2-year Non-relapse Mortality Research Articles

Alternative Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult with Hematological Diseases

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only potential curative option for many advanced hematologic diseases. Pediatrics, adolescent and young adult (PAYA) patients overall have less pre-HCT comorbidity or organ toxicity and lower transplant related morbidity and mortality risk compared to older adults. As such, a higher percentage of patients in this age group tend to receive myeloablative conditioning (MAC) over non-myeloablative regimens. Current alternative donor sources when a matched sibling donor (MSD) is not available include matched unrelated (MUD), umbilical cord blood (UCB), and haploidentical (Haplo) donors. While there are accumulating data comparing the HCT outcomes between MUD vs. Haplo or UCB in adult patients, the data are sparse in PAYA patients. In this retrospective study, we reviewed 314 consecutive patients aged 1-39 years who underwent their first allogeneic HCT using MAC at City of Hope between 1/2005-7/2018. Patients who received HCT from a matched sibling donor were excluded. Patients received HCT from either an 8/8 HLA MUD (n=196 [BM= 27%, PBSC= 73%]), UCB (n=83 [single: n=30, double: n=53]) or Haplo (n=35) donor. The most used MAC regimens were fractionated total body irradiation-based (n=234, 74%). All Haplo recipients got post-HCT cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as GVHD prophylaxis. To adjust for the difference in transplant era between UCB (predominantly performed in earlier years) and Haplo (carried out predominantly in more recent years) the comparative analyses were focused on Haplo or UCB vs. MUD. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the impact of patient, disease, and treatment factors on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), relapse/progression (RP), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Median age of patients at the time of HCT was 24 years (range: 0.7-39), with 55% of patients being male. KPS was ≥80% in 88% of the patients and 25% had HCT-CI ≥ 2. The most common diagnoses included: ALL (48%), AML (41%), and MDS/CML (11%). DRI was high/very high in 44% of patients. Groups were balanced in general but patients in the Haplo group had higher HCT-CI (median: 2, p<0.01), more frequently had high/very high disease risk (49%, p<0.01) and higher KPS ≥80% (77%, p<0.01). Neutrophil engraftment was achieved at a median of 23 days (range: 10-94) in the UCB, 16 days (range: 12-32) in the Haplo and 15 days (range: 10-33) in the MUD (p<0.01). After a median follow up duration of 36 months (range: 5.9-36), 3-year OS was inferior among recipients of UCB-HCT (53%, 95% CI: 42-63) compared with the MUD (63%, 95% CI: 56-70; p=0.03), while similar between Haplo (62%, 95% CI:41-78) and MUD (p=0.82). The lower OS in UCB group was primarily due to the significantly higher NRM at 3 years (34%, 95% CI: 24-44) compared with the MUD (16%, 95%CI: 11-22, p<0.01); and 3-year NRM was not significantly different between Haplo (18%,95%CI: 6-34) and MUD (p= 0.99). On the contrary, the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) at 3 years was significantly lower in the UCB group (14%, 95%CI: 8-24) compared to MUD (29%, 95%CI: 23-36, p=0.01); the difference in CIR was not significant between Haplo (29%, 95% CI: 16-51) and MUD (p=0.81). PFS at 3 years was not significantly different among the three donor groups (p=0.43). Cumulative incidence of day 100 acute GvHD grade 2-4 was 61% (95% CI: 55-66) in the whole cohort, with no significant difference among the three groups (p=0.27). Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 3 years was higher in the MUD group (66%: 95%CI: 59-72) compared to UCB (45%, 95%CI: 34-56, P<0.01) and Haplo (47%, 95% CI: 28-64, P=0.01). By multivariable analysis, patients with high/very high disease risk had worse OS (HR=1.8, 95% CI: 1.2-2.6, p<0.01) and PFS (HR=1.8, 95% CI: 1.3-2.5, p<0.01) and higher R/P (HR=2.3, 95% CI: 1.4-3.6, p<0.01). Neither Cord nor Haplo was significantly associated with OS compared with MUD when adjusted for Age, HCT CI, DRI, KPS, and HCT Era. In conclusion, our results indicated that in PAYA patients without a suitable MSD, outcomes of Haplo HCT are comparable to MUD HCT. By univariate analysis, UCB HCT was associated with a lower relapse rate compared to MUD. However, survival was worse in recipients of UCB HCT due to the higher NRM, possibly resulted from more infections and engraftment delays in these patients. Figure 1 Disclosures Ali: Incyte Corporation: Consultancy. Nakamura:Viracor: Consultancy; Kadmon Corporation: Other: Advisory board meeting; NapaJen Pharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Other: Support on seminar; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Advisory board meeting; Alexion: Other: Support on a meeting presentation; Merck: Other: advisory board meeting; Kyowa-Kirin: Other: Support on a meeting presentation. Al Malki:Jazz Pharmacuticals, Inc: Consultancy; Neximmune: Consultancy; Rigel Pharma: Consultancy.

