Mean 24-hour Blood Pressure Research Articles

Effects of an olmesartan medoxomil based treatment algorithm on 24-hour blood pressure control in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes

Objective:The BENIFICIARY (BENIcar safety and efFICacy evaluatIon: An open-label, single-ARm, titration study in patients with hypertension and tYpe 2 diabetes) study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes.Research design and methods:After a placebo run-in period, 192 patients received OM 20 mg/day for 3 weeks. If blood pressure (BP) remained ≥120/70 mm Hg, patients were up-titrated to OM 40 mg/day for 3 weeks and subsequently (in 3-week intervals) to OM/HCTZ 40/12.5 mg/day, then OM/HCTZ 40/25 mg/day as necessary. Blood pressure was evaluated by mean 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) from baseline to Week 12. Secondary endpoints included: change in ambulatory diastolic BP (DBP) from baseline to Week 12; changes in ambulatory SBP and DBP during daytime, nighttime, and the last 2, 4, and 6 hours of the dosing interval; and achievement of prespecified ambulatory BP targets.Clinical trials registry number:NCT00403481.Results:Mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP and DBP decreased by 20.4 mm Hg and 11.1 mm Hg, respectively (both P < 0.0001 to baseline), and 61.6%, 47.1%, and 39.0% of patients reached the ambulatory BP targets of <130/80 mm Hg, <125/75 mm Hg, and <120/80 mm Hg, respectively. The study medication was well tolerated with few adverse events: 67/192 patients (34.9%) experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) while 15/192 (7.8%) experienced a drug-related TEAE.Conclusions:In this open-label ABPM study, an OM ± HCTZ based treatment regimen safely and significantly reduced BP in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes when assessed by 24-hour ABPM.

Beneficial Effect of Efonidipine, an L- and T-Type Dual Calcium Channel Blocker, on Heart Rate and Blood Pressure in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Essential Hypertension

Background and ObjectivesEfonidipine hydrochloride, an L- and T-type dual calcium channel blocker, is suggested to have a heart rate (HR)-slowing action in addition to a blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of efonidipine on HR and BP in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.Subjects and MethodsIn a multi-center, prospective, open-labeled, single-armed study, we enrolled 53 patients who had mild-to-moderate hypertension {sitting diastolic BP (SiDBP) 90-110 mmHg}. After a 2-week washout, eligible patients were treated with efonidipine (40 mg once daily for 12 weeks). The primary end point was the change in HR from baseline to week 12. The secondary end-point included the change in trough sitting BP and 24-hour mean BP between baseline and week 12. Laboratory and clinical adverse events were monitored at each study visit (4, 8, and 12 weeks).ResultsFifty-two patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. After 12 weeks of treatment with efonidipine, the resting HR decreased significantly from baseline to week 12 {from 81.5±5.3 to 71.8±9.9 beats/minute (difference, -9.9±9.0 beats/minute), p<0.0001}. The trough BP {sitting systolic blood pressure (SiSBP) and SiDBP} and 24-hour mean BP also decreased significantly (SiSBP: from 144.6±8.2 to 132.9±13.5 mmHg, p<0.0001; SiDBP: from 96.9±5.4 to 88.3±8.6 mmHg, p<0.0001, 24-hour mean systolic BP: from 140.4±13.5 to 133.8±11.6 mmHg, p<0.0001; 24-hour mean diastolic BP: from 91.7±8.7 to 87.5±9.5 mmHg, p<0.0001).ConclusionEfonidipine was effective in controlling both HR and BP in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

