Urban noise can potentially disturb the acoustic signals of animals inhabiting urban areas. Although a wide variety of noises from different sources is common in cities, the impact of non-engine noise on animal calls is less studied. In a natural experiment, we evaluated the effect of different urban noises on the advertisement calls of urban frogs (Eleutherodactylus nitidus) in the metropolitan area of Puebla, Mexico. We recorded and analyzed 672 advertisement calls from 28 male frogs and the corresponding environmental noises from three distinct localities. Our analysis focused on four acoustic properties of the calls: inter-call interval, call duration, dominant frequency, and call amplitude. To standardize the amplitude measurements of sound pressure levels produced by noise and frog calls, we employed a practical approach using a reference signal for calibration. We treated the longitudinal data of different noises occurring before, during, and after advertisement calls as repeated measures within the urban locations. During our samplings, frogs called amidst spontaneous urban noises, including dog barking, fireworks, and vehicle engine sounds. Our results indicate that vehicle engine sounds and dog barking do not cause significant distortions in the calls of these urban frogs. However, we observed slight variations in the dominant frequency of calls, decreasing by 11 Hz, during and after fireworks. Given the observed plasticity of E. nitidus in response to noise, urban noises may not pose a severe problem for this urban frog.

The degree of prey sociality reflects trade-offs between predation risk, and competition for mates and resources. Consequently, the degree of sociality is predicted to differ spatiotemporally. Variations in nychthemeral sociality are, however, understudied. We assessed the activity of solitary, territorial black wildebeest bulls (Connochaetes gnou) over rutting and non-rutting seasons. We predicted that solitary bulls would reduce their nocturnal use of territorial stands and join herds to reduce predation risk from nocturnally hunting lions (Panthera leo), but that these responses would differ across rutting and non-rutting seasons. We used camera trap data and modelled solitary bull and herd activity over 24-hour daily cycles, across rutting and non-rutting seasons. We calculated the proportion of images with solitary bulls and herds across nocturnal and diurnal periods, across both seasons. We show that solitary bulls are predominantly diurnal across both seasons, but the probability of nocturnal detection is higher in the rutting than in the non-rutting season. Furthermore, we recorded a lower proportion of solitary bulls to herds at night in the non-rutting relative to the rutting season. Thus, wildebeest bulls may trade-off predation risk for mate acquisition during the rutting season but reduce risky solitary behaviour during the non-rutting season.