Activity Of Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid Research Articles

Comparative study of the antioxidant capability of EDTA and Irganox

Oxidative stress makes it difficult to preserve food and negatively affect the applicability of polymeric packaging. It is typically caused by an excess of free radicals, and it is dangerous to human health, resulting in the onset and development of diseases. The antioxidant ability and activity of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and Irganox (Irg) as synthetic antioxidant additives were studied. Three different antioxidant mechanisms were considered and compared by calculating bond dissociation enthalpy (BDE), ionization potential (IP), proton dissociation enthalpy (PDE), proton affinity (PA), and electron transfer enthalpy (ETE) values. Two density functional theory (DFT) methods were used, M05-2X and M06-2X with the 6–311++G(2d,2p) basis set in gas phase. Both additives can be used to protect pre-processed food products and polymeric packaging from oxidative stress related material deterioration. By comparing the two studied compounds, it was found that EDTA has a higher antioxidant potential than Irganox. To the best of our knowledge several studies have been carried out to understand the antioxidant potential of various natural and synthetic species, but EDTA and Irganox were not compared and investigated before. These additives can be used to protect pre-processed food products and polymeric packaging and prevent material deterioration caused by oxidative stress.

In vitro and in vivo activity of EDTA and antibacterial agents against the biofilm of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Refractory infection caused by bacterial biofilm is an important clinical problem. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a common pathogen responsible for persistent and chronic biofilm infections. We aimed to explore the in vitro and in vivo activity of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) in combination with antibacterial agents against mucoid P. aeruginosa biofilm. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration of ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and ampicillin alone or with EDTA against P. aeruginosa were determined in vitro. Extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) and structural parameters of the biofilm were monitored. P. aeruginosa was aerosolized and delivered into the lungs of guinea pigs, which were treated with ciprofloxacin with or without EDTA. The colony-forming units (CFUs) of P. aeruginosa were determined from the lungs. EDTA reduced the MIC of ciprofloxacin and ampicillin by about 30-fold and that of gentamicin by twofold. EDTA reduced the biofilm EPS and the proportion of viable bacteria. The thickness, average diffusion distance, and textural entropy of EDTA-treated biofilm were significantly decreased. EDTA plus antibiotics reduced the colony counting from 107 to 103CFU/mL. In vivo, EDTA plus ciprofloxacin had a significantly lower mean CFU/g of lung tissue (EDTA+ciprofloxacin 1.3±0.19; EDTA 4.4±0.57; ciprofloxacin 4.2±0.47), and lung lesions were less severe compared with the single treatment groups. EDTA can destroy the biofilm structures of mucoid P. aeruginosa in vitro. Moreover, EDTA and ciprofloxacin had a significant bactericidal effect against biofilm in vivo.

Activation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid by a 940 nm diode laser for enhanced removal of smear layer.

Laser enhancement of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid with cetrimide (EDTAC) has previously been shown to increase removal of smear layer, for middle-infrared erbium lasers. This study evaluated the efficiency of EDTAC activation using a near-infrared-pulsed 940 nm laser delivered by plain fibre tips into 15% EDTAC or 3% hydrogen peroxide. Root canals in 4 groups of 10 single roots were prepared using rotary files, with controls for the presence and absence of smear layer. After laser treatment (80 mJ pulse(-1) , 50 Hz, 6 cycles of 10 s), roots were split and the apical, middle and coronal thirds of the canal were examined using scanning electron microscopy, with the area of dentine tubules determined by a validated quantitative image analysis method. Lasing EDTAC considerably improved smear layer removal, while lasing into peroxide gave minimal smear layer removal. The laser protocol used was more effective for smear layer removal than the 'gold standard' protocol using EDTAC with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). In addition, lasers may also provide a benefit through photothermal disinfection. Further research is needed to optimise irrigant activation protocols using near-infrared diode lasers of other wavelengths.