Acetabular Reconstruction Research Articles

Research status of acetabular reconstruction in Crowe type Ⅱ and Ⅲ developmental dysplasia of the hip

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a major cause of hip arthritis and ultimately total hip arthroplasty. Due to the dysplastic acetabulum, how to place the acetabular cup becomes a challenge in acetabular reconstruction for such patients. Especially in the acetabula classified as Crowe typeⅡand type Ⅲ, the dislocation of the femoral head causes bone defects above the true acetabulum, which will affect the stability of the acetabular cup when the acetabular reconstruction is performed at the true acetabulum. Many acetabular reconstruction methods such as bone grafting, the use of small acetabular cups, socket medialization technique, and high hip center technique are used to increase the host bone coverage of the cup. However, each method has its own shortcomings that can not be ignored so that there is no unified conclusion on the acetabular reconstruction methods for Crowe typeⅡand type Ⅲ hip dysplasia. This article summarized and evaluated various reconstruction methods in combination with the acetabular morphology of DDH, and put forward the research direction in the future.

Application of porous tantalum Jumbo cup in revision of hip arthroplasty

To investigate the clinical effect of porous tantalum Jumbo cup on acetabular reconstruction in revision of total hip arthroplasty. From September 2014 to December 2017, 18 patients(18 hips) with acetabular defect were reconstructed by porous tantalum Jumbo cup technology, including 6 males and 12 females;the age ranged from 54 to 76 years old with an average of(63.8±15.3) years. There were 6 cases of paprosky typeⅡA, 8 cases of typeⅡB, 2 cases of typeⅡC and 2 cases of type Ⅲ a. Harris score and visual analogue scale (VAS) were performed before and after operation. Imaging examination was performed to evaluate the position of hip rotation center and prosthesis, and to judge whether acetabular loosening, displacement and complications existed. All cases were followed up for 13 to 49 months, with an average of 20.6 months. Harris score increased from 54.6±4.7 to 86.5±3.2 one year after operation(P<0.01), and VAS score decreased from 6.8±0.7 to 0.8±0.6 one year after operation (P<0.01). The transverse coordinate of hip rotation center was (3.52±0.72) cm before operation and (3.47±0.54) cm after operation (P>0.05). The longitudinal coordinate of hip rotation center was improved from (3.02±0.84) cm before operation to (2.35±0.53) cm after operation (P<0.01). During the follow-up period, the Jumbo cup was well fixed without loosening and displacement, the acetabular cup had bone ingrowth in varying degrees, and no light transmission line and osteolysis around the acetabular cup were found. No complications such as infection and nerve injury occurred. The method of reconstructing acetabular bone defect with porous tantalum Jumbo cup is simple and easy, the early stability of acetabulum is good, and the short-term follow-up effect is good.

TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT USING ACETABULAR METAL AUGMENT AND BONE GRAFT IN PAPROSKY TYPE 3B ACETABULAR DEFECT: A CASE REPORT

Old unreduced and untreated fracture of the acetabulum is seen more commonly in developing countries and can be due to various reasons. Various methods can be used in the management of such cases which in general includes arthrodesis in young and total hip replacement in elderly patients. Acetabular fractures associated with acetabular defect pose challenge to the treating surgeon and the management of such defects plays an important role in the nal outcome of the surgery. We are here reporting a case of a 36 years old male patient who presented with 1 year 6 months old fracture of posterior wall of the acetabulum who is treated with THR with acetabular reconstruction using bone graft and acetabular augment. The patient was under regular follow up and now after 6 months of surgery patient is having good functional improvements with painless range of motions at index hip.

Clinical application of 3D-printed patient-specific guide plate combined with computer navigation in acetabular reconstruction following resection of periacetabular tumors.

