Judgement of 28 March 2019, Pometon v Commission, T-433/16, EU:T:2019:201 In staggered hybrid settlement cases, references made to non-settling parties in settlement decisions do not always breach the right to good administration and the presumption of innocence. On 28 March 2019, the General Court (the ‘Court’) ruled on Pometon SpA’s (‘Pometon’) application seeking annulment of European Commission (‘Commission’) Decision C (2016) 3121 final (Case AT.39792—Steel Abrasives), concerning a cartel between Pometon and four other undertakings, essentially designed to coordinate the price of steel abrasives throughout the European Economic Area (EEA) (the ‘Judgement’). On 13 April 2010, the Commission had received an immunity application from one undertaking, Ervin. On 16 January 2013, the Commission initiated infringement proceedings against Pometon and four other undertakings. The Commission and all the undertakings entered into settlement discussions. On 2 April 2014, the Commission reached a settlement with four undertakings involved in the cartel and adopted Decision C(2014) 2074 final (the ‘settlement decision’), while Pometon decided to withdraw from the settlement procedure.