5-year Overall Survival Benefit Research Articles

Liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation or trans-arterial chemoembolization for early-stage (BCLC A) oligo-nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: meta-analysis.

The 2022 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) algorithm does not recommend liver resection (LR) in BCLC A patients with oligo-nodular (two or three nodules ≤3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This sharply contrasts with the therapeutic hierarchy concept, implying a precise treatment order exists within each BCLC stage. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of LR versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in BCLC A patients. A meta-analysis adhering to PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook was performed. All RCT, cohort and case-control studies that compared LR versus RFA or TACE in oligo-nodular BCLC A HCC published between January 2000 and October 2023 were comprehensively searched on PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and China Biology Medicine databases. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 and 5 years. Risk ratio (RR) was computed as a measure of treatment effect (OS and DFS benefit) to calculate common and random effects estimates for meta-analyses with binary outcome data. 2601 patients from 14 included studies were analysed (LR = 1227, RFA = 686, TACE = 688). There was a significant 3- and 5-year OS benefit of LR over TACE (RR = 0.55, 95% c.i. 0.44 to 0.69, P < 0.001 and RR 0.57, 95% c.i. 0.36 to 0.90, P = 0.030, respectively), while there was no significant 3- and 5-year OS benefit of LR over RFA (RR = 0.78, 95% c.i. 0.37 to 1.62, P = 0.452 and RR 0.74, 95% c.i. 0.50 to 1.09, P = 0.103, respectively). However, a significant 3- and 5-year DFS benefit of LR over RFA was found (RR = 0.70, 95% c.i. 0.54 to 0.93, P = 0.020 and RR 0.82, 95% c.i. 0.72 to 0.95, P = 0.015, respectively). A single study comparing LR and TACE regarding DFS showed a significant superiority of LR. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale quality of studies was high in eight (57%) and moderate in six (43%). In BCLC A oligo-nodular HCC patients, LR should be preferred to RFA or TACE (therapeutic hierarchy concept). Additional comparative cohort studies are urgently needed to increase the certainty of this evidence.

Neoadjuvant Gastric Score: How Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Affects Overall Survival and Adjuvant Benefit.

The Neoadjuvant Rectal score (NAR) was developed as a short-term surrogate for 5-year overall survival (OS) prediction in locally advanced rectal cancer on the basis of response to neoadjuvant therapy. We aim to assess whether this score can be repurposed for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection. Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by surgical resection were extracted from the National Cancer Database. Neoadjuvant Gastric (NAG) scores were calculated, and patients were stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-score categories, with low scores predicting longer survival. Patients were propensity-matched 1:1:1 between the groups for OS comparison. We also matched patients within each group 1:1 per receipt of adjuvant therapy and compared 5-year OS. There were 2,970 patients identified. NAG classified patients into low- (n = 396, 13.3%), intermediate-(n = 756, 25.5%), and high (n = 1818, 61.2%) groups. After propensity matching, 5-year OS was significantly different between the matched groups (low-NAG 82%, intermediate-NAG 73%, and high-NAG 39%; p < 0.001). NAG score grouping also predicted OS benefit of adjuvant therapy; low- and intermediate-NAG patients had no OS benefit with adjuvant therapy (86% vs. 84%; p = 0.492, and 77% vs. 74%; p = 0.382, respectively), whereas patients with high-NAG score had a 5-year OS benefit with adjuvant therapy (39% vs. 29%; p = 0.024). NAR score may be repurposed to generate a prognostic tool in gastric adenocarcinoma to predict 5-year OS and has the potential to guide decision-making regarding allocation of adjuvant therapy. Further studies should prospectively validate these findings to confirm clinical utility.