BackgroundThe precise acetabular reconstruction has historically been a challenging procedure. 3D-printed patient-specific guide (PSG) and computer navigation (CN) technologies have been used to assist acetabular component positioning and pelvic reconstruction. This precise reconstruction approach may translate into clinical benefit.MethodsThe clinical data of 84 patients who underwent periacetabular malignant tumor resection and screw-rod-acetabular cage system reconstruction in our center from January 2013 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into four groups: free hand (FH) group, PSG group, CN group, and PSG combined with computer navigation (PSG + CN) group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and number of fluoroscopy views were recorded. The oncological prognosis, radiographic measurements of the acetabulum, limb function data, and postoperative complications were compared among groups. And finally, we evaluated the risk factors for mechanical failure of the prosthesis.ResultsThe postoperative X-ray and computed tomography (CT) scan revealed that the vertical offset discrepancy (VOD) between affected side and contralateral side was 8.4±1.9, 5.9±2.2, 4.1±1.3, and 2.4±1.2 mm in each groups; the horizontal offset discrepancy (HOD) was 9.0±1.9, 6.1±2.2, 3.2±1.3, and 2.1±1.2 mm, correspondingly; the abduction angle discrepancy (ABAD) was 8.6°±1.8°, 5.6°±2.0°, 2.5°±1.3°, and 1.8°±0.9°, respectively; the anteversion angle discrepancy (ANAD) was 5.9°±1.6°, 3.6°±1.7°, 2.9°±1.6°, and 1.9°±0.9°, correspondingly. Statistical results show that the PSG + CN group was superior to the FH group and the PSG group in terms of acetabular position and limb function (P<0.05). Body mass index (P=0.040) and resection type (P=0.042) were found to be the high-risk factors for mechanical failure of the prosthesis.ConclusionsPSG + CN has potential advantages in improving the accuracy and safety of acetabular positioning and reconstruction.

THA in patients with neglected acetabular fractures.

Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) outcomes in patients with neglected acetabular fractures are less favourable compared to THA for osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis. These poorer clinical outcomes are largely due to an unexpected bone deficiency, and the procedure is more time-consuming and complicated for cases that require acetabular reconstruction and bone grafting. The clinical outcomes of THA in neglected acetabular fractures are not often studied. Methods: This study is a retrospective single surgeon series of THA for 51 neglected acetabular fractures in 49 patients treated with THA alone, open reduction and internal fixation with THA, or acetabular defect reconstruction THA. Our series aims to focus on the surgical technique and describe the functional and radiological outcomes of neglected acetabular fractures treated with different THA approaches by a single surgeon. Results: Using the Harris Hip score at the mean long-term follow-up, there was a clear improvement in 90% of patients in the present study. The long-term results are encouraging in terms of clinical improvement, radiographic restoration of acetabular bone stock, and the centre of restoration. Discussion: The series shows that with proper planning and reconstruction using structural bone grafting techniques, a neglected fracture-dislocation with loss of structural support can be satisfactorily treated using primary components alone. Bony reconstruction and use of primary cementless components ensure long-term survival and preserve bone stock for an easier revision of THA, if necessary, in the future.

Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device and allogeneic structural bone graft.

One of the major problems in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is severe acetabular bone loss. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of revision THA using a Kerboull-type reinforcement device (KT plate) and allogeneic structural bone graft. This retrospective study evaluated 48 hips that underwent revision THA using a KT plate and allogeneic structural bone graft between 2008 and 2016, with a median follow-up of 6.2years (range 3-12.6years). Functional outcome was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score. Postoperative and follow-up radiographs were compared to assess migration and breakage of the implant. The mean JOA hip score improved from 45.6 (±16.3) points before surgery to 72.1 (±11.9) points at the most recent follow-up examination (p < 0.001). Two hips (4.2%) underwent re-revision THA because of cup loosening due to breakage of the KT plate. A total of 13 hips (27.1%) were classified as radiological failures. Binomial logistic regression analysis showed that a Kawanabe classification of stage 4, which indicates massive bone defects in the weight-bearing area, was a risk factor for radiological failure (odds ratio: 4.57; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-26.35). A KT plate with an allogeneic structural bone graft is a useful method of acetabular reconstruction in revision THA that restores bone stock and improves hip function. Our findings indicated that a Kawanabe classification of stage 4 was a risk factor for radiological failure of the implant.

CEMENTLESS TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING MORSELIZED BONE GRAFT IN PATIENTS WITH PROTRUSIO ACETABULI SECONDARY TO RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS : CASE SERIES

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common inammatory joint disease lesions involving the hips, knees, and other large joints which can lead to joint deformity and dysfunction [1,2].Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis is chronic inammatory arthritis involving which may involve one or more joints with age of onset less than 16 years.With progressive hip disease, the deformed femoral head causes irregular abrasion of the acetabulum, secondarily shifting the femoral head inward and in turn triggering varying degrees of the acetabular protrusion, the incidence of which is about 5%.[3,4]THR in such cases provide improvement in function and pain but challenges posed by lack of bone stock, decient medial cup support, and medialization of the joint centre in those with protrusio acetabuli must be addressed during acetabular reconstruction.

