intraoperative risk and postoperative morbidity have been highlighted. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of surgery after ICIs administration and to evaluate its effectiveness on the final pathological examination. We retrospectively identified stages III-IVA NSCLC consecutive patients who underwent surgery with radical intent after ICIs at three National Centers (2016-2022). Before treatment, all patients were considered unresectable by a multidisciplinary discussion. After surgery, pathological response was evaluated according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) recommendation. Thirty-one patients were included; pretreatment clinical stage was: IIIA in 4 patients (10%), IIIB in 13 (42%), IIIC in 3 (13%), and IVA in 11 (35%). Median treatment duration was four cycles. Only anatomical resections were performed, with lobectomy that represent the main type of resection (22 patients, 74%). A minimally invasive approach was performed in 10 patients (32%), with a conversion rate of 0%. Postoperative complications were observed in eight patients (25%). Complete pathologic response (CPR) and major pathologic response (MPR) were 48% and 16%, respectively. Two and 3-years survival were 88%. Based on our experience, salvage surgery of advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs confirm his feasibility and safety in responder patients. Moreover, it is associated with low morbidity, high CPR rate, and satisfying medium-term survival.

Optimized patient-specific immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies for cancer treatment based on tumor immune microenvironment modeling.

Enhancing patient response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is crucial in cancer immunotherapy. We aim to create a data-driven mathematical model of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and utilize deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to optimize patient-specific ICI therapy combined with chemotherapy (ICC). Using patients' genomic and transcriptomic data, we develop an ordinary differential equations (ODEs)-based TIME dynamic evolutionary model to characterize interactions among chemotherapy, ICIs, immune cells, and tumor cells. A DRL agent is trained to determine the personalized optimal ICC therapy. Numerical experiments with real-world data demonstrate that the proposed TIME model can predict ICI therapy response. The DRL-derived personalized ICC therapy outperforms predefined fixed schedules. For tumors with extremely low CD8 + T cell infiltration ('extremely cold tumors'), the DRL agent recommends high-dosage chemotherapy alone. For tumors with higher CD8 + T cell infiltration ('cold' and 'hot tumors'), an appropriate chemotherapy dosage induces CD8 + T cell proliferation, enhancing ICI therapy outcomes. Specifically, for 'hot tumors', chemotherapy and ICI are administered simultaneously, while for 'cold tumors', a mid-dosage of chemotherapy makes the TIME 'hotter' before ICI administration. However, in several 'cold tumors' with rapid resistant tumor cell growth, ICC eventually fails. This study highlights the potential of utilizing real-world clinical data and DRL algorithm to develop personalized optimal ICC by understanding the complex biological dynamics of a patient's TIME. Our ODE-based TIME dynamic evolutionary model offers a theoretical framework for determining the best use of ICI, and the proposed DRL agent may guide personalized ICC schedules.

Synergistic effect between denosumab and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)? A retrospective study of 268 patients with ICI and bone metastases

BackgroundBone metastasis is a significant concern in advanced solid tumors, contributing to diminished patient survival and quality of life due to skeletal-related events (SREs). Denosumab (DMAB), a monoclonal antibody targeting the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), is used to prevent SREs in such cases. The RANK/RANKL axis, crucial in immunological processes, has garnered attention, especially with the expanding use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in modern oncology. ObjectiveOur study aims to explore the potential synergistic antitumor effects of combining immunotherapy with denosumab, as suggested by anecdotal evidence, small cohort studies, and preclinical research. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis using the IMMUCARE database, encompassing patients receiving ICI treatment since 2014 and diagnosed with bone metastases. We examined overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and switch of treatment line based on denosumab usage. Patients were stratified into groups: without denosumab, ICI followed by denosumab, and denosumab followed by ICI. Survival curves and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. ResultsAmong the 268 patients with bone metastases, 154 received treatment with ICI alone, while 114 received ICI in combination with denosumab at some point during their oncological history. No significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) between patients receiving ICI monotherapy and those receiving ICI with denosumab (p = 0.29 and p = 0.79, respectively). However, upon analyzing patients who received denosumab following ICI initiation (17 patients), a notable difference emerged. The group receiving ICI followed by denosumab exhibited a significant advantage compared to those without denosumab (154 patients) or those receiving denosumab before ICI initiation (72 patients) (p = 0.022). ConclusionThis retrospective investigation supports the notion of potential benefits associated with sequential administration of ICI and denosumab, although statistical significance was not achieved. Future studies, including prospective trials or updated retrospective analyses, focusing on cancers treated with first-line immunotherapy, could provide further insights into this therapeutic approach.

