AbstractBackgroundAntimicrobial Stewardship Research Articles

1289. The Challenge of Treating Community-Associated Enterobacterales Infections in a Middle-Income Country: Data from SMART 2018-2019

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs have been used widely in hospital settings due to the rise of resistant bacteria, antibiotic toxicities, and costs. Nevertheless, few efforts are done to prevent the rising antimicrobial resistance in community settings. The aim of our study was to evaluate the antimicrobial resistance from Enterobacterales community- and hospital-acquired infections in Southern Brazil.MethodsA total of 272 Enterobacterales isolates (i.e., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Serratia spp., Proteus spp., and Providencia) were collected from 2018 and 2019. Broth microdilution method was used to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations for ceftriaxone, cefepime, levofloxacin, amikacin and ertapenem. Molecular evaluation of beta-lactamases (ESBLs, AmpC, and KPC) was also performed.ResultsNinety-three, and a hundred and seventy-nine isolates were from community- and hospital-acquired infections, respectively. Similar MIC distribution was found between community and hospital settings (Table 1). Levofloxacin MIC of 8mg/L occurred in 38.7% (n=36) and 30.7% (n=55) of isolates from community- and hospital-acquired infections, respectively (Figure 1). Ceftriaxone MIC of 16mg/L occurred in 39.7%(n=37) and 39.1% (n=70) of isolates from community- and hospital-acquired infections, respectively (Figure 1). At last, cefepime MIC of 32mg/L occurred in 22% (n=21) and 25% (n=46) of isolates from community- and hospital-acquired infections, respectively. The following beta-lactamases were found in isolates from community-acquired group, ACT-MIR, CTX-M, SHV and TEM; while beta-lactamases from the hospital-acquired group were ACT-MIR, CMY II, KPC-2, CTX-M, SHV and TEM. Table 1. Enterobacterales ceftriaxone, cefepime, levofloxacin, amikacin and ertapenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (mg/L) distribution from community- and hospital-settings. Figure 1. Enterobacterales ceftriaxone and levofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentrations (mg/L) distribution from community- and hospital-settings.ConclusionSimilar antimicrobials resistances were found in Enterobacterales from community- and hospital-acquired infections. New anti-infective agents are needed urgently to treat pathogens from the community-acquired infections and hospitals that have resistance to the first line regimen. Additionally, community antimicrobial stewardship programs are required.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

53. Optimizing Transitions of Care Antimicrobial Prescribing at a Community Teaching Hospital

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship integral to patient care. Institutions with stewardship decrease antibiotic use, cost, and antibiotic-associated infections. However, few efforts have been formally made to address discharge antimicrobial prescribing, even though many patients started on antibiotic therapy in the hospital are prescribed oral antibiotics to complete their regimens.MethodsThis was an IRB approved, quasi-experimental, pre-post study. Patients were included if they were >18 years and were discharged from the hospital with an oral antibiotic prescription. Patients discharged against medical advice, prescribed indefinite prophylactic antimicrobial therapy for legitimate reasons, or discharged to a skilled nursing facility were excluded. The retrospective group evaluated a random sample of patients discharged in 2/2020. The prospective group included patients discharged between 1/2021 – 6/2021. In the prospective group, a clinical pharmacist assessed the indication for antibiotics and pended discharge antibiotic prescriptions for physician review. Antibiotic choice and duration of therapy were based on local and national guidelines.Patient Screening for Inclusion and Exclusion Breakdown of patients screened, included, and excluded for studyResults86 (53.1%) of 162 retrospective patients from 2/2020 prior to implementation of the program demonstrated were discharged on inappropriate antimicrobial therapy with excessive duration being the principal driver for inappropriateness. In the prospective group of 64 patients, the rate of patients discharged on inappropriate antibiotics decreased to 28.1% (p=0.001). The duration of inappropriate therapy decreased from a mean of 4.6 days to 2.7 days (p=0.001). 45 (70.3%) of 64 prospective pharmacist’s interventions were accepted by providers.Study Outcomes Outcomes including overall appropriate prescribing, appropriate duration, spectrum, frequency, and dose, as well as days of inappropriate therapyConclusionLiterature demonstrates that prospective evaluation of discharge antibiotics by a clinical pharmacist is effective in improving appropriateness of discharge antibiotic prescriptions, optimizing duration of outpatient antibiotics as well as reducing unnecessarily broad-spectrum therapy. The prospective results from this study demonstrate that this innovative approach can improve outpatient oral antibiotic prescribing and provide a framework for other institutions to implement similar programs.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

137. Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions on Post-Elective Caesarean Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Surgical Site Infections