Survival Trends in Multiple Myeloma after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Survival Trends in Multiple Myeloma after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Improvement in Non-Relapse Mortality Following Allogeneic Transplantation for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia in Australia and New Zealand: An Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry Study

Background The treatment landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) has significantly changed over the past decade with the advent of targeted therapies. Subsequent improvement in remission rates has been seen in all patient groups, however patients with high-risk genetic features (del17p, TP53 mutation) continue to have poorer outcomes. In such patients, and in multiply relapsed/refractory standard risk patients, allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains a viable management option despite the associated morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to examine trends in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for CLL in Australia and New Zealand over the past decade, and to identify predictive factors for overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Methods Data was collected through the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry (ABMTRR) for patients receiving a first allogeneic stem cell transplantation for CLL, in the absence of Richter's transformation, between January 2009 and December 2018. Transplant outcomes were compared between 2 time periods, 2009-2013 and 2014-2018 using log rank test for survival and Gray's test for cumulative incidence curves. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors predictive of survival. Medians are reported with ranges, hazard ratios (HR) and cumulative incidence with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results A total of 153 patients (75% males) were included. Median age at transplantation was 55 years (range 23-69) with a median time from diagnosis to transplantation of 5.7 years (range 100days - 24.7years). Most patients received reduced intensity or non-myeloablative conditioning (84.3%, n=129) and did not receive T cell depleting therapy (73%, n=94). The median follow up was 5.9 years (range 0.8-11years). Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 16 days (range 6-49) and median time to platelet engraftment was 18 days (range 1-69). At 100 days following transplantation the cumulative incidence of graft failure was 3.9%, CMV reactivation 41% (95% CI 31-50%) and CMV disease 3.2% (95% CI 1-8%). Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) grade II-IV occurred in 39% (95% CI 29-49%) of patients and grade III-IV in 17% (95% CI 9-25%). The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 65% (95% CI 53-76%) at 5 years; extensive cGVHD occurred in 77% of patients with cGVHD. Median OS was 4.3 years (95% CI 3.6-not reached) and PFS was 2.6 years (95% CI 1.7-3.9). The most common contributors to mortality were infection (43%), GVHD (40%) and persistent disease or relapse (24%). In a multivariate analysis active disease at time of transplantation was associated with a worse OS (HR 2.16, 1.01-4.63), however, age, matched sibling donor, myeloablative conditioning and the use of T cell depleting therapies did not have a significant impact. The use of myeloablative conditioning was associated with improved PFS (HR 1.85, 1.1-3.1) in a univariate analysis but lost significance in multivariate analysis. Ninety-seven patients underwent transplantation between 2009-2013 and 56 patients between 2014-2018. There was no statistical difference in patient age, performance status, donor or disease status at transplantation between the groups. Myeloablative conditioning was used in 18.6% and 8.9% (p=0.197), and T cell depleting therapy in 25% and 31% (p=0.58), for the 2009-2013 and 2014-2018 periods respectively. There was a significant improvement in 5-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) from 41.5% (31-52%) to 23.4% (13-29%; p=0.04). Five year OS (46% vs 56%), PFS (36% vs 46%) and relapse rates (21% vs 31%) were not statistically different. Cumulative incidence of both acute and chronic GVHD was reduced in the later cohort; aGVHD 51% (95% CI 34-65%) vs 29% (95% CI 16-43%; p=0.03), cGVHD 76% (95% CI 57-88%) vs 53% (36-66%; p=0.02). Kaplan-meier and cumulative incidence curves for these outcomes are presented in figure 1. Conclusion The number of allogeneic stem cell transplantations performed for CLL has reduced over the past decade in Australasia. There has been an improvement in NRM and incidence of GVHD, however OS and PFS have not significantly changed. This may reflect improved GVHD prophylaxis and management, or advances in supportive care. Further analysis of impact of high-risk genetic factors at transplantation is pending at the time of abstract submission. Figure Disclosures Spencer: Celgene, Janssen and Takeda: Speakers Bureau; AbbVie, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Sanofi, SecuraBio, Specialised Therapeutics Australia, Servier and Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Servier and Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, Sanofi, SecuraBio, Specialised Therapeutics Australia, Servier and Takeda: Honoraria. Greenwood:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Tam:AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; BeiGene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Di Ciaccio:Jansen: Honoraria, Other: travel and accomodation grant. Hamad:Novartis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria.

Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation with or without Inotuzumab Ozogamicin for Lymphoid Malignancies

Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation with or without Inotuzumab Ozogamicin for Lymphoid Malignancies

Outcome predictors after retransplantation in relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a multicenter, retrospective study.

