Year
Publisher
Journal
1
Institution
Institution Country
Publication Type
Field Of Study
Topics
Open Access
Language
Filter 1
Year
Publisher
Journal
1
Institution
Institution Country
Publication Type
Field Of Study
Topics
Open Access
Language
Filter 1
Export
Sort by: Relevance
Hybrid control systems for seismic protection of a phase II benchmark cable‐stayed bridge

AbstractThis paper presents hybrid control systems for seismic protection of a phase II benchmark cable‐stayed bridge. Because multiple control devices are operating, a hybrid control system could alleviate some of the restrictions and limitations that exist when each system is acting alone. In this study, two types of hybrid control system are considered to protect the cable‐stayed bridge under seismic events. Lead–rubber bearings are used as passive control devices to reduce the earthquake‐induced forces in the bridge and hydraulic actuators or magnetorheological fluid dampers are used as additional control devices to further reduce the bridge responses, especially deck displacements. Numerical simulation results show that the performances of the proposed hybrid control systems are superior to those of the passive control system, and slightly better than those of the active or semi‐active control system alone. Furthermore, it is verified that the hybrid control systems are robust to mass or stiffness parameter perturbation, and there is no sign of instability in the overall system due to the passive control part. Therefore, the proposed hybrid control systems could effectively be applied to seismically excited cable‐stayed bridges. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Read full abstract
H<sub>2</sub>‐based control strategies for civil engineering structures

AbstractTwo H2‐based control strategies are proposed and their applications to civil engineering benchmark structures are presented. The first strategy deals with a class of excitations with a specified ‘energy’ bound, referred to as the H2‐based controller with energy‐bounded excitations (H2B‐EB), whereas the second strategy addresses a class of excitations with a specified peak bound, referred to as the H2‐based controller with peak‐bounded excitations (H2B‐PB). Both control strategies are derived by minimizing an upper bound of the H2 performance with the constraints (or penalties) on the peak values of another set of quantities, such as the control resources. State feedback and dynamic output feedback controllers are derived and presented. The design syntheses of these control strategies are developed and formulated within the framework of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs), so that the LMI toolbox in MATLAB can be used effectively and conveniently. These control strategies are applied to the Phase I long‐span cable‐stayed benchmark bridge subject to earthquakes and a wind‐excited 76‐storey benchmark building to illustrate their applicability to practical problems. Simulation results indicate that the performances of these proposed controllers for structural responses are better than that of the LQG sample controller. It is shown that these new control strategies are viable and effective for applications to civil engineering structures. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

Read full abstract
Phase II benchmark control problem for seismic response of cable‐stayed bridges

AbstractThis paper presents the problem definition for the second generation of benchmark structural control problems for cable‐stayed bridges. The goal of this study is to provide a testbed for the development of strategies for the control of cable stayed‐bridges. Based on detailed drawings of the Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge, a three‐dimensional evaluation model has been developed to represent the complex behavior of the full‐scale benchmark bridge. Phase II considers more complex structural behavior than phase I, including multi‐support and transverse excitations. Evaluation criteria are presented for the design problem that are consistent with the goals of seismic response control of a cable‐stayed bridge. Control constraints are also provided to ensure that the benchmark results are representative of a control implementation on the physical structure. Each participant in this benchmark bridge control study is given the task of defining, evaluating and reporting on their proposed control strategies. Participants should also evaluate the robust stability and performance of their resulting designs through simulation with an evaluation model which includes additional mass due to snow loads. The problem and a sample control design have been made available in the form of a set of MATLAB equations. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.

Read full abstract
Open Access