Year Year arrow
arrow-active-down-0
Publisher Publisher arrow
arrow-active-down-1
Journal
1
Journal arrow
arrow-active-down-2
Institution Institution arrow
arrow-active-down-3
Institution Country Institution Country arrow
arrow-active-down-4
Publication Type Publication Type arrow
arrow-active-down-5
Field Of Study Field Of Study arrow
arrow-active-down-6
Topics Topics arrow
arrow-active-down-7
Open Access Open Access arrow
arrow-active-down-8
Language Language arrow
arrow-active-down-9
Filter Icon Filter 1
Year Year arrow
arrow-active-down-0
Publisher Publisher arrow
arrow-active-down-1
Journal
1
Journal arrow
arrow-active-down-2
Institution Institution arrow
arrow-active-down-3
Institution Country Institution Country arrow
arrow-active-down-4
Publication Type Publication Type arrow
arrow-active-down-5
Field Of Study Field Of Study arrow
arrow-active-down-6
Topics Topics arrow
arrow-active-down-7
Open Access Open Access arrow
arrow-active-down-8
Language Language arrow
arrow-active-down-9
Filter Icon Filter 1
Export
Sort by: Relevance
  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.1016/j.ejdp.2026.100069
Real-world relevance of multicriteria decision analysis applied to environmental problems: A critical review of operational research literature
  • Jan 1, 2026
  • EURO Journal on Decision Processes
  • Judit Lienert

  • Research Article
  • 10.1016/j.ejdp.2025.100063
A stage-gate decision process for guiding the development of AI solutions for preventive maintenance
  • Jan 1, 2026
  • EURO Journal on Decision Processes
  • Jussi Leppinen + 2 more

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions for preventive maintenance applications is a risky and resource-demanding process. Typically, there are several candidate solutions whose performance in transforming data into useful prognostic information is initially uncertain. These uncertainties can be managed by structuring the development process into multiple stages that help choose and implement the final solution. In this paper, we propose such a stage-gate process by using Robust Portfolio Modelling to screen increasingly detailed candidate solutions through four development stages and three decision gates. The development stages generate evidence on how the candidate solutions contribute to six development objectives that represent different financial and technical criteria. At the decision gates, decisions about the continuation/termination of candidate solutions are taken by identifying portfolios of non-dominated candidate solutions subject to time and budget constraints. Uncertainties are captured by admitting incomplete information about the criteria weights and scores of candidate solutions. We illustrate the process by considering the development of an AI solution for a train’s toilet door system. The process brings consistency to the development process and, among other benefits, helps mitigate the risk of missing the development objectives due to premature fixation on a single candidate solution. • A multi-stage decision process based on objectives and criteria is proposed. • Numerical scales are presented to help elicit comparable evaluation statements. • The process can be tailored to many kinds of AI-assisted prognostic tasks. • An illustrative example and a reflective discussion are presented. • The process offers benefits in terms of fostering organisational learning.

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.1016/j.ejdp.2025.100067
Preferential knowledge for multi-criteria decision making: Stability and consistency of decision rules and weights
  • Jan 1, 2026
  • EURO Journal on Decision Processes
  • Marko Bohanec + 2 more

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.1016/j.ejdp.2026.100068
Projecting decisions. Unfolding architectural design practice in decision-making processes
  • Jan 1, 2026
  • EURO Journal on Decision Processes
  • Elena Todella

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.1016/j.ejdp.2025.100060
A Portfolio Selection Model for Planning Natural Gas Smart Energy Hubs with a Multicriteria Benefit-to-Cost Ratio-Based Approach
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • EURO Journal on Decision Processes
  • Eduarda Asfora Frej + 4 more

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.1016/s2193-9438(25)00007-x
Editorial Board
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • EURO Journal on Decision Processes

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.1016/j.ejdp.2025.100061
Rewarding organisations for sustainable mobility of their employees: A multi-criteria assessment model and certification framework
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • EURO Journal on Decision Processes
  • Marko Bohanec + 5 more

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 15
  • 10.1016/j.ejdp.2025.100062
Optimal supply chain design using machine learning, risk assessment and optimisation applied to coal distribution
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • EURO Journal on Decision Processes
  • Spyros Giannelos + 2 more

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • 10.1016/j.ejdp.2025.100064
A structured group decision support approach within SMEs under industry 5.0: An application on delivery policy selection
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • EURO Journal on Decision Processes
  • Jérémy Traversac + 3 more

International audience

  • Open Access Icon
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.1016/j.ejdp.2025.100059
Cross-efficiency aggregation method considering bounded rationality: An application to healthcare service
  • Jan 1, 2025
  • EURO Journal on Decision Processes
  • Hao Pan + 3 more