Retransplantation is the only curative treatment option for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) that has relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT); however, data in this setting remain scant. Hence, this multicenter, retrospective study aims to determine outcome predictors after retransplantation in relapsed ALL. We examined 55 recipients who underwent multiple allo-HCTs during 2006-2018. The 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and non-relapse mortality rates were 35.9%, 29.1%, and 23.6%, respectively. We observed a trend of better outcome in Ph + ALL (n= 22) patients compared with non-Ph ALL (n = 33) patients; the 2-year PFS was 40.9% versus 21.2%, indicating a beneficial effect of more potent second- or third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Univariate analysis revealed that late relapse after the previous transplant was the only significant predictor of better transplant outcome among Ph + ALL patients, whereas factors related to prolonged OS/PFS in non-Ph ALL patients were late relapse after the previous transplant, longer duration from disease relapse/progression to second or more allo-HCT, disease status at the transplantation, and good performance status. Nevertheless, further investigations are warranted to determine whether novel molecular-targeted agents with higher efficacy and fewer toxicities could exceed conventional chemotherapies as a bridging strategy to next allo-HCT and improve the outcomes of non-Ph ALL patients.

Outcomes in Patients with AL (Light-Chain) Cardiac Amyloidosis

Outcomes in Patients with AL (Light-Chain) Cardiac Amyloidosis

Citrulline Trajectory during Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Is Correlated to Conditioning Intensity and Non-Relapse Mortality

Introduction Citrulline, a non-essential amino acid produced exclusively by enterocytes in the small intestine and involved in the synthesis of L-arginine, is not metabolized by the liver. Therefore citrulline serum concentration is highly correlated with functional enterocyte mass, and decreases with digestive toxicity induced by conditioning therapy (radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy) for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) . Acute Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), one of the major complications of HSCT, is correlated to conditioning-induced gut barrier damage and may be predicted by pre-transplant serum citrulline level (Rashidi, BBMT 2018). It could be interesting to know whether citrulline kinetics could also represent a biomarker for conditioning toxicity, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and GvHD. The aim of this study is thus to define group-based trajectory modeling, to identify clusters of individual serum citrulline kinetics in the early phase of allogeneic HCST, and to test whether these unsupervised trajectories were correlated with these early complications. Materials and Methods Serum citrulline was quantified by liquid chromatography in blood samples collected from consecutive patients who received an allogeneic HSCT in our institution between July 2014 and November 2019. These samples were drawn at different time-points: pre-transplant (D-7, D-3); day of transplant (D0), and post-transplant (D7, D15, D21). Distinct trajectories were identified for serum citrulline by using the semiparametric mixture model described by Nagin (Nagin, Stat Methods Med Res 2018). Results Among 161 patients (pts) included in the study, with a median age of 53 years (17-72), 98 pts (60.9%) received a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), 36 pts (22.4%) reduced-toxicity conditioning (RTC), 18 pts (11.1 %) sequential conditioning, and 9 pts (5.6%) myeloablative conditioning (MAC). Donor were identical sibling (22%), matched unrelated donor (52%) and haploidentical sibling (25%). Graft source was peripheral blood mononuclear cells in 144 pts (89.4%) and bone marrow in 17 pts (10.6%) respectively. HCT-CI score was low, intermediate and high-risk in 38%, 32%, and 30% of pts respectively. Disease-Risk Index (DRI) was low/intermediate in 111 pts (69%) and high/very-high in 50 pts (31%). With a median follow up of 29.1 month, 3-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and NRM rates were 64.5%, 58.3%, and 18.9%, respectively. The median number of citrulline samples per patient was 7 [3-16]. Median citrulline concentrations before conditioning and at D-3, D0, D7 and D15 were statistically different during RIC, RTC, MAC, and sequential conditioning (p<0,001 respectively) but was not different at D21 (p=0.296). In the whole cohort, 3 citrulline trajectories were determined in an unsupervised method. Patients belonging to these 3 trajectories were different according to intensity of conditioning received with lower citrulline trajectories during MAC and sequential conditioning (p<0.001). In the uper citrulline trajectorie, pts were significantly older (p=0.005). However, citrulline trajectories were not correlated to OS (p = 0.1), NRM (p=0.24), cumulative incidence of acute GvHD (p=0.39) or chronic GvHD (p=0.2). After restricting the analysis to pts who received RIC conditioning (n=98), higher pre-HSCT citrulline concentrations were associated with a lower NRM (p=0.042). Unsupervised analysis in this setting individualized 4 clusters of individual trajectories (figure 1), that did neither distinguish age (p=0.28), DRI (p=0.87), HCT-CI score (p=0.81) nor the incidence of acute (p=0.6) or chronic (p=0.4) GvHD. However, the lowest citrulline trajectory contained significantly more haploidentical transplantations (p=0.004) and less pts who received antithymocyte globulin for GvHD prophylaxis (p=0.005). Interestingly in this RIC cohort, cumulative incidence of NRM at 12 months was 23%, 21%, 8%, and 0% respectively according to the 4 citrulline trajectories (figure 2). Conclusion In patients receiving allogeneic HSCT, the variation of serum citrulline concentrations depends on the intensity of the conditioning regimen. In patients who received RIC conditioning, lower plasma citrulline trajectories are associated with higher NRM. In this setting, citrulline may be an attractive biomarker for predicting conditioning toxicity and NRM. Disclosures Hunault: Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Diachi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jansen: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thepot:astellas: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; sanofi: Honoraria; celgene: Honoraria.

