[The edictal title de vadimoniis in Paul’s commentary: sixt book] The current paper focuses on the palingenetic aspects of Paul’s sixth book ad edictum.

The author examines Paul’s texts ascribable to the comment to the clause quibus ex causis vadimonia recuperatoribus suppositis fiant of the edictal title de vadimoniis, to demonstrate how the Kruger order is preferable in the reconstruction of Paul’s seventh book ad edictum.

[Neratius, Paulus and the animus in the notion of possessio] The author examines the role of the term animus in the development of notion of possession, limited to the thought of Neratius and Paulus, to identify common aspects and differences between these two jurists.

[A Purchase a non domino by servus fugitivus: rule and exception]. The author, after a presentation of hypotheses of the in bonis habere, inspects the case of the Purchase a non domino by servus fugitivus and examines the different interpretations of classical jurists.