Renal autoregulation in medical therapy of renovascular hypertension

IntroductionRenovascular hypertension (RVH) is caused by renal ischaemia associated with haemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis (RAS). The choice of optimal treatment of atherosclerotic RAS is still controversial. Increase in the renal resistive index (RI) value after captopril administration is considered to indicate preserved renal autoregulation. The objective of the study was to assess the effect of medical therapy of RVH on renal autoregulation efficiency in patients with atherosclerotic RAS.Material and methods19 persons (38 kidneys) in 2 groups: 1) study: with RVH and stenosis of 1 renal artery – 8 patients; 2) control: – 11 healthy volunteers. Doppler captopril test with RI measurements and estimation of creatinine clearance (CCr) were performed in both groups at baseline, and after a period of controlled medical therapy (CMT) only in the study group. ABPM was evaluated in controls at baseline, and in the study group at the end of CMT.ResultsIn the study group the mean period of CMT was 8.3 ±2.7 months, the number of antihypertensive drugs was 4.1 ±1.0, and mean 24-hour blood pressure was 138/74 mmHg. Mean CCr was stable during the study. Significant increase of RI after captopril was found only in controls. At baseline, in the group of kidneys with a non-stenotic renal artery, significant lowering of RI was observed, and ΔRI differed significantly from controls. After CMT, ΔRI increased in non-stenotic kidneys in comparison to the baseline, and did not differ from controls.ConclusionsAdequate medical therapy of RVH preserved renal function and improved renal autoregulation efficiency in non-stenotic kidneys.

The efficacy and safety of irbesartan in primary hypertension even if a dose is missed: Results from the NO PROBLEM Study

Objectives. This study aimed to demonstrate that irbesartan is successful in reducing diastolic blood pressure (BP) even following a missed dose after 6–8-weeks’ treatment as measured by 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Methods. Eighty-eight patients (64 females, mean age: 53.4 ± 10.6 years) with primary hypertension were included in this national, single-center, single-arm, open-label, prospective clinical study. Irbesartan (150 or 300 mg/day) was administered for 8 weeks. All patients were asked to cease treatment for 1 day during weeks 6–8. Changes in diastolic and mean 24-hour BP on the day of cessation and diastolic BP values during visits were efficacy parameters. Adverse events were also recorded. Results. Systolic, diastolic, and mean BP values measured via ABPM before and on the day of a missed dose did not differ significantly. Irbesartan effectively controlled BP of the patients. BP normalization rates were 54% for 150 mg/day irbesartan only and 77% for both doses (150 or 300 mg/day) of irbesartan. None of the patients experienced serious adverse events throughout the study period. Conclusions. Irbesartan is successful and safe in the control of BP levels even following a missed dose at the end of a 6–8-week treatment period.

Contribution of Endothelin 1 to the Vascular Effects of Diesel Exhaust Inhalation in Humans

Diesel exhaust inhalation impairs vascular function, and, although the underlying mechanism remains unclear, endothelin (ET) 1 and NO are potential mediators. The aim of this study was to identify whether diesel exhaust inhalation affects the vascular actions of ET-1 in humans. In a randomized, double-blind crossover study, 13 healthy male volunteers were exposed to either filtered air or dilute diesel exhaust (331+/-13 microg/m(3)). Plasma concentrations of ET-1 and big-ET-1 were determined at baseline and throughout the 24-hour study period. Bilateral forearm blood flow was measured 2 hours after the exposure during infusion of either ET-1 (5 pmol/min) or the ET(A) receptor antagonist, BQ-123 (10 nmol/min) alone and in combination with the ET(B) receptor antagonist, BQ-788 (1 nmol/min). Diesel exhaust exposure had no effect on plasma ET-1 and big-ET-1 concentrations (P>0.05 for both) or 24-hour mean blood pressure or heart rate (P>0.05 for all). ET-1 infusion increased plasma ET-1 concentrations by 58% (P<0.01) but caused vasoconstriction only after diesel exhaust exposure (-17% versus 2% after air; P<0.001). In contrast, diesel exhaust exposure reduced vasodilatation to isolated BQ-123 infusion (20% versus 59% after air; P<0.001) but had no effect on vasodilatation to combined BQ-123 and BQ-788 administration (P>0.05). Diesel exhaust inhalation increases vascular sensitivity to ET-1 and reduces vasodilatation to ET(A) receptor antagonism despite unchanged plasma ET-1 concentrations. Given the tonic interaction between the ET and NO systems, we conclude that diesel exhaust inhalation alters vascular reactivity to ET-1 probably through its effects on NO bioavailability.

