Year Year arrow
arrow-active-down-0
Publisher Publisher arrow
arrow-active-down-1
Journal
1
Journal arrow
arrow-active-down-2
Institution Institution arrow
arrow-active-down-3
Institution Country Institution Country arrow
arrow-active-down-4
Publication Type Publication Type arrow
arrow-active-down-5
Field Of Study Field Of Study arrow
arrow-active-down-6
Topics Topics arrow
arrow-active-down-7
Open Access Open Access arrow
arrow-active-down-8
Language Language arrow
arrow-active-down-9
Filter Icon Filter 1
Year Year arrow
arrow-active-down-0
Publisher Publisher arrow
arrow-active-down-1
Journal
1
Journal arrow
arrow-active-down-2
Institution Institution arrow
arrow-active-down-3
Institution Country Institution Country arrow
arrow-active-down-4
Publication Type Publication Type arrow
arrow-active-down-5
Field Of Study Field Of Study arrow
arrow-active-down-6
Topics Topics arrow
arrow-active-down-7
Open Access Open Access arrow
arrow-active-down-8
Language Language arrow
arrow-active-down-9
Filter Icon Filter 1
Export
Sort by: Relevance
  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.3138/uram.37.1-2.87
4.1 The Concept of Evil in Bob Dylan’s Art
  • Mar 1, 2020
  • Ultimate Reality and Meaning
  • Lisa O’neill + 1 more

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.3138/uram.37.1-2.18
4.1 Thomas Berry’s URAM Principles and Policy Recommendations for the Environment and Work of Environmental Economists
  • Mar 1, 2020
  • Ultimate Reality and Meaning
  • Matthew Fung

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.3138/uram.37.1-2.1
4.5 Being-in-Relationship: A Dialogue between Karl Rahner and Confucian Views on the Human Person
  • Mar 1, 2020
  • Ultimate Reality and Meaning
  • Anh Q Tran

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.3138/uram.37.1-2.i
Presenting This Issue
  • Mar 1, 2020
  • Ultimate Reality and Meaning

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.3138/uram.36.3-4.144
3.9 The Self—A Thinking Thing or a Thinking Being? Insight from Shankarite and Cartesian Philosophies
  • Feb 1, 2020
  • Ultimate Reality and Meaning
  • Iluyomade Raphael Funwa

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.3138/uram.36.3-4.160
4.1 At Home in the Universe Again: Doing Justice to Polanyi’s Theological Intuitions
  • Feb 1, 2020
  • Ultimate Reality and Meaning
  • Martin X Moleski

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 2
  • 10.3138/uram.36.3-4.127
4.5 AI (Artificial Intelligence) and Ultimate Reality
  • Feb 1, 2020
  • Ultimate Reality and Meaning
  • Anthony Cristiano

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.3138/uram.36.3-4.202
3.19 Hegel on the Self in Crisis: Dialectic and the Modern Self
  • Feb 1, 2020
  • Ultimate Reality and Meaning
  • Ian Thut

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.3138/uram.36.3-4.186
4.7 Information-Bearing Pattern and the Substantial Form: A Comparison of John Polkinghorne and Thomas Aquinas on Their Meaning for URAM
  • Feb 1, 2020
  • Ultimate Reality and Meaning
  • Effendi Kusuma Sunur

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.3138/uram.36.3-4.103
3.13 Developing Aquinas’ Missing Metaphysical Concept of God Today: <i>Ipsa Essentia Subsistens</i> as Infinite Self-Fulfillment Itself
  • Feb 1, 2020
  • Ultimate Reality and Meaning
  • John Cheng Wai Leung

An interesting article, "Where is God?Thinking in More Than Three Dimen sions" in God for the 21st Century (Houghton 157-59), may characterize a prin cipal feature of the God whom people in general nowadays are genuinely looking for.Accordingly, people in this postmodern age do not want to be "just imagin ing some remote being but experiencing him [God] for real."(Houghton 159) In other words, countless people at the beginning of the third millennium today are hungry for a God who is not present in an abstract and transcendent way.Rather, Deity should be existing in a really concrete manner with whom they can interact everywhere in their daily lives.In the metaphysical language of St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-74), one may say that the God whom countless people are thirsty for is no longer the abstract Ipsum Esse Subsistens (i.e., Subsisting Exis tence Itself).Rather, they are seeking for, heuristically speaking, Ipsa Essentia Subsistens (i.e., Subsisting Essence Itself), who is personally and substantially con crete everywhere according to His loving, self-giving essence or nature.As we know, Thomistically speaking, God's omnipresent Existence is exactly the same as His omnipresent Essence (Aquinas, "Summa contra Gentiles," XXII).As it is, heuristics (from Greek heuriskein "find") is the study and use of certain trial-and-error technique(s), problem-solving method(s) or rule(s) loosely defined which enable a person to discover and learn something (Soanes and Stevenson 815).Bernard Lonergan (1904-84) states: "A heuristic notion, then, is the notion of an unknown content and it is determined by anticipating the type of act through which the unknown would become known" (Lonergan, Insight 392).In retrospect, St. Thomas did not use the term Ipsa Essentia Subsistens for God.He only implied it.It is the author's trial-and-error name for God to dis cover and learn something about Him anew.Awaiting proper verifications, this name represents an effort to bring the medieval idea of Ipsum Esse Subsistens