Stage IV gastric cancer with microsatellite instability–high achieving long-term survival by gastrectomy after nivolumab as third-line therapy: a case report and literature review

BackgroundThe prognosis for stage IV gastric cancer remains poor; however, the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as nivolumab has increased the number of patients with long-term survival. Patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)–high gastric cancer have been recognized as a highly effective population for ICIs. Herein, we report a patient with MSI–high advanced gastric cancer treated with gastrectomy after the administration of nivolumab as third-line therapy.Case presentationA 73-year-old woman presented with a type 3 tumor in the lower part of the gastric body, which was diagnosed as gastric cancer through biopsy. Staging laparoscopy revealed that the tumor had invaded the pancreas and the posterior lobe of the transverse mesocolon, and disseminated nodules were found near the ligament of Treitz. After 4 courses of S-1 plus cisplatin therapy, laparoscopic gastrojejunal bypass was performed because of difficulty in oral intake. She received S-1 plus oxaliplatin therapy after a gastrojejunal bypass; however, her regional lymph nodes were enlarged. After six courses of paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line chemotherapy, computed tomography (CT) showed exacerbation of peritoneal dissemination; thus, nivolumab was selected as the third-line therapy. The tumor was characterized by MSI–high. At 24 courses, CT and gastroscopy revealed a complete clinical response of the tumor; however, re-growth of the primary tumor was observed at 36 courses. The patient underwent distal gastrectomy with D1 + lymph node dissection, and received S-1 monotherapy as adjuvant therapy for 1 year. No recurrence was noted at 39 months after the surgery.ConclusionsWe report a patient with highly advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination, which worsened during second-line therapy and was successfully treated with gastrectomy after nivolumab administration as a third-line therapy. MSI–high gastric cancer is a target that should be actively considered for the administration of ICIs, such as nivolumab, and multidisciplinary treatment combined with chemotherapy and gastrectomy, including conversion surgery, can lead to patients’ long-term survival.

Association between immune checkpoint inhibitor and cytomegalovirus infection: A pharmacovigilance study based on the adverse event reporting system.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced adverse events due to excessive immune stimulation are problematic in immunotherapy. The activation of viral infection triggered by ICI-induced dysregulated immunity has been proposed; however, this association remains inconsistent. This study investigated the association between ICI administration and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections, a pathogen linked to immune abnormalities and reactivation, using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. We used the crude data set and immunocompromise-free data set from the fourth quarter of 2012 to 2023. The disproportionality between CMV infection and ICI was analyzed using reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) methodologies. Disproportionality between ipilimumab and nivolumab combination case and CMV infection was observed in the crude (ROR: 2.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.32-3.47; IC: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.14-1.73) and immunocompromise-free data set (ROR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.33-2.33; IC: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.33-1.14), whereas disproportionality between other ICI and CMV infection was not observed in the immunocompromise-free data set. Multiple sensitivity analyses and time-scan analysis also revealed the consistent disproportionality between ipilimumab and nivolumab combination cases and CMV infection, regardless of the host's immune status. While further research is warranted to validate our findings, these results highlight new insights into ICI-induced viral infections and suggest the importance of considering the possibility of CMV infections during ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy, regardless of the host's immune status.

Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer

Recent studies have investigated the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer. However, there is an ongoing debate about the optimal approach for integrating this strategy. To evaluate the association of neoadjuvant ICIs with pathologic complete response (pCR) across molecular phenotypes, to quantify the survival benefits of ICIs beyond pCR status, and to estimate the incidence of specific adverse events. The PubMed database was searched on December 10, 2023, to identify all potential eligible studies. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that assessed (neo)adjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy in early breast cancer. Data from the eligible RCTs were extracted by 2 reviewers. An extracted individual patient data meta-analysis and a trial-level random-effect meta-analysis were performed. Outcomes were pCR, event-free survival (EFS) in patients with and without pCR, and adverse events. Hazard ratios were estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazards regression models. Nine RCTs involving 5114 patients met the inclusion criteria (2097 triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC], 1924 hormone receptor-positive [HR+]/ERBB2-negative [ERBB2-], and 1115 ERBB2+ tumors). In TNBC, the addition of ICIs was associated with an improved pCR rate regardless of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status (absolute improvement, >10%). In HR+/ ERBB2- tumors, the administration of ICIs was associated with improved pCR only in the PD-L1-positive (PD-L1+) population (absolute improvement, +12.2%), whereas no benefit was observed in ERBB2+ tumors. In patients with TNBC achieving a pCR, the addition of ICIs was associated with improved EFS (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-1.00), resulting in a 5-year EFS of 92.0% with ICIs compared with 88.0% without them. In patients with residual disease, ICIs also showed better EFS (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.61-0.98), resulting in a 5-year EFS of 63.3% with ICIs and 56.1% without them. Adjuvant ICI did not show numerical improvement in patients with either pCR or residual disease (all hazard ratios >1). During the neoadjuvant treatment, the incidence of grade 3 or greater immune-related adverse events with ICI was 10.3%. These findings suggest that neoadjuvant ICI therapy improves efficacy outcomes in early-stage TNBC and PD-L1+ HR+/ERBB2- tumors with an acceptable safety profile; however, no benefit was observed with adjuvant ICI. Given the financial and toxicity costs associated with ICIs, future research should prioritize identifying patients most likely to benefit from the addition of ICIs to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Endoscopic findings of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related gastrointestinal adverse events.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of various malignancies is increasing. Immune-related adverse events can occur after ICI administration, with gastrointestinal adverse events constituting a significant proportion of these events. When ICI-related diarrhea/colitis is suspected, endoscopic evaluation is recommended to differentiate it from other etiologies and assess the severity of colitis. The distribution of intestinal inflammation in ICI-related colitis demonstrates a high frequency of extensive colitis (23-86%). However, isolated right-sided colitis (3-8%) and ileitis (2-16%) are less prevalent. Endoscopic findings vary and predominantly encompass features indicative of inflammatory bowel disease, including aphthae, ulcers, diffuse or patchy erythema, mucosal edema, loss of vascular pattern, and friability. The presence of ulcers and extensive intestinal inflammation are associated with a reduced response to treatment. Microscopic inflammation can be observed even in endoscopically normal mucosa, underscoring the need for biopsies of seemingly normal mucosa. Histological findings present with acute/chronic inflammation and occasionally exhibit characteristics observed in inflammatory bowel disease, microscopic colitis, or ischemic colitis. The first-line therapeutic choice for ICI-related diarrhea/colitis with a common terminology criteria for adverse events grade of 2 or above is corticosteroids, whereas infliximab and vedolizumab are recommended for refractory cases.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Cerebellar Toxicity: Clinical Features and Comparison with Paraneoplastic Cerebellar Ataxia