The Effects of an Olmesartan Medoxomil–Based Treatment Algorithm on 24‐Hour Blood Pressure Levels in Elderly Patients Aged 65 and Older

This study examined the effect of olmesartan medoxomil (OM) +/- hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) on mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, mean seated cuff (Se) blood pressure (BP), and SeBP goal achievement in elderly (65 years and older) patients with hypertension. After a 2- to 3-week placebo run-in period, patients received OM 20 mg, up-titrated to OM 40 mg, and then added HCTZ 12.5 mg to 25 mg in a stepwise manner at 3-week intervals if SeBP remained >or=120/70 mm Hg. The primary end point was change from baseline in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP. At study end, mean 24-hour ambulatory BP had decreased by 25.7/12.3 mm Hg (n=150) and mean SeBP by 25.4/10.5 mm Hg (n=176; all P<.00001 vs baseline). Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events, most commonly dizziness (3.4%), hypotension (2.2%), and headache (1.1%), were observed in 11.8% of patients. An OM-based treatment algorithm effectively lowers BP in an elderly patient population throughout the 24-hour dosing interval without compromising tolerability.

The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Information Technology–Supported Program on Blood Pressure Control in Primary Care

Hypertension is a leading mortality risk factor yet inadequately controlled in most affected subjects. Effective programs to address this problem are lacking. We hypothesized that an information technology-supported management program could help improve blood pressure (BP) control. This randomized controlled trial included 223 primary care hypertensive subjects with mean 24-hour BP >130/80 and daytime BP >135/85 mm Hg measured with ambulatory monitoring (ABPM). Intervention subjects received a BP monitor and access to an information technology-supported adherence and BP monitoring system providing nurses, pharmacists, and physicians with monthly reports. Control subjects received usual care. The mean (+/-SD) follow-up was 348 (+/-78) and 349 (+/-84) days in the intervention and control group, respectively. The primary end point of the change in the mean 24-hour ambulatory BP was consistently greater in intervention subjects for both systolic (-11.9 versus -7.1 mm Hg; P<0.001) and diastolic BP (-6.6 versus -4.5 mm Hg; P=0.007). The proportion of subjects that achieved Canadian Guideline target BP (46.0% versus 28.6%) was also greater in the intervention group (P=0.006). We observed similar BP declines for ABPM and self-recorded home BP suggesting the latter could be an alternative for confirming BP control. The intervention was associated with more physician-driven antihypertensive dose adjustments or changes in agents (P=0.03), more antihypertensive classes at study end (P=0.007), and a trend toward improved adherence measured by prescription refills (P=0.07). This multidisciplinary information technology-supported program that provided feedback to patients and healthcare providers significantly improved blood pressure levels in a primary care setting.

Blood Pressure Lowering Effects of a New Long-Acting Inhibitor of Phosphodiesterase 5 in Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension

Inhibition of phosphodiesterase 5 is an attractive candidate mechanism for blood pressure (BP) lowering. In this study, a novel long-acting phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, PF-00489791, was evaluated in 133 patients with mild to moderate hypertension, randomized into 1 of 4 groups: placebo, 4 mg, 10 mg, and 20 mg titrated after 14 days of dosing to 40 mg. Study medication was administered once daily for 28 days. Ambulatory BP monitoring was used. There was a statistically significant decrease (compared with placebo) in mean daytime systolic BP on day 28 at the 10 and 20/40 mg doses (by approximately 5 and approximately 7 mm Hg, respectively). Changes in mean daytime diastolic BP corresponded with those in systolic BP. The magnitude of BP lowering was greater on day 1 than on days 14 and 28, but the response was sustained between days 14 and 28. PF-00489791 also exerted BP lowering effects on mean 24-hour ambulatory BP. There was a dose-related increase in plasma cGMP concentration (statistically significant at the 20/40 mg dose). There was an increased incidence of headaches at the 10 and 20/40 mg doses (22% and 21%, respectively, compared with 12% with placebo) and an increased incidence of dyspepsia/gastroesophageal reflux disease and musculoskeletal adverse events at the 20/40 mg dose. In conclusion, PF-00489791 causes a clinically meaningful and sustained BP lowering in patients with hypertension. It is generally safe and well tolerated at the clinically efficacious doses.

