In this issue of Brachytherapy, Morris et al. ( [1] Morris W.J. Spadinger I. Keyes M. et al. Whole prostate D90 and V100: A dose-response analysis of 2000 consecutive 125-Iodine monotherapy cases. Brachytherapy. 2014; 13: 32-41 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (30) Google Scholar ) reviewed their experience with 2000 consecutive 125I prostate implants to determine which pretreatment- and treatment-related factors influenced prostate-specific antigen (PSA; Phoenix) control. In this group of low- and intermediate-risk patients with a median followup of 5 year, the 5-, 7-, and 10-year actuarial disease-free survival (DFS) estimates were 96.0%, 94.4%, and 93.0%, respectively. Based on their analyses, they concluded “that dose metrics are not equivalent to oncologic endpoints and must be calibrated against DFS for each physician and each institution offering low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.” The obvious question is “does dose matter?” Because there is ample evidence that higher radiation doses improve biochemical and local control after external beam radiation therapy, maybe the question should be narrowed to “does dose only matter for 125I prostate implants?” Rebuttal to Drs Stone and StockBrachytherapyVol. 13Issue 1Preview“… a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest …”The Boxer, 1969, lyrics by Paul Simon Full-Text PDF Whole prostate D90 and V100: A dose–response analysis of 2000 consecutive 125I monotherapy patientsBrachytherapyVol. 13Issue 1PreviewTo examine the relationship between whole prostate dose metrics and disease-free survival (DFS) after 125I low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB). Full-Text PDF
Read full abstract