Impact of Donor Search Strategy for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from Haploidentical or Matched Unrelated Donor for Patients Older Than 55 Years with Hematological Malignancies: Randomized Prospective Phase III Study

Impact of Donor Search Strategy for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from Haploidentical or Matched Unrelated Donor for Patients Older Than 55 Years with Hematological Malignancies: Randomized Prospective Phase III Study

High Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

High Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Values of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index, Comorbidity/Age Index and Augmented Comorbidity/Age Index in Recipients of Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation Using Ptcy As Gvhd Prophylaxis: A Retrospective Study of 223 Cases

Introduction: Pre-transplant comorbidities, which may impact the success of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (AlloSCT) can be appreciated through 3 different scoring systems. The Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) allows to predict non-relapse mortality (NRM) and survival (Sorror, Blood 2005). Its prognostic value was further augmented by the addition of donor age (< vs ≥40 yo) (Comorbidity/Age index, C/AI, Sorror, JCO 2014) then of pre-transplant ferritin (< or >2500 µg/L) and albumin (<3 g/dL vs 3-3.5 g/dL vs >3.5g/dL) serum levels as well as platelet count (< vs >100 109/L) (Augmented Comorbidity/Age index, AC/AI, Elsawy, BBMT 2019). The performance of these 3 scores has not been evaluated in haploASCT using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY), a procedure in constant expansion worldwide. Material and Methods: We studied retrospectively the impact on non-relapse mortality (NRM), overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival of the 3 comorbidity scores on a cohort of 223 patients (pts) having received a haploSCT with PTCY. All pts had pre-transplant ferritin and albumin levels and platelet counts available. These parameters were evaluated at the time of the pre-transplant check-up or just before conditioning (median from transplant: 20 days, range: 4-49). Results: Pts were recruited in 4 French centers (Nantes n=127; Angers n=45; Besançon n=29, Brest n=22). They had received haploSCT between October 2013 and January 2020. There were 136 males and 87 females with a median age of 55 yo (16-71, >40 years n=172). The majority of pts had a myeloid disease (n=157) and received a reduced intensity regimen (n=161, myeloablative n=30; sequential n=32). Respectively, 132 and 91 pts had low/intermediate and high/very-high Disease-Risk Index (DRI). All pts received PTCY, cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetyl as graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Donors had a median age of 40.8 years (19.4-71.7). Median HCT-CI, C/AI and AC/AI scores were 2 (0-8), 3 (0-9) and 3 (0-11), respectively. The HCT-CI score was <2 in 139 patients, CA/I was <3, 3-4 and >5 in 110, 83 and 30 pts, respectively, while the AC/AI score was <4 in 112 cases. With a median follow-up for alive patients of 35.6 months (6-77), 3-year OS, DFS and NRM were 47.8+3%, 46+3% and 29.4+6%, respectively. In univariate analysis, better 3-year OS and DFS were associated with lymphoid diseases (OS: 60.4+6% vs 42.3+4%, p=0.02; DFS: 56.2+6% vs 41.6+4%, p=0.04), low/intermediate DRI (OS: 59.1+4% vs 30.1+7%, p<0.001; DFS: 56.3+4% vs 31.1+5% p<0.001), donor age <40 years (OS: 58.1+4% vs 36.2+5% p=0.004; DFS: 55.4+4% vs 35.7+4% p=0.01), and albumin level (<3g/dL OS: 33.3+12% vs 3-3.5g/dL 46.1+8% vs >3.5g/dL 50.1+4%, p=0.03; <3g/dL DFS: 30+12% vs 3-3.5g/dL 44.5+8% vs >3.5g/dL 47.4+3%, p=0.05). OS and DFS were not impacted by ferritin levels, platelet count, recipient age, gender, nor any of the 3 comorbidity scores. A lower 3-year NRM was observed in younger pts (<55 yo) (21.8% vs 36.8%, p=0.02) and in those with a younger donor (<40 yo) (20.5% vs 39.2%, p=0.003). NRM was not associated with gender, type of disease, DRI, ferritin, albumin, platelet counts nor any of the 3 comorbidity scores. In multivariate analysis, each comorbidity score was compared to DRI, donor and patient age, type of disease and pre-transplant albumin levels. DRI and donor age remained associated with OS and DFS. This was also the case for recipient age, except when considering a high C/AI index score. Finally, an older age of recipients and donors remained associated with higher NRM. Conclusion: HCT-CI, C/AI and AC/AI do not to predict survivals nor NRM in haploSCT with PTCY, suggesting that pre-transplant comorbidities should not be a contra-indication to this procedure. As donor age is the only factor predicting survivals and NRM in this series, while multiple donors are generally available in the haploSCT setting, the selection of a younger donor should be the rule whenever possible for all patients. Disclosures Hunault: Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Diachi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jansen: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Deconinck:ImmunoGen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Stemline: Consultancy. Thepot:astellas: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; sanofi: Honoraria; celgene: Honoraria. Le Gouill:Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Consultancy; Roche Genentech, Janssen-Cilag and Abbvie, Celgene, Jazz pharmaceutical, Gilead-kite, Loxo, Daiichi-Sankyo and Servier: Honoraria. Chevallier:Incyte Corporation: Honoraria.