The outcome of the uncemented acetabular component in delayed total hip arthroplasty following acetabular fractures.

AimsAfter failed acetabular fractures, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging procedure and considered the gold standard treatment. The complexity of the procedure depends on the fracture pattern and the initial fracture management. This study’s primary aim was to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients who underwent delayed uncemented acetabular THA after acetabular fractures. The secondary aims were to assess the radiological outcome and the incidence of the associated complications in those patients.MethodsA total of 40 patients underwent cementless acetabular THA following failed treatment of acetabular fractures. The postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated for all the cohort.ResultsThe median (interquartile range (IQR)) Oxford Hip Score (OHS) improved significantly from 9.5 (7 to 11.5), (95% confidence interval (CI) (8 to 10.6)) to 40 (39 to 44), (95% CI (40 to 43)) postoperatively at the latest follow-up (p < 0.001). It was worth noting that the initial acetabular fracture type (simple vs complex), previous acetabular treatment (ORIF vs conservative), fracture union, and restoration of anatomical centre of rotation (COR) did not affect the final OHS. The reconstructed centre of rotation (COR) was restored in 29 (72.5%) patients. The mean abduction angle in whom acetabular fractures were managed conservatively was statistically significantly higher than the surgically treated patients 42.6° (SD 7.4) vs 38° (SD 5.6)) (p = 0.032). We did not have any case of acetabular or femoral loosening at the time of the last follow-up. We had two patients with successful two-stage revision for infection with overall eight-year survival rate was 95.2% (95% CI 86.6% to 100%) with revision for any reason at a median (IQR) duration of follow-up 50 months (16 to 87) months following THA.ConclusionDelayed cementless acetabular THA in patients with previous failed acetabular fracture treatments produces good clinical outcomes (PROMS) with excellent survivorship, despite the technically demanding nature of the procedure. The initial fracture treatment does not influence the outcome of delayed THA. In selected cases of acetabular fractures (either nondisplaced or with secondary congruency), the initial nonoperative treatment neither resulted in large acetabular defects nor required additional acetabular reconstruction at the time of THA.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1067–1074.

Bone defect map of the true acetabulum in hip dysplasia (Crowe type II and III) based on three-dimensional image reconstruction analysis

The high hip center technique (HHC) is considered to be feasible for acetabular reconstruction in patients with DDH, but there is little in-depth study of its specific impact on Crowe type II and III DDH. The purpose of this study was to simultaneously analyze the effect of HHC on bone coverage of the cup (CC) in the acetabular reconstruction of type II and III DDH patients and to propose a map of acetabular bone defects from the perspective of the cup. Forty-nine hip CT data of 39 patients with DDH (Crowe type II and III) were collected to simulate acetabular reconstruction by cup models of different sizes (diameter 38mm–50 mm, 2 mm increment) with the HHC technique. The frequency distribution was plotted by overlapping the portions of the 44 mm cups that were not covered by the host bone. The mean CC of cups with sizes of 38 mm, 40 mm, 42 mm, 44 mm, 46 mm, 48 mm, and 50 mm at the true acetabula were 77.85%, 76.71%, 75.73%, 74.56%, 73.68%, 72.51%, and 71.75%, respectively, and the maximum CC increments were 21.24%, 21.58%, 20.86%, 20.04%, 18.62%, 17.18%, and 15.42% (P < 0.001), respectively, after the cups were elevated from the true acetabula. The bone defect map shows that 95% of type II and III DDH acetabula had posterosuperior bone defects, and approximately 60% were located outside the force line of the hip joint. Acetabular cups can meet a CC of more than 70% at the true acetabulum, and approximately 60% of Crowe type II and III DDH patients can obtain satisfactory CC at the true acetabulum by using a 44-mm cup without additional operations.