Age is an Independent Risk Factor for the Early Morning Blood Pressure Surge in Patients Never-Treated for Hypertension

Background and ObjectivesThe early morning blood pressure surge (EMBPS) has been reported to be associated with cardiovascular events. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) parameters and conventional cardiovascular risk factors.Subjects and MethodsPatients (n=346) never-treated for essential hypertension with no other cardiovascular risk factors, such as diabetes, dyslipidemia, and nephropathy were enrolled. The EMBPS was defined as the early morning systolic BP minus the lowest night systolic BP. We compared the 24-hour ABPM parameters in two groups divided by age (<60 and ≥60 years) and examined the association between the 24-hour ABPM parameters and cardiovascular risk factor.ResultsThe EMBPS (18±14 vs. 24±14 mmHg, p=0.002), 24-hour mean blood pressure {MBP; 102±9 vs. 105±11 mmHg, p=0.044}, and 24-hour mean pulse pressure (PP; 52±10 vs. 58±11 mmHg, p<0.001) were significantly increased in the elderly subjects compared to the younger subjects. The degree of decrease was less in the elderly subjects (10±8 vs. 7±10%, p=0.002). Based on multivariate analysis, age was an independent risk factor for the highest quartile of EMBPS (>28 mmHg) after adjusting for gender differences, body mass index, and various 24-hour ABPM parameters (odds ratio, 1.051; 95% confidence interval, 1.028-1.075; p<0.001).ConclusionAge is an independent risk factor for EMBPS in patients with never-treated hypertension. BP control in the early morning period is more important in elderly patients so as to prevent cardiovascular events.

Using Diuretics in Practice—One Opinion

Using Diuretics in Practice—One Opinion

Effect of Allopurinol on Blood Pressure of Adolescents With Newly Diagnosed Essential Hypertension

Hyperuricemia is a predictor for the development of hypertension and is commonly present in new-onset essential hypertension. Experimentally increasing uric acid levels using a uricase inhibitor causes systemic hypertension in animal models. To determine whether lowering uric acid lowers blood pressure (BP) in hyperuricemic adolescents with newly diagnosed hypertension. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial (September 2004-March 2007) involving 30 adolescents (aged 11-17 years) who had newly diagnosed, never-treated stage 1 essential hypertension and serum uric acid levels > or = 6 mg/dL. Participants were treated at the Pediatric Hypertension Clinic at Texas Children's Hospital in Houston. Patients were excluded if they had stage 2 hypertension or known renal, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal tract, hepatic, or endocrine disease. Allopurinol, 200 mg twice daily for 4 weeks, and placebo, twice daily for 4 weeks, with a 2-week washout period between treatments. The order of the treatments was randomized. Change in casual and ambulatory blood pressure. For casual BP, the mean change in systolic BP for allopurinol was -6.9 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], -4.5 to -9.3 mm Hg) vs -2.0 mm Hg (95% CI, 0.3 to -4.3 mm Hg; P = .009) for placebo, and the mean change in diastolic BP for allopurinol was -5.1 mm Hg (95% CI, -2.5 to -7.8 mm Hg) vs -2.4 (95% CI, 0.2 to -4.1; P = .05) for placebo. Mean change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP for allopurinol was -6.3 mm Hg (95% CI, -3.8 to -8.9 mm Hg) vs 0.8 mm Hg (95% CI, 3.4 to -2.9 mm Hg; P = .001) for placebo and mean 24-hour ambulatory diastolic BP for allopurinol was -4.6 mm Hg (-2.4 to -6.8 mm Hg) vs -0.3 mm Hg (95% CI, 2.3 to -2.1 mm Hg; P = .004) for placebo. Twenty of the 30 participants achieved normal BP by casual and ambulatory criteria while taking allopurinol vs 1 participant while taking placebo (P < .001). In this short-term, crossover study of adolescents with newly diagnosed hypertension, treatment with allopurinol resulted in reduction of BP. The results represent a new potential therapeutic approach, although not a fully developed therapeutic strategy due to potential adverse effects. These preliminary findings require confirmation in larger clinical trials. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00288184.

