- Research Article
- 10.26599/jicv.2025.9210059
- Jun 1, 2025
- Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
- Zhiqiang Hu + 2 more
- Research Article
- 10.26599/jicv.2025.9210057
- Jun 1, 2025
- Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
- Fang Zong + 7 more
- Research Article
- 10.26599/jicv.2024.9210053
- Mar 1, 2025
- Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
- Donglei Rong + 6 more
To improve the adaptability of Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs) in mixed traffic, this study proposes a prediction model training indicator that comprehensively considers drivers' Social Value Orientation (SVO) and planning goals. Active Influence Factor (AIF) is used as the goal to predict the future safety loss and consistency loss of CAVs. Second, an objective function based on SVO is constructed to understand the driver’s characteristics to evaluate the safety, comfort, efficiency, and consistency of candidate trajectories. The results showed that integrating SVO and consistency functions can help ensure that CAVs drive under a more stable risk potential energy field. The prediction planning model that considers SVO can improve the reliability of the CAV output trajectory to a certain extent. The prediction planning under the AIF has better accuracy and stability of the output trajectory; however, it still has strong adaptability and superiority under different sensitivity parameters. The minimum and maximum standard deviations of our model are 0.78 and 0.78 m, respectively, whereas the minimum and maximum standard deviations of the comparative model reach 2.07 and 4.56 m, respectively. The minimum standard deviation of the other comparative model reaches 1.35 m, and the maximum standard deviation reaches 4.45 m.
- Front Matter
- 10.26599/jicv.2025.10960596
- Mar 1, 2025
- Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
- Research Article
- 10.26599/jicv.2024.9210051
- Mar 1, 2025
- Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
- Changxi Ma + 4 more
- Research Article
- 10.26599/jicv.2025.10960595
- Mar 1, 2025
- Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
- Research Article
1
- 10.26599/jicv.2024.9210048
- Mar 1, 2025
- Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
- Tanjida Tahmina + 2 more
This study scrutinizes the use of virtual reality (VR) in automated driving simulation environments, with a focus on publication year, driving simulator type, virtual reality (VR) technology, and the advantages and drawbacks of VR application in autonomous driving simulations. An analysis of 87 articles from 10 databases reveals a notable uptick in VR-related research for autonomous driving simulations after 2015, demonstrating VR’s potential in crafting realistic and secure environments for driving research. The identified challenges include motion sickness in participants, validation of driving scenarios, and simulator discomfort, alongside other obstacles and benefits. This study delineates existing research gaps and proposes research directions, aiming to inform and guide subsequent scholarly work at the intersection of VR and autonomous driving research.
- Research Article
- 10.26599/jicv.2024.9210045
- Mar 1, 2025
- Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
- Zhichao An + 7 more
To address existing shortcomings such as short time domains and low interpretability, this study proposes a long-term trajectory prediction model for leading vehicles that considers the impact of traffic flow. Through an analysis of trailing trajectory data from the HighD natural driving dataset, fitting relationships for the following behavior patterns were derived. Building upon the intelligent driver model (IDM), three long-term trajectory prediction models were established: acceleration delta velocity (ADV), space delta velocity intelligent driver model (SDVIDM), and space velocity intelligent driver model (SVIDM). These models were then compared with the IDM model through simulations. The results indicate that when there is one vehicle ahead, under aggressive following conditions, the ADV model outperforms the IDM model, reducing the root mean square errors in acceleration, speed, and position by 79.61%, 91.26%, and 87.82%, respectively. In scenarios with two vehicles ahead and conservative short-distance following, the SDVIDM model exhibits reductions of 83.42%, 92.85%, and 92.25%, while the SVIDM model shows reductions of 82.31%, 92.47%, and 94.02%, respectively, compared to the IDM model.
- Research Article
1
- 10.26599/jicv.2024.9210052
- Mar 1, 2025
- Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
- Zhaojie Wang + 4 more
- Research Article
- 10.26599/jicv.2024.9210054
- Mar 1, 2025
- Journal of Intelligent and Connected Vehicles
- Ling Han + 6 more