Rapidly destructive osteoarthritis and total hip arthroplasty: A new technique for acetabular reconstruction in the setting of extensive bone loss

We report the case of a 58-year-old woman who presented with rapidly destructive osteoarthritis (RDO) of the hip that had been causing her severe pain and disability. By the time of presentation to our institution, she had a significant leg length discrepancy resulting from extensive destruction of the posterior acetabular wall, posterior column, and femoral head with a superiorly migrated femoral shaft. She underwent structural acetabular allograft augmentation of the pelvis re-enforced with a locking plate, concomitant total hip replacement with dual mobility implants, and extensive soft tissue releases to restore length to the extremity.

Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects with porous metal augment in total hip arthroplasty: A finite element analysis study.

This study aims to evaluate the reconstructive stability for Paprosky III acetabular defects after total hip arthroplasty using three different reconstruction strategies with trabecular metal (TM) augments. The acetabular bone defects examined were located in the ilium, the sciatic ramus and the pubic ramus. Different scenarios of acetabular reconstructions were simulated, including the non-reconstruction model (NRM), the complete reconstruction model (CRM), the two-point reconstruction model (TRM) and the superior edge reconstruction model (SRM). A primary hip replacement model (HRM) was also investigated to compare the initial stability with different reconstruction models. The gait cycle was incorporated in the model to investigate the dynamic variation within the contact mechanics parameters. By comparing the SRM and the TRM, the acetabular cup translation was more pronounced when the superior defect on the acetabulum remained unfixed. Comparison of the acetabular cup displacement and the interface micromotion of both HRM and CRM demonstrated that the prosthetic implant provided good support for the reconstructed acetabulum. With the use of a press-fit cup, the cup displacement was reduced remarkably, while its Von-Mises stress increased significantly. The results show that the CRM was the best reconstruction option. In terms of acetabular defects, future improvements should focus on the reconstructive stability in stress concentration areas, to ensure no significant stress-shielding or other factors contributing to loosening of the prosthesis.

Labral Tear Management in Patients Aged 40 Years and Older Undergoing Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Propensity-Matched Case-Control Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Background: Previous literature has suggested that primary acetabular labral reconstruction leads to lower secondary surgery rates than does labral repair for patients aged ≥40 years. Purpose: To report minimum 2-year patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, survivorship, and secondary surgeries in patients aged ≥40 years who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with labral reconstruction compared with a propensity-matched primary labral repair group. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent a primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome between January 2014 and June 2018. Patients aged ≥40 years who underwent a labral reconstruction or a labral repair and had preoperative and minimum 2-year PROs for the modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain were included. Patients with previous ipsilateral hip conditions and surgery, Tönnis grade >1, hip dysplasia, or workers’ compensation status were excluded. Patients in the reconstruction group were propensity matched 1:2 to patients in the repair group based on age, sex, and body mass index. Secondary surgeries and achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and maximum outcome improvement (MOI) were recorded. Results: A total of 53 and 106 hips were included in the labral reconstruction and repair groups, respectively. The average follow-up time was 37.6 months. The average ages for the reconstruction and repair groups were 48.01 ± 5.4 years and 48.61 ± 6.0 years, respectively. Both groups achieved significant improvements in all PROs at a minimum of 2 years, with similar achievements of MCID, PASS, and MOI, and comparable secondary surgery rates. Conclusion: Patients aged ≥40 years who received primary labral repair and primary labral reconstruction achieved similar significant improvements in all PROs, VAS pain, and patient satisfaction at the minimum 2-year follow-up, with comparable rates of secondary surgeries and achieving MCID, PASS, and MOI. Based on these findings, labral repair remains the gold standard treatment for viable labrum in this population group, while reconstruction is a useful alternative for irreparable labrum.