Salt Sensitivity of Children With Low Birth Weight

Compromised intrauterine fetal growth leading to low birth weight (<2500 g) is associated with adulthood renal and cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of salt intake on blood pressure (salt sensitivity) in children with low birth weight. White children (n=50; mean age: 11.3+/-2.1 years) born with low (n=35) or normal (n=15) birth weight and being either small or appropriate for gestational age (n=25 in each group) were investigated. The glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the Schwartz formula, and renal size was measured by ultrasound. Salt sensitivity was assigned if mean 24-hour blood pressure increased by >or=3 mm Hg on a high-salt diet as compared with a controlled-salt diet. Baseline office blood pressure was higher and glomerular filtration rate lower in children born with low birth weight as compared with children born at term with appropriate weight (P<0.05). Salt sensitivity was present in 37% and 47% of all of the low birth weight and small for gestational age children, respectively, higher even than healthy young adults from the same region. Kidney length and volume (both P<0.0001) were reduced in low birth weight children. Salt sensitivity inversely correlated with kidney length (r(2)=0.31; P=0.005) but not with glomerular filtration rate. We conclude that a reduced renal mass in growth-restricted children poses a risk for a lower renal function and for increased salt sensitivity. Whether the changes in renal growth are causative or are the consequence of the same abnormal "fetal programming" awaits clarification.

Managing White‐Coat Effect

Managing White‐Coat Effect

Effects of metoprolol succinate extended release vs. amlodipine besylate on the blood pressure, heart rate, and the rate-pressure product in patients with hypertension

Ambulatory monitoring of the blood pressure (BP) and heart rate allows for the assessment of the 24-hour rate-pressure product (RPP), a close correlate of myocardial oxygen demand, both in the untreated state and while on antihypertensive therapy. To evaluate the clinical effects of metoprolol succinate extended release (ER) tablets (100 mg titrated to 200 mg for clinic BP >140/90 mm Hg) vs. amlodipine (5 mg titrated to 10 mg for clinic BP >140/90 mm Hg) on the 24-hour and early morning hemodynamic parameters, we performed a double-blind crossover trial that included 8 weeks of active treatment, 4 weeks of placebo washout, and 8 weeks of active crossover treatment using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) measurements. Patients were included if they were untreated, had hypertension based on both clinic (140 to 179/90 to 109 mm Hg) and ABP recordings (>135/85 mm Hg while awake), and were 18 to 65 years of age. Patients enrolled in the trial (n = 35) had a mean age of 55 ± 7 years, 24-hour mean BP of 148/91 ± 11/7 mm Hg, heart rate (HR) of 76 ± 10 beats/minute, and a RPP of 11,230 ± 1717 mm Hg·beats·minute). In the early morning period (6 am to 10 am), baseline BP was 155/98 ± 11/7 mm Hg and the RPP was 12,084 ± 1752 mm Hg·beats·minute. The 24-hour diastolic blood pressure (DBP), HR, and RPP were lowered to a greater extent by metoprolol succinate compared with amlodipine. Additionally, changes from baseline in early morning DBP, HF, and RPP were lowered to a significantly greater extent by metoprolol (mean dose, 124 ± 44 mg daily) compared with amlodipine (mean dose, 7.2 ± 2.5 mg daily) ( P = .02 for DBP and P < .0001 for HR and the RPP). The incident rates of adverse events were low and similar for the two treatment groups. These data demonstrate that metoprolol succinate ER induced greater reductions in early morning BP, HR, and FPP than amlodipine in middle-aged patients with Stages 1 and 2 hypertension. These findings have clinical implications for patients with hypertension and coronary heart disease.

How Well Does a Shortened Time Interval Characterize Results of a Full Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Session?

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is useful in evaluating cardiovascular risk but requires significant time. The authors examined how closely shortened time intervals correlate with the systolic blood pressure (BP) determined from a full 24-hour ABPM session in 1004 ABPM recordings. After excluding the first hour, Pearson correlations performed for the mean systolic BP of the subsequent 3-, 5-, and 7-hour periods (4, 6, and 8 hours total) with the entire, and remainder of the session, demonstrated greatest improvement in correlation when the session is increased from 4 to 6 hours. Bland-Altman analysis of the 6-hour time period revealed a mean difference of 5.41 mm Hg compared with the full session mean. The authors conclude that 6-hour ABPM can approximate the overall mean BP obtained from full 24-hour ABPM. However, shortened sessions do not characterize the influence of circadian variation on the 24-hour mean BP and may overestimate the 24-hour BP levels.