Efficacy and safety comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and upfront surgery for treating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aimsCurrently, surgical resection is the most commonly performed and effective treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) worldwide. However, the prognosis of ICC is unsatisfactory. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and upfront surgery in treating intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The study also intends to explore whether chemotherapy should be introduced before surgery and which populations should be considered for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.MethodFour databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, were searched from their inception dates to January 2022 for relevant articles. The statistical analysis was performed using the Review Manager Software (version5.3). The non-randomized interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to assess the methodological quality of included studies and the overall quality of evidence was assessed through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Moreover, the primary outcomes included 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS), while the secondary outcomes were R0 resection, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), postoperative complications and ninety-day postoperative mortality.ResultsFive studies involving 2412 patients were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in 1-year OS, 3-year OS, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year RFS, postoperative complications and ninety-day postoperative mortality between the two groups. However, the meta-analysis showed that the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group had a better 5-year OS benefit in ICC patients than the upfront surgery group (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.02–1.58), while the R0 resection rate was lower in neoadjuvant chemotherapy group than that in the upfront surgery group (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.26–0.91).ConclusionCompared with the upfront surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery could prolong the 5-year OS without increasing the risk of postoperative complications in ICC patients. Considering that the patients in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery group had more advanced ICC cases, the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be more significant in patients with more advanced ICC.

Lobaplatin-based prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for T4 gastric cancer patients: A retrospective clinical study.

To explore the clinical efficacy of lobaplatin-based prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with T4 gastric cancer after surgery and to evaluate its impact on survival. Data on patients with T4 gastric cancer who underwent radical gastric resection between March 2016 and August 2017 were collected from the National Cancer Center and Huangxing Cancer Hospital. Enrolled patients were divided into two groups according to receiving or not receiving HIPEC. A total of 106 patients were included in this study; among them, 51 patients underwent radical gastric resection plus prophylactic HIPEC, and 55 patients underwent radical gastric resection only. The baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The postoperative platelet counts in the HIPEC group were significantly lower than those in the non-HIPEC group (P< 0.05); however, we did not observe any occurrences of serious bleeding in the HIPEC group. There were no significant differences in the postoperative complication rates between the two groups (P > 0.05). The postoperative (1 month) CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4 levels in the HIPEC group were significantly decreased in the HIPEC group (P < 0.05). At a median follow-up of 59.3 months, 3 (5.5%) patients in the HIPEC group experienced peritoneal recurrence, and 10 (18.2%) patients in the non-HIPEC group experienced peritoneal recurrence (P < 0.05). Both groups had comparable 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (41.1% HIPEC group vs. 34.5% non-HIPEC group, P = 0.118). The 5-year disease-free survival was significantly higher in the HIPEC group than in the non-HIPEC group (28.6% versus 39.7%, p = 0.046). Lobaplatin-based prophylactic HIPEC is feasible and safe for patients with T4 gastric cancer and does not increase postoperative adverse effects. The use of HIPEC showed a significant decrease in the incidence of local recurrence rates and blood tumor marker levels. The 5-year disease-free survival was significantly higher in the HIPEC group; however, the 5-year OS benefit was not found in T4 stage patients.

Pretreatment Lymphocyte Count Predicts Benefit From Concurrent Chemotherapy With Radiotherapy in Oropharyngeal Cancer.

PURPOSEThere is a need to refine the selection of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) for treatment de-escalation. We investigated whether pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) predicted overall survival (OS) benefit from the addition of concurrent chemotherapy to radical radiotherapy.PATIENTS AND METHODSThis was an observational study of consecutive OPSCCs treated by curative-intent radiotherapy, with or without concurrent chemotherapy (n = 791) with external, independent validation from a separate institution (n = 609). The primary end point was OS at 5 years. Locoregional control (LRC) was assessed using competing risk regression as a secondary end point. Previously determined prognostic factors were used in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to assess the prognostic importance of ALC and the interaction between ALC and cisplatin chemotherapy use.RESULTSPretreatment ALC was prognostic for 5-year OS on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.98; P = .04). It also predicted benefit from the use of concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy, with a significant interaction between cisplatin chemotherapy and pretreatment ALC (likelihood ratio test, P = .04): higher ALC count reduced the 5-year OS benefit compared with radiotherapy alone (HR 2.53; 95% CI, 1.03 to 6.19; P = .043). This was likely driven by an effect on LRC up to 5 years (interaction subdistribution HR 2.29; 95% CI, 0.68 to 7.71; P = .094). An independent validation cohort replicated the OS (HR 2.53; 95% CI, 0.98 to 6.52; P = .055) and LRC findings (interaction subdistribution HR 3.43; 95% CI, 1.23 to 9.52; P = .018).CONCLUSIONFor OPSCC, the pretreatment ALC is prognostic for OS and also predicts benefit from the addition of cisplatin chemotherapy to radiotherapy. These findings require prospective evaluation, and could inform the selection of good prognosis patients for a de-escalation trial.