Mid-term outcomes of tantalum cup\u2013 a single centre study

IntroductionThe cementless acetabular implants are commonly used in primary and revision hip arthroplasty. Reconstruction of acetabulum in case of bone defects can be challenging. The aims of this single center study are to review the mid-term outcomes of porous tantalum cups (TM) and evaluate complications.MethodsThe midterm outcome of a trabecular metal tantalum modular uncemented cup was evaluated in 59 hips in 58 patients. In our group, we had 23 males and 35 females. The mean age was 70.11 years (range, 30 to 87 years). Four patients were lost to follow-up and 13 died during the period without having further surgeries attributed to the hip arthroplasty. The remaining 41 patients (42 revision hip arthroplasties) had complete data available.ResultsThe mean follow-up was 87 months, ranging from 24 to 144 months. Standard pelvic anteroposterior (AP) radiographs were used to assess and preoperatively classify acetabular defects as per Paprosky classification. The serial radiographs showed excellent stability, bone opposition and graft incorporation. Four patients had further surgeries. Two of these were due to infection (one superficial and one deep infection). One of the patients had washout and then removal of metal work, the other patient only had a washout and symptoms settled. One patient had vascular compromise and went for surgery to stem the bleeding. One patient had re-revision due to stem loosening and hence required surgery but the revision cup remained stable. We noted a 96% survival at an average of 7.2 years follow-up.ConclusionThe mid-term results with the trabecular metal cementless cup appeared to be promising in both primary and revision hip arthroplasty, even in the presence of considerable bone loss which requires bone grafting and augments.Level of evidenceIV.

Minimum 10\u2009years clinical and radiological outcomes of acetabular revisions of total hip arthroplasties with tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute

BackgroundAseptic loosening is the most frequent indication for revision of total hip arthroplasty. Revision arthroplasty of acetabular component is a challenge for every surgeon because they have to simultaneously deal with the reconstruction of bone defects, adequate implant geometry and stable fixation. Allografts are the most frequently used materials in reconstruction of bone loss during revision surgeries. Because of an increasing number of revision hip arthroplasties and poor availability of allografts, we decided to use bone graft substitutes in acetabular revisions.MethodsBetween September 2005 and January 2010, 44 revision arthroplasties in 43 patients were performed with the use of bone graft substitutes for acetabular defect reconstruction in revision of total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular bone defects were classified according to Paprosky. Seventeen hips were classified as IIA, 3 hips IIB, 3 hips IIC, 10 hips IIIA and 11 hips IIIB. Acetabular bone defects were reconstructed with tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute - BoneSave. Clinical and radiological examination was performed after 3 months, 1 year and then annually. Harris hip score was used for clinical evaluation. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier method with aseptic loosening as the definition of endpoint.ResultsThe average follow-up period is 12 (range from 10 to 15) years. During the follow-up, three patients died after 24 months because of causes not related to surgery. None of the patients was lost to follow-up. The evaluation of clinical results revealed an increase in pre-operative HHS from average 38.3 (range 25 to 55) points to average 86.3 (range 45 to 95) points at the most recent follow-up. Radiographic evaluation showed the migration of one revision cage 12 months after surgery. Revision arthroplasty performed after 14 months revealed the partial incorporation of bone graft substitute. There were not any cases of loosening of revision acetabular cup at the most recent follow up examination in the remaining 39 patients. Bone graft substitute was not absorbed in all of these patients. The survival after 10 years amounted to 97.56%.ConclusionBone graft substitute Bone Save may be suitable for acetabular revision surgery, however preoperative bone defect is critical for success and determining of a surgical technique, so this is multifactorial in this challenge surgery.

Acetabular reconstruction with femoral head autograft in primary total hip arthroplasty through a direct anterior approach is a reliable option for patients with secondary osteoarthritis due to developmental dysplasia of the hip

BackgroundDevelopmental dysplasia is challenging to treat with total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach (DAA). Reconstructing the former anatomy while restoring the acetabular bone stock for future revisions in this young patient collective combined with the known advantages of the DAA would be desirable. The purpose of this study was to analyze the feasibility, radiographic outcome and clinical outcome of primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty with bulk femoral head autograft for acetabular augmentation through a DAA with a minimal follow-up of 12 months.MethodsA retrospective, consecutive series from March 2006 to March 2018 of 29 primary total hip arthroplasty with acetabular augmentation with bulk femoral head autograft through a direct anterior approach was identified. All complications, reoperations and failures were analyzed. Radiographic and clinical outcome was measured.Results24 patients (29 hips) with a mean age of 43 (18–75) years and a mean follow-up of 35 months (12–137) were included. Surgical indication was secondary osteoarthritis for developmental dysplasia of the hip (Hartofilakidis Grade A (n = 19), B (n = 10)) in all cases. We noted no conversion of the approach, no dislocation and no acetabular loosening. The center of rotation was significantly distalized by a mean of 9 mm (0–23) and significantly medialized by a mean of 18 mm (6–29). The bone graft was fully integrated after 12 months in all cases.ConclusionAcetabular reconstruction with femoral head autograft in primary THA through a direct anterior approach seems to be a reliable option for the treatment of secondary osteoarthritis in patients with DDH Hartofilakidis grade A and B. Prospective cohort studies with a large sample population and a long-term follow-up are necessary to confirm our findings.