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy, and the association with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is well-established. However, cerebellar irAEs are poorly defined and their relationship with paraneoplastic disorders remains unclear. Our aim was (i) to characterize cerebellar irAE; (ii) to compare it with paraneoplastic cerebellar ataxia (PCA). We performed a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study of patients developing new-onset, immune-mediated, isolated/predominant cerebellar dysfunction after ICI administration. In addition, a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was performed. Cerebellar irAE cases were compared with a consecutive cohort of patients with PCA. Overall, 35 patients were included, of whom 12 were original cases (males: 25/35 (71%), median age: 65 [range: 20–82]). The most frequent tumor was non-small cell lung cancer (12/35, 34%). Anti-PD1 were adopted in 19/35 (54%). Symptoms developed at a median of 11 weeks after ICI onset. Neuronal antibodies were detected in 15/31 patients tested (48%). Cerebrospinal fluid was inflammatory in 25/30 (83%). Magnetic resonance imaging showed cerebellar hyperintensities in 8/35 (23%). Immunotherapy was applied in 33/35 cases (94%), and most patients improved with residual disability (16/35, 46%). When compared with a series of PCA (n = 15), the cerebellar irAE group was significantly more associated with male sex, lung cancer (rather than gynecological/breast cancers), isolated ataxia, and a better outcome. We provide a detailed characterization of cerebellar irAE. Compared to PCA, differences exist in terms of tumor association, clinical features, and outcome. Clinical presentation-antibody-tumor triad in the ICI group only partially reflects the associations described in paraneoplastic disorders.

Effects of antibiotics on the anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has shown several benefits over traditional therapies. However, the eligible population remains small. Antibiotic (ATB) use might reduce immunotherapy efficacy by disrupting the gut microbiota. However, in China, ATB effect on ICI therapy efficacy remains unelucidated. We aimed to assess the effects of ATBs on the anti-tumor efficacy of ICIs to provide a reference for clinical use. We included 134 patients with advanced tumors undergoing ICI therapy at Shanghai Jiading District Central Hospital from January 1, 2021, to October 1, 2023. They were divided into Non-ATB and ATB groups based on ATB use within 30days before and after ICI administration. Moreover, we compared progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival between the groups. Median PFS and OS were lower in the ATB than in the Non-ATB group (PFS: 4.0 vs. 5.5months; OS: 5.4 vs. 6.5months). Univariate analysis revealed that ATB use significantly affected PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.318, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.281-4.194, P = 0.005) and OS (HR = 2.115, 95% CI = 1.161-3.850, P = 0.014). Moreover, multivariate analysis revealed poor PFS (HR = 2.573, 95% CI = 1.373-4.826, P = 0.003) and OS (HR = 2.452, 95% CI = 1.298-4.632, P = 0.006) in patients who received ATBs during ICI therapy. ATB use is negatively correlated with ICI therapy efficacy, leading to reduced PFS and OS in patients undergoing such treatment. Owing to the significant impact of ATBs on the human gut microbiome, regulation of the gut microbiome may emerge as a novel therapeutic target that can enhance the clinical activity of ICIs.

Cross-Cancer Type Evaluation of Potential Interstitial Lung Disease Complications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Using JADER.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a serious adverse event caused by the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, only few large-scale studies have explored the association among ICI use, underlying cancer type, and ILD complications. This study aimed to analyze the association between the primary cancer type and ICI-induced ILD in a cross-sectional manner using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab (anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies) and durvalumab, avelumab, and atezolizumab (anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies) were included as ICIs in this study. Adverse events were identified based on the preferred terms of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 27.0/J listed in the Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQ) "interstitial lung disease." The reporting odds ratio was calculated to detect the association between ICI use and ILD complications, and a signal was detected if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval exceeded 1. In the analysis of all cancer types, a signal was detected for all ICIs except avelumab. An association between ICI and ILD was detected for all cancer types with nivolumab. However, pembrolizumab exhibited a signal only in colorectal cancer. In contrast, anti-PD-L1 antibodies displayed signals in five cancer types, excluding head and neck cancer, which was not reported in JADER. Among these cancer types, atezolizumab exhibited a signal only in breast cancer. The results of this study will help guide the safe use of ICIs based on the underlying cancer type in terms of ILD complications.

