7,233 publications found
Sort by
INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING VITRECTOMY FOR TRACTIONAL RETINAL DETACHMENT SECONDARY TO DIABETIC RETIONPATHY

To assess the merits of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in subjects with a tractional retinal detachment (TRD) secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). One hundred and ninety one PDR subjects undergoing PPV for the principal indication of TRD were enrolled into this randomized controlled trial. Study subjects were intraoperatively randomized into one of the following treatment groups: Cohort A patients underwent ILM peeling, while Cohort B patients did not undergo ILM peeling. The main outcome was postsurgical epiretinal membrane (ERM) development at 6 months. The secondary outcome was attainment of ≥ 20/50 visual acuity (Snellen) at 6 months. One hundred and thirty nine subjects underwent randomization and completed the study's 6-month trial period. Cohort A had 3.1% (2/64) of subjects develop an ERM postoperatively, while Group B had 26.7% (20/75) of subjects develop an ERM postoperatively at 6 months (p<0.001). Attainment of ≥ 20/50 visual acuity (Snellen) at 6 months was found in 21.9% (14/64) of subjects in Cohort A and 9.3% (7/75) of subjects in Cohort B (p=0.039). PDR patients undergoing PPV for TRD have a lower frequency of postsurgical ERM formation and a greater likelihood of attaining ≥ 20/50 Snellen visual acuity at 6 months when ILM peeling is conducted. Specialists may consider peeling of the ILM during PPV an important surgical maneuver in this patient population.

Relevant
EVALUATION OF VISION-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS AFTER VITRECTOMY FOLLOWING IDIOPATHIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE

To evaluate the impact of different intraocular tamponades on the visual-related quality of life (VRQOL) after idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IEM) surgery with epiretinal membrane peeling. We prospectively enrolled 50 patients diagnosed with IEM who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Patients were consecutively assigned to either the air tamponade (air) group (25 patients) or the balanced salt solutions (BSS) tamponade group (25 patients). The following data were collected before and after surgery and compared between two groups: VRQOL, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), metamorphopsia, contrast sensitivity (CS), and central macular thickness (CMT). PPV was performed in 50 eyes. At baseline, there were no significant differences between the two groups. At 6 months postoperatively, VRQOL (p < 0.001), BCVA (p < 0.001), CMT (p < 0.001), CS (p < 0.001), and metamorphopsia (p < 0.001) improved significantly in comparison to baseline, without significant differences between the air tamponade and BSS groups. Removing IEM significantly improved visual function and VRQOL. Despite improvements, our study showed no difference postoperatively whether air or BSS tamponade was used during surgery. As a result, air tamponade may not be a mandatory treatment for IEM surgery and provides no additional advantage compare with BSS tamponade.

Relevant
EVALUATION OF THE INCLUSION OF SPECTRAL DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IN A TELEMEDICINE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY SCREENING PROGRAM

To evaluate whether combining spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) with monoscopic fundus photography using a non-mydriatic camera (MFP-NMC) improves the accuracy of diabetic macular edema (DME) referrals in a teleophthalmology diabetic retinopathy screening program. We conducted a cross-sectional study with all diabetic patients aged ≥18 years who attended screening from September 2016 to December 2017. We assessed DME according to the three MFP-NMC and the four SD-OCT criteria. The sensitivity and specificity obtained for each criterion were estimated by comparing them with the ground truth of DME. This study included 3918 eyes (1925 patients; median age, 66 years; interquartile range, 58-73; females, 40.7%; once-screened, 68.1%). The prevalence of DME ranged from 1.22% to 1.83% and 1.54% to 8.77% on MFP-NMC and SD-OCT, respectively. Sensitivity barely reached 50% in MFP-NMC and less for the quantitative criteria of SD-OCT. When macular thickening and anatomical signs of DME were considered, sensitivity increased to 88.3%, and the false DMEs and non-gradable images were reduced. Macular thickening and anatomical signs showed the highest suitability for screening, with a sensitivity of 88.3% and a specificity of 99.8%. Notably, MFP-NMC alone missed half of the true DMEs that lacked indirect signs.

Relevant
INCIDENCE AND TIMING OF PIGMENT EPITHELIAL DETACHMENT AND SUBRETINAL FLUID DEVELOPMENT IN TYPE 3 MACULAR NEOVASCULARIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION

To evaluate the incidence and timing of pigment epithelial detachment (PED) and subretinal fluid(SRF) development in type 3 macular neovascularization (MNV). This retrospective study included 84 patients who were diagnosed with treatment-naïve type 3 MNV who did not show SRF at diagnosis. All patients were initially treated with three loading injections of ranibizumab or aflibercept. Following the initial loading injections, as-needed regimen was performed for retreatment. The development of either PED or SRF was identified. The incidence and timing of PED development in patients without PED at diagnosis and that of SRF development in patients with PED at diagnosis were evaluated. The mean follow-up period was 41.3±20.7 months after diagnosis. Among the 32 patients without serous PED at diagnosis, PED developed in 20 (62.5%) at a mean of 10.9±5.1 months after diagnosis. PED development was noted within 12 months in 15 patients (46.8%; 75.0% among the PED development cases). In 52 patients with serous PED and without SRF at diagnosis, 15 developed SRF (28.8%) at a mean of 11.2±6.4 months after diagnosis. SRF development was noted within 12 months in 9 patients (17.3%; 66.6% among the SRF development cases). PED and SRF developed in a substantial proportion of patients with type 3 MNV. The average period of development of these pathologic findings was within 12 months of diagnosis, suggesting the need for active treatment during the early treatment period to improve treatment outcomes.

Relevant
INTRAVITREAL FLUOCINOLONE ACETONIDE IMPLANT FOR RADIATION RETINOPATHY

To assess the efficacy of a 0.18 mg intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide (FA) implant (Yutiq, EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Watertown, MA) as a treatment option for patients with radiation retinopathy-related cystoid macular edema (CME). A retrospective review of 7 patients treated for uveal melanoma who developed radiation retinopathy-related CME. They were initially treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF and/or steroid injections and then transitioned to intravitreal FA implant. Primary outcomes include BCVA, central subfield thickness (CST), and number of additional injections. After FA implant insertion, BCVA and CST remained stable in all patients. The variance in BCVA decreased from 75.5 ETDRS letters (range 0-199 letters) to 29.8 (range 1.2-134) following FA implant insertion. Mean CST was 384 μm (range 165-641) and 354 μm (range 282-493) before and after FA implant insertion, resulting in a 30 μm mean reduction. The number of intravitreal injections (average 4.9, range 2-10) decreased following intravitreal FA implant insertion with only two patients requiring one additional FA implant (average 0.29, range 0-1) over a mean of 12.1 months (range 0.9-18.5) follow-up. Intravitreal FA implant is an effective treatment for CME radiation retinopathy. The slow release of steroid allows for sustained control of macular edema, which correlated with stable visual acuity and decreased injection burden for patients.

Relevant