Modular revision strategy with bispherical augments in severe acetabular deficiency reconstruction.

Reconstruction of severe acetabular deficiency is extremely challenging in total hip arthroplasty (THA) revisions. Novel bispherical augments were designed to fill acetabular bone loss and facilitate restoration of hip center of rotation (HCOR). Current study aims to compare the outcomes of bispherical augments and tantalum augments. Between July 2017 and December 2018, bispherical augments (BA group) were implanted in 25 patients (25 hips) and 22 patients (22 hips) underwent porous tantalum augments (TA group) reconstruction in revision THA. Clinical and radiographic results were evaluated for 25 hips in BA group and 20 hips in TA group at the final follow-up. The mean duration of follow-up was 2.9years (range, 2.2 ~ 3.7) in BA group and 2.9years (range, 2.3 ~ 3.8) in TA group. Harris hip scores, HCOR, and leg length discrepancy (LLD) correction did not differ between the treatment groups. The bispherical augments were located more closer to the medial-superior part (zone II) of acetabular shell while the majority of tantalum augments were located at the lateral-superior part (zone I) (P = 0.010). More screws were used in the BA group for augment fixation (mean 2.1 vs. 1.3) (P = 0.000). There was no evidence of loosening or migration in all hips. Only one dislocation occurred in BA group and treated with closed reduction, no recurrence of instability up to the final follow-up. The clinical and radiological outcomes of bispherical augments were comparable with tantalum augments; this technique was a reliable alternative method in severe acetabular deficiency reconstruction.

Fluoroscopy-Guided Suture Anchor Placement Yields Excellent Accuracy for Arthroscopic Acetabular Labral Repair: A Cadaveric Study

PurposeTo determine the accuracy of fluoroscopy-guided suture anchor placement for arthroscopic acetabular labral repair in cadaveric hip specimens.MethodsTwo sports medicine fellowship–trained surgeons performed arthroscopic hip surgery on 6 cadaveric specimens each. Suture anchors were placed at the 11-, 12-, 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-o’clock positions of the acetabulum in each specimen using a previously described fluoroscopically guided technique. Gross dissection and thin-cut computed tomography scans were performed to assess for accuracy. The insertion angle between the subchondral bone and the drill bit immediately prior to suture anchor insertion was measured, and fluoroscopic visualization of the subchondral bone at each clock-face position was qualitatively graded as good, fair, or poor by 2 independent reviewers.ResultsOverall, 90.3% of attempts (65 of 72) were entirely intraosseous, 5.5% (4 of 72) perforated the articular cartilage, and 4.2% (3 of 72) perforated the far cortex, rates that are comparable with those in previous cadaveric studies. There was no statistically significant difference in accuracy between the surgeons (P = .42) or between the various clock-face positions (P = .63). Neither the insertion angle (P = .26) nor visualization of the subchondral bone (P = .35) was significantly correlated with accuracy by gross dissection.ConclusionsIn a cadaveric hip arthroscopy model, fluoroscopy-guided suture anchor placement yields excellent accuracy rates, similar to non–image-guided techniques.Clinical RelevanceIntra-articular suture anchor placement and intrapelvic suture anchor placement are known complications of arthroscopic acetabular labral repair. Fluoroscopically guided suture anchor placement can be a useful tool for hip arthroscopy surgeons performing acetabular labral repair and reconstruction, potentially reducing the risk of these complications.

Allograft Chip Incorporation in Acetabular Reconstruction: Multiscale Characterization Revealing Osteoconductive Capacity.