Autologous Vs. Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Double-Expressor Lymphoma

Purpose: Dual expression of MYC and BCL2 proteins (Double Expressor Lymphoma-[DEL]) is an important prognostic factor in patients (pts) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are treated with standard chemo-immunotherapy. Studies have suggested that pts with these biomarkers have inferior survival compared to pts who were non-DEL after autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT). For this reason, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) has been advocated for its potential graft-versus-lymphoma effect. Data are limited however regarding the outcomes in pts with relapsed DEL who were treated with autoSCT vs. alloSCT. Methods: Data from pts with relapsed DEL/DLBCL who underwent auto- and alloSCT as their first transplant at our center and in whom archived tumor material was available were analyzed. Cutoff values of 40% for MYC and 70% for BCL2 were established by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The majority of autoSCT pts (84%) underwent chemo-mobilization of stem cells with rituximab (R) for in-vivo purging; rituximab was also given on days+1 and +8 with BEAM conditioning (J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:2240-7; Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24:2304-11). Conditioning for the alloSCT was myeloablative (n=16, 50%), reduced-intensity (n=6, 19%), and nonmyelablative (n=10,31%). The study was IRB-approved at our center. Kaplan-Meier analysis and corresponding log-rank/Gray's tests were used to estimate and compare overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cumulative incidence (CI) of non-relapse mortality and relapse by SCT group. Standard multivariable Cox regression was used to evaluate associations between SCT type and OS/PFS after controlling for differences in baseline characteristics and cause-specific multivariable Cox regression was used for competing-risk outcomes [non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse]. Results: The study included 161 autoSCT and 32 alloSCT pts treated between 2000-2018. Median age was 59 (range,18-80) and 55 years (range, 21-66), respectively (P=0.009). Male gender was 62.7 vs 50.0%, respectively (P= 0.234). Fifty-one (32.5%) autoSCT pts and 9 (28.1%) alloSCT pts had an elevated serum LDH (P= 0.683) and 41/148 (27.7%) autoSCT and 11/25 (44.0%) alloSCT pts were PET-positive at study entry (P=0.106). The time from diagnosis to transplant was 20.0 and 25.2 months, respectively, (P=0.068), and the distribution of the years of transplant was similar between both groups (P=0.317). Significant differences between treatment groups were observed for prior number of chemotherapies, disease status, stage, and HCT-CI score at transplant. Pts. receiving alloSCT were more heavily pretreated [median 3 prior therapies, (range 1-8) vs. a median of 2, (range 1-6); P=0.0001], had more advanced stage III-IV disease (P=0.035), and more refractory disease (P=0.010) at transplant. In addition, a higher percentage of alloSCT pts had an HCT-CI of >4 (28.1% vs. 10.2%, P=0.018) at study entry. Allogeneic transplant characteristics included matched siblings (n=18; 56.3%), matched unrelated (n=13, 40.6%) and haplo-identical (n=1, 3.1%) donors. With a median follow-up for autoSCT surviving pts of 65 months (range, 5-217 months) and 93 months (range, 34--124 months) for alloSCT pts, the OS at 5-years were 59% and 34%, respectively (P= 0.0001) (Figure1). The PFS rates at 5-years were 49% and 31%, respectively (P = 0.002). AutoSCT had a similar rate of relapse to alloSCT but a lower rate of NRM. The 5-year CI of relapse was 37% vs 28%, respectively (P = 0.611) and the 5-year NRM rates were 14% vs 41 % (P=0.0001), respectively (Figure 2). The associations between SCT group and outcomes persisted after adjusting for differences between groups (alloSCT vs. autoSCT HR= 3.46/p=0.0004 for OS; HR=2.67/p=0.005 for PFS; HR=4.74/p=0.009 for NRM; HR=2.22/p=0.080 for relapse). The 100-day CI of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD in the alloSCT group was 37.5 and 9.4%, respectively. The 1-year CI of chronic GVHD was 25.0%. C onclusions: This study is the first to show that autoSCT confers a superior survival in pts with relapsed DEL/DLBCL compared to alloSCT. Our conclusions are supported by long-term follow-up. The use of novel nonmyeloablative regimens in a larger number of pts receiving an alloSCT and ongoing studies at our center with targeted investigational agents after autoSCT may improve results. Disclosures Khouri: Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Iyer:CRISPR: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Curio Biosciences: Honoraria; Target Oncology: Honoraria; Afffimed: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Legend Biotech: Consultancy; Rhizen: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Popat:Bayer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Qazilbash:Angiocrine: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Bioclinica: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding. Champlin:DKMS America: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinium: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Cytonus: Consultancy; Takeda: Patents & Royalties; Genzyme: Speakers Bureau.