Effect of Sitagliptin, a Dipeptidyl Peptidase‐4 Inhibitor, on Blood Pressure in Nondiabetic Patients With Mild to Moderate Hypertension

The effect of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, on ambulatory blood pressure was assessed in nondiabetic patients with mild to moderate hypertension in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-period crossover study. Nineteen patients on stable treatment with antihypertensive agent(s) received sitagliptin 100 mg b.i.d., 50 mg b.i.d., or placebo for 5 days, with at least a 7-day washout interval between periods. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure, including systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure, were monitored on days 1 and 5. Relative to placebo on day 1, the mean difference in 24-hour systolic blood pressure was -0.9 mm Hg (90% confidence interval: -2.9 to 1.1; P = .46) with sitagliptin 50 mg b.i.d. and -2.8 mm Hg (90% confidence interval: -4.9 to -0.8; P < .05) with 100 mg b.i.d. On day 5, the mean difference in 24-hour systolic blood pressure was -2.0 mm Hg (90% confidence interval: -3.5 to -0.4; P < .05) with 50 mg b.i.d. and -2.2 mm Hg (90% confidence interval: -3.7 to -0.6; P < .05) with 100 mg b.i.d. relative to placebo. For 24-hour diastolic blood pressure, there were no between-group differences in mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressure on day 1. On day 5, sitagliptin 50 mg and 100 mg b.i.d significantly (P < .05) lowered mean 24-hour diastolic blood pressure by -1.8 mm Hg (90% confidence interval: -2.8 to -0.8) and -1.6 mm Hg (90% confidence interval: -2.6 to -0.7), respectively, relative to placebo. Sitagliptin produced small but statistically significant reductions of 2 mm Hg to 3 mm Hg in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements acutely (day 1) and at steady state (day 5), and was generally well tolerated in nondiabetic patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Involvement of Carotid Baroreceptor Function in Blood Pressure Control in the Chronic Phase: Effect on 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure

Background. It is generally thought that the sole function of baroreceptors is for the regulation of rapid blood pressure fluctuations caused by postural changes and other motion. However, recent studies have suggested that baroreceptors may also be involved in blood pressure control in the chronic phase. Purpose.The study was performed to examine the involvement of carotid baroreceptors in blood pressure control in the chronic phase, through determination of the relationship between 24-hour blood pressure data and carotid baroreceptor function. Methods.Ambulatory blood pressure, ECG, and the number of steps during exercise were measured every 15 minutes with an ambulatory blood pressure monitor and a 24-hour Holter ECG fitted with an accelerometer (Cardy-II-p, Suzuken KK, Japan). In addition, the dependence of blood pressure on autonomic nerve activity and exercise was analyzed based on the frequency of the RR interval. Patients were divided into three groups based on different blood-pressure types: autonomic nerve-dependent, exercise-dependent, and independent types. Carotid baroreceptor function was evaluated using the sequence method; subjects adopted a supine position on a tilt table and their arterial pressure was monitored continuously using a Finapress finger cuff (Finapress, Ohmeda, Louisville, Colorado, USA). The study was performed in 90 patients, including 42 with essential hypertension whose blood pressure was well controlled. Results and Conclusions.A significant negative correlation was found between the mean 24-hour blood pressure and baroreceptor function for both systolic and diastolic pressure. Systolic pressure in patients of the independent type was significantly higher than that in patients of the exercise-dependent type. Furthermore, non-dipper hypertension was noted more frequently and baroreceptor function was significantly lower in independent-type patients, compared with autonomic nerve-dependent and exercise-dependent types, suggesting that independent-type blood pressure may be due to baroreceptor dysfunction. In conclusion, our results suggest that baroreceptor function might be involved in blood pressure control in the chronic phase, and baroreceptor dysfunction may contribute to the development of essential hypertension.