Real‐World Incidence of Incident Noninfectious Uveitis in Patients Treated With BRAF Inhibitors: A Nationwide Clinical Cohort Study

To compare the incidence of noninfectious uveitis in skin melanoma or lung cancer patients who received BRAF inhibitors with that in those who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Nationwide population-based retrospective clinical cohort study METHODS: From the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database of South Korea, we retrospectively defined 77,323 patients with skin melanoma or lung cancer who received BRAF inhibitor therapy (BRAF inhibitor-exposed group; n = 396), ICIs (ICI-exposed group; n = 22,474), or conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy (unexposed group; n = 54,453). We calculated the 1-year cumulative incidence of noninfectious uveitis in each group from the first day of BRAF inhibitor, ICI, or cytotoxic agent administration. During the first year of treatment initiation, the cumulative incidence of uveitis was 0.33%, 0.35%, and 2.27% in the unexposed, ICI-exposed, and BRAF inhibitor-exposed groups, respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) indicated a 7.52-fold and 5.68-fold increased risk of uveitis in the BRAF inhibitor-exposed group compared with that in the unexposed and ICI-exposed groups (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.83-14.75, P < 0.001 and 95% CI 2.81-11.47, P < 0.001, respectively). After 1:4 propensity score matching, aHRs showed a 35.51-fold and 15.80-fold increased risk (95% CI 4.49-280.48, P = 0.001 and 95% CI 1.76-141.00, P = 0.014) of uveitis and severe uveitis, respectively, in the BRAF inhibitor-exposed versus unexposed patients. Crossover analysis within the BRAF inhibitor-exposed group showed a 3.71-fold increase in uveitis risk during 1-year post index date in comparison with 1-year prior to index date (95% CI 1.03-13.40, P = 0.046). In the BRAF inhibitor-exposed group, female sex, chronic kidney disease, and melanoma were associated with a trend of increased, albeit nonsignificant, risk of uveitis. Melanoma or lung cancer patients treated with BRAF inhibitors showed significantly higher risk of noninfectious uveitis than patients treated with conventional cytotoxic drugs or ICIs. These findings emphasize the importance of pretreatment patient education on BRAF-inhibitor-associated uveitis risk to enable prompt ophthalmic evaluation and treatment if symptoms arise during drug administration.

Management and treatment of severe immune-related hepatotoxicity based on clinical and pathological characteristics.

The management of severe immune-related hepatotoxicity (irH) needs to be further optimized. This study aims to analyze the clinical characteristics of severe irH; improve the therapeutic strategy, especially salvage treatment in steroid-refractory irH; and determine the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi)-rechallenge. This multicenter retrospective study included patients who developed severe irH and those without irH after immunotherapy between May 2019 and June 2023. Propensity score matching was used to match these two cohorts with similar baseline characteristics. Among 5,326 patients receiving ICPis, 51 patients developed severe irH. irH occurred after a median duration of 36days and a median of two doses after the first ICPi administration. Patients receiving PD-L1 inhibitors faced a lower risk of developing severe irH. A higher dose of glucocorticoids (GCS) was administered to grade 4 irH than grade 3 irH. For steroid-sensitive patients, grade 4 irH individuals received a higher dosage of GCS than those with grade 3 irH, with no difference in time to resolution. Meanwhile, a significantly higher dose of GCS plus immunosuppression was needed in the steroid-refractory group. Liver biopsy of the steroid-refractory patients exhibited heterogeneous histological features. Twelve patients were retreated with ICPi. No irH reoccurred after a median follow-up of 9.3months. irH requires multidimensional evaluation. PD-L1 inhibitors correlated with a lower risk of severe irH. Grade 4 irH demands a higher dose of GCS than recommended. Pathology may guide the salvage treatment for steroid-refractory irH. ICPi rechallenge in severe irH is feasible and safe.