Impacted bone-grafting with morselized allograft chips is commonly used to reconstruct acetabular bone defects in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). While the overall clinical outcome of this procedure is described to be excellent, the microstructural basis and histological determinants of allograft incorporation remained to be further elucidated. The acetabula of 23 individuals with documented previous use of allograft chips during revision THA were explanted post mortem. The time that the allografts were in situ averaged 10.3 ± 4.5 years (range, 1.2 to 19.8 years). The host bone (HB)-allograft bone (AB) interface was characterized using a suite of high-resolution (HR) imaging techniques including HR-peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT), histological analysis, cellular histomorphometry, and scanning electron microscopy. AB could be identified in 16 of the 23 cases. The HB and AB showed overlap (i.e., ingrowth) in 91.3% of the total interface. The mean ingrowth was 2.2 ± 1.0 mm with a maximum of 4.7 ± 2.1 mm. The periphery of the AB showed a tight interconnection with the HB associated with increased bone remodeling indices and increased trabecular thickness. While no association between the time in situ and the ingrowth was observed, the bone defect area was positively associated with the thickness of a fibrosis layer separating the ingrowth zone from the AB. Allograft chips in revision THA form an adequate osseous foundation with successful incorporation through ingrowth of the HB (i.e., osteoconduction). While complete remodeling was not observed, larger defects were associated with fibrosis formation, which may compromise stability. Our study provides the first systematic, multiscale long-term evaluation of chip allograft incorporation in revision THA to underscore its successful clinical use. As larger defects were associated with fibrous ingrowth, structural allografts may be superior for larger defects in terms of long-term outcomes.

Functional and radiological outcomes of impaction grafts and cemented cup for the treatment of acetabular bone deficiency in total hip arthroplasty

Background and Aim Acetabular bone defects are one of the most difficult problems in both primary and revision total hip replacements. Many techniques have been described to deal with acetabular bone defects in total hip replacement, including the use of cement with or without cages and rings, structural bone grafting, and impaction bone grafts with cementless or cemented cups. The aim of this study was to asses short-term to midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of acetabular reconstruction by impaction bone grafts and cemented cups in both primary and revision cases indicated for total hip arthroplasty (THA) with acetabular bone deficiency. Patients and methods This is a retrospective study that included 26 patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) who underwent acetabular bone defect reconstructions with grafting and cemented cups between December 2014 and January 2019. The mean age at operation was 45.3 years. Among the procedures, 12 were primary THAs, whereas 14 procedures were revision THAs. The morselized grafts were used in eight cases only, along with combined strut graft and morselized grafts in five cases, acetabular rim mesh and morselized grafts in 12 cases, and Kerboul cross-ring with morselized grafts in one case. All cases were clinically evaluated by Harris hip score in addition to radiological evaluation. Results All the patients except one showed clinical improvement, where the mean postoperative Harris hip score became 84. Radiograph follow-up for all the cases showed graft incorporation without loosening or any significant cup migration, except one case, which was revised owing to loosening around the cup. Conclusion The use of impaction graft and cemented cups is safe and reproductive even in young patients. Moreover, this technique reconstitutes bone and gives a stable platform of bone stock for further revision, especially in young population.

Design of custom acetabular components: influence of the type of defects on the design

Options for treatment of massive acetabular defects are very diverse and continue to be a challenge for the surgeon. Although custom implants do not perform well over other reconstruction methods, design variability offers wide option for reliable primary fixation. There were performed 115 acetabular reconstructions with custom implants in Russian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R.R. Vreden of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation from 2015 to 2019 years. The aim of our study was to clarify and define main types of custom implants which were used for reconstruction of extensive acetabular defects. Despite the most defects refers to such categories as 3A, 3B according to Paprosky and pelvic ring discontinuity, the type of custom implants was determined to a greater extent by the geometry of the defect. Custom implants were used as augmentation of posterior, anterior or superior wall in the cases when the medial wall was saved. When medial support was absent, custom implants had bridge-like fixation and antiprotrusion properties. In the most severe cases, in the absence of support and connection with the axial skeleton, custom acetabular component had iliac flange and a stem that was fixed in the posterior parts of the iliac body. The main design types of the presented constructions are represented by augments, threeflange and flanged constructions with a stem. Along with patient-specific acetabular reconstruction various design types wided primary screw fixation options, allowed us to find optimal hip rotational center position and acetabular cup orientation yet at planning stage. Custom designing of acetabular implants lets combine different fixation options of various acetabular implant types.