Brain Microbleeds Are Associated With Ambulatory Blood Pressure Levels in a Hypertensive Population

Brain microbleeds, indicative of cerebral small-vessel disease, may occur with increased frequency in patients with hypertension. However, little is known about the relation of these abnormalities with blood pressure levels. We assessed the relation between ambulatory measured blood pressure and the presence of microbleeds in a cohort of hypertensive patients without a history of cerebrovascular disease. A total of 218 participants (110 males, age 52.5+/-12.6 years) underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring twice (off-medication) and brain MRI to detect microbleeds and coexisting white matter hyperintensities. We performed logistic regression analyses to relate the following blood pressure components (based on both recordings) to microbleeds: the mean 24-hour, awake, and asleep blood pressures; nocturnal hypertension (asleep pressure >or=120/70 mm Hg); nocturnal blood pressure dipping. Models were adjusted for age and sex, and additionally for cardiovascular risk factors and white matter hyperintensities. We detected microbleeds in 35 participants (16.1%; 95% confidence interval, 11.1% to 21.0%). On average, each standard deviation increment in blood pressure, whether 24-hour, awake, or asleep, was significantly and independently associated with a 1.8- to 1.9-fold higher likelihood for microbleeds (all models P<0.05). Similarly, the adjusted odds ratio for microbleeds was 5- to 6-fold higher in subjects diagnosed with nocturnal hypertension (all models P<0.05). Microbleeds were not associated with nocturnal dipping. In conclusion, brain microbleeds are frequently found in hypertensive patients without a history of cerebrovascular disease, and are independently associated with higher daytime as well as night-time blood pressure levels.

Trimetazidine added to combined hemodynamic antianginal therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized crossover trial

In nondiabetic patients with stable angina, combined treatment with hemodynamic agents and trimetazidine is well-tolerated and effective in controlling ischemia. This study aims to evaluate the antiischemic and metabolic effects of trimetazidine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, not eligible for revascularization, who remained symptomatic despite the use of at least 2 antianginal agents. A randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial was used. Ten patients were randomized to receive trimetazidine (20 mg, 3 times a day) or placebo for 6-week periods. At baseline and at the end of each 6-week intervention period, clinical and biochemical evaluations, exercise testing, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure, and Holter monitoring were performed. During trimetazidine therapy, patients had significant improvement on angina functional class (P < .05), with decrease in the number of weekly angina episodes (1.5 +/- 0.8 vs 0.4 +/- 0.7, P < .01), and in sublingual nitrate doses (1.4 +/- 0.7 mg vs 0.1 +/- 0.3 mg, P < .001). Time to 1-mm ST-segment depression during exercise test was increased after trimetazidine use (229 +/- 126 seconds at baseline, 276 +/- 101 seconds after placebo, and 348 +/- 145 seconds after trimetazidine, P < .001). No differences were observed between treatment periods on mean 24-hour blood pressure, heart rate, and rate-pressure product evaluated concomitantly with ambulatory blood pressure and Holter monitoring. Glycemic and lipid profiles were similar after trimetazidine and placebo use. In patients with diabetes who remain symptomatic, the addition of trimetazidine improves symptoms and exercise responses without hemodynamic or metabolic changes. The present data suggest that trimetazidine may be an effective adjunct therapy for these patients, but further investigation is needed to confirm these findings.

The Impact of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Blood Pressure in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) might lower blood pressure, but evidence from clinical studies is inconsistent, perhaps as a result of small sample size or heterogeneity in study design. This study aimed to assess whether CPAP reduces ambulatory blood pressure in patients with OSAS, to quantify the effect size with precision, and to identify trial characteristics associated with the greatest blood pressure reductions. We identified randomized controlled trials of CPAP vs placebo in patients with OSAS specifically reporting 24-hour ambulatory mean blood pressure (MBP). We included a total of 572 patients from 12 randomized controlled trials. According to a random-effects model, the pooled estimate of the effect of the CPAP intervention was a net decrease of 1.69 mm Hg in 24-hour MBP (95% confidence interval, -2.69 to -0.69). Statistical heterogeneity was moderate (I(2) = 41%). Predefined metaregression analyses estimated that 24-hour MBP would decrease by 0.89 mm Hg per 10-point increase in apnea-hypopnea index at entry (P = .006), by 0.74 mm Hg for each increase of 10 arousal events per hour slept (P = .008), and by 1.39 mm Hg for each 1-hour increase in effective nightly use of the CPAP device (P = .01). Among patients with OSAS, CPAP reduces 24-hour ambulatory MBP, with greater treatment-related reductions in ambulatory MBP among patients with a more severe degree of OSAS and a better effective nightly use of the CPAP device. These reductions in blood pressure are likely to contribute to a better prognosis in terms of adverse cardiovascular events.