Outcomes of first, second, and third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases (NSCLCBM).

2034 Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cause of brain metastases. ALK, which codes for tyrosine kinase receptors, is rearranged in 4-7% of NSCLC. First-generation ALK inhibitors have restricted efficacy due to poor blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration and ALK-resistant tumor mutations. Second-generation ALK inhibitors have shown better BBB penetration, while third-generation ALK inhibitors were efficacious even against ALK-resistant mutations. In this retrospective study, we investigated the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLCBM patients treated with first, second, and third-generation ALK inhibitors. Methods: NSCLCBM patients between 2010 and 2019 were evaluated. We analyzed data regarding molecular marker status, systemic therapies, and date of progression. OS was defined as the start date of systemic therapy to the date of last follow-up or death. The Cox proportional model was used to estimate OS and PFS. Results: A total of 90 patients had ALK gene rearrangement. 16 ALK positive patients received first-generation ALK inhibitor (crizotinib), with a median age of 59.2 years, 50% of the cohort being female and 83.3% being white. Another 17 patients received second-generation (alectinib, ceritinib, brigatinib) and third-generation ALK inhibitors (lorlatinib), with a combined median age of 52.2 years and a cohort of 52.6% females and 72.2% white patients. The 5-year OS rate was 49% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 24%, 71%) for first-generation ALK inhibitors and 76% (95% CI = 40%, 92%) for second and third-generation ALK inhibitors (p-value (p) = 0.019). The median PFS (mPFS) for patients who received first-generation ALK inhibitors was 45.3 months and for those who received second or third-generation ALK inhibitors was 180.1 months. The respective 5-year PFS rate was 43% (95% CI = 19%, 65%) and 72% (95% CI = 42%, 89%). Conclusions: Newer generations of targeted therapies in NSCLCBM have improved BBB penetration and effectiveness against resistant mutations. We determined that there was a significant 5-year OS benefit in patients who received second and third-generation ALK inhibitors compared to first-generation ALK inhibitors, and a respective trend towards significant PFS benefit in newer-generation ALK inhibitors when compared to first-generation. These results are encouraging, but the effect on intracranial lesion size and response rates should be examined in the future.[Table: see text]

The population benefit of evidence-based radiotherapy: 5-Year local control and overall survival benefits

BackgroundTo describe the population benefit of radiotherapy in a high-income setting if evidence-based guidelines were routinely followed. MethodsAustralian decision tree models were utilized. Radiotherapy alone (RT) benefit was defined as the absolute proportional benefit of radiotherapy compared with no treatment for radical indications, and of radiotherapy over surgery alone for adjuvant indications. Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) benefit was the absolute incremental benefit of concurrent chemoradiotherapy over RT. Five-year local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) benefits were measured. Citation databases were systematically queried for benefit data. Meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed. Findings48% of all cancer patients have indications for radiotherapy, 34% curative and 14% palliative. RT provides 5-year LC benefit in 10.4% of all cancer patients (95% Confidence Interval 9.3, 11.8) and 5-year OS benefit in 2.4% (2.1, 2.7). CRT provides 5-year LC benefit in an additional 0.6% of all cancer patients (0.5, 0.6), and 5-year OS benefit for an additional 0.3% (0.2, 0.4). RT benefit was greatest for head and neck (LC 32%, OS 16%), and cervix (LC 33%, OS 18%). CRT LC benefit was greatest for rectum (6%) and OS for cervix (3%) and brain (3%). Sensitivity analysis confirmed a robust model. InterpretationRadiotherapy provides significant 5-year LC and OS benefits as part of evidence-based cancer care. CRT provides modest additional benefits.

MP67-01 SARCOPENIA AS A PREDICTOR OF CANCER-SPECIFIC AND OVERALL SURVIVAL AFTER RADICAL CYSTECTOMY: IS THERE A GENDER INFLUENCE?