FLAMSA-Based Reduced-Intensity Conditioning versus Myeloablative Conditioning in Younger Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Active Disease at the Time of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: An Analysis from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

The use of myeloablative conditioning (MAC) in the setting of active relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been hindered by high historical rates of nonrelapse mortality (NRM). FLAMSA (fludarabine, Ara-C, and amsacrine) chemotherapy (CT) followed by reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) has been proposed as an effective and potentially safer alternative in this scenario. As improvements in supportive care have contributed to decreasing NRM rates after MAC, a comparative reassessment of these two strategies was performed. This was a registry-based analysis by the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Eligibility criteria included age 18 to 50 years, primary refractory, first or second relapsed active AML, first allogeneic stem cell transplantation from a matched sibling donor (MSD) or an unrelated donor (UD) performed between 2005 and 2018, MAC or FLAMSA-RIC. A total of 1018 patients were included. The median patient age was 39 years (range, 18 to 50). Two hundred and fifty-eight patients received busulfan (Bu)/cyclophosphamide (Cy), 314 received Cy/total body irradiation (TBI), 318 received FLAMSA-TBI, and 128 received FLAMSA-CT. The median duration of follow-up was 50 months. In univariate analysis, the 2-year relapse incidence (RI) (54%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 50%-57%), leukemia-free survival (LFS) (30%; 95% CI, 27%-33%), and refined graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) (21%; 95% CI, 18%-24%) were not significantly different between cohorts. Lower 2-year NRM was observed in the FLAMSA-CT group (7% versus 16% in Bu/Cy, 19% in Cy/TBI, and 18% in FLAMSA-TBI; P=.04), as well as increased 2-year overall survival (OS) (50% versus 33% in Bu/Cy, 34% in Cy/TBI, and 36% in FLAMSA-TBI; P=.03). These results were maintained in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] for NRM: .40, P=.01; HR for OS: .65, P=.01; Bu/Cy as reference). These data suggest that FLAMSA-CT may be a preferred conditioning regimen in patients with active R/R AML due to lower NRM. Yet, the high relapse rates observed in our analyses emphasize the need for novel therapeutic strategies in this clinical setting.

“Real World” Australian Experience of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) in Adults with Severe Aplastic Anaemia.

Acquired Severe Aplastic Anaemia (SAA) is a rare bone marrow failure syndrome, for which allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is a proven curative therapy. Despite excellent outcomes for matched sibling SAA recipients in terms of engraftment and survival, HSCT remains highly challenging in older matched-unrelated-donor (MUD) recipients, due to increased non-relapse mortality (NRM) from causes such as graft versus host disease (GVHD), organ failure and infection. We sought to evaluate our local HSCT outcomes for SAA, determine factors that predict for inferior outcomes, and benchmark local outcomes against international cohorts. To define outcomes for sibling and MUD HSCT in adults ≥17 years of age with SAA at a single Australian institution between 2002 and 2018 and compare these outcomes to internationally published cohorts. The primary outcome was 1-year overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included the incidences of engraftment, response, secondary graft failure, GVHD, and moderate to severe organ dysfunction. All 21 patients comprising 10 sibling and 11 MUD HSCTs, with a median age of 30 (range 17-64), received bone marrow grafts. At a median follow up of 3.5 years, 17 (81%) of 21 patients remained alive and in remission from SAA. 1-year OS, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and GVHD incidence were 85%, 15%, and 48% respectively. Two patients died prior to engraftment at Day+27 and Day+33. When comparing sibling and MUD HSCT recipients, incidences of survival, engraftment and post-HSCT complications were similar; however, MUD HSCT survivors experienced a higher incidence of chronic GVHD (67% vs. 11%; p=0.04). Age >40 years, AKI by Day+28, infection by Day+100 and deviation from intended GVHD prophylaxis predicted for worse OS. Our outcomes following HSCT for SAA are comparable to international cohorts with age >40 years, early onset infection, AKI and deviation from intended GVHD prophylaxis protocol negatively impacting OS. Further research is warranted to optimise MUD HSCT conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis protocols for SAA, particularly in older patients.

Ex vivo T-cell depletion vs post-transplant cyclophosphamide, sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil as graft-vs-host disease prophylaxis for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

To compare the efficacy and safety of CD34+ selected ex vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) vs post-transplant cyclophosphamide, sirolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil (PTCy-Sir-MMF) as graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We retrospectively included patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with either TCD (n=38) or PTCy-Sir-MMF (n=91). Cumulative incidence of neutrophil and platelet recovery was 92% vs 99% (P=.06) and 89% vs 97% (P=.3) in TCD and PTCy-Sir-MMF, respectively. Cumulative incidences of aGHVD grade II-IV, III-IV, and moderate to severe cGVHD were 11% vs 19% (P=.2), 3% vs 2% (P=.9), and 3% vs 36% (P<.001) in TCD and PTCy-Sir-MMF, respectively. The 2-year non-relapse mortality, relapse, disease-free and overall survival were 25% vs 8% (P=.01), 20% vs 16% (P=.2), 55% vs 76% (P=.004), 57% vs 83% (P=.004) for TCD and PTCy-Sir-MMF, respectively. Cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr infection requiring therapy was 76% vs 40% (P<.001) and 32% vs 0% (P<.001) in TCD and PTCy-Sir-MMF, respectively. PTCy-Sir-MMF platform showed faster T-cell reconstitution. PTCy-Sir-MMF provides better survival outcomes but is associated with higher risk of cGVHD compared to TCD.

Nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation achieves clinical and molecular remission in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

AbstractThe majority of patients with refractory, advanced-stage mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sézary syndrome (SS) have a life expectancy of <5 years. Here, we report a phase 2 study of a novel nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation strategy tailored for this patient population. This study has completed the enrollment, and 35 patients (13 MF, 22 SS) have undergone transplant as planned. The majority (80%) of the patients had stage IV disease and received multiple previous systemic therapies. All patients had active disease at the time of conditioning using total skin electron beam therapy, total lymphoid irradiation, and antithymocyte globulin, and received allograft infusion as outpatients. Cyclosporine or tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were used for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Patients tolerated the transplant well, with 1- and 2-year nonrelapse mortality of 3% and 14%, respectively. The day +180 cumulative incidence of grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD was 16%, and the 2-year incidence of moderate/severe chronic GVHD was 32%. With a median posttransplant follow-up of 5.4 years, the 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 68%, 62%, and 56%. Using high-throughput sequencing of the T-cell receptor for minimal residual disease monitoring, we observed that 43% achieved molecular remission, which was associated with a lower incidence of disease progression or relapse (9% vs 87%; P = .02). Our study also showed that patients who were aged ≥65 years at the time of allotransplant had similar clinical outcomes compared with younger patients. Thus, we have developed an alternative and potentially curative nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplant regimen for patients with advanced stage MF/SS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00896493.

BEAM-Campath Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma: High Incidence of Long-Term Mixed Donor-Recipient Chimerism and the Response to Donor Lymphocyte Infusions

BiCNU (carmustine), etoposide, Ara-C, melphalan (BEAM) and Campath conditioning was developed to reduce the high transplant-related mortality in patients with lymphoma while delivering intensive antilymphoma immunotherapy, as well as to some extent a platform for allogeneic stem cell engraftment. Significant numbers of patients appeared to have persistent recipient-derived hematopoiesis, and therefore we retrospectively analyzed patients with lymphoma undergoing BEAM-Campath conditioned allogeneic stem cell transplantation at our center (2003 to 2017) to characterize the patterns of chimerism and patient outcomes. Chimerism was analyzed with short tandem repeat PCR. Mixed donor-recipient chimerism (MDRC) was defined as 5% to 94.9% donor. Fifty-two patients (n=30 male), with a median age of 45 years, were identified with histologic diagnoses of Hodgkin lymphoma (n=13), diffuse large B cell lymphoma (n=7), low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n=16), mantle cell lymphoma (n=10), and T cell lymphoma (n=6). Pretransplant, 93% achieved complete response (52%) or partial response (41%) with a median of 3 prior therapies (n=3 prior autologous stem cell transplantation). Donors were Matched sibling donors (MSD) (n=21), matched unrelated donors (MUD) (n=24), miss-matched unrelated donors (MMUD) (n=6), and syngeneic (n=1). Acute graft-versus host disease (GVHD) developed in 52% (81% grade I to II) and chronic GVHD (83% extensive) in 12%. MDRC of T cells (MDRCt) developed in 62% (n=32), and 29% (n=15) developed MDRC of myeloid cells (MDRCm) at a median onset of 100 days. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) was given to 17 patients, with a median starting dose of 1×106/kg. The first DLI was given at a median of 225 days post-transplant (range, 99 days to 5.3 years). Of these, 9 developed acute post-DLI GVHD and 2 limited chronic GVHD. Conversion to full donor occurred in 47% MDRCt and 50% MDRCm. Multivariate analysis identified sibling donor type as associated with increased MDRCt (P=.035; hazard ratio [HR], 0.17) and reduced total nucleated cell dose with increased MDRCm (P=.021; HR, 0.76). The median follow-up was 6 years, and 2-year NRM cumulative incidence was 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7% to 27%). Ten-year progression and extensive GVHD-free survival was 45% (95% CI, 28% to 61%), and overall survival was 66% (95% CI, 50% to 78%). One-year landmark analysis identified no increased GVHD or relapse risk with MDRCt or MDRCm but reduced nonrelapse mortality (NRM) risk with MDRCt (P=.001). BEAM-Campath allografts for high-risk lymphoma achieve long-term disease-free survival with low rates of GVHD and transplant-related mortality. The frequent development of myeloid MDRC demonstrates that BEAM-Campath is a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen in almost a third of patients. MDRCt is associated with reduced NRM, but neither MDRCt or MDRCm is associated with increased GVHD or relapse.

