In order to investigate whether an observed difference in the meal patterns of rats and humans may be due to constraints that humans have on the timing of meals and their large but infrequent meal pattern, rats had similar constraints imposed on their meal intake. Fifteen male Long-Evans rats were monitored in five individual enclosed chambers equipped with pellet sensing eatometers for three fourteen-day data collection periods. Both groups were monitored in a baseline ad lib condition, then one group (n=7) was allowed access to food only once every two hours, while the second group (n=8) was allowed to access only five times per day. Both groups were then monitored for a second ad lib baseline period. The imposition of both schedules reduced meal frequencies and estimated premeal stomach contents, and increased meal sizes and estimated postmeal stomach contents. The imposition of the five meal per day, but not the twelve meal per day schedule of meal access, eliminated the significant relationships between meal size and the postmeal interval evident during baseline conditions and produced significant relationships between meal size and the premeal interval and estimated premeal stomach content, not seen during baseline conditions. The rats under the five meal per day access schedule showed a preprandial pattern of intake very similar to that previously observed in humans eating ad lib. It was concluded that the preprandial pattern, typical of humans, is characteristic of intake involving large infrequent meals which produce stomach filling to an upper limiting threshold. The postprandial pattern, typical of rats, is characteristic of intake involving small frequent meals that are initiated when the stomach empties to a lower threshold. A peripheral, stomach capacity, model then, can be used to explain both the preprandial and the postprandial patterns. Which pattern is used depends upon environmental conditions.
Read full abstract