Management of plant disease in agro-ecosystems ideally relies on a combination of host genetic resistance, chemical control, and cultural practices. Growers increasingly rely on chemical and genetic options, but their relative benefits in disease control, yield, and economic outcomes are rarely quantified. We explore this relationship for blackleg crown canker disease (caused by Leptosphaeria maculans), a major biotic constraint limiting canola production globally. Data from 20 field trials conducted from 2013 to 2015 in canola-growing regions of Australia were used to assess the effects of host resistance and fungicide treatment on blackleg severity, grain yield, and gross margin. In the absence of fungicide, blackleg disease was 88% lower in the most resistant compared with the most susceptible blackleg resistance category. In the most susceptible resistance category, the most effective fungicide treatment significantly reduced blackleg severity (from 50 to 6%) and increased grain yield (478 kg/ha, 41%) and gross margin (AU$120/ha, 17%). However, the mean benefits of fungicide tended to decrease with increasing levels of genetic resistance, to the point that yield, disease, and gross margin benefits were close to zero in the most resistant cultivars. Overall, these findings suggest that fungicides can reduce blackleg severity, but the benefits of application strongly depend on associated levels of genetic resistance. Canola cultivars with higher genetic resistance reliably reduced blackleg disease and maintained grain yield without the associated cost of fungicide application. The intensification of canola production to meet increasing global demand will require strategies to sustainably manage and protect finite genetic resistance resources to control blackleg disease.
Read full abstract