Outcome of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation after Venetoclax and Hypomethylating Agent Therapy for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

The combination of hypomethylating agents with the selective Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax (HMA-VEN) has emerged as a highly active regimen in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in both the upfront and relapsed/refractory (r/r) settings. We report our early experience with a cohort of patients who were able to proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) after HMA-VEN therapy. Thirty-two patients with AML (19 r/r and 13 de novo) with a median age of 62 years underwent alloHCT after HMA-VEN therapy. Twenty-two (68.8%) were in complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery at time of HCT. With a median follow up of 14.4 months, the 1-year overall survival (OS) was 62.5%, and disease-free survival was 43.8%. The 1-year nonrelapse mortality rate was 18.8%, and the cumulative incidence of relapse was 37.5%. Among patients who underwent alloHCT in CR, the 1-year OS was 77.3%, and the cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 9.1%. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease was 43.8%. We conclude that alloHCT after HMA-VEN is therapy associated with favorable allogeneic HCT outcomes in newly diagnosed older patients with AML, as well as those with r/r AML.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Post-essential Thrombocythemia and Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis.

Objective Little information is available about the outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for patients with secondary myelofibrosis from essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV). A nationwide retrospective study of the outcome of HSCT for post-ET and post-PV myelofibrosis was conducted in Japan. Patients and Methods Clinical data for patients with post-ET (n=29) and post-PV (n=9) myelofibrosis who had received first allogeneic HSCT were extracted from the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program, which is a registry of the outcomes of HSCT in Japan. Results Five patients died without neutrophil recovery within 60 days after transplantation. The incidence of neutrophil recovery was significantly lower in umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation than in related donor transplantation (40% vs. 92%, p=0.010). The 1-year non-relapse mortality for post-ET and post-PV myelofibrosis was 35% and 27%, respectively (p=0.972). No patient or transplantation characteristics were associated with non-relapse mortality. The 4-year overall survival for post-ET and post-PV myelofibrosis was 46% and 65%, respectively (p=0.362). A univariate analysis identified UCB transplantation (vs. related donor, p=0.017) and ≥10 times red blood cell transfusions before transplantation (vs. <10 times, p=0.037) as predictive of a lower overall survival. Conclusion Allogeneic HSCT provides a long-term survival for at least some patients with post-ET and post-PV myelofibrosis. Further studies with more patients are required to determine the best alternative donor.

Prospective phase 2 trial of ixazomib after nonmyeloablative haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplant

AbstractProteasome inhibition results in extensive immunomodulatory effects that augment natural killer cell cytotoxicity and inhibit aspects of T-cell, B-cell, and dendritic cell function. We performed a phase 2 study that examined the effects of ixazomib for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (up to 12 cycles) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide and tacrolimus after standard nonmyeloablative haploidentical donor transplantation (HIDT). Ixazomib was started on day +5 (4 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle), with dose reductions allowed in future cycles for toxicity. All patients received peripheral blood stem cells. Twenty-five patients were enrolled with a median age of 62 years (range, 35-77 years) who had acute leukemia (4), myelodysplastic syndrome (7), non-Hodgkin lymphoma/Hodgkin lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (8), and myeloma (6). The hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index was ≥3 in 68% of the patients. After a median follow-up of 33.5 months, the cumulative incidence of relapse/progression at 1 year was 24% and 44% at 3 years, which failed to meet the statistically predefined goal of decreasing 1-year risk of relapse. Engraftment occurred in all patients with no secondary graft failure, and 3-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 12%. Cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD was 8%, whereas moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD occurred in 19%. Nineteen patients survive with an estimated 1-year overall survival (OS) of 84% and 3-year OS of 74%. Hematologic and cutaneous toxicities were common but manageable. The substitution of ixazomib for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) post-HIDT results in reliable engraftment, comparable rates of clinically significant GVHD, relapse and NRM, and favorable OS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT02169791.

Haploidentical transplants for patients with relapse after the first allograft.

Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (AHSCT) is associated with very poor outcomes. A second transplant offers the possibility of long-term disease control. We analyzed outcomes with haploidentical donors for second allograft at our institution. All consecutive patients with hematological malignancies (N = 29) who relapsed after AHSCT and underwent a haploidentical transplant (haploSCT) as second transplant between February 2009 and October 2018 were included. Median age was 36 years (interquartile range (IQR) 24-60); 83% of patients had high/very high disease risk index; 61% of AML/MDS patients had high-risk cytogenetics; and only 24% were in complete remission at transplant. With a median follow-up of 46.9 months, the 3-year relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 30%, 39%, 31% and 40%, respectively. In multivariable analysis (MVA), comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and detectable donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) prior to second transplant were significantly associated with worse outcomes. Patients with HCT-CI <3 and without DSA had 3-year PFS and OS of 53% and 60.3%, respectively. Our findings suggest that haploSCT as second AHSCT is feasible and potentially curative. Lower HCT-CI and no DSA were associated with lower NRM and improved survival. Haploidentical grafts might be a preferred donor source for second AHSCT as these are high-risk patients who frequently need to proceed urgently to transplant.