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) aim to improve appropriate antimicrobial use. Post-operative antibiotics are generally not necessary, especially those without surgical site infections risk factors (e.g. obesity). Few studies have described the impact of ASP interventions on patient outcomes especially in unique populations such as obstetrics. This study aims to evaluate the impact of ASP interventions on post-elective caesarean (eLSCS) oral antibiotic prophylaxis use and patient outcomes including SSI rates.MethodsThis pre-post quasi-experimental study was conducted over 9 months (2 months pre- and 7 months post-intervention) in all women admitted for eLSCS in our institution. Interventions included eLSCS surgical prophylaxis guideline dissemination, where a single antibiotic dose within 60 minutes before skin incision was recommended. Post-eLSCS oral antibiotics was actively discouraged in those without SSI risk factors. This was followed by ASP intervention notes (phase 1) for 3 months, and an additional phone call to the ward team for the next 7 months (phase 2). Phase 3 (next 6 months) constituted speaking to the operating consultant. The primary outcome was post-operative oral antibiotics prescription rates. Secondary outcomes included rates of 30-day post-operative SSI.ResultsA total of 1751 women was reviewed. Appropriateness of pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis was 98% in our institution. There were 244 women pre-intervention, 274 in post-intervention phase 1, 658 in phase 2 and 575 in phase 3. Pre-intervention post-eLSCS antibiotic prescribing rates was 82% (200), which reduced significantly post-intervention to 54% (148) in phase 1, 50% (331) in phase 2 and 39% (226) in phase 3 (p< 0.001). There was no significant difference in patients who developed post-operative SSI pre-post intervention (0.8%, 2 of 242 vs. 1.9%, 28 of 1479, p=0.420) and among who received post-operative oral antibiotics compared to those without (1.9%, 17 of 905 vs. 1.5%, 13 of 846, p=0.582).ConclusionASP interventions can reduce post-eLSCS antibiotic prophylaxis rates without adversely impacting patient safety.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

104. Improving Efficiency of Antimicrobial Stewardship Reviews Using Artificial Intelligence Modelling

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) in hospitals improve antibiotic prescribing, slow antimicrobial resistance, reduce hospitalisation duration, mortality and readmission rates, and save costs. However, the strategy of prospective audit and feedback is laborious. In Singapore General Hospital (SGH), 10 reviews are required to identify 2 inappropriate cases. Limited manpower constraints ASP audits to only about 30% of antibiotics prescribed. This proof-of-concept study explored the feasibility of developing a predictive model to prioritise inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for ASP review. MethodsASP-audited adult pneumonia patients from January 2016 to December 2018 in SGH were included. Patient data e.g., demographics, allergies, past medical history, and relevant laboratory investigations at each antibiotic use episode were extracted from electronic medical records and re-assembled through linking for analysis. Ground truth for model training was based on ASP-defined appropriateness for each encounter. The dataset was split into 80% and 20% for training and testing respectively. Three modelling techniques, XGBoost, decision tree and logistic regression, were assessed for their relative performance in terms of precision, sensitivity and specificity. ResultsThere were 12471 unique patient encounters. Training was done on 10459 encounters and 39 data elements were included. When tested on 2012 encounters, the logistic regression model performed the best (86.7% sensitivity, 71.4% specificity). The model correctly classified 1377 out of 1388 (99.2%) encounters as “appropriate” (do not require ASP intervention). 624 antibiotic use encounters were classified as “inappropriate”, of which only 72 were truly inappropriate (positive predictive value for ASP intervention, PPV 11.5%). The low PPV was likely due to inadequate representation of “inappropriate” cases in the training dataset (4.1%). Applying this model would prioritise the number of immediate ASP reviews needed to identify cases for intervention by two-thirds, from 2012 to 624 (Figure 1). Figure 1. Illustration of AI benefits in ASP ConclusionASPs can leverage on machine learning capabilities to improve audit efficiency. This can increase ASP’s productivity and staff’s job satisfaction as they are freed up to perform other work. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

117. How Does Antimicrobial Stewardship Provider Role Affect Prospective Audit and Feedback Acceptance by the Attending Physician?

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship (AMS) teams are commonly multidisciplinary. The effect of AMS provider role on prospective audit and feedback (PAF) acceptance has previously been investigated with mixed results. PAF of restricted antimicrobials (carbapenems, linezolid, daptomycin, and tigecycline) in adult inpatients at our large Canadian academic centre has been performed since 2018. Actionable feedback is communicated via chart note plus one of a phone call, direct message, or in-person discussion with the most responsible physician of the attending team in order to optimize the prescription if deemed necessary. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of AMS provider role on PAF acceptance.MethodsA 3 year retrospective review of all PAF events was undertaken. All audited prescriptions were included. Logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios for acceptance for individual AMS provider roles of pharmacist, physician, and supervised post-graduate physician trainee.ResultsOut of 1896 prescriptions audited, actionable feedback was provided to the most responsible physician in 731 (39%) cases. 677/731 (93%) of audited antibiotics were carbapenems. The overall acceptance rate was 82% (598/731). Acceptance rate and odds of acceptance based on AMS provider role were as follows: pharmacist alone 171/208 (82%), OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.70-1.59, physician alone 141/160 (88%), OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.12-3.20, pharmacist-physician duo 211/268 (79%), OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.07, and supervised post-graduate physician trainee 75/95 (79%), OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.48-1.41.ConclusionThe overall acceptance rate was high. There was a higher odds of acceptance if an AMS physician was providing PAF alone, highlighting the importance of physician involvement.Disclosures Dima Kabbani, MD, AVIR Pharma (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Speaker)Edesa Biotech (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)

Impact of an electronic alert on prescription patterns of meropenem, voriconazole and caspofungin

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs promote the appropriate use of antimicrobial substances through the implementation of evidence-based, active and passive interventions. We analyzed the effect of a computer-assisted intervention on antimicrobial use in a tertiary care hospital.MethodsBetween 2011 and 2016 we introduced an electronic alert for patients being prescribed meropenem, voriconazole and caspofungin. At prescription and at day 3 of treatment, physicians were informed about the risk related to these antimicrobial substances by an electronic alert in the medical records. Physicians were invited to revoke or confirm the prescription and to contact the infectious disease (ID) team. Using interrupted time series regression, the days of therapy (DOTs) and the number of prescriptions before and after the intervention were compared.ResultsWe counted 64,281 DOTs for 5549 prescriptions during 4100 hospital stays. Overall, the DOTs decreased continuously over time. An additional benefit of the alert could not be observed. Similarly, the number of prescriptions decreased over time, without significant effect of the intervention. When considering the three drugs separately, the alert impacted the duration (change in slope of DOTs/1000 bed days; P = 0.0017) as well as the number of prescriptions (change in slope of prescriptions/1000 bed days; P < 0.001) of voriconazole only.ConclusionsThe introduction of the alert lowered prescriptions of voriconazole only. Thus, self-stewardship alone seems to have a limited impact on electronic prescriptions of anti-infective substances. Additional measures such as face-to-face prompting with ID physicians or audit and feedback are indispensable to optimize antimicrobial use.

Staphylococcus aureus\xa0- selective reporting of antibiogram results and its impact on antibiotic use:\xa0Interventional study with a reference group on the effect of switching from non-selective to selective antibiotic reporting

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship (AMS) strategies worldwide focus on optimising the use of antibiotics. Selective susceptibility reporting is recommended as an effective AMS tool although there is a lack of representative studies investigating the impact of selective susceptibility reporting on antibiotic use. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of selective susceptibility reporting of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) on antibiotic consumption. Enhancing the use of narrow-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics such as flucloxacillin/cefazolin/cefalexin is one of the main goals in optimising antibiotic therapy of S. aureus infections.MethodsThis interventional study with control group was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Germany. During the one-year interventional period susceptibility reports for all methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) were restricted to flucloxacillin/cefazolin/cefalexin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, gentamicin and rifampin/fosfomycin, instead of reporting all tested antibiotics. The impact of implementing selective reporting was analysed by monitoring total monthly antibiotic consumption in our hospital and in a reference hospital (recommended daily dose/100 occupied bed days: RDD/100 BD), as well as on an individual patient level by analysing days of therapy adjusted for bed days (DOT/ 100 BD) for patients with S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) and respectively skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI).ResultsMSSA-antibiograms were acquired for 2836 patients. The total use of narrow-spectrum beta-lactams more than doubled after implementing selective reporting (from 1.2 to 2.8 RDD/100 BD, P < 0.001). The use of intravenous flucloxacillin/cefazolin for SAB rose significantly from 52 to 75 DOT/100 BD (plus 42%), just as the use of oral cefalexin for SSTI (from 1.4 to 9.4 DOT/100 BD, from 3 to 17 of 85/88 patients). Considering the overall consumption, there was no decrease in antibiotics omitted from the antibiogram. This was probably due to their wide use for other infections.ConclusionsAs narrow-spectrum beta-lactams are not widely used for other infections, their increase in the overall consumption of the entire hospital was a strong indicator that selective reporting guided clinicians to an optimised antibiotic therapy of S. aureus infections. On a patient level, this assumption was verified by a significant improved treatment of S. aureus infections in the subgroups of SAB and SSTI. As useful AMS tool, we recommend implementing selective reporting rules into the national/international standards for susceptibility reporting.

EP.TU.682Antibiotic Stewardship Within A General Surgery Department – A Quality Improvement Project

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship involves a coherent set of actions geared towards responsible use of antimicrobials. NICE antimicrobial stewardship guidance forms the basis for trust wide standards; the surgical department inconsistently complies to these standards.AimsUse of PDSA framework to improve departmental antibiotic prescribing practices.MethodsData collection via Meditech™ prescribing records and documentation. ‘Snapshots’ of antibiotic prescriptions for surgical inpatients taken collecting the following data:Correct antibiotic prescribed as per guidelines or positive culture resultsAntibiotic prescription reviewed within 72 hoursSamples sent for culture and sensitivityIV prescriptions reviewed if longer than 72 hoursCycle 1 data collection in August/September 2020, followed by a presentation distributed to junior doctors detailing importance of accurate prescribing. Cycle 2 data collection in October/November 2020 was followed by a summary of documentation/prescribing guidelines being circulated to surgical juniors. The final data collection period took place in November 2020. Analysis via Chi-Squared test.ResultsInterventions improved prescribing of correct antibiotics (75 to 89.3%), and documentation of IV antibiotic prescriptions with courses longer than 72 hours (p < 0.05). Similar insigificant improvements observed with reviewing prescriptions within 72 hours and samples sent to microbiology.DiscussionLow frequency of samples sent to microbiology as antibiotics often used for surgical prophylaxis and continued post-operatively without prior cultures. Brief documentation on the ward round, accentuated by constraints enforced by Covid-19 pandemic.ConclusionPositive changes can be achieved from simple interventions. Sustainable changes in prescribing practices require engagement of entire clinical team and amendments to electronic prescribing.

Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship in a 126-bed community hospital with close communication between pharmacists working on post-prescription audit, ward pharmacists, and the antimicrobial stewardship team

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship (AS) is defined as coordinated interventions to improve and measure the appropriate use of antimicrobial agents. However, available resources for AS differ depending on the size of the clinical setting. Therefore, AS programs based on guidelines need to be selected in order to implement AS in small- to medium-sized hospitals. The present study compared the impact of AS in a 126-bed community hospital between pre- and post-AS periods.MethodsThe present study was retrospectively performed by selecting data on eligible patients from electronic medical records stored in the central database of the hospital. The roles of the AS team included weekly rounds and recommendations on the appropriate use of antimicrobials, and pharmacists working on post-prescription audits and pharmaceutical care at the bedside closely communicated with the AS team to assist with its implementation. As process measurements, the order rate of culture examinations, the conducting rate of de-escalation, antimicrobial use density (AUD), days of therapy (DOT), and the AUD/DOT ratio of carbapenems and tazobactam-piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) were measured. Thirty-day mortality and recurrence rates were examined as clinical outcomes.ResultsA total of 535 patients (288 in the pre-AS period and 247 in the post-AS period) were enrolled in the present study. The recommendation rate to prescribers significantly increased (p < 0.01) from 10.4% in the pre-AS period to 21.1% in the post-AS period. The order rate of culture examinations increased from 56.3 to 73.3% (p < 0.01). The conducting rate of de-escalation increased from 10.2 to 30.8% (p < 0.05). The AUD of carbapenems and TAZ/PIPC significantly decreased (p < 0.05). The DOT of carbapenems (p < 0.01) and TAZ/PIPC (p < 0.05) also significantly decreased. The AUD/DOT ratio of carbapenem significantly increased from 0.37 to 0.60 (p < 0.01). Thirty-day mortality rates were 11.2 and 14.2%, respectively, and were not significantly different. The 30-day recurrence rate significantly decreased (p < 0.05) from 14.7 to 7.5%.ConclusionsThe implementation of AS in this hospital improved the appropriate use of antimicrobials without negatively affecting clinical outcomes. These results may be attributed to close communication between pharmacists working on post-prescription audits and pharmaceutical care at the bedside and the AS team.

Compliance with the 4Ds of antimicrobial stewardship practice in a tertiary care centre.

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship describes the practice of promoting the selection of the right drug, dosage, delivery and duration of antimicrobial therapy (the 4Ds) in order to curtail the emergence of resistant organisms. It is important to quantify the inappropriate use of antimicrobials in terms of percentage adherence to each of the 4Ds mentioned.MethodsWe undertook a prospective review of medical records of patients admitted to the medical wards of a tertiary care centre in North India. All patients on antimicrobials were included and their records reviewed for indication, drug, dose, delivery and duration (or by asking the treating physician if not documented). Adherence to the 4Ds was determined by referring to updated literature-based standard treatment guidelines (STGs) for each specific disease.ResultsOf 304 patients, drugs were appropriate and matched STGs in 218 (72%) patients, with adherence to the right dose in 210 (69%), route of delivery in 216 (71%) and duration in 197 (65%). Full adherence to the 4Ds was observed in 196 (64.5%). Maximum adherence was observed in treating skin and soft tissue infections (100%), while minimum adherence was observed in administering medical prophylaxis (40%). WHO Access, Watch and Reserve categories comprised 29%, 63% and 8.5% of all prescribed antibiotics, respectively.ConclusionsThe right drug, dose, delivery and duration of therapy are prescribed in 72%, 69%, 71%, and 65% of patients, respectively. In order to increase the adherence to 100%, bedside stewardship practices in the form of prospective audits and feedback must be improved. There is a need to integrate WHO AWaRe classification of antibiotics into treatment guidelines.

Exploring the practice, confidence and educational needs of hospital pharmacists in reviewing antimicrobial prescribing: a cross-sectional, nationwide survey

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs are usually limited in resources and scope. Therefore, wider engagement of hospital pharmacists in reviewing antimicrobial orders is necessary to ensure appropriate prescribing. We assessed hospital pharmacists’ self-reported practice and confidence in reviewing antimicrobial prescribing, and their knowledge in making AMS interventions.MethodsWe conducted an Australia-wide, cross-sectional survey in October 2017. A link to the online survey was emailed to hospital pharmacists via the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia. Factors associated with higher knowledge scores were explored using linear regression models.ResultsThere were 439 respondents, of whom 272 (61.7%) were from metropolitan public hospitals. Pharmacists were more likely to assess the appropriateness of intravenous, broad-spectrum or restricted antibiotics than narrow-spectrum, oral antibiotics within 24–72 h of prescription; p < 0.001. Fifty percent or fewer respondents were confident in identifying AMS interventions related to dose optimization based on infection-specific factors, bug-drug mismatch, and inappropriate lack of spectra of antimicrobial activity. The median knowledge score (correct answers to knowledge questions) was 6 out of 9 (interquartile range, 5–7); key gaps were noted in antimicrobials’ anaerobic spectrum, beta-lactam allergy assessment and dosing in immunocompromised patients. Clinical practice in inpatient areas, registration for 3–5 years and receipt of recent AMS education were associated with higher knowledge scores. More interactive modes of education delivery were preferred over didactic modes; p ≤ 0.01.ConclusionGaps in practice, confidence and knowledge among hospital pharmacists were identified that could inform the design of educational strategies to help improve antimicrobial prescribing in Australian hospitals.

130. Antimicrobial Stewardship Practices in Community Pharmacies Across the United States

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in the community is essential as majority of antibiotic prescribing occurs in the community. Pharmacists are recognized by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as co-leaders for leading implementation efforts to improve antibiotic use. The purpose of this study is to evaluate current AMS practices in community pharmacies across the United States (US) and identify challenges.MethodsA 15-item survey was created based on CDC’s Core Elements of Outpatient AMS to assess current policies and practices in place, as well as collect baseline demographics and pharmacists’ perceptions. A survey invite was posted on the Facebook group, Pharmacist Moms, in September 2019. Participation was voluntarily and anonymous.ResultsParticipants included 61 community pharmacists from 25 states across the US. 88.5% work in a chain pharmacy with 54.1% in staff positions and 37.7% in management. 37.7% have been practicing for > 10 years, 36.1% for 6–10 years and 26.2% 5 or less years. Minimal responses met CDC’s Core Elements of AMS: commitment (27.9%), action (24.6%), tracking and reporting (14.8%), and education and expertise (23% for pharmacists, 9.8% for patients).In regards to perception, 67.9% felt AMS is important in the community. 88.5% would participate in AMS if the opportunity were provided. 91.8% were unsure or had no plans to implement AMS within the next 2 years.Common challenges include the lack of time/staff (83.6%), pushback from prescribers (68.9%), lack of leadership (57.4%), lack of financial incentives (52.5%), pushback from patients (52.5%), lack of pharmacist knowledge/training (39.3%), lack of funding/financial support (29.5%), lack of legal requirement (21.3%), lack of information technology support (19.7%), and lack of pharmacist interest (11.5%).Current Trends of U.S. Community Pharmacies in Meeting CDC’s Core Elements of Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Challenges in Implementing Antimicrobial Stewardship in Community Pharamacies ConclusionResults from this study reveal the lack of AMS practices in community pharmacies. Pharmacists have a critical role in AMS, but many challenges exist in the community setting inhibiting the full potential of pharmacists in AMS efforts. This study highlights the importance and need for addressing these issues as regulations and strategies for AMS in community settings develop.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

59. Evaluation of Drug-Bug Mismatch Alerts and Their Value in an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship is a priority for hospitals and utilizing generated reports can enhance stewardship activities. At our institution, a software program was used to help optimize antimicrobial therapy by providing a drug-bug mismatch (DBM) alert which identifies patients with culture susceptibilities not covered by their current antimicrobial therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of this alert feature and determine whether or not an intervention was needed for patients identified.MethodsFrom August 2019 to March 2020 the DBM alerts were reviewed by a pharmacist and interventions pursued when appropriate. Data collection included the patient’s culture results and source, indication for current antibiotics, and potential for intervention. Alerts were stratified into different groups based on the type of culture, including urine, blood, sputum, bone or bodily fluid, wound or tissues, and stool. Those mismatches not resulting in an intervention were categorized as a contamination, colonization, or inappropriate. This study was approved by the institutional review board.ResultsA total of 105 DBM alerts were analyzed from various sources, including 51 (47.6%) urine, 17 (16.2%) sputum, 16 (15.2%) wound or tissue, 14 (13.3%) blood, 6 (5.7%) bone or bodily fluid, and 1 stool culture. Overall, 48 of 105 (45.7%) of alerts resulted in an intervention. Urine and sputum culture alerts required interventions at the lowest rate with treatment interventions in 12 of 51 (23.5%) and 5 of 17 (29.4%) of those cases respectively. Blood culture alerts were the most successful as 9 of 14 (64.3%) alerts required an intervention. Alerts with wound or tissue cultures identified gaps in therapy as 9 of 16 (56.3%) cases required intervention. Colonization or contamination appeared to be the major cause of alerts that did not result in intervention.ConclusionThe DBM alert can be a beneficial tool for pharmacists participating in antimicrobial stewardship activities. However, the alerts had varying value depending on the culture source. The DBM alert can identify real-time patient issues regarding appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Further modifications to our process in utilizing this DBM report are warranted to enhance value and allocate time accordingly.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

142. Frequency of Short-course Empiric Antibiotic Use as an Antimicrobial Stewardship Metric

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship metrics that provide actionable guidance are needed to support efforts to improve hospital use of antibiotics. Antibiotics such as vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam are common empiric agents used frequently when the infectious process remains unknown. Thus short, incomplete courses of therapy are used more frequently for such agents. We aimed to evaluate the variability in short courses of vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam use across U.S. hospitals. MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional study among U.S. hospitals that contributed inpatient pharmacy data to the Vizient clinical database in 2016. We identified vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam courses initiated within the 48 hours of admission, measured as days of therapy received. We calculated the percent of patients that received 1, 2, 3, 4 or >4 days of therapy at each facility to describe short course empiric therapy use. To describe the variability across facilities, we then assessed the median, interquartile range (IQR), and total range of that percentage.ResultsWe identified 145 hospitals representing approximately 3.7 million patient encounters for inclusion in this study. Within 48 hours of admission, 13.9% of encounters received vancomycin, 7.7% piperacillin/tazobactam, and 4.6% received both. The figure demonstrates the variability in the frequency of short course antibiotic use across hospitals; boxes indicate the IQR with the transecting line representing the median and whiskers representing the full range. The proportion of patients that received one day of therapy varied most across hospitals, with vancomycin ranging from 0–100%. In contrast, the frequency of patients that received greater than four days of therapy varied considerably less across hospitals; 0–33% for vancomycin.ConclusionThe variability in use of short course empiric therapies suggests that use for non-infectious processes or infections not appropriately treated by these agents varies greatly across facilities. Measuring short course use for common empiric agents may serve as an important antimicrobial stewardship metric. Such a metric could inform antimicrobial stewardship efforts to reduce unnecessary initiation of empiric antimicrobial therapy.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

204. Post-Liver Transplant Antimicrobial Use after the Expansion of a Pharmacist-Lead Antimicrobial Stewardship Program

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) allow for infectious diseases (ID)-trained practitioners to focus on timely and appropriate antimicrobial use. In December 2016, the ASP at Indiana University (IU) Health expanded from one ID pharmacist to three. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of an expanding ASP on broad-spectrum antimicrobial use within post-liver transplant patients.MethodsThis was a retrospective, cross-sectional study. Data were collected from patients aged at least 18 years old that received a liver transplant either before or after the ASP expansion. Patients were excluded if they survived less than 72 hours after transplant, if they received a multivisceral transplant, or if there was an active infection prior to transplantation. The hypothesis of this study was that an expanded ASP leads to a reduction in days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient-days for a composite of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents within this patient population.ResultsA total of 268 patients were included in this study. Of the patients that received at least one dose of the studied antimicrobial agents, the median (IQR) DOT per 1000 patient-days in the pre- and post-ASP expansion cohort was 174.4 (117.6 – 333.3) and 142.9 (62.5 – 257.5), respectively. This was statistically significant (difference 48.6, 95% CI 7.5 – 83.3). Specifically, the post-ASP expansion cohort used less meropenem (difference 197.8, 95% CI 66.3 – 451.6) and vancomycin (difference 57.6, 95% CI 2.2 – 132.2). The post-ASP expansion cohort also consulted ID for more patients (2 vs. 12 consults in the pre- and post-expansion group, respectively; p=0.011). Patient and graft survival one year after transplantation were similar between the two cohorts (p=0.540 and p=0.255, respectively).ConclusionAn expanded ASP contributed to a reduction in broad-spectrum antimicrobial use in post-liver transplant patients without negatively impacting patient and graft survival one year post-transplantation. These data provide further evidence of ASP benefits within immunocompromised populations.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

156. How Does Exposure to C. Diffogenic Antibiotics Impact Multidrug-resistant Organism Colonization and Environment Contamination in Nursing Homes?

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) outcomes are often measured in the acute care setting, less is known about the effect of acute care antibiotic exposures on multidrug-resistant organism (MDROs) colonization of nursing home (NH) patients. We assessed exposure to antibiotics commonly associated with Clostridioides difficile (C. diffogenic agents) on post-acute care patient colonization and room environment contamination (Figure 1).Figure 1. Conceptual Diagram of Hospital Antibiotic Exposure’s Influence on Patient Colonization and Room Environment Contamination with Multidrug-Resistant Organisms MethodsMDRO surveillance of post-acute care patients in 6 NHs between 2013–16. We screened patient hands, nares, oropharynx, groin, perianal area, and high-touch room environment surfaces for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and resistant Gram-negative bacilli (rGNB). C. diffogenic agents were defined as fluoroquinolones, 3rd/4th generation cephalosporins, penicillin combinations, lincosamides, and carbapenems. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess whether hospital antibiotic exposure is an independent risk factor for MDRO colonization and room environment contamination on study enrollment.ResultsWe enrolled 618 patients: average age was 74.4 years; 57.4% female; 62.3% white; 9.9% had indwelling devices (Table 1). Three hundred-fifty patients (56.6%) were MDRO colonized on enrollment: 98 (15.9%), MRSA; 208 (33.7%); VRE; 196 (31.7%), rGNB. Sixty-eight percent of patient rooms were MDRO contaminated: 166 (26.9%), MRSA; 293, (47.4%). VRE; 182 (29.5%), rGNB.A majority (59.4%) of patients were exposed to an antibiotic before admission. Of which, 239 (65.1%) were exposed to a C. diffogenic antibiotic. In multivariable analysis, C. diffogenic antibiotic exposure was an independent risk factor for MDRO colonization (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.35–2.79), MDRO room environment contamination (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.43–2.63), VRE colonization (OR, 4.23; 95% CI, 2.59–6.90), and VRE room environment contamination (OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 2.00–3.33).Table 1. Clinical Characteristics and MDRO Burden on Study Enrollment, Stratified by Hospital Antibiotic Exposure Status Multivariable Analysis of Hospital Antibiotic Exposure Status as Risk Factor for Proximal and Distal MDRO Outcomes ConclusionHospital exposure to antibiotics is associated with an increased risk of VRE colonization and room environment contamination on NH study enrollment. These observations highlight the potential influence of hospital-based ASPs on MDRO prevalence and transmission in NHs.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

158. A multi-site, prospective study of antimicrobial prescribing practices in three low- or middle-income country hospitals

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are being developed internationally to mitigate the misuse of antimicrobials. An understanding of current practices and prescribing patterns is necessary to determine targets to develop context-specific ASPs in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) hospitals.MethodsWe conducted a prospective study of patients admitted to the adult medical wards at three LMIC tertiary care centers in 2018- 2019: a 1,800-bed public hospital in Galle, Sri Lanka; a 991-bed public hospital in Eldoret, Kenya; and a 630-bed private hospital in Moshi, Tanzania. Information regarding antimicrobial therapy received during hospitalization, indications for antimicrobial therapy, and duration of antimicrobial use were extracted from the medical record.ResultsIn total, 3150 patients were enrolled: 1297 in Sri Lanka, 750 in Kenya, and 1103 in Tanzania. Antimicrobial use prevalence varied between the three sites, with 56.0% of patients receiving antimicrobials during hospitalization in Sri Lanka, 56.5% in Kenya, and 35.4% in Tanzania. Third-generation cephalosporins were used most frequently in Kenya (70.0%) and Tanzania (73.1%), whereas amoxicillin/ clavulanic acid was used most frequently in Sri Lanka (48.4%). Lower respiratory tract infection was the most common indication for antimicrobial use in all three locations: 37.4% in Sri Lanka, 27.8% in Kenya, and 49.2% in Tanzania. No clear indication for antimicrobial use was documented among 11.6% patients receiving antimicrobials in Sri Lanka, 32.8% in Kenya, and 10.5% in Tanzania. In Tanzania, 8.6% of the patients had documentation of input from the microbiology or infectious diseases teams compared to less than 1% in either Sri Lanka or Kenya. Pertinent culture data related to the primary indication for antimicrobials was present in 16.1% (Sri Lanka), 6.1% (Kenya), and 7.4% (Tanzania).ConclusionUnclear documentation for antimicrobial use was common in all three sites and most patients on antimicrobial therapy did not have pertinent culture data. Improving documentation and the capacity of the local microbiology laboratories could be initial targets for ASPs in these LMIC hospitals.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

223. Difference in Carbapenem Use by ASP Intervention in Japanese Healthcare Facilities

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) interventions have been reported to reduce unnecessary antimicrobial use (AMU). In this study, we investigated the difference in the use of carbapenems by ASP intervention in Japanese healthcare facilities.MethodsData on two components of AMU and ASP registered in Japan Surveillance for Infection Prevention and Healthcare Epidemiology (J-SIPHE) from January to December 2019, were used. Facilities with an infection control team in addition to an antimicrobial stewardship team responsible for the proper use of antimicrobial agents were included in the study. AMU data (such as DOT [Days of Therapy / 100 patient days]) are entered semi-automatically from medical fee statement (receipt) file at each facility. ASP intervention is divided into four categories 1) pre-authorization, 2) prospective audit and feedback (PAF), 3) PAF and required notification (RN), 4) RN. The Kruskal-Wallis test is performed to see overall difference and the Dunn test with the Bonferroni correction is done for each pair of categories.ResultsA total of 114 hospitals were included in the analysis. The median number of beds at participating facilities were 430 [IQR: 281–602], the median average hospital stay was 13.0 days [IQR: 11.4–15.2] and total number of inpatients per month was 10087 [6247–14536]. PAF and RN were the most common ASP interventions for carbapenems (62.5%), followed by RN (33.6%). The median DOT [IQR] of participating facilities were 2.1 [1.2–3.1] and 1) 0.7 [0.2–1.1], 2) 2.7 [2.1–3.4], 3) 2.1 [1.4–3.1] and 4) 2.0 [1.2–3.5] by ASP categories. There are significant differences between 1) and 2), 1) and 3), and 1) and 4) (p=0.014, p< 0.01 and p< 0.01, respectively) while the differences between 2) and 3), 2) and 4), and 3) and 4) are not significant (p=1.00).Table 1. Summary statistics of healthcare facilities by ASP Interventions Figure 1. DOT by ASP Interventions ConclusionOnly 3.5% of ASP interventions belong to 1) pre-authorization category and this might be due to the complexity of registration process. This category was found to have the lowest DOT among all ASP interventions in Japanese healthcare facilities. The variances of DOT were especially large in categories 3) and 4), and more detailed analyses would be necessary to evaluate their efficacies accurately.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

1335. Accuracy of Outpatient Antibiotic Prescriptions for Urinary Tract Infection in Pediatric Ambulatory Care

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs have typically focused on inpatient care, but antibiotics are frequently prescribed at pediatric ambulatory care centers. Ensuring accurate pediatric antibiotic dosing is important to optimize outcomes while minimizing adverse drug effects. Outpatient pharmacists often lack the resources to recommend optimal antibiotic dosing for pediatric infections. The primary objective was to evaluate the accuracy of antibiotic dose, frequency and formulation prescribed. The secondary objective was to describe the most commonly prescribed treatment durations.MethodsA retrospective review of electronic medical records was conducted at two suburban pediatric practices. Patients diagnosed with uncomplicated UTI over a two year period were identified using ICD-10 codes N39, R30 and R35. Patients 2 months-18 years were included if prescribed an oral antibiotic for the treatment of UTI. Data collected included baseline demographics, antibiotic, dose (mg and mg/kg), frequency, formulation, and duration. Antibiotic dose, frequency and formulation were considered accurate if they were consistent with clinical guidelines and tertiary dosing references, allowing for 10% rounding in weight-based doses.ResultsA total of 472 outpatient prescriptions met inclusion criteria. Overall, 24% of dosing regimens were found to be inaccurate. Patients were most commonly prescribed doses that were too low (54/118, 45%) or too high (41/118, 35%). Less frequently, doses exceeded the maximum total dose (9/118, 8%), were given at the wrong frequency (8/118, 7%), or the wrong dosage form was selected (6/118, 5%). Of the commonly prescribed antibiotics, dosing errors were most likely to occur with ciprofloxacin (24/27, 89%) and amoxicillin (33/64; 55%). The majority of patients completed a 10 day course of antibiotics (381, 80%), followed by 7 days (66, 13.9%). Durations of 3 days (20, 4.2%), 5 days (7, 1.5%) and 14 days (2, 0.4%) occurred less frequently.ConclusionErrors in antibiotic dosing occurred with nearly one in four prescriptions written for outpatient UTI from pediatric primary care centers. Durations were most commonly 10 days. Education and resources should be provided to outpatient pediatric providers to optimize antibiotic dosing.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

139. Impact of Pharmacist Driven Outpatient Fluoroquinolone Stewardship Initiative in Community Based Setting

BackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship initiatives and efforts have historically had a greater emphasis in the inpatient hospital setting. There is a need for outpatient stewardship, and additionally, accreditation standards are starting to require antimicrobial stewardship efforts in the ambulatory care setting. Fluoroquinolones are a target for antimicrobial stewardship based on their broad-spectrum activity, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, safety profile, downstream resistance, and risk of super infections. The objective of this study was to compare outpatient fluoroquinolone prescribing rates before and after pharmacist led initiative.MethodsThis was a prospective, quality improvement initiative between October 1, 2019 to June 1, 2020 at a community-based physician network across Indiana. The pharmacist initiative incorporated a live, educational presentation with intervention 1 and an informational letter to healthcare providers across the outpatient physician network with intervention 2. Data was collected from a computer-generated, prescription report. The primary outcome was fluoroquinolone prescribing rates at Central Indiana (CI) sites before and after pharmacist led interventions. Rate of fluoroquinolone prescribing was defined as total number of fluoroquinolone prescriptions per month. The secondary outcome included percentage of fluoroquinolone use at CI sites. Percentage of fluoroquinolone use was defined as monthly number of fluoroquinolones prescriptions compared to monthly number of all oral antibiotic prescriptions.ResultsThere was a 29.8% decrease (382 vs 268 prescriptions) in outpatient fluoroquinolone prescriptions at CI sites after intervention 1 compared to same month of previous year. There was a 43.7% decrease (428 vs 241 prescriptions) in outpatient fluoroquinolone prescriptions at CI sites after intervention 2. There was an overall 2.4% decrease (4.9% vs 2.5%) in percentage of fluoroquinolone use compared to all oral antibiotics at CI sites after intervention 2 compared to same month of previous year.ConclusionThese findings suggest the pharmacist led outpatient antimicrobial stewardship initiative successfully decreased fluoroquinolone prescribing rates across the network.DisclosuresChristian Cheatham, PharmD, BCIDP, Antimicrobial Resistance Solutions (Shareholder)