You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Invasive IV1 Apr 2015MP67-01 SARCOPENIA AS A PREDICTOR OF CANCER-SPECIFIC AND OVERALL SURVIVAL AFTER RADICAL CYSTECTOMY: IS THERE A GENDER INFLUENCE? Ahmed Harraz, Yasser Osman, Islam Fakhreldin, Osama Mahmoud, Mona El-Deeb, Mahmoud Laymon, Ahmed Mosbah, Hassan Abol-Enein, and Atallah Shaaban Ahmed HarrazAhmed Harraz More articles by this author , Yasser OsmanYasser Osman More articles by this author , Islam FakhreldinIslam Fakhreldin More articles by this author , Osama MahmoudOsama Mahmoud More articles by this author , Mona El-DeebMona El-Deeb More articles by this author , Mahmoud LaymonMahmoud Laymon More articles by this author , Ahmed MosbahAhmed Mosbah More articles by this author , Hassan Abol-EneinHassan Abol-Enein More articles by this author , and Atallah ShaabanAtallah Shaaban More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2484AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Sarcopenia is a novel emerging predictor of mortality after cancer surgery. However, published data on the untoward effect of sarcopenia in patients with bladder cancer are few and were derived from studies with a relatively low number of patients. In addition, no previous studies has explored sarcopenia outcome stratified by gender. We evaluated sarcopenia as a predictor for cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) in a large series. METHODS A retrospective analysis of electronic database for patients underwent radical cystectomy, between January 2004 and January 2008, for muscle invasive bladder cancer was performed. Only patients with available preoperative computerized tomography scan (CT) and survival data were included. Patients with missed follow-up or those with missing data were excluded. Total psoas area (TPA) score was calculated using preoperative CT and was adjusted for the height (cm2/m2). Cut-off values for men and women were developed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and were used to investigate the impact of sarcopenia on CSS and OS by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS A total of 460 patients were included in the analysis during the specified period. The mean ± SD adjusted-TPA scores for men and women were 58.8 ± 21.5 and 37 ± 12 cm2/m2, respectively (p < 0.001). An adjusted-TPA scores ≤ 53.5 cm2/m2 and ≤ 37.4 cm2/m2 were identified as cut-off values to define sarcopenia in men and women, respectively. Men with sarcopenia showed significantly worse 5-year CSS than men without sarcopenia (66.7% vs 77.8%; p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, sarcopenia (Hazards ratio [HR]: 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-2.5; p = 0.01) was an independent predictor of 5-year CSS. Similarly, the 5-year OS was significantly worse in men with sarcopenia vs those with no sarcopenia (33.3% vs 40%; p = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, sarcopenia was an independent predictor for 5-year OS (HR: 1.3; 95%CI: 1.1-1.6; p = 0.02). On the other hand, women without sarcopenia did not show neither 5-year CSS benefit (75% vs 80%; p = 0.06) nor 5-year OS benefit (36% vs 55%; p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS Sarcopenia in men is an independent predictor of cancer-specific and overall survival after radical cystectomy. Further research would confirm sarcopenia as a useful predictor of mortality after radical cystectomy would suggest the development of new nomograms for better cancer outcome prediction. © 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 193Issue 4SApril 2015Page: e849 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2015 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ahmed Harraz More articles by this author Yasser Osman More articles by this author Islam Fakhreldin More articles by this author Osama Mahmoud More articles by this author Mona El-Deeb More articles by this author Mahmoud Laymon More articles by this author Ahmed Mosbah More articles by this author Hassan Abol-Enein More articles by this author Atallah Shaaban More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy after neoadjuvant treatment and surgery for rectal cancer.

Current guidelines support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) and surgery to treat rectal cancer, although clinical trials have provided little evidence that it is effective. We performed a systematic review of published studies to assess whether adjuvant CT improves outcome after neoadjuvant therapy and radical surgery in cases of rectal cancer. We conducted an electronic database search for randomized and nonrandomized studies in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. We then carried out a meta-analysis by using the fixed- or random-effects models. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival (OS) reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one pooled analysis of five RCTs and 10 retrospective studies that included a total of 5,457 patients matched our selection criteria. Meta-analysis showed that for rectal cancer patients treated with surgery and neoadjuvant CTRT, adjuvant CT improves 5-year OS (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.88; p = 0.006) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.6-0.83; p < 0.0001). The 5-year OS benefit was significantly larger in downstaged patients and in retrospective series. A better DFS was instead noted in all studies due to a reduced risk of local relapse. Amongst rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy and surgery, adjuvant CT seems to improve the 5-year DFS and OS rates and may be discussed with patients. However, the benefit derives